Federal authorities confiscate machinery that processs 160,000 daily fentanyl pills

Machinery for processing 160,000 daily fentanyl pills is part of the smuggling merchandise seized in the Los Angeles/Long Beach port complex. Next to the Los Angeles Maritime Museum, the interim federal prosecutor of the Department of Justice, Joseph T. McNally announced the arrest of eight individuals: four of Chinese origin and four Latinos who were part of a sophisticated network of smugglers. The main leader is a fugitive and is speculated that he hides in China. The specific figures associated with the alleged criminals were: $ 130 million in smuggling seized and $ 200 million in smuggling goods attributed to the defendants, including counterfeit goods and chemical precursors to produce narcotics and machinery to produce fentanyl pills. At present, the authorities have seized more than $ 1.3 billion in counterfeit products associated with this type of smuggling and other similar schemes of stamps. Container surveillance is extreme in the Los Angeles/Long Beach port complex. Credit: Jorge Luis Macías | IMPREMEDIA Cloned seal The criminal plan fell apart in 2023 when a Customs Agriculture and Border Protection (CBP) specialist in a routine review detected that the seal of a container had been cloned. This prevented the detection of smuggling merchandise from the containers arriving at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The original seal was found within the container that the worker was inspecting. “This case attests to its unwavering surveillance, maximum professionalism and great focus on protecting the integrity of legal trade, a key component of our critical national security mission,” said Cheryl Davies, director of Customs field operations and border protection of USA. Davies informed that, among the smuggling seized were substances, controlled, chemical precursors, weapons, spare parts for weapons, false postcards, currency and falsified consumption products, drug paraphernalia and more than 220 tons of prohibited plant and animal products. Customs Office and Border Protection staff were present.Credit: Jorge Luis Macías | IMPREMEDIA Shipments also contained several capsules filling machines, which can be used in the production of illicit chemicals. “To import a machine for encapsulating pills, a permission from the US drug administration (DEA) is needed,” Jaime Ruiz, Customs spokesman and border protection of the United States (CBP) told La Opinion. “They are large, automatic and similar machines; When they are smuggled, they have a potential capacity to produce between 160,000 and 190,000 fentanyl pills daily. ” Order forces also intercepted around 50 falsified stamps and made 204 seizures, including controlled substances and prohibited items. The band of alleged criminals hired $ 300 or up to $ 10,000 to truck drivers to transport smuggling items. Thus, the investigations will be extended to the drivers of tractocamiones that were probably involved in the distribution of merchandise. There could be more arrests. “The message for these people who abuse their position of trust and for truckers in the port, is that if they participate in this behavior (to get involved in smuggling), they could go to a federal prison,” said prosecutor Joseph T . “There are real consequences for them if they participate in smuggling and for those who organize fraud,” he added. “We will detect this behavior, we will process them and face important sanctions in the federal judicial system.” Jaime Ruiz is a spokesman for the Office of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).Credit: Jorge Luis Macíás | IMPREMEDIA McNally said that truckers will not be able to argue that they did not know that the load they transported was not illegal. “The truckers were not innocent. The accusation alleges that these individuals participated consciously and voluntarily in the plan. ” In the investigation that began since 2023, in addition to the Federal Prosecutor of the United States of Los Angeles, agents of National Security Investigations (HSI), Customs and Border Protection of the United States (CBP), and the investigation services of investigation of The Coast Guard. The investigation began since 2023 The joint operation of order forces is part of an operation of the anti -drug work group against organized crime (OECTF). Federal Prison If they are convicted of all charges, those accused of a federal large jury would face a maximum legal sentence of five years in federal prison for each position of conspiracy, up to 10 years in federal prison for each charge of breaking customs stamps and up to 20 years Prison for each smuggling position. Seven defendants were arrested on Friday, an eighth was arrested on Saturday night and a defendant is fugitive. Seven of those arrested have already been prosecuted in the United States District Court. Each of them declared innocent of the charges against him and for March 18 the date of the trial is scheduled. If they are convicted of all charges, the defendants would face a maximum legal sentence of five years in federal prison for each conspiracy charge, up to 10 years in federal prison for each charge of breaking customs seals and up to 20 years in prison for each smuggling . Change of stamps According to the accusation, Weijun Zheng, Hexi Wang, Jin “Mark” Liu and others maintained and operated stores to store, hide and sell large amounts of smuggling goods that were illegally imported to the United States from China. When smuggling containers were selected by the United States Customs and Border Protection Office (CBP) for inspection, the defendants hired commercial truck drivers to transport containers from the port of Los Angeles to private warehouses controlled by conspirators , including stores in the city of Industry that were controlled or managed by Zheng, Wang and others. In these places, the accomplices broke the safety stamps of the shipping containers and took the smuggling from the interior. Then, they placed false security stamps on the containers to hide that they had removed the load of them. Subsequently, Zheng, Wang and others ordered their accomplices to transport the containers (after emptying them from much of their original load and securing them with false seals) to places authorized by the CBP so that the rest of the … Read more

Trump fired nearly all inspectors general at major federal agencies

The president donald trump fired the independent inspectors general of more than a dozen federal agencies in an unprecedented purge held on Friday night. The decision paved the way for Trump to install his loyalists in the crucial role of Identify fraud, waste and abuse in government. The only Cabinet-level inspectors general who were spared were those at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice. The Washington Post was the first to report the layoffs. An Inspector General conducts investigations and audits into possible irregularities, fraud, waste, or abuse by a government agency or its personnel, and issues reports and recommendations on his or her findings. The Inspector General’s office is intended to operate independently. The layoffs appear to violate federal law, which requires Congress to receive 30 days’ notice of any intention to fire a Senate-confirmed inspector general. Legal uncertainty could create uncomfortable encounters on Monday, when several watchdogs who were informed they had been fired planned to report to their offices for work anyway. The chairman of the Board of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency questioned the White House action in a letter to Gor late Friday, cited by The Washington Post. “I recommend that you contact the White House legal counsel to discuss the course of action you intend to follow. At this time, we do not believe that the actions taken are legally sufficient to remove the Presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed Inspectors General,” wrote Hannibal “Mike” Ware, inspector general of the Small Business Administration and acting inspector general of the Social Security Administration. Democratic lawmakers criticized the firings, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer calling the move “a chilling purge” and warning that the firings could usher in “a golden age of government abuses, and even corruption.” . Keep reading:· They wish death to bishop who asked Trump for mercy for immigrants and LGBTQ people· Trump argues in public with the mayor of Los Angeles over her management of the wildfires· Trump continues to sign executive orders with big changes in government

US House approves immigration detention law that could be the first that Trump enacts

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday gave final approval to a bill that requires the detention of migrants who are in the country without permission and who have been accused of theft and violent crimes, the first measure that President Donald Trump can enact it, after Congress—with some bipartisan support—moved quickly in line with the president’s plans to toughen measures against illegal immigration. The passage of the Laken Riley Act, named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered last year by a Venezuelan, shows how dramatically the political debate over immigration has shifted to the right following Trump’s election victory. . Immigration policy has often been one of the most entrenched issues in Congress, but a crucial group of 46 politically vulnerable Democrats joined Republicans to pass the strict proposal by a vote count of 263 in favor and 156 against. . “For decades, it has been nearly impossible for our government to agree on solutions to problems at our border and within our country,” said Republican Senator Katie Britt. He noted that it is likely to be the “most significant immigration bill” that Congress has passed in nearly three decades. However, the bill will require a massive increase in the capabilities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but does not include any new funding. Meanwhile, the new president has issued a series of executive orders aimed at sealing the border with Mexico to immigration and ultimately deporting millions of migrants who lack permanent legal status in the United States. On Wednesday, Trump also canceled refugee resettlement and his administration has said it intends to prosecute local law enforcement officials who do not comply with his new immigration policies. Republican congressional leaders have made clear that they intend to follow the same path, although their biggest challenge will be finding a way to approve funding to actually implement Trump’s strict plans. “What he’s doing is starting what will ultimately be our legislative agenda,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson. House Republicans initially passed the legislation last year with the support of 37 Democrats in a move intended as a political rebuke to then-President Joe Biden’s handling of the southern border. He then languished in the Democratic-controlled Senate. This year, Republicans, now in control of both houses of Congress, have made this their top priority. When it came before the Senate, 12 Democrats voted in favor of the measure, and when the House voted on a version of the bill earlier this month, 48 Democrats supported it. A majority of adults in the United States favor deporting immigrants convicted of violent crimes, according to a recent poll by the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and The Associated Press. However, only about 37% of U.S. adults favor deporting migrants in the country illegally who have not been convicted of a crime. “While the bill is not perfect, it sends a clear message that we think criminals should be deported,” said Rep. Tom Suozzi, a New York Democrat who has urged his party to support stricter enforcement of the law. immigration law. Under the bill, federal authorities would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes such as shoplifting. The scope of the proposal was expanded in the Senate to also include those accused of assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or cause the death of someone. The bill also gives state attorneys general standing to sue the federal government for damages caused by federal immigration decisions. This gives states new power in immigration policy when they have already been trying to counter presidential decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations. Democrats unsuccessfully tried to have that provision removed from the bill in the Senate, saying it would inject even more uncertainty and partisanship into immigration policy. Ultimately, even the Trump administration will likely struggle to implement the new requirements unless Congress follows up later this year with funding. Republicans are currently planning how to push their priorities through Congress through a party-line process known as budget reconciliation. They have estimated the cost of funding Trump’s border and deportation priorities at approximately $100 billion. Trump has “established the largest domestic logistics undertaking of our lifetimes, which is the deportation of the majority of aliens who are in the United States illegally,” said Ken Cuccinelli, who led U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Trump’s first term, to a Senate panel recently. Cuccinelli noted that it would require an increase in immigration judges, prosecutors and other staff, but Trump has also paved the way for using military assets, bases and other resources to carry out mass deportations. The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that the Laken Riley Act would cost $26.9 billion in the first year to implement, including an increase of 110,000 ICE detention beds. Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill as evidence that it is a piecemeal approach that would do little to fix problems in the immigration system but would burden federal authorities with new requirements. “The authors of the bill stated that it would result in the arrest and detention of dangerous criminals, but it will not because it is a completely unfunded mandate,” said Democratic Senator Chris Murphy. Others expressed concerns that the bill would deprive migrants, including minors or beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, of due process rights. Senator Alex Padilla said federal authorities would now be forced to prioritize detaining migrants arrested for minor crimes such as shoplifting, rather than those who commit serious crimes. Overall, there is no evidence that migrants are more likely to commit violent crimes. Several studies have found that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than those born in the United States. Groups that advocate for restrictive immigration policies dispute or dismiss those findings. But Republicans pointed to the bill’s namesake, Laken Riley, and how she was murdered by a Venezuelan migrant who had previously been arrested by local authorities but released while his … Read more

Huntington Beach was declared “non-sanctuary” and its authorities will comply with federal policies

The coastal city of Huntington Beachin Californiasharpened his confrontation with the state when The local government adopted a resolution declaring the city “a non-sanctuary city for illegal immigration in order to prevent crime.” Huntington Beach has an ongoing lawsuit against California sanctuary state lawwhich limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities, citing a high recidivism rate of illegal immigrants with active detentions by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that are supposed to result in transfers and deportations. In a statementMayor Pat Burns’ office confirmed that the city council voted unanimously to approve his initiative to declare the city a “Non-Sanctuary City” and that that provision took effect immediately. The resolution, according to Burns’ office, “deliberately circumvents the governor’s efforts to subvert the good work of federal immigration authorities and trumpet the city’s cooperation with the federal government, the Trump administration and the work of border czar Tom Homan ”according to the statement. “City officials have a duty to comply with all laws, including federal immigration laws, and neither the Governor nor the State will interfere with that.” Criticism of the Huntington Beach decision The Harbor Institute for Immigrant & Economic Justice published the following statement in response to the Huntington Beach City Council’s declaration of a “non-sanctuary city” and the lawsuit filed by the local government against the state’s sanctuary law, the California Securities Act (SB 54, 2017). “Federal and California courts have already ruled that the state’s sanctuary law is constitutional and that Huntington Beach must respect the rule of law. In 2020, the United States Supreme Court also refused to hear challenges against him. The Huntington Beach City Council’s challenge to state law is purely performative and will be defeated again. The hate circus led by Huntington Beach politicians does nothing to improve the quality of life or public safety in the city.” And he goes on to say that instead of confronting the day-to-day problems that city government must solve, “politicians are wasting their energy blaming immigrant and refugee neighbors, undermining sanctuary policies that have been shown to reduce crime, and attacking protections.” constitutional due process provisions in our sanctuary state law, which have withstood numerous legal challenges in recent years.” Keep reading:‘ Huntington Beach defines its position as a “non-sanctuary city”· David Chiu, San Francisco prosecutor, will confront Trump to defend the Sanctuary city· Councilors approve that Los Angeles be a Sanctuary City

US House approves immigration detention law that could be the first that Trump enacts

WASHINGTON— The US House of Representatives on Wednesday gave final approval to a bill that requires the detention of migrants who are in the country without permission and who have been accused of theft and violent crimes, the first measure that President Donald Trump can enact it, after Congress—with some bipartisan support—moved quickly in line with the president’s plans to toughen measures against illegal immigration. The passage of the Laken Riley Act, named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered last year by a Venezuelan, shows how dramatically the political debate over immigration has shifted to the right following Trump’s election victory. . Immigration policy has often been one of the most entrenched issues in Congress, but a crucial group of 46 politically vulnerable Democrats joined Republicans to pass the strict proposal by a vote count of 263 in favor and 156 against. . “For decades, it has been nearly impossible for our government to agree on solutions to problems at our border and within our country,” said Republican Senator Katie Britt. He noted that it is likely to be the “most significant immigration bill” that Congress has passed in nearly three decades. However, the bill will require a massive increase in the capabilities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but does not include any new funding. Meanwhile, the new president has issued a series of executive orders aimed at sealing the border with Mexico to immigration and ultimately deporting millions of migrants who lack permanent legal status in the United States. On Wednesday, Trump also canceled refugee resettlement and his administration has said it intends to prosecute local law enforcement officials who do not comply with his new immigration policies. Republican congressional leaders have made clear that they intend to follow the same path, although their biggest challenge will be finding a way to approve funding to actually implement Trump’s strict plans. “What he’s doing is starting what will ultimately be our legislative agenda,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson. House Republicans initially passed the legislation last year with the support of 37 Democrats in a move intended as a political rebuke to then-President Joe Biden’s handling of the southern border. He then languished in the Democratic-controlled Senate. This year, Republicans, now in control of both houses of Congress, have made this their top priority. When it came before the Senate, 12 Democrats voted in favor of the measure, and when the House voted on a version of the bill earlier this month, 48 Democrats supported it. A majority of adults in the United States favor deporting immigrants convicted of violent crimes, according to a recent poll by the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and The Associated Press. However, only about 37% of U.S. adults favor deporting migrants in the country illegally who have not been convicted of a crime. “While the bill is not perfect, it sends a clear message that we think criminals should be deported,” said Rep. Tom Suozzi, a New York Democrat who has urged his party to support stricter enforcement of the law. immigration law. Under the bill, federal authorities would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes such as shoplifting. The scope of the proposal was expanded in the Senate to also include those accused of assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or cause the death of someone. The bill also gives state attorneys general standing to sue the federal government for damages caused by federal immigration decisions. This gives states new power in immigration policy when they have already been trying to counter presidential decisions under the Trump and Biden administrations. Democrats unsuccessfully tried to have that provision removed from the bill in the Senate, saying it would inject even more uncertainty and partisanship into immigration policy. Ultimately, even the Trump administration will likely struggle to implement the new requirements unless Congress follows up later this year with funding. Republicans are currently planning how to push their priorities through Congress through a party-line process known as budget reconciliation. They have estimated the cost of funding Trump’s border and deportation priorities at approximately $100 billion. Trump has “established the largest domestic logistics undertaking of our lifetimes, which is the deportation of the majority of aliens who are in the United States illegally,” said Ken Cuccinelli, who led U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Trump’s first term, to a Senate panel recently. Cuccinelli noted that it would require an increase in immigration judges, prosecutors and other staff, but Trump has also paved the way for using military assets, bases and other resources to carry out mass deportations. The Department of Homeland Security has estimated that the Laken Riley Act would cost $26.9 billion in the first year to implement, including an increase of 110,000 ICE detention beds. Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill as evidence that it is a piecemeal approach that would do little to fix problems in the immigration system but would burden federal authorities with new requirements. “The authors of the bill stated that it would result in the arrest and detention of dangerous criminals, but it will not because it is a completely unfunded mandate,” said Democratic Senator Chris Murphy. Others expressed concerns that the bill would deprive migrants, including minors or beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, of due process rights. Senator Alex Padilla said federal authorities would now be forced to prioritize detaining migrants arrested for minor crimes such as shoplifting, rather than those who commit serious crimes. Overall, there is no evidence that migrants are more likely to commit violent crimes. Several studies have found that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than those born in the United States. Groups that advocate for restrictive immigration policies dispute or dismiss those findings. But Republicans pointed to the bill’s namesake, Laken Riley, and how she was murdered by a Venezuelan migrant who had previously been arrested by local authorities but released while … Read more

Trump orders federal diversity, equity and inclusion employees to be placed on leave

One night after Donald Trump signed an executive order eliminating the federal government’s diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, The president ordered that all employees in that area be placed on paid leave starting Wednesday. Thus, the new administration sent a letter to all heads and acting heads of government agencies, informing them that All federal employees on DEI duty must be placed on paid leave by 5 p.m. Wednesday. This comes as agencies prepare to close all DEI-related offices and programs and delete all websites and social media accounts for those offices. It also calls on federal agencies to submit a written plan by Jan. 31 to lay off employees. As reported by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, “President Trump campaigned on ending the scourge of DEI from our federal government and returning America to a merit-based society where people based on their abilities, not the color of their skin.” “This is another victory for Americans of all races, religions and creeds. “Promises made, promises kept,” he said. Different media outlets highlighted that after signing the anti-DEI executive order this week, Trump fired the leader of the US Coast Guard, Admiral Linda Fagan, the first woman to lead one of the branches of the US Armed Forces. According to Fox News, the new government’s decision is due to an “erosion of trust” in Fagan due to issues related to border security or recruitment. However, critics say the dismissal came from concerns about his obsession with politics. DEI. Fagan, according to the same network, made diversity, equity and inclusion policies a priority, the same ones that the new Trump Executive has proposed to end. Keep reading: • Trump announces firing of four high-profile officials, including chef José Andrés• Jill Biden defines Donald Trump as “a dangerous bully for the LGBTQ community”• Attorneys general from 18 states sue to stop Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Trump orders federal workers back to office or threatens layoffs

In one of his first actions as president of the United States, Donald Trump issued an executive order ending remote work for all federal employees, a measure aimed at reducing the federal workforce through attrition. The White House directed all US government departments and agencies in the executive branch to end remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work full time. Department heads may exempt some workers from this requirement, but in very specific cases. The executive order was one of multiple directives aimed at the 2.3 million-person federal workforce that, along with the return-to-the-office mandate, includes a hiring freeze, revamped hiring rules and other measures to make it more easy to fire high-level career employees. The White House said the measures were necessary to limit what Trump and his supporters consider a “deep state” that fought against his actions during the president’s first term. “There have been numerous well-documented cases of career federal officials resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership.”states one of the executive orders signed by the president on Monday night “Therefore, the principles of good administration require that measures be taken to restore accountability to career officials,” he continues. According to the Office of Management and Budget, about 1.1 million federal civilian employees, that is, 46% of the civilian workforce, were eligible for some form of teleworking. Of those, approximately 228,000 workers, or 10% of the total workforce, had fully remote positions with no obligation to go to an office. Union reaction The return-to-office directive is expected to face a fight from federal unions, some of which have remote work written into their contracts. A union representing government workers criticized the mandate as representing a return to the patronage system thatthat oversaw the federal workforce until the end of the 19th century. “Every American has a stake in ensuring that federal employees remain free to carry out the mission of the agencies that employ them without fear of political interference,” Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. (AFGE), which represents 800,000 workers in the federal government and the government of the District of Columbia. Kelly, whose union represents employees of the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies, also called Trump’s directives “a blatant attempt to corrupt the government.” federal law by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.” The National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit against the president’s “Schedule F” executive order, a directive that makes it easier for the Trump administration to fire career government employees. Trump’s order is “contrary to the intent of Congress,” according to the complaint filed Monday night in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Keep reading: • Vivek Ramaswamy gives up his mission to try to save the government millions of dollars• Trump sets a date for charging 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada• Trump’s insistence on increasing defense spending to 5% worries NATO

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.