lose the market that matters

Anthropic has closed a financing round of 30,000 million dollars that doubles its valuation to 380,000 millionjust four months after being valued at 183,000 million. The operation is led by the Singapore sovereign fund GIC and Coatue, with participation from NVIDIA and Microsoft. Bang. The company has already raised more than $57 billion since its founding in 2021. OpenAI continues to have the leadership in valuation with half a billion after its last round of 40 billion at the end of last year, but now it faces a threat that is growing faster than expected. Between the lines. The numbers explain an uncomfortable paradox for OpenAI: ChatGPT processes 2.5 billion queries daily and takes the consumer market by storm… …but Anthropic controls 32% of the LLM business market according to Menlo Ventures, compared to 25% for OpenAI. And in programming, the distance is even greater: 42% versus 21%. OpenAI has seen its enterprise share fall from 50% in 2023 to 25% todayjust when this segment is emerging as the most profitable and predictable. If the consumer chatbot doesn’t turn out to be the winning horse in this race, Sam Altman has a big problem. The contrast. Sarah Friar, chief financial officer of OpenAI, acknowledged in Davos that they have gone from 70/30 consumer-business to 60/40, with the expectation of reaching 50/50 this year. The transcript of the interview CNBC Bring all the details. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, boasts of maintaining an 80/20 business-consumer ratio from the beginning. Anthropic reports recurring revenues of more than 14 billion, with growth multiplying tenfold annually for three years. And customers spending more than $100,000 annually have increased sevenfold in 12 months. Yes, but. Neither of them is profitable yet: Anthropic projected gross margins of 40% by 2025, but lowered his expectations by 10 points due to inference costs 23% higher than expected. The servers rented from Google and Amazon weigh more than calculated. OpenAI faces the same problem as both turn to the market every few months to fund the next phase. That is why both are considering IPOs between this year and next. Unexpected twist. The launch of Claude Code in December has accelerated enterprise adoption in a way that perhaps no one anticipated. The tool has not only doubled users in a month, but has consolidated the perception of Claude as “the serious option” for companies compared to ChatGPT. If companies value something, even more than the end consumer, it is stability and predictability. And Anthropic has been able to capitalize on that demand. Missing? Temporal context: By the time Apple reached a valuation of 380 billion, it had already been in existence for almost four decades. He sold Macs, he sold iPods, he sold iPads. It was already going for the iPhone 5s and its annual profit was 50 billion dollars. Anthropic reaches the same figure without being profitable, compressing decades of value creation into just a few quarters. It is not necessarily wrong, especially with the recent good dynamics of Claude’s company, but it remains to be seen if these models can sustain those explosive revenues and convert them into profits before the market loses patience. In Xataka | Featured image | OpenAI, Anthropic

Science has been measuring whether size matters for years. A study with 3D simulation has the most complete answer

It is probably one of the most recurring questions in the history of humanity and, yet, one of the ones that accumulates the most myths per square meter. Leaving aside popular culture and internet forums, scientific literature has been trying for years to quantify what is true about the importance penis size. Science to the rescue. A published study This year, PLOS Biology wanted to resolve a question that has undoubtedly generated many jokes and also some complexes in the male sex. And the truth is that the short answer to this question is that size does matterbut perhaps not for the reasons most men believe. The signal theory. Until now, many studies were based on simple surveys to answer this question. However, this study has gone one step further by using 343 3D figures to evaluate the response of more than 800 participants. The goal was to understand penis size not only as a reproductive tool, but as an evolutionary signaling trait. The results. In the investigationfemale participants rated men as more attractive, which combined three factors: greater height, a “V” shaped torso (wide shoulders and narrow hips) and a larger penis. But there is a very important nuance. Attraction doesn’t follow a line of “the more the merrier” ad infinitum. The study in this case detected diminishing returns, since after a certain size, attractiveness does not increase proportionally, but rather there is a ceiling. Competence. But men also went through this study to evaluate the size of other men. In this case, it was highlighted that they perceived those with larger genitals as more competitive rivals and with greater fighting capacity. This suggests that, evolutionarily, the size could have served as both sexual ornament and a signal of status or threat towards other males, similar to the antlers of a deer. What they prefer. If we move away from evolutionary theory and go to stated preference, the baseline study remains the one published by N. Prause in PLOS One in 2015. This work is key because it differentiated, for the first time with rigor, between the type of relationship sought. In this case, using 3D models on heterosexual women, a preference was specifically shown for a slightly larger size, averaging about 16.3 cm in length in an erect state and 12.7 cm in circumference. But in the case of stable couples, the preference dropped slightly to 16 cm and 12.2 cm in circumference. The key reading. The first point to note is that circumference matters more than length in visual choice. The second is that these measures are only “slightly” above the population average. A mechanical reality. This is where science busts most porn myths. A narrative review published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2023 analyzed the existing literature To answer the million-dollar question: does a larger penis give more pleasure? The answer is a very nuanced ‘it depends’. Science points out in this case that there are few high-quality studies that manage to directly link size with the organism, and the results are heterogeneous. But if we draw a clear conclusion, the truth is that the quality of the relationship such as trust or communication correlates more strongly with sexual satisfaction than the size of the penis. Male anxiety. If female preferences are moderate and satisfaction depends more on technique than size, why is there still so much anxiety among society? The studies in this case They point out that there is a great disconnection between reality and male perception, since approximately 38% of men report some degree of dissatisfaction with their penis. However, the vast majority of couples have a positive view of their partners’ genitals. Images | Deon Black In Xataka | Desire in times of stress and screens: this is how the era of programmed sex was born

The Academy has discovered that being relevant matters

The Hollywood Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has signed an agreement that, beyond the specific broadcast of its awards gala, marks a turning point in the entertainment industry: from 2029YouTube will broadcast the oscars exclusively and free for everyone. The story underlying this movement is not so much the demise of cable television (a phenomenon that in Spain we perceive from a certain distance) but the confirmation of a fundamental change: if the content is not available in a simple and instantaneous way, it does not exist for the majority. The deal. YouTube will obtain exclusive worldwide broadcasting rights from the 101st edition of the awards, scheduled for 2029. The deal extends until 2033 and the transmission will be free worldwide, including the main ceremony, the red carpet and exclusive material from the backstage and the Governors Ball. Until now, Disney paid $100 million each year for broadcast rights on ABC, a very tight economic dealsince this year, for example, it only earned 127 million from advertising during the broadcast. Little thing compared to YouTubewhich recorded advertising revenue of $36 billion in 2024. Worse and worse audiences. The break between ABC and the Academy comes from progressive worsening of audience data. The 2019 ceremony brought together 29.6 million viewers; In 2020, the figure dropped to 23.6. But the real collapse came with the 2021 edition in the middle of the pandemic, which sank to 10.4 million viewers. In 2025 there were signs of recovery with 19.69 million viewers, the highest audience in five years, thanks to simultaneous streaming on Hulu and the return of Conan O’Brien as host. Possible solutions. To improve the numbers (and the friction between ABC and the Academy) the network proposed changes inspired by the Grammys: moving technical categories out of the main broadcast, prioritizing musical performances and reducing the total duration. The Academy resisted, but in 2018 announced the creation of a category of Outstanding Achievement in Popular Filman idea so bad that it was canceled just 29 days later. Instead of actually cutting the Academy added two new categories (casting in 2025 and stunt coordination in 2028). It was seen coming. In fact, the jump to YouTube is the inevitable step that certifies the agony of cable. In fact, this is demonstrated by the Academy’s own decision to incorporate streaming simultaneous on Hulu this very 2025, despite a good number of technological difficulties. YouTube is the inevitable next stop: instant distribution, unrestricted global reach, and free (or, at most, dependent on a single subscription to the platform’s premium option). Taking into account the traditional difficulties in watching the ceremony, YouTube’s proposal has a certain radicality: from anywhere you can watch the ceremony without downloading applications or bypassing blocks. The lace There is one more detail that certifies that the grudges come from afar. In May 2024, YouTube hired Justin Connolly, a veteran who had spent a quarter of a century at Disney, to oversee the platform’s media and sports operations. The signing triggered a legal battle: Disney filed a lawsuit trying to block Connolly’s incorporation, in a dispute that was resolved through an out-of-court settlement. A former Disney executive, speaking to The Wrap, stressed: “Do not underestimate the importance of the hatred and resentment between Justin Connolly and Bob Iger. The dispute continues.” And we just saw the last blow. In Xataka | The “ghost” category of the Oscars: it exists but it is so demanding that there have never been films that compete for it

Not all of them serve the same purpose, and choosing well matters more than ever.

Buy a smart watch It may not be as easy as it seems. We begin to review the options on the market and the eternal question arises: which one is the most suitable for us? Which device will be worth the investment? And, precisely, it is at this point where we will try to help you. In a new video from the Xataka YouTube ChannelAna Boria brings the 7 best smart watches of the year. This is a selection that derives directly from the finalists of the Xataka NordVPN 2025 Awards. Our partner gives us key data about each model to help us choose the best option. The seven best smartwatches of 2025 Google Pixel Watch 4. Google watches have evolved significantly in recent years, offering an increasingly solid bet. This generation arrives in identical versions in 45 and 41 mm cases. They also boast a screen AMOLED LTPO between 1 and 60 Hz. And it reaches 3,000 nits of peak brightness. “In terms of measurements, the latest generations of Pixel Watch have improved a lot and in fact it is capable of measuring everything with an acceptable precision for general use and fitness,” says Ana, but in the video published on YouTube she does not hesitate to mention some manufacturers that have more successful products. Xiaomi Watch S4. From the American brand we move on to the Chinese march. Yes, it has a huge product catalog, and that catalog includes smart watches. “The Xiaomi Watch S4, a big 47mm smartwatch and with aluminum frames,” says our colleague, and highlights its interchangeable bezel. Of course, not all are advantages. Like the Pixel, Xiaomi’s proposal also has its negative points. Ana reminds us which ones, which will allow us to continue with the purchase if it is not a priority for us or look for an alternative if not. Of course, the price is a highlight: 160 euros. Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro. Among the finalists of the Xataka Awards was this proposal, which is available in two sizes (44 and 48 mm). At the display level, an AMOED screen reigns supreme with a peak brightness of 3,000 nits. “ANDIt’s a very sports-oriented watch since you can take it anywhere without anything happening to it,” says Ana. We are looking at a watch focused on sports, offering options not only for health monitoring but also for training performance. In the video that we have just published you will find some features that stand out if you are a user who values ​​sports and are thinking about buying this smart watch. Samsung Galaxy Watch 8. “For this generation, Samsung has released Wear OS 6 with One UI 8 for Watch and has included integration with Google Gemini, which allows us to use voice commands to request information and/or do things on the fly”, details our colleague. Do you want to have AI on your wrist? This may be your option. Garmin Fenix ​​8. Garmin’s journey in smart watches has been very interesting, developing a product as polished as the one we find in this selection. The Garmin Fénix 8 comes in three sizes (43, 47 and 51 mm), incorporates an AMOLED screen and if we must mention a strong point, it is resistance. Of course, Ana says: “The Garmin Fénix 8 is an expensive smartwatch.” And it is, with a recommended retail price of 950 eurosit is a choice that may be outside of some budgets. However, in the video you will find more details so you can evaluate if this watch is really worth the investment for you. Apple Watch Series 11. Among the finalists of this year’s Xataka Awards is Apple’s proposal in second position. It is a watch that has many benefits, many followers, but it is certainly not for everyone. It is available in 42 and 46 mm versions, and there is an option to purchase it with 5G. You may be wondering how it is different from the Apple Watch Series 10. Ana helps us find some differences. In addition, he mentions the important role that the health section occupies: “They place it as one of the best in terms of accuracy on the list“This proposal starts at 449 euros. Huawei Watch GT 6 Pro. At the end of the article, but at the top of the podium is the Huawei Watch GT 6 Pro, winner of the Xataka NordVPN 2025 Awards in the Best smartwatch category. Ana reminds us that, in addition, this product won the community award, the one you chose. “It is a large watch, 46mm, with an AMOLED screen that reaches 3,000 nits of maximum brightness and protected with sapphire crystal“explains Ana, who highlights its benefits in the sections of sport, health and autonomy. She does not miss the price, which starts at 379 euros, but can be obtained with discounts. Images | Xataka In Xataka | Apple Watch SE 3: a fantastic renewal that was worth waiting three years for

In AI, teraflops came first, then parameters. Now what matters are the ‘bragawatts’

The technological conversation revolves around fashions, and there is nothing as fashionable as artificial intelligence. All the countries that want to be part of the conversation are developing their models and tools and it is interesting how geopolitics permeates everything: the US seeking to be sovereign while China wants to monetize now. But as interesting as the capabilities of one model or another, it is to talk about two concepts that are totally aligned: data centers that feed the enormous amount of calculation necessary to train artificial intelligence and, evidently, Where do they get that absurd amount of energy from?. And as a result of that conversation a fascinating term has been born: the one with the ‘bragawatts’. The ‘bragawatts’ as the bragging of AI Something common when companies like OpenAI or Google announce new data centers focused on AI is that they give a bombastic number about the amount of energy it will consume. RecentlyOpenAI announced a new campus in Michigan that, together with six other also recently revealedthey will need more than 8 GW to operate. They also talk about money: a plan launched in January of this year of 500 billion dollars and 10 GW of planned capacity. According to the company, it is “the infrastructure necessary to advance AI and reindustrialize the country.” In Financial Times They have done the math and, with the Michigan project, the company has 46 GW of computing power. As when talking about operations like the purchase of Activision-Blizzard by Microsoft for 75 billion dollars, context is needed because it is difficult to imagine such enormous numbers. If 1 GW is enough to power 800,000 homes in the United States (with what they spend on air conditioning at any time of the year), these OpenAI data centers would consume as much energy as more than 44 million homes. More context pointed out in the Financial Times: almost three times all the homes there are in California. And the fact that companies give this power data so happily has led to some coin the term ‘bragawatt’. This neologism is a sarcastic combination between ‘brag’, “to show off”, and ‘watts’, the unit of power. In Spanish it is difficult to find a name, but basically it is a boast, something that some companies use, publicly exaggerating the energy consumption capacities planned for their infrastructures. There are several reasons why this is done, but as with any type of announcement by companies that are ‘public’ -those listed on the stock exchange-, the objective is to attract the attention of both the press and the technology sector and, above all, investors. In the economic environment they comment that these bombastic figures are not always met, but beyond the marketing boastthere is a bottom to all this. OpenAI asked the US government to secure 100 GW annually to fuel the country’s different AI developments and NVIDIA explained quite well why estimating the demand for these centers is a problem. In a recent report, the company commented something very interesting: Unlike a traditional data center, which runs thousands of unrelated tasks, an AI “factory” operates as a single system. When training a large language model, or LLM, thousands of GPUs perform intensive calculation cycles, followed by periods of data exchange. Everything is done in perfect synchrony that generates an energy profile characterized by massive and rapid load variations. The electrical consumption of a rack can go from an “idle” state, around 30% utilization, to 100% and back again in a matter of milliseconds. This forces engineers to oversize components to support the maximum current, not the average, which increases costs and space requirements. When these oscillations are added across an entire data room – which can represent hundreds of megawatts rising and falling in seconds – they pose a significant threat to the stability of the electrical grid, making interconnection with the grid a key bottleneck for the expansion of AI. Therefore, beyond the aforementioned boasting, there is some substance in those enormous figures that companies give. And what Nvidia says is backed by data. The big technology companies in the United States are taking over important technology centers. nuclear electricity production or with contracts with oil and gas companies. The coal is re-emerging in full decarbonization to feed the ‘gluttons’ data centers and we are seeing that this focus on LLM is leading large oil companies to give a turn in their plans to adopt renewable energies. AI needs fast energy capable of supporting those performance peaks, and renewables don’t seem like the way to go at the moment. Since we are dealing with grandiose figures, esteem that, between now and 2029, the world will spend about 3 trillion dollars (“its” three trillion) on data centers. And to give more context, it is what France’s economy was worth in 2024. Yeah Are we talking about a bubble or not?is another topic, but there are those who think that these ‘fanfare’ are very difficult to believe. Also who point that AI will have more impact than technologies so far, including the Internet, so we may need all that energy. Only time will tell. Image | İsmail Enes Ayhan In Xataka | While Silicon Valley seeks electricity, China subsidizes it: this is how it wants to win the AI ​​war

While everyone criticized GPT-5, Openai was winning the war that really matters: that of companies

He GPT-5 launch It has been, in broad strokes, disappointing. Openai needed this model with this model bigger in the history of AIbut we have encountered a model that improves, but not spectacularly. And yet, it is achieving something that is more important than it seems: to convince companies. Companies

“20 years ago I would have pointed to my daughter to the Top schools, now I think that no longer matters.”

Artificial intelligence is modeling the present at such a frantic pace that We can barely realize that what until only a few years ago was essential, in the very close future will be Totally accessory. As confirmed in a recent interview Ben Mann, co -founder of Anthropic, academic training and the skills learning is one of those pillars That is changing. Knowledge and skills. Benjamin Mann is one of the “six of Anthropic” a group of engineers who left OpenAi to create their own AI model. Now they are one of The main competitors of his “alma mater“Business. In a recent interview In the podcast From Lenny Rachitsky, the co -founder made it clear that he preferred his children to be happy and kept their curiosity, to pass a good part of their youth acquiring knowledge. “10 or 20 years ago, maybe I would be trying to prepare it to be the best in school and aim it to all extracurricular activities and all that. But at this time, I don’t think that an amount. I just want it to be happy, considered, curious and friendly,” Mann said when talking about his children’s academic training. The titles are overvalued. Despite having abandoned Openai, Mann took with him a common idea in many OpenAi managers and engineers: in the near future marked by AI, university titles They are not guarantee of anything. Mann’s statements go along the same lines asjust a few days agoMark Chen, Openai research leader. The manager assured that“It is less and less necessary to have a doctorate in AI”, even when it came to accessing jobs in AI development. Again, the questions are the key. Mann said he preferred that his children maintain a profile open to experimentation, empathetic and with high doses of curiosity to be studied in an elite school with programs only based on knowledge. Just the same skills that Chen stood out in the profiles he was looking for to incorporate his team. Sam Altman, OpenAi CEO, I summed it up In a much more specific way: “Determining what questions will be more important than knowing the answer.” According to Altman, in a context in which AI can already assume the executive part of tasks such as programming or designing academic training will go to the background, the most decisive part will be how to squeeze the maximum that technology with people who know how to ask questions adequate. AI as an executing arm. The main actors in AI development seem to have reached the consensus that AI, at least in the short term, will have the role of executing arm of human decisions. Such and As I said Jensen Huang during An interviewthat change of roles will make knowledge such as programming less and less relevant to the work world. As Mann mentioned, this approach is totally opposed to that established so far, in which academic training and knowledge acquisition was a fundamental pillar to develop a successful work career. The founder of Anthropic does not even contemplate that possibility for the education of his children, aware that they will develop their career in a labor market conditioned by AI. In that scenario, the truly differential will be to contribute something that still the AI You cannot offer: Creativity and curiosity. In Xataka | Founders of small startups and large technological ones already has something in common: they are millmillonarios thanks to the AI Image | Unspash (Siora Photography), Lenny Rachitsky

Who produced the key matters of the world after World War I, in a 1927 graphics

The end of the Great War He left a totally devastated Europe. France, Italy, the United Kingdom and Germany lost between 25% and 30% of their national wealth and basic agricultural and industrial infrastructure was very damaged. After a first period of recovery just after the end of the war, there was a situation of hyperinflation, monetary depreciation, debt payments to an US that claimed his money and a break in international trade. However, in mid -1920, an economic recovery was lived, and a series of graphics published in 1927 reflects that moment of fleeting splendor just before the Great Depression and of the Second World War. And why not say it, they were a valuable tool if someone with expansionist ideas He threw the glove. Happy twenty years. After the World War IUSA lent money to France and the United Kingdom to rebuild. Germany was punished He pays a rate to those same countries, but when the US claimed the money, the system broke. Germany had no money and France and the United Kingdom needed German funds to pay Americans. However, the Dawes Plan To give a respite to the German economy, so everyone’s debt relaxed and began the “happy twenties.” It was an economic recovery period in which the countries involved reached some stability and, above all, an industrial rebirth. It continued depending on American money and we already know how the decade ended with the breakage of the stock market, but at least allowed European nations to be repurchased in a way. Hickmann Atlas. No levels prior to the Great War were reached, but at least the production and export of raw materials resumed. Beyond Europe, there were many other countries that had been oblivious to the conflict and followed their own path. In 1927, the Austrian publishing house G. Freytag & Berndt published the universal geographical and statistical Atlas of Hickmann. It is a very interesting document because it reflects that panorama of the mid -20s and offers many, many statistics, graphs and maps that are a reflection of the economic and productive state worldwide. We can consult the 80 pages on the web David Rumsey Map Collectionbut from Visual Capitalist They have compiled the most interesting maps in terms of production and raw materials. Land use. The pages dedicated to ‘Produktion’ show precisely that: the most powerful countries in certain types of interesting resources at the time. The first cover the use of the Earth and the graph is divided into: Acherland: Cultivation lands or farmland. Wald: forest. Wieen und Weiden: Praderas and grasslands. Unproduktivland: unproductive land. There are countries like Spain that are very balanced, with large cultivation surfaces and practically identical proportions of the rest, but also striking cases. For example, according to this Atlas, France is the country that, with 56%, more arable land has. They captured that Finland had the largest amount of forests, covering 61% of their territory (in 2021 estimated That was more than 73% and British India was the one that had the most won, followed by the US. And the worst? Norway, with 70% unproductive land. Agricultural production. In Produktion III and IV they focused on land production, and for the Austrians, the US was an agricultural power plant. They were the ones that most wheat, barley, oatmeal and corn produced (by far). The Soviet Union led in Centeno and Germany, obvious, in potato production. Argentina was the second in production of corn and Spain the third in barley. Who had less grain, mattered. Whose? From Argentina, Canada, the United States and Australia, and the great importing countries were the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. As for wine, France was the spearhead, followed by Italy and Spain. In beer, the United Kingdom marked the pattern, followed by Germany. In that graph, Spain does not appear. In other resources such as Café, Brazil is a lot of difference from Colombia, El Salvador, Venezuela or Guatemala. And China also makes an appearance as a power in the production of tea and rice. Textiles and natural resources. As for textiles, it depends a lot on it. The United States led cotton production, followed by the British and China Indies. Japan and China were silk powers; The Soviet Union and the Philippines were of the hemp culture; The USSR and Poland led the linen, and the hops was a thing of Great Britain and the United States. The oil is a barbarity and, perhaps, the fact that puts us most into perspective with what they thought a century ago. In the Atlas, they indicate that the United States produced about 753,000 barrels in 1923. One hundred years later, US production was 21.4 million barrels … a day during the last quarter of 2023. In tobacco, salt, oil, rubber or paper, Spain has little to say, but where it stands out is in Mercury, very close to Italy and a lot of distance from the United States or Mexico. Mining. Produktion VII and VIII reflects the production of metals, gems and minerals, with South Africa leading the production of gold and diamonds and Mexico that of silver. The United Kingdom had the leadership of gas, but the absolute protagonist in the Serurgy after World War I, and something that would be key to the second, was the United States, leading coal, iron and steel. Cataclysm. The photo for some countries was really hopeful, but only two years after the publication of Hickmann Atlas produced The collapse of the NYSE. This caused the bankruptcy of banks, a reduction in production, protectionist measures and a break in international trade. The US was no longer to lend money to anyone, which caused a worldwide deflation. Europe, which was already indebted to the eyebrows, also suffered this recession, devaluing its coins and causing a new crisis. If a new volume of Hickmann’s work had been published years after the great depression, the situation of the graphics would have been very different. There were some visual … Read more

Google TV will give you daily AI summaries of the news that matters most to you

Have Google TV at home, either through the Smart TV itself or a dongle like the new Chromecastallows you to fully access the playback of multimedia content or access the most popular streaming platforms. Google now also wants it to become the user information node with an experience based on the use of generative artificial intelligence. It is already happening in the new Samsung Galaxy S25 that include an assistant on the lock screen to assist the user according to the context of using their mobile or simply give a daily summary of the topics that may interest you the most, such as the news of the day. Access to information is more flexible and what the technology giant wants is for the user to have it available on the devices or accessories they use the most, and one of them is the Smart TV you have in the living room. After making a previous announcement of the new “News Briefs” feature at CES in Las Vegas earlier this year, the technology giant has now announced that it will begin rolling out an experimental feature that is powered by generative artificial intelligence of Gemini. The deployment of its AI seems to have no end and can even be enjoyed through a widget on Google Home to give text summaries of the situation of connected smart devices in the user’s smart home. Google TV 9to5Google The Free Android “News Briefs” It is a feature designed to collect all the new news that arises throughout the day, and with the help of Gemini, its AI, Google TV will be in charge of making a summary of each of them as well as playing videos from them. sources that are related to the context of the news. The video content offered by Google TV through this new function will be extracted mainly from YouTube. The technology giant has given several details about this new feature in the support page: “Using Gemini’s artificial intelligence models and human evaluation, News Briefs presents summaries of the most important news and plays those videos from trusted news sources so that the user has all the information at hand available.” Manuel Ramirez The Free Android The availability of News Brief at the moment it will not be general and Google’s idea is to deploy it to some Google TV users first in their country this week. This new AI-powered news experience will appear on the For You page of Google TV.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.