How a plague threatens to become a public health crisis

Two years ago, a group of researchers and scientific advisors regarding pests, revealed that ticks (Hyalomma Lusitanicum) They had become strong in Catalonia. The invasive species It had been located in 3rd municipalities of the region of Barcelona and one of that of Tarragona. It was, as the researchers repeated by active and passive, a “potential public health problem.” One that did not get control It would be very “Difficult to control” in a short time. Then, As the researchers explain nowthe authorities prepared to do absolutely nothing. And the situation has been uncontrolled. If two years ago, the number of Catalan municipalities where the presence of the tick had been detected It was 31; Today the plague has been located In 81 municipalities (55 located in Barcelona and 26 in Tarragona). What happened? Beyond the inaction of public health authorities, the increase in ticks in Catalonia is not accidental. The Hyalomma Lusitanicum proliferate thanks to The high temperatures of recent yearsto changes in soil uses (which unbalance ecosystems and make them more vulnerable to invasive species) and, above all, To increase the main hosts From this tick: rabbits and The wild boars. But … Why is this a problem? It must be recognized that, at first glance, ticks do not seem like a big public health problem, but what if they are. Above all, because we talk about disease vectors at a historical moment in which these diseases are just around the corner. For the Hyalomma Lusitanicum, What most worries the experts is their relationship with Crimea-Congo hemorrhagic fevera serious illness that we detected in Spain in 2016 and has a mortality rate between 10% and 40%. It is not the only pathology (the Lyme disease Or Babesiosis are also transmitted thanks to them), but it is the clearest show of how the plague could cause serious problems in a densely populated area. And what can be done? At the time, researchers They raised that we had to “start a monitoring program to know the distribution of this and other ticks.” One with sufficient detail to allow elaborate ambitious control plants; something that the Gares Project of the Ministry of Health I would not allow. But, in reality, the problem goes further: it is something that shows everything that remains to be done. It seems that we have not come to understand that the epidemiological situation of our country (and the world) has changed radically. The geoclimatic borders containing the diseases have disappeared, the world has flattened and we have to assemble epidemiologically to defend ourselves. What the ticks show is that we are not doing it. Image | Adam Roscoe | Carlos Pradera & Agustín Estrada-Peña In Xataka | The ‘era of epidemics’ has already begun: are we prepared to face them?

Republican Giménez threatens a military attack on Mexico similar to Afghanistan after ultimatum to end cartels

Extreme positions among Republicans are advancing by leaps and bounds, even for attacking a strategic ally and main trading partner like Mexico. The representative Carlos Giménez (Florida), of Cuban descent, threatened to support a United States military attack in Mexicosimilar to what happened in Afghanistan, after issuing an ultimatum that they must end the cartels in two weeks. “I would give Mexico two weeks to do the job, and if they can’t do it, then we have to do it,” Giménez said on Fox News. “We have to protect American citizens. Hey, Stuart, they’ve been killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, and they’re doing it knowingly. (…) they are poisoning us. So, yes, we have to go find them and we have to wipe them off the face of the Earth.” The presenter expressed that this was a radical position, but Giménez stated that the United States launched attacks in Afghanistan after the death of 3,000 Americans, in reference to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. “We were at war for 15 years and Al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans,” he said. “These Mexican cartels (…) are killing hundreds of times more than that. And they are on the other side of the border. So yes, we have to go find them and wipe them off the face of the earth.” Giménez defended that President Donald Trump will order naming cartels as Transnational Terrorist Organizations (FTO, in English). “We are very happy that they are terrorists and have been designated terrorists,” he said. However, the appointment as FTO to cartels and other criminal organizationslike Tren de Aragua and MS-13, is not yet effective, as President Trump called for a framework to support the designation, to determine if it is viable and how it should be done. Mexico has expressed that it will not allow unilateral military attacks by the United States and will defend its territory and sovereignty, which is why it asked to maintain cooperation against organized crime. Even Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at his confirmation hearing that he preferred to increase cooperation with Mexico against cartels rather than appointing them FTO, due to the complications that would entail. Experts have pointed out that the national and international legal framework of FTOs is complex and can have an impact even on legally established companies. Giménez, however, does not talk about the criminal groups that distribute drugs in the United States, money laundering or arms trafficking from this country to Mexico that empower the cartels. Keep reading:· Trump’s first orders on immigration and border: deportations, Remain in Mexico and cartels as terrorist groups· Donald Trump will eliminate birthright citizenship· Trump is officially the 47th President of the United States: I will implement an emergency on the southern border

Trump orders federal workers back to office or threatens layoffs

In one of his first actions as president of the United States, Donald Trump issued an executive order ending remote work for all federal employees, a measure aimed at reducing the federal workforce through attrition. The White House directed all US government departments and agencies in the executive branch to end remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work full time. Department heads may exempt some workers from this requirement, but in very specific cases. The executive order was one of multiple directives aimed at the 2.3 million-person federal workforce that, along with the return-to-the-office mandate, includes a hiring freeze, revamped hiring rules and other measures to make it more easy to fire high-level career employees. The White House said the measures were necessary to limit what Trump and his supporters consider a “deep state” that fought against his actions during the president’s first term. “There have been numerous well-documented cases of career federal officials resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership.”states one of the executive orders signed by the president on Monday night “Therefore, the principles of good administration require that measures be taken to restore accountability to career officials,” he continues. According to the Office of Management and Budget, about 1.1 million federal civilian employees, that is, 46% of the civilian workforce, were eligible for some form of teleworking. Of those, approximately 228,000 workers, or 10% of the total workforce, had fully remote positions with no obligation to go to an office. Union reaction The return-to-office directive is expected to face a fight from federal unions, some of which have remote work written into their contracts. A union representing government workers criticized the mandate as representing a return to the patronage system thatthat oversaw the federal workforce until the end of the 19th century. “Every American has a stake in ensuring that federal employees remain free to carry out the mission of the agencies that employ them without fear of political interference,” Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. (AFGE), which represents 800,000 workers in the federal government and the government of the District of Columbia. Kelly, whose union represents employees of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies, also called Trump’s directives “a blatant attempt to corrupt the government.” federal law by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.” The National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against the president’s “Schedule F” executive order, a directive that makes it easier for the Trump administration to fire career government employees. Trump’s order is “contrary to the intent of Congress,” according to the complaint filed Monday night in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.