so that the software still fits on a floppy disk

We have become accustomed to software weighing more and more. We see it in applications that take time to download, in simple tools that come with too many layers and in services that promise convenience in exchange for take up more spaceconsume more resources and depend on more invisible parts. That is why it is striking that, in 2026, when much of the technological conversation revolves around AI and increasingly ambitious systems, there are those who claim an idea that seems to have come from another era. The initiative is called Fits on a Floppy and part of a manifesto published by developer Matt Sephton. Its rule is as simple as it is striking: an application that wants to show off its badge must have a total download size of less than 1.44 MB, the capacity of a classic 3.5-inch floppy disk. The text itself summarizes it with a direct phrase, “the software has lost its way”, but its proposal is not to miss the physical support, but to recover the discipline that was imposed by working within very narrow limits. For a long time, making software was also about giving up. If something was not necessary, was left outbecause memory, storage and user patience had a very visible limit. Then came a different stage: the teams they began to have more margindownloads stopped feeling like an adventure, and the size of an app stopped being a central concern. There a dangerous door began to open. The software has not gained weight by accident Not all of that growth came from adding visible features. Much of it came underneath, in the form of layers that the user does not always see: libraries, engines, update systems, components designed to support more than one version of the same product and dependencies that allow progress to be made faster without solving each problem from scratch. That way of building makes sense in many cases, especially when you want to maintain the same product in several systems. But the scale also changes. This is where the real value of Sephton’s proposal comes in. Fits on a Floppy is not trying to show that everything should be compressed to fit into 1.44 MB, but rather that an artificial restriction can serve to prioritize. If an app is born to solve a specific task, the manifesto asks that it download quickly, start without waiting, consume few resources, be native and avoid unnecessary dependencies. The underlying idea is simple: the less baggage a tool carries, the easier it is to understand what it does, why it does it, and how much it costs to maintain it. The question, then, is whether this discipline can once again have a journey outside the manifesto. In some software, probably yes. We are not talking about browsers, video editors or services with integrated artificial intelligence, but rather small utilities, single-function tools and native applications that often do not need to carry a huge architecture. There Sephton’s argument is stronger: if the objective is limited, the size should also be limited. Not out of nostalgia, but because a simple tool has fewer excuses to behave like a full platform. The other side of the story is that much of the software is not going to get smaller. Many current applications are no longer just a window with a specific function: they integrate accounts, synchronize data, offer real-time collaboration, work on multiple systems and they accumulate functions that were not part of a desktop application years ago. All of this may be justified, but it weighs. That’s why the promise of returning to lightweight software has clear limits. For many products, the real question will not be whether they can fit on a floppy disk, but whether they are growing out of necessity or accumulation. The beauty of the floppy disk, in fact, is that it no longer seems reasonable. Precisely for this reason it forces us to look at the software from another place and ask ourselves if all that weight responds to a real need or to an accumulation that no one dared to review. Fits on a Floppy is not about stopping the evolution of modern tools or denying that many need to be big. Its usefulness lies elsewhere: reminding us that efficiency is also a design decision, and that the size of an application says something about how it was intended. Images | Fernando Lavin In Xataka | iOS 27 doesn’t leave any iPhone behind, but WatchOS 27 can’t say the same with Apple Watches

Stephen Hawking left a hidden treasure that has just been discovered. The problem is that it is in the form of floppy disks

The Cambridge University Library houses several historical treasures including letters from Isaac Newton and notebooks from Charles Darwin. Now they will take care also of manage 113 boxes with documents and memories of the physical Stephen Hawkingbut in those boxes they also found a surprise turned into a challenge: floppy disks. Lots of them. Computer pioneer. The famous physicist was an early user of those first computers in which data was stored on floppy disks. When he suffered from ALS this was a very important resource to be able to communicate and work, and now those disks that have just been discovered could contain all kinds of revealing data about Hawking’s life and work. Future Nostalgia. That’s what it’s called the project of the University of Cambridge and its library that precisely tries to safeguard all that information that in the past ended up being stored on floppy disks. Recovering such data is not easy when so much time has passed, and this project tries to educate about the best ways to preserve said information and transfer or recover it from those floppy disks. A format with an expiration date. Although one would think that floppy disks are a more secure way to store data than paper and ink, this physical medium also has clear disadvantages. The iron oxide covering the thin layer of plastic can degrade and lose its magnetic capabilities, meaning data could be lost forever. Each floppy disk is a world. With old books there are not too many problems when it comes to retrieving the information: you open them and read them (if you understand the language, of course). With floppy disks you need the hardware to be able to read them—a compatible disk drive—and also figure out how they are formatted. Leontien Talboom, responsible for this project, explained How to also clean those floppy disks was complex and there were various methods that they were exploring. These included the use of hand soap or isopropyl alcohol. Hawking used both a PC and a Mac. The disks arrived at the project in two batches. The first, with five and a quarter (5.25 inch) disks formatted on an MS-DOS based PC. The second, with three and a half disks, somewhat more recent and that were still used on an old Mac. According to Talboom, they are mainly talks that Hawking gave: “from a technical point of view they are really interesting because his talks were so big that he had to divide them into several floppy disks.” I wrote to speak. Hawking’s illness left him unable to speak for himself, so for years he used various voice synthesizers to express his ideas. Precisely for this reason he wrote so much on the computer and saved those documents on disk: this allowed him to use them later so that his synthesized voice could read said documents. Different discs, different readers. Although 5.25″ and especially 3.5″ discs were the most widespread, other formats were also seen such as eight inch discs which for example were used in the Churchill Archives Centre. Chris Knowles, one of the Future Nostalgia participants, explained how he bought a player for these discs on eBay. “It was a miracle that it worked,” but that allowed him to recover the information from those disks. Forgotten formats. They have also received some three-inch floppy disks, a much less widespread and peculiar format that had some success in the United Kingdom before the 3.5″ format was clearly imposed. To recover them, they ended up using an old reader manufactured by Amstrad that they had to modify to bring it back to life. And then there’s the software problem.. The information recovered from these disks can also pose another challenge: that it was created with software that was abandoned and even ended up disappearing. Some disks, for example, had documents written with a missing word processor called Diamond Word. That’s where a kind of “translation” comes into play to convert those files into something readable in the current era. Safeguarding our past. This work demonstrates how critical it is to try to protect and recover information from these old formats. Many of those floppy disks are 40 or 50 years old, and as Knowles says, “old emails and work calendars may not look like historical documents. They might seem banal. But they’re what Newton’s or Darwin’s letters would have looked like 200 years ago. Now they are fascinating documents that open a window to the past.” In Xataka | The 20 most important personal computers in the history of technology

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.