We have solved the problem of space junk by burning it. A SpaceX lithium trail just proved to be a terrible idea

For decades, the aerospace industry has had a consensus solution to the problem of space junk: burn it. A fairly simple phenomenon that is based on the satellite reentry when it ends its useful life in the atmosphere so that it begins to suffer friction and completely disintegrates. But the reality is that we are facing a huge problemsince physics reminds us that matter is neither created nor destroyed. We have captured him. Science is realizing that we are not removing space junk, we are just vaporizing it into metallic aerosols that are changing the chemistry of our own sky. And the definitive clue to this problem was found on the night of February 19, 2025where a team of German researchers pointed a laser into the sky over Kühlungsborn. What they detected in this case at about 100 kilometers altitude, in the thermosphere, was something that should not be there, since there were large amounts of lithium. And it wasn’t there for no reason, since it just coincided hours before with the re-entry of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket which had disintegrated over the Atlantic between Ireland and the United Kingdom. Something new. The signal measured in this case was not very subtle, since was 10 times bigger to the usual concentration in that region, and this finding was collected in an article because it marks a great milestone: it is the first time that the metallic contamination released from a specific piece of space junk at the exact moment of burning has been observed “live” and from Earth. The metallic iceberg. The incident with this Falcon is not something isolated in our society, but is a symptom of the structural change we are experiencing. In 2023, a team of researchers already used different devices to be able analyze more than 50,000 aerosol particles in the stratospherewhich is the layer where our ozone layer resides, at about 15-30 km altitude. What did they see? Historically, the metals found in the stratosphere came from meteorites that entered our planet. But today it is estimated that 210 tons of aluminum per year in the atmosphere comes from the disintegration of satellites and rockets, compared to the 20 tons per year that vaporize naturally from meteors. But lithium is not the only metal in the atmosphere of our planet, since scientists have detected more than twenty elements, among which aluminum, copper, lead or silver stand out… This is something that does not fit with the normal composition of meteorites, but it does coincide with the materials that different aerospace companies use to create their rockets and satellites. There is no planning. The pace of launches has skyrocketed in recent years, and if today we are close to 10,000 objects orbiting the Earth, we have to know that only Starlink aspires to have more than 40,000 satellites in Earth orbit low. But the problem is that the useful life of these devices is short, so their inevitable fate is to end up vaporized over our heads. Its effects. Science here is quite clear that the effects of filling the stratosphere with these metals are currently unknown. But the projections suggest that we should not be calm because elements such as aluminum and copper are important catabolizers that can affect the delicate ozone layer. In addition to this, metallic particles can act as special condensation nuclei, altering the microphysics of polar stratospheric clouds. And if that were not enough, adding anthropogenic material to sulfuric acid aerosols changes their size and ability to scatter sunlight. Ironically, we are altering the reflectivity of the stratosphere, the same layer that some scientists want to use for climate geoengineering, without knowing what the consequences will be. The planetary limit. The models here suggest that, if the planned megaconstellations materialize, the fraction of stratospheric particles contaminated with aluminum from satellites will rise from the current 10% to around 50%. In other words, the load of metals in the stratosphere could grow by around 40% compared to natural levels. Here for years space agencies have assumed that disintegrating satellites was a completely harmless and clean practice. The example of the Falcon 9, which has validated the warnings of the scientific community, shows us that the Earth’s orbit and our atmosphere make up a connected ecosystem. In this way, launching tens of thousands of objects into space and then burning them on our own roof may be a solution to keep space clean, but we are dirtying the sky in return. In Xataka | Spain and Portugal have joined forces to launch satellites with a mission: to monitor catastrophes in real time

If you think hospital food is terrible, science has just proved you

The industrial aspect of the trays in which food is served in the clinics, the aseptic environment of the room, or the bad drink that generally implies the visit to the health center are factors that convert hospital food into a dish of the liking of few. Well, the problem can be even more serious. Health and environment. A team of researchers has analyzed the food served in two hospitals and three residences in Germany and He has found reasons For concern, both for the health impact of menus and for their environmental effects. The team detected, in all the institutions analyzed, shortcomings in fundamental nutrients, including folate, potassium and vitamin B6. In addition, they also detected that in residences patients failed to achieve the required provision of proteins. “We have found that meals contained insufficient plant foods, such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains and legumes; and too many refined grains, added sugars, salt and saturated fats,” pointed in a press release Lisa Pörtner, co -author of the study. “This leads us to an inadequate provision of nutrients and poor dietary quality.” Not only a matter of health. According to the equipment, the diet in health centers should be model in relation to its dietary quality, but the problems detected by the study go further, and the study found that the analyzed diets had a negative environmental impact. “We find that (these menus) contribute to environmental degradation and climate change (which also threatens health),” Nathalie Lambrecht highlightedalso member of the team. Planetary health diet. How did the team reach these conclusions? The study was based on the comparison between the sampled diets and a model diet, in this case the so -called Planetary Health Diet or phd. PHD is a diet Proposal in 2019 by experts of the Eat-Lancet commission, linked to the magazine specialized in medical studies The Lancet. This diet prepares the consumption of plant foods, limiting in turn the consumption of meats and dairy (without eliminating them). The equine not only contrasted the degree of adhesion of these menus to the PHD, it also cotnrasted its nutritional qualities through the so-called Healthy Eating Index-2020 and a nutritional adaptation evaluation. In addition, they calculated the “environmental footprint” of diets through an estimate of the requirements in land use, greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication (excess nutrients caused by waste emission), water -water acidification and expenditure. The details of the study have been published In an article In the magazine The Lancet: Planetary Health. And in Spain? The results are not directly extrapolated to Spanish hospitals, after all ingredients and cooking techniques can vary much from country to country, even in something as apparently bland as hospital food. However the situation here It doesn’t seem much betterto the point that the complaints of users and professionals took a few months ago to the ministries of health and consumption to take action on the matter. In May, the project of a new Royal Decree focused on improving the quality of menus in health centers, a framework similar to the announced months ago for the improvement of food quality in teaching centers, was announced. The process for the development of the new standard began with a public consultation announced the same May. In Xataka | How much meat is too much meat? This is how the debate about meat is changing Image | Xataka with Gemini

YouTube risked a lot trying to be more like Tiktok. 200,000 million visualizations have proved him right

The future of the video is brief. You just have to look at the disproportionate growth of short video platforms such as The Almighty Tiktokwith 1.6 billion users on a global scale and a sustained growth that will lead to 113.2 million in the US in 2023 to 121.1 in 2027. So it has nothing strange that the rest of video apps go behind, behind, exactly the same with Netflix and its competitors in streaming. Many of Tiktok’s rivals are going well: YouTube, for example, not to grow thanks to its open tiktokization. Shorts better. YouTube Shortsthe section of short videos of the platform (no more than 60 seconds – then extended to three minutes – and with vertical format) has reached a new maximum when averaging 200,000 million daily viewsas announced by the CEO of YouTube, Neal Mohan, during his speech at Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity 2025. It represents a growth of no less than 186% compared to the previous year: in March 2024 the platform spoke of 70,000 million daily visualizations from the launch of Shorts in 2021. Now, with Ia. In this growth context, Mohan made another announcement that can make an important difference between Tiktok and YouTube: the arrival of I see 3 To YouTube Shorts this summer. The Google video generation model will allow users to create funds and clips, something that already did the previous version, Dream Screen, but I see 3 exceeds it in many aspects, from the technical quality to the audio implementation also generated by AI. The usual youtube is eaten. The rise of YouTube Shorts has been generating a debate about the possible “cannibalization” of the traditional long YouTube content. As in Tiktok, Shorts favors content discovery and rapid consumptionwhich has captured the attention of younger audiences and with mobile devices as the main platform. The expansion of the maximum short duration of 3 minutes in 2025 reduced the gap between both formats and has allowed content creators to develop more complex ideas, tending a bridge between the traditional YouTube and shorts and between Shorts and Tiktok, a platform that has been experiencing with the Creation of videos of up to 30 minutes. He lacks a boil. Although growth is unstoppable, the truth is that Tiktok has an unmatched capacity to discover new videos to the user. All thanks to a much more refined algorithm, as anyone who spends some time on both platforms and demands not an avalanche of videos for anyone, but content thought a little more specifically for him. At the moment the trends, musical discoveries or memes continue to be born in Tiktok, and shorts are following the wake, still without algorithm. There are multiple reasons for it to be like this: The Tiktok algorithm Analyze thousands of user behavior signals (likes, comments, visualization time, repetitions, all to customize the content that appears in you). The possibility that any creator, however unknown, is viralize is what favors experimentation and creativity. In that same way, applied to music, Tiktok has revolutionized how songs are discovered and popularized: The platform is now the main way for new themes and artists to be known, thanks to how the platform reuses music, favoring the creation of Challengesmemes or choreographies. There is a game. YouTube, however, has some advantages over Tiktok, all structural and business. On the one hand is the eternal fear that Tiktok is prohibited In territories such as the United States, which would allow Shorts (and Instagram) to occupy that space. Besides, Monetization is much more worked On YouTube, where money reaches the creators more robust and predictable. It is a negligible detail, and has made Influencers and Streamers They end up returning to the platform after passing through others, thanks to the advantages offered by YouTube (and despite the inevitable ups and downs). In Xataka | The PAU is over, so the true students’ festival has begun: react to their notes on Tiktok

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.