Peter Thiel is one of the pillars of Silicon Valley. His record-breaking move to Florida is one more nail in California’s coffin

A rental contract does not usually provide enough space for owners, except if it is for a centrally located apartment in Madrid or Barcelona for less than 600 euros. Then, it would be a miracle. But when the signer is one of the names that they defined Silicon Valley and their destination is Florida, things change. As and how I collected the North American Fox BusinessPeter Thiel has just signed the contract for what will be his offices in Miami, paying more than anyone else in that city before. “For Peter Thiel to sign that lease, marking a milestone of $250 per square foot, is absolutely incredible,” said Joe DaGrosa, founder and president of the real estate investment consultancy. DaGrosa Capital Partners. The record price reached in office rentals draws attention, but what is truly interesting is what lies behind it: a historic name in Silicon Valley is willing to pay more just to leave California as soon as possible, joining (and urgently) the migratory wave of millionaires who have already established their residence in front of the warm waters from Miami. A record rental that hides a trend Thiel’s office will occupy part of the 44th floor of the tower 830 Brickella busy building in which it will share elevators with companies such as Microsoft or Citadel. Its offices will occupy about 1,690 m2 and the price that has registered the record is $2,690.98 per square meter. That is, a bill of 4.55 million dollars per year. As Joe DaGrosa explained to Fox Businessthe average rent in that area was around $40 or $60 per square foot for an office, which implies that Peter Thiel would be paying between 525% and 316% surcharge for the rent of their offices. The increase in the price of business land in South Florida already compete with the prices of Manhattan and San Francisco. This price increase has arisen from the growing interest of technology companies that until now had their headquarters in Silicon Valley, but are now moving en masse to Miami, following in the footsteps of their founders. Thiel hasn’t arrived in Florida overnight. Just like other millionaires have done like Jeff Bezos o Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of Citadel, Thiel bought a property in Miami Beach more than five years ago. In December 2025, with California already debating the tax on great fortunes, Thiel Capital announced that opened office in that same area. The final blow came in February with the announcement of Palantir: the company chaired by Thiel confirmed the move from its headquarters to Miami, thus completing the migration of Thiel’s main businesses to Miami. Expelled by a tax that does not exist Behind so much movement there is a very specific reason: tax payment. California has been debating for months application of a tax single 5% on the assets of those who exceed $1 billion and reside in the state on January 1, 2026. This tax is expected to raise about $100 billion over the next five years, which will be used to mitigate cuts in social benefits for the most vulnerable population in California. The measure has already gathered more than 1.5 million signatures, well above the million necessary, and was confirmed to be submitted to vote next November after the failure of negotiations between the driving unions and Governor Gavin Newsom, who is against imposing the new rate that would affect about 200 people. That is, the millionaires already have started their preventive migration reacting to a tax that has not even been approved and that does not even have the support of the state governor. Larry Page and Sergey Brin left California before the tax deadline. Page paid more than 170 million dollars for two houses in Coconut Grove, and Brin was bought a 51 million home on Allison Island. Mark Zuckerberg, after two decades in San Francisco, changed zip code to become Jeff Bezos’ neighbor in Billionaire Bunker. The great beneficiary of the move It’s been Florida. His choice has not been causal, and responds to a compelling reason: he does not charge income or wealth tax, and that weighs a lot when the fortune is counted in billions of dollars. Not all technology magnates take a dim view of the tax on large fortunes. Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, has expressed his willingness to pay taxes get approved and stay in California. But Thiel already donated three million dollars to the California Business Roundtable, the group fighting the proposal. In Xataka | More and more millionaires and technology companies are fleeing California. The winners: Texas and Miami In Xataka | Billionaires prepare their mansions for the apocalypse: luxury bunkers have become a trend Image | Gage SkidmoreUnsplash (mark)

Peter Thiel believes that the Holy See is making a big mistake

Peter Thiel doesn’t usually bite his tongue, and he didn’t do so a few days ago at the Aspen Ideas Festival. The investor and co-founder of Palantir and PayPal He participated in a talk in which he accused Pope Leo XIV of being (unknowingly) at the service of the Chinese Communist Party. The reason: his last encyclical, Magnificent Humanitas. Thiel’s argument. In this text the Pope advocated regulate AI to avoid misuse of technology. For Thiel, although this message may resonate with people around the world concerned about AI, it will hardly have a similar effect in China, where the Catholic religion is a minority. The Pope is “working for the Chinese communists”. For Thiel, this means that the encyclical only stops one of the two major sides in the race for AI, and leaves Beijing free to continue advancing without any type of moral brake. Conclusion, according to this magnate: the Pope “is working for the Chinese communists.” This comes from afar. A few months ago, in March, Thiel already offered a series of private lectures on the Antichrist. As it turned out later, this event bothered the Vatican so much that two Catholic universities they had to go out to clarify who had not participated in its organization. For the tycoon, the Antichrist might not be a person, but a world government who takes power promising to protect humanity from existential threats like AI. Thiel didn’t stop there. In addition to this accusation about the Pope, Thiel also warned that a “democratic-socialist coup d’état” is taking place in the United States. Without any evidence, he accused Anthropic (which he called “woke liberal”) that it would use its models to manipulate the 2028 elections in favor of Democrats. Interested speech. But this investor and entrepreneur has its own “agenda” and a few ideas quite pilgrims. He was one of Donald Trump’s first supporters in Silicon Valley, and as pointed out on CNN, he also helped boost the political career of the US vice president, J.D. Vance. The latter worked at Mithrill Capital, the investment firm co-founded by Thiel himself, before making the leap into politics. Image | Gage Skidmore | Catholic Church England and Wales In Xataka | If things go wrong for me, it’s because of the politicians; If I do well, it is thanks to me: the bias that damages democracy

Peter Thiel’s latest madness is to exchange barbed wire for a subscription

Livestock farming is a highly sacrificed world that is unlikely to be replaced by AI, but that does not mean that technology can alleviate the hard task of caring for livestock. And even more so when one of the most influential men in technology believes in you: Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and Palantir, has a new futuristic bet between eyebrows: putting solar-powered smart collars on cows. Cows with subscription collars. More specifically, Thiel and his fund have put money into Haltera New Zealand startup that has been betting for a decade on solar feeding collars with GPS and artificial intelligence to control cows as if it were a 2.0 barn. Just a few weeks ago Halter managed to harvest a financial injection of $220 million led by Thiel’s Founders Fund, which allowed it to reach a valuation of $2 billion. In essence, these collars allow the cows to be guided using audio signals and vibrations so that they adhere to virtual limits that the farmer establishes within the app, without the need to build a fence. According to explains the startupanimals only need 10 days to learn the stimuli, something that supports science. each necklace send more than 6,000 data per minute to the cloud with information on health, movement, fertility or behavior, which allows, for example, to optimize grazing or reproduction. In addition to the initial investment of the collar, the service consists of a subscription of between five and eight dollars per cow in the United States plus the cost of installing the infrastructure. Why is it important. Because on the one hand it is increasingly difficult to find ranchers and those who remain are turning older and have to travel to their farm with the consequent expense of fuel for routine surveillance or care tasks. Halter means that the farmer does not have to go as often because it solves three problems at the same time: there is no need to build fences to keep them within an area, it minimizes the need for personnel in the field and the system detects health anomalies in the animal based on metrics that usually go unnoticed in the initial stages of certain diseases. Context. Extensive livestock farming has low technological penetration and high dependence on labor and it is not because there is a lack of initiatives to modernize it. According to the American specialized media iGrow, at least 21 companies in the sector in the North American country went bankrupt in 2025 alone. The problem is that alternative technologies are expensive, difficult to sell to professionals and have an unclear return on investment. As mentions the consulting firm McKinseymore than half of professionals in the sector mention high prices as a barrier to the entry of new technologies. With Halter, calculating the ROI considering savings in travel or labor is clearer. In detail. The financing acquired by Halter aims to consolidate its presence in the United States, Australia and New Zealand, as well as expanding into other markets such as Ireland, the United Kingdom and parts of North and South America. This geographical expansion has a technological ally to improve its surveillance: integration with Starlinka fundamental strategic improvement to operate in areas with coverage problems. Halter CEO and Founder Craig Piggott explains that this improvement will make livestock work more attractive, which helps new generations see the profession as something less slave-like and bearable. It’s his fault”Cowgorithm“, the algorithm behind it: a huge dataset that contains 7 billion hours of bovine behavior to know how to read and interpret results. Yes, but. On paper, the theory offers a technology that reduces the frequency of visits to the farm, anticipates possible diseases and also optimizes reproduction through a subscription service. Or what is the same: that the shoulder on which a business stands is the technology of a specific company. If the service fails, the rancher has no containment alternative. If the company raises its quotas, the rancher is sold on this alternative. Likewise, adding connectivity also incorporates the risk of attacks and vulnerabilities that can affect the exploitation and well-being of the animal. We mentioned before that cost is one of the great barriers to the entry of new technologies in the sector. A survey of South Dakota State University among farmers in the Midwest of the United States shows that the second reason is data privacy: Halter is not clear about the destination of this enormous volume of information that he accumulates. In Xataka | He is one of the richest men in the world and is obsessed with the Antichrist. The Pope has four things to tell you In Xataka | Peter Thiel’s “anti-scholarship”: a salary of $5,400 a month for dropping out of college and going to work Cover | Halter and Gage Skidmore

After the giant wolf, a huge bird of New Zealand wins points to be desixtinquida. And Peter Jackson has a lot to do

‘Jurassic Park‘It is a science fiction story until it ceases to be. Not so much because there are those who consider current technology can bring dinosaurs backbut because there is already a company that is returning to life species that were extinguished thousands of years ago. It is colossal and are accepting requests to relive your favorite extinct animal. Whenever you call yourself Peter Jackson and have 25 million dollars to donate them. “Hobby”Jackson does not need presentations at this point. After several minor films, he jumped to world fame with his adaptation of ‘The Lord of the Rings‘, which allowed him to fulfill another of his dreams: roll a King Kong movie. In the tape the love that the New Zealander director feels for animals from other times, but that passion transcends to the screen was felt. Interestingly, one of the director’s fun is to collect Moa bones, to the point of having one of the largest private collections in the world focused on the bones of that extinct animal. “The movies are my work, but the moa are my hobby,” commented Jackson. From left to right a kiwi, an ostrich and a moa. They were … big De -sextinging the moa. But … what is a moa? In a nutshell, it’s like a kiwi, but about three meters high, about 250 kilos and can not fly either. His closest living relatives would be the aforementioned kiwis, but also the casuaries and the most similar would be Emú. New Zealand natives, the MOA was not extinguished: we extinguish it. When the Maori arrived at the islands, they began to hunt them and, although sightings have been reported in the nineteenth century, there is no evidence of this and it is considered that the MOA was extinguished, at least 500 years ago. Jackson comments that “any Neozyre child feels fascination with Moa.” Colossal comes into play. The filmmaker has between 300 and 400 Moa bones, and it will be that private collection the one that drives The animal’s de -sexyction thanks to a company called Colossal. It is not the first time we talk about them, since it is a company dedicated to biotechnology that has become popular for their interest in Return animal to life like mammoth or the Tasmania tiger. Also to Dodo. What they do is Take extinct animal DNAsomething that can be done from bones such as those that Jackson possesses and, the more remains, the better, and combine it with samples of relatives who live today. That is the easy thing: the complicated thing comes when, once the genetic information of the two DNA is combined, they are “filtering variants” to edit the genes and get exactly the animal they want. Finally, a living animal is used to give birth to the “new” creature. And it is not cheap. Money. A lot. In a recent financing round, Colossal Biosciences reached a assessment of 10,200 million dollars. At the end of 2024, Jackson already He collaborated With 10 million dollars in Colossal Bioscience, but now it has donated another 15 million for the company to place the MOA in its list of ‘goals’. This implies that we will take time to see the result. Now, Colossal is not just castles in the air. In April of this year, the company advertisement His first success: they had achieved resurrect the giant wolf, the Aenocyon Dirus. Now there are three puppies called Romulo, Remo and Khaleesi that, with six months of age – they were born in January this year – they have reached a weight of about 36 kilos and a length of 120 cm. They are expected to reach 180 cm and 68 kilos each. Jackson on the left and Ben Lamm, one of the founders of Colossal, on the right. Both with moa bones Complex. We will see what happens to the moa, but there are those who think that what is best colossal is Sell the motorcycle. With the MOA we are at a very early stage of the welcoming, but as we read in Physthe process seems to be more complex than with the wolves. Beth Shapiro is the chief scientist of Colossal and has commented that, unlike what happens with mammals, bird embryos develop inside eggs, so the process of transferring an embryo to a substitute mother will be very different from in vitro fertilization in mammals. Nic Rawlence is a paleontologist who works at the University of Otago and has commented that reviving New Zealand birds “is not scientifically possible with current technology.” The problem is that there is no good moa genome and its closest relatives are the Tinamúesof those who separated 60 million years ago. Criticism Apart from that, which is an important challenge, there is another issue: if an extinct animal is revived, is the patent of nature or the responsible company? Ben Lamm, the director of Colossal, has already explained that They do not want to monetize those animals directly, but sell its technology. But of course, he does not close the door to patent what they wish. And, although Alex, 10 would love to see a tyrannosaur in the streets of San Diego, the current Alex knows that no company is going to do it for love of art and that, probably, it does not matter that the habitat of that animal does not look like it or the least to the one he had at the time of his disappearance. Who is excited It’s Jackson. “Returning the moa to life would be so exciting, if not more, than any movie you could do.” Images | Colossal, Kkpcw, Gage Skidmore In Xataka | We just closed a primate. If someone believes that brings us closer to the cloning of humans, it is wrong

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.