start a purge if it reaches 9.5 million inhabitants
The idea of drastically limiting immigration to Switzerland is neither a recent anomaly nor a passing eccentricity, but the reemergence of a fear deeply rooted in its political and social history, visible already in the seventies with the initiatives of James Schwarzenbach and the concept from Uberfremdung. That’s why the last idea is not surprising, although it is scary. The fear that returns in cycles. Last year I remembered it in a great report of the Vanguard. That climate of identity anguish of the 1970s, fueled by the rapid economic growth and the massive arrival of foreign workers, left a lasting mark: the conviction that the State had to actively protect the demographic and moral composition of the country, an obsession that never completely disappeared and that reappears strongly in moments of pressure or perceived saturation. From immigration to the population limit. The current proposal goes a step beyond the classic debates on quotas or visas and directly proposes a kind of dystopia: a population cap total, set at around 10 million inhabitants, with a first alert threshold in the 9.5 million. In practice, this approach turns immigration into a variable to cut almost automatically if the country continues to grow, without distinguishing between refugees, skilled workers or highly paid managers, and opens the door to a policy that prioritizes the total number of residents over economic or humanitarian needs. Caught up in their own success. The background of the initiative is a paradox that is difficult to resolve: Switzerland is one of the countries more prosperous in the world, with a dynamic economy, global companies and salaries much higher than those of its neighbors, and precisely that success has made it a magnet for immigration. He population growth of the last decade, driven almost entirely by arrival of foreignershas fueled the perception that the quality of life deteriorates through of skyrocketing rentssaturated infrastructure and congested public transportation, although these same immigrants support key sectors of the labor market. The staggered “purge.” Thus we arrive at an approach without half measures. The plan promoted by the Swiss People’s Party introduces a progressive logic which is more reminiscent of an emergency switch than a classic immigration policy. Yeah is overcome that threshold of 9.5 millionthe first restrictions would fall about asylum seekers and family reunification. Not only that. If 10 million are reached, Switzerland would withdraw from international treaties considered “population boosters” (as the proposal states) and, as a last resort, it would abandon the free movement agreement with the European Union, a move that would have profound consequences on residence rights of millions of Europeans and about the Swiss access to the single market. The clash with reality. A good part of the business community and the large economic lobbies warn that this strategy would have a high costfrom a shortage of hundreds of thousands of workers to an accelerated aging of society and a loss of competitiveness structural. Although defenders of the initiative they promise compensation In the form of lower rents and less pressure on the welfare state, the absence of detailed studies and the weight of trade with the EU raise fears that the cure is more harmful than the disease. Discomfort amplifier. Unlike other European countries, Switzerland channels this type of tensions through referendums frequent, which allows latent concerns to quickly become concrete political proposals, no matter how Orwellian that they seem This characteristic explains why ideas that in other places would remain in the media debate, or even that, end up being voted on there, but it also makes the country in a laboratory where it measures the extent to which a society is willing to sacrifice growth and openness in the name of identity, control and perceived stability. Europe watches. Many media outlets in the country have gone one step furtheranticipating the activation of the plan and projecting what it would mean for the old continent. A rhetoric that tells that the Swiss debate anticipate discussions that already appear in other countries, where immigration continues to gain political weight while the traditional parties try to contain the extreme right through cordons sanitaire that do not always reduce their appeal. The Swiss experience points to a disturbing approach, to say the least: that ignoring or disqualifying discomfort does not eliminate it, and that the question is not so much whether there should be immigration, but at what pace and on what scale. In that sense, the possibility of a demographic “purge” Switzerland is not just a national decision, but a warning sign about the direction some European democracies could take if they fail to reconcile prosperity, social cohesion and political legitimacy. Image | Ruth Georgiev, IToldYa In Xataka | Switzerland has been a refuge for great fortunes for decades. Now he is debating taxing heirs In Xataka | Millionaires are changing their countries of residence in 2024. These are their new destinations explained in a graphic
