The problem is how to prove something that is not impossible

The capture of Nicolás Maduro by the US special forces has generated one of those stories that, due to its form and timing, seem designed to colonize the collective imagination even before a verifiable version of the events can be established. The rumor: Washington has been able to use its own secret weapon from a Marvel movie. It’s not impossible, and that’s the catch. The perfect rumor. We are not talking about something completely new, because this theory already sounded strongly with Washington and Cuba as protagonists years ago. The return of the “sonic weapon” now appears as a perfect story to explain a humiliating defeat. Also to elevate the operation to the category of a technological demonstration: a group of special forces captures Maduro and, according to a guard, leaves the defenders bleeding, dizzy and lying on the ground unable to get up. It is a type of narration that automatically has gone viral because it does not require nuances: it converts a confusing fight in a clear scene of absolute superiority and ends with a deterrent conclusion (“no one should confront the United States”), which is exactly the phrase that an intimidation campaign would want to put in the mouth of the enemy. From TikTok to institutional speaker. The origin of everything is quite flimsy: it appears in a TikTok videoa testimony impossible to verify (an alleged member of the Venezuelan security forces as a witness), then translated and later amplified by commentators with the clear intention of dramatizing it and making it viral. Then something happens that changes everything: the White House spokesperson share it and promote it as required reading. Without confirming anything, this gesture gives it authority and creates the most certain ambiguity: it is not official, but it is no longer a simple hoax, and in that gray area it fuels conversation, fear and propaganda. The Pentagon and SOUTHCOM take shelter in operational securitywhich leaves the ideal void for the myth to grow without the need for evidence. @franklinvarela09 loser of January 23 recognizing the surrender of Diosdado Cabello eschunlo friend s #greenscreenvideo ♬ original sound – Varela News What we know about the assault. He described operational framework was already, in itself, that of a high-risk mission with specialized means: nighttime heliborne insertion, armed support helicopters, shooting, American injuries and a high number of casualties on the defending side, including foreign military allies of the regime. With surprise, local air superiority, electronic warfare, cyber support, and precise fire, a defensive collapse can occur without the need for mysterious “lightning strikes.” That is why the rumor that has gone viral is not essential to explain the result: it is, in any case, an embellishment that transforms a complex tactical victory into a fable of technological domination. But there is something else. Technology that exists. What really means that the rumor does not die instantly and that many specialized media have remembered, is that it relies on a real background: Washington takes decades researching non-kinetic capabilities and “less lethal” to incapacitate without killing, from the called Active Denial System (millimeter microwaves that cause severe pain) to long-range acoustic devices LRAD type scope and dazzling lasers to deny vision. It has also been explored combine sensory effects (pain, disorientation, temporary blindness, confusion) to break an adversary’s coordination without resorting to immediate lethal fire. There is no doubt that programs exist of this type does not prove that they were used in Caracas, but it does provide veracity: “it may exist” is enough for the story to survive. A briefing slide from about a decade ago describing the “Non-Lethal Weapons Demonstrators” available to the US military at the time, including the Active Denial System and Acoustic Call-type systems “Sonic” as a label. They remembered in Forbes that sound as a weapon has physical limits and is riddled with historical exaggerations: it is easy to promise “paralysis” or “panic” over frequencies, but much more difficult to demonstrate consistent effects beyond hearing damage or disorientation from extreme volume. Furthermore, the TWZ analysts explained that a witness under stress can describe as a “sound wave” any devastating sensory experience: close explosions, flashbangs, overpressure, daze, and trauma. The language of the victim in this scenario does not identify the mechanism, it only transmits an experience, and that difference is crucial when the story travels through networks as if it were a technical report. An ADS prototype loaded into the back of a heavy truck EPIC, the hypothesis. Forbes too emphasized in a more “coherent” alternative with certain symptoms: EPICa concept that would use radiofrequency pulses to interfere with the inner ear and balance, causing extreme vertigo, inability to stand, and visual disorientation. The idea would be tactical and attractive because, unlike sound, radio waves cross obstacles and may feel like pressure or “popping” in the head as it affects the vestibular system. The problem is that there is no public evidence that this program went beyond early phases nor that it exists as an operational capacity, so here it functions more as a credible anchor than as proof. Havana Syndrome. It we count a few years ago. The debate over anomalous health incidents associated with the so-called Havana Syndrome prepared the ground: there was already a conversation about possible invisible mechanisms (acoustic, radioelectric or other) capable of producing real symptoms without an obvious explosion. The official evaluations have oscillated between skepticism about foreign authorship and the caution of not ruling out that a small number of cases could fit with known scientific principles used for harassment or incapacitation. In this scenario, any “invisible weapon” story is feasible because it leads one to think that the strange is not impossible, just classified. The most plausible explanation. If the strongest hypothesis is to be chosen, it is likely to be a combination of actual combat, explosions, distraction devices, smoke, shock and disorganization, amplified by testimony that has every incentive to exaggerate and convert defeat into technological inevitability. Details like “vomiting blood” or … Read more

prove that it can also be a PC

a user shared on Reddit how he managed to install iPadOS on a iPhone 17 Pro Max taking advantage of a security exploit, allowing the phone to benefit from opening multiple windows simultaneously, desktop apps and even support for an external monitor. All to demonstrate how Apple keeps locked capabilities that the iPhone’s own hardware already has. What has happened. The user, who calls himself ‘TechExpert2910’, has published several tests of your iPhone 17 Pro Max running the iPad operating system. It’s not a simulation or an app: it’s iPadOS running natively. The device features multitasking with floating windows, a full desktop interface when connected to an external monitor, and apps normally only available on iPad. All this without affecting performance, as explained by the hacker himself in his publication. Click on the image to go to the post The trick behind the hack. The modification takes advantage of an exploit present in iOS 26.1 which tricks the operating system into thinking it is running on an iPad instead of an iPhone. This unlocks features like a landscape home screen, iPad-style app switcher, more items in the Dock, and, most notably, a full system of floating windows and multitasking management. Apple has already patched this vulnerability in the iOS 26.2 beta, confirming that Apple was aware and wanted to put an end to it. Why it works so well. The key is that iOS and iPadOS share practically all of their code base. “it turns out that iOS has all the iPadOS code (and vice versa; you can, for example, activate Dynamic Island on iPad),” they cited in Wired. They are not different operating systems, but variants of the same software with features enabled or disabled depending on the device. The iPhone 17 Pro Max comes equipped with the chip A19 Pro and 12 GB of RAM, so it has plenty of power to run iPadOS. Apple boasted so much about this chip at its September event that the company even claimed that it offers “MacBook Pro levels of computing.” The foldable iPhone hypothesis. There are many who suggest that this hidden capacity could be prepared for the future foldable iPhone that Apple would plan to launch in the future. And of course, it would be very crazy to think that a device with much more screen space would not take advantage of its larger size with functions like those found on an iPad, especially in terms of multitasking. The debate over Apple’s strategy. The hacker accuses Apple of artificially limiting its devices to force the purchase of more products. The logic makes sense, since Apple has historically prospered by selling a complete ecosystem where each device has its defined space. However, as they point out from Wccftech, this strategy has precedents in Android: Samsung has been offering since 2017 DeXwhich converts mobile phones into desktop computers, without this having necessarily damaged its sales of tablets or laptops. What does this say about the future?. This experiment demonstrates three things. First: the lines of separation between iPhone, iPad and Mac are increasingly blurred. Second: Apple has the tools ready to offer a desktop mode on iPhone, but chooses not to. And third: all the reports suggest that the first foldable iPhone could have a system very similar to iPadOS, if not the same. Although it seems that we will have to wait to find out first-hand what Apple’s strategy will end up being. Cover image | TechExpert2910 (Reddit) In Xataka | How to send files from your Android to an iPhone using Quick Share with AirDrop

Juan Roig believes that domestic cuisine has the days counted. There are eight million Spaniards who are already beginning to prove him

“I said it and I maintain it: in the middle of the 21st century there will be no kitchens”, with that simple phrase, Juan Roig (the executive president of Mercadona) summarized the future Of his company just a month ago: it was not only a banal prediction, it was a declaration of intentions. Then half Spain He was thrown on him. But there was something that half Spain did not know and Roig, yes: there are already eight million people who resort to the prepared dishes of the supermarket. And it’s just the beginning. What is happening? If we go to the datawe can see that, in recent decades, home cuisine had been in clear decline. Millenials ate 30% more often in restaurants than any other generation; When they cooked, they spent less time (one hour less than the week X) and, when they bought, they opted more for prepared meals, pasta and sweets than the rest. They are US data, but We could find A similar process in all Western countries It is true that in recent years the situation seemed to have changed (the survey World Cooking Index Gallupfor example, said that homemade cuisine had increased 10% in Spain in 2022 compared to 2018). However, everything seems to indicate that it is something close to pandemic that, little by little, everything returns to previous trends. And that have been seen from supermarkets. The figures The Kantar consultancy was given This same March and fit as a glove with another good number of related data. As Elena L. Villalvilla explainedduring 2024 Spanish households consumed more than 700,000 tons of prepared dishes: that is 17 kilos per head. Which represents an increase of 6.6 % compared to the previous year. The same data presented Roig last month confirmed the trend. The precooked dishes section of the supermarket chain “is already profitable and continues to grow.” In fact, it is present in 1200 of the 1600 establishments and follows an ambitious incorporation program (salmon with vegetables, roasted vegetables with romesco sauce, roasted rib or seafood salad). But the bet goes further. At least in Mercadona. As explained in DAP“The disappearance of kitchens not only translates into a greater offer of prepared dishes, but also in a simplification of fresh products, destined to reduce the time we dedicate to the kitchen. “ The best example is the fish market section in which the products ready for cooking are increasingly weight without the intervention of any store in store. And why? From the Kantar point of view, the explanations are very simple: “comfort, lack of time and the increasingly elaborate and healthy proposals by supermarkets.” As explained by the Director of Great Consumption ClientsVeronika Khurshudyan, in Infobae, consumers “not only buy food, look for solutions.” This is the background key: solutions. Because, deep down, the twentieth century has been a century in which more and more food process stages have been taken out of domestic kitchens. Today, our country Only 28% of the Spaniards cooks from fresh foods. Fourth range foods (raw packaging, minimally processed and ready for cooking) began to introduce in the late 80s in Spain. And, although they have been with us for 35 years, Only recently have they introduced themselves completely. Just behind the fifth range: an arrival that It was truncated by the pandemicbut that has already recovered and takes speed. That is based on Roig’s prophecy; But, above all, that is based on a good part of the key changes in the food of the future. Image | Deski Jayantoro | Joana Costa In Xataka | Mercadona fried eggs are an example of how in the future the kitchen will be recreational, not food

Tablets are still more alive than ever. Samsung has presented the new Galaxy Tab S10 Fe to prove it

Samsung has just announced by surprise its two new tablets to compete in the mid-high range. The small sisters of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra and Galaxy Tab S10+ They are the new Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Fe and Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+, two models that cut in some of their technical specifications to adjust the price as much as possible. Technical sheet of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Fe and Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+ Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Fe (10.9 ”) Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+ (13,1 ”) Dimensions and weight 254.3 x 165.8 x 6.0 mm, 497 g (Wi-Fi), 500 g (5g) 300.6 x 194.7 x 6.0 mm, 664 g (Wi-Fi), 668 g (5g) SCREEN 10.9 inches LCD 90 Hz 13.1 inches LCD 90 Hz PROCESSOR Exynos 1580 Exynos 1580 Memoirs 8 GB + 128 GB 12 GB + 256 GB MicroSD to 2TB 8 GB + 128 GB 12 GB + 256 GB MicroSD to 2TB BATTERY 8,000mah 45w 10.090MAH 45w Rear cameras 13 MP 13 MP Front camera 12 MP ultra wide angle 12 MP ultra wide angle Operating system Android 15 One UI 7 Android 15 One UI 7 Connectivity 5g Wifi 6 Wi -Fi Direct Bluetooth 5.3 5g Wifi 6 Wi -Fi Direct Bluetooth 5.3 PRICE Not available Not available The screens. Both tablets share technology, betting on a humble LCD instead of AMOLED technology. The panel update frequency is 90Hz, and visibility is complemented with 800 nits. The only difference between both tablets is the size: the Tab S10 Fe galaxy has 10.9 inches and the Plus model rises to 13.1. Performance and battery. These two almost twin sisters arrive with the processor Exynos 1580accompanied by 8 + 128 GB base and expandable memories up to 12 + 256 GB, a higher range configuration. This processor is oriented to mid -range devices, it is composed of an eight -core architecture (1 Cortex A720 + 3 Cortex A720 + 4 Cortex A520) with a maximum frequency of 2.9 GHz. It should perform more than left over for the day to day. The battery is another big difference between both models, with 8,000mAh for the Galaxy Tab S10 Fe and 10.090MAH for the Plus variant. Both share a fast charge of 45W. Software. Both tablets land with Android 15 and the latest version of One UI. As it is already a classic in Samsung, these tablets will have functions such as Circle to Search, draft objects, a new better face oriented function oriented to group photos, and some of the functions of the views in models of the Galaxy A family and Galaxy S. They have not transcended details about how many years of support these tablets will have. The cameras. The tablets are tablets, and mobile phones are almost pocket cameras, so do not expect the configuration of a Galaxy S. Without too many surprises, we find a 12 megapixel rear camera, next to a great angle sensor of 13 megapixels for the front camera. The extras. Both models land with IP68 resistance to water and dust, the possibility of incorporating Dual SIM (through a physical sim and an ESIM, there is no double physical tray), it is compatible with Samsung accessories including the S-PEN, and they are 5G Sub-6 tablets, so we will have full spectrum connectivity. Versions and price of LAs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Fe and Galaxy Tab S10 Fe+ Samsung’s new tablets will be put up for sale tomorrow, April 3, and will be sold in gray, silver and blue colors. There is no price announced for the moment Image | Samsung In Xataka | Best tablets (2025). Which to buy and 9 recommended models for all pockets and needs

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.