A British F-35 has been stranded in India. Almost as surreal as the day a hunt landed in a Spanish container

The truth is that the United Kingdom expected The F-35b out A practically invincible huntbut today it flies little, and the times that does certainly surrealist situations like the one that is happening right now In India. Be that as it may, not even the current scene approaches what happened in 1983, when the indescribable episode known as the incident in the Alraigo occurred. The hunt does not start. British f-35b furtive furtive hunt, one of the most advanced and expensive on the planet, remains stranded more than a month In India since he made an emergency landing on June 14 at the Thiruvananthapuram International Airport (Kerala) due to a technical failure related to the hydraulic system and the auxiliary power unit. A team of British engineers and military He arrived in the country on July 6 To take exclusively responsible for the repairs that are carried out under strict security measures in a deprived hangar of Air India, completely sealed and with restricted access to local forces. Although the aircraft was transferred from its initial location after three weeks immobilized, there is no news about when it will be operational again. The Government of India has taken the opportunity to take advantage of the hunting situation Everything goes wrong. But as we said at the beginning, the story, although difficult to believe, is little compared to What happened several decades ago. In June 1983, during NATO maneuvers off the coast of Portugal, the young British lieutenant Ian “Soapy” Watson took off from the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious aboard a Hunt is Harrier For a simulated search mission under combat conditions. Together with another pilot they had to locate a French aircraft carrier keeping the radio silence and the radars off until they reached the assigned area. After activating them, they both separated and, at the end of the search, Watson tried to meet with his partner, but failed to contact. When running out of precise navigation references and with the inoperative radio, It was disoriented In full ocean. Without any contact, without a signal in the radar and with the fuel running out, the pilot knew that he had to make a drastic decision. The impossible maneuver. Looking for maritime traffic signs, its radar finally detected a goal: the Spanish merchant ship Alraigowhich was heading to Tenerife. Unable to communicate with the crew, Watson decided to make a past to get his attention. When observing that the containers on the roof formed a flat platform similar to a training track, he opted for Try the unthinkable: land your vertical hunting on load containers. Although He managed to perchthe aircraft began to slide back until its landing train partially fell from the edge, even impacting Against a van destined for a florist on the island of Tenerife. However, the hunt did not fall and was embedded on the containers. The scene (and images) were forever in the history of aviation. Arrival. The Captain of the Alraigo, impassive, notified the British authorities that they would deliver the pilot and his plane In Tenerife in four dayswithout altering your route. Upon arrival in Puerto, a multitude of journalists waited for the surreal scene with the Sea Harrier mounted on a merchant ship. This was the hunt after the “impossible” maneuver Diplomatic consequences. Upon arriving at Puerto, both Naviera García Miñaur and the Red Crew considered that they had starred in an authentic Maritime rescueas contemplated by Spanish legislation. The value of the Harrier, then encrypted at 1,500 million pesetas, was not a small thing. To ensure the collection of a fair award, lawyer Fernando Meana He requested without success The preventive embargo of the plane. Given the judicial refusal, it was decided to go to An arbitration in Londonwith the certainty that British legislation (unlike the Spanish) would grant the entire reward to the shipowner, leaving out the crew. Legal justice. It was then when He entered the scene The lawyer José María Ruiz Soroa, who defended the sailors commissioned by the Merchant Marine Free Union. Thanks to a thorough investigation, Ruiz Soroa located in his father’s archives a forgotten British law, The Maritime Conventions Act of 1911, which established that the distribution of the prize should be made according to the legislation of the country of the Salvador ship. That norm changed everything. After harsh negotiations, he managed to be signed A new contract with the British embassy in Madrid that guaranteed the application of Spanish law. Thus, the crew and owners of the ship received compensation close to The 570,000 pounds (about 1.14 million dollars of the time). The case became a mixture of diplomatic anecdote, media circus and legal rarity. Responsibilities Initially, Watson underwent A research board aboard the Illustriumus, which did not take disciplinary measures. But once the aircraft carrier returned to Puerto, a second board attributed partial responsibility, claiming that it had only completed 75% of its training and that the hunting had technical failures, especially in the radio system. The pilot was reprimanded and relegated to administrative functions. However, Watson continued his career, accumulating more than 2,000 flight hours in Sea Harriers and 900 more in F/A-18 before leaving the Navy in 1996. Despite the controversy, always He assumed responsibility Without excuses: “It was my fault. I was there. And there should end everything.” Thus, what began as a routine operation ended up becoming one of the most unique and bizarre episodes of British naval aviation. Image | Navy, Reddit In Xataka | The United Kingdom was waiting for an invincible hunt. Today, the F-35 flies little and cannot shoot its own weapons In Xataka | The hunt that still resists in Iran more than 40 years after his arrival. It is not Russian or Iranian. It is the American F-14

The most surreal is not that a Patricia Fernández has supplanted another Patricia Fernández in the Royal House: it is her flight forward

A confusion of identities that seems out of a classic comedy of briefcases, portzos and persecutions, and that in principle might seem anecdotal, has become the most attentive Internet soil at the fauna influencer. The reason not the reputation of those involved, nor the ultimate reason after confusion, but the posterior reaction of one of them. A reaction that perhaps says quite a lot about how the sector is mounted. The mess. Last Friday, the 40th anniversary of the Signature of the Spanish and Portugal Adhesion Treaty to the European CommunityEvent through which both countries entered what today is the European Union. King Felipe VI and Pedro Sánchez were present at the event. Among the guests was the content creator Patricia Fernándezspecialized in culture, human rights and the European Union (more than 200,000 followers, from now on Patricia 1). However, the event was another Patricia Fernández, influencer that focuses its posts on issues related to lifestyle, fashion and decoration (almost 2 million followers, Patricia 2 hereinafter). The Royal House was to blame. The cause of confusion is very simple: as both creators are called the same, the Royal House was confused by sending the invitations. The curious thing about the situation is that Patricia 2 did not find especially strange to invite him to such an event, but he enjoyed it and even chatted for a while with the king. Patricia 1 has counted on their networks His point of view about the situation: “I have not wanted to speak before because, above all, I am a journalist. I wanted to talk to the primary source, which has already told me the error; they have apologized.” And the thing is still more complicated with the arrival of a Patricia 3. In Xataka Lola Lolita’s controversy and the 4,000 euros bag reveals something else: influencers have stopped having normal lives This third Patricia Fernández is Patricia Fernández VicensSpanish lawyer specialized in childhood, situations of social exclusion and migrations, and National Human Rights Award in 2022. Although it is a more notorious possibility to have been present at the act, the truth is that the invitation was for a influencer So, for now we stayed with the option of Patricia 1. “The statement has been worse than usurpation.” What has really caught the attention of networks It has been the reaction to the erroneous guestand that justified his presence in the event in the most pilgrim form: “I have created content for Europe and about sustainability and I was also born in 1985, the same in which the Spanish adhesion treaty was signed to European communities.” He also affirms that “human rights I do it phenomenal because I don’t get into anyone, I respect everyone (…) not to incite bullying, not destroy the image of a person, not insult, all that kind of thing also has a lot to do with human rights.” {“Videid”: “X8CVU8H”, “Autoplay”: True, “Title”: “How to eliminate a Tiktok account forever”, “Tag”: “Webedia-Prod”, “Duration”: “184”}} Patricia 2 also states that “given this uncomfortable done, I have also made my checks with the royal house and what is informed of my invitation was correct and that they were delighted to receive me, in addition to sending me a big hug for seeing me wrapped in this controversy without meaning.” Of course, commentators in networks They have been primed in error And in his refusal to recognize that there was perhaps a more appropriate Patricia Fernández for the event. The bonfire of vanities. For years, more or less since the profession of influencer He settled without problems in public normalitywe know that the dynamics of the popular content creators are based on APPEAR A STATUSa social status or a rise. Something with An unattainable point that make them desirable for his followers, and that generates situations as absurd as Anna Allen, the actress who invented for their social networks that had attended the Oscars, pure dynamic of desire to give carnaza to their fans. In Xataka The Prado Museum closed its doors so that Dua Lipa could create content. That has generated a furious debate In this context it is in which confusions such as the two (or three) Patricia Fernández are given: an event in the Royal House is an exhibition, which is the currency of change of social networks, and there we have two Influencers fighting in the post, no matter how much one of the two seems unquestionably more appropriate than another to appear. A situation that brings the grief due to the confusion of the royal house and that leads us to the usual question: is it worth in exchange for a Care space in an account of only a few seconds? In Xataka | Inés de Robles: The phenomenon of the year in Tiktok Spain is an influencer dressed in the nineteenth -century maiden (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news The most surreal is not that a Patricia Fernández has supplanted another Patricia Fernández in the Royal House: it is her flight forward It was originally posted in Xataka by John Tones .

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.