We have turned WhatsApp into an “emotional pacifier”. And science warns that it is making us more fragile

A message sent, a double check blue and, suddenly, silence. In that period of time, which can last minutes or days, the stomach shrinks. The immediate reaction for many is instinctive: unlock the screen of the smartphoneimmersing yourself in social media, sending looping messages seeking solace. We have turned our devices into an “emotional pacifier” to calm the anxiety of “not knowing.” In an era where hyperconnection promises us instant answers, science and psychology issue a clear warning: our inability to tolerate uncertainty is making us increasingly fragile. The brain in the face of chaos. To understand what happens to us, we have to look at our biology. As psychologist Regina López Riego explainsour brain is evolutionarily designed to look for patterns and make sense of everything around us. “This was key to our survival as a species: identifying threats and anticipating dangers,” he says. However, in today’s world, that need for certainty translates into constant suffering. The problem is that we live in a universe governed by entropy. From the team of Nalu Psychology remember thatbased on chaos theory and thermodynamics, systems tend toward disorder. “The future is uncertain and, one way or another, we deal with it as best we can,” they explain. When changes threaten, fear takes center stage, alerting us to possible danger. To mitigate that fear, we resort to a patch: control. However, it is a trap. The brain processes the symptoms of anxiety in the same way that it relates to uncertainty, releasing large amounts of norepinephrine that affect our nervous system. The more we try to tie down the future, the more discomfort we generate. The trap of overthinking. When the mind has no data, it invents it. The psychologist Marta Valle In his blog he explains that overthinking not as a lack of intelligence, but as a failed protection mechanism born of fear of error and low tolerance for uncertainty. It manifests itself in two ways: ruminating on the past or worrying in anticipation about the future. “You think that if you think about it enough, you will avoid a problem,” he details, but the end result is paralysis, insomnia and disconnection from the present. Experts from Harvard Mental Health Services (CAMHS) They have a name for this phenomenon: “toxic time travel.” Dr. Rue Wilson, a psychologist at this institution, describes how we try to feel in control by imagining different outcomes. “We get stuck ruminating, overwhelmed by ‘what ifs,’ and disconnected from the present, which is where we really have the most certainty.” Feed a bigger monster. This loop ends in what psychologist Laura Marín defines as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)where concern is constant and fueled by overestimating the risks. Marín illustrates this with a clear example: two women, Alicia and Brenda, undergo a medical test. While Alicia asks whatever is necessary and continues with her daily life, Brenda compulsively searches for information on the Internet and needs her partner to continually reassure her. It is the so-called “reinsurance search”. Checking emails, postponing decisions or constantly asking for opinions are strategies that give false relief in the short term, but in the long run make us unable to tolerate the slightest doubt. The cell phone as an escape route. The need to escape from uncertainty has found in smartphones your best ally, but at a high cost for mental health. Rigorous research supports this claim. In a couple of published studies in the scientific journal Science Direct (led by Jon D. Elhai and colleagues in 2017), it was demonstrated through systematic reviews that the severity of depression and anxiety are strongly linked to problematic mobile phone use. One of the most revealing findings of Elhai’s research differentiates between “social” use of the phone (messaging, networks) and “process” use (consumption of news, entertainment, scroll passive). The study found that anxiety is much more related to process use than social use. That is, people with anxiety use the non-social functions of their devices as an avoidance mechanism (such as doomscrolling or addictive consumption of news) to avoid facing stress, this “use of process” being the direct bridge to mobile addiction. In fact, Dr. Leigh W. Jerome warns precisely about this habit. In the face of global chaos, doomscrolling It does not prepare us for the future, but “can cause headaches, muscle tension, high blood pressure, and difficulty sleeping.” Leon Garber, mental health counselor, adds a vital reflection on compulsive doubt avoidance: “Avoidance, in and of itself, is not negative (…) but imagine how many missed opportunities for growth or connection, over time, add up to a lost relationship.” Garber points out that even therapy has a limit if the patient is only seeking definitive answers. “We have to learn to live with uncertainty. Fundamentally, we have to learn to live,” he says. The trap of the hyperconnected world. The desire for certainties not only affects the individual, but shapes our society. An analysis published in The Conversation reminds us thatAccording to Maslow’s pyramid, security is a primary need. However, the obsession with eliminating all risks has a dark side. “There are desires that should not be fulfilled and that of radical security is a desire that can never and should never be satisfied,” the article underlines. Trying to control everything, whether through algorithms, surveillance cameras or the transfer of freedoms, strips us of our humanity and leads us to voluntary servitude. Instead of delegating control to technology to avoid panic, experts advocate a “pedagogy of responsibility”, appealing to the values ​​of Kant and Rousseau, where we assume that zero risk does not exist. How to inhabit the void. Since uncertainty is inevitable, the solution is not to find all the answers, but to change our relationship with the questions. According to institutions such as Harvard CAMHS and diverse psychology professionalsthere are four keys to navigate the uncontrollable: Focus on what you control: challenge the illusion of absolute certainty. If you lose your job, you can’t control when you’ll be hired, but you … Read more

Generation Z lists their emotional crises and turns them into infographics

We recently described the Wrapped that have been born in the shadow of Spotify as real monstersand no wonder: companies in principle so barely linked to the recreational use that we give to Spotify, such as Linkedin or Wetransfer, reminding us that during the year, essentially, we have worked more than necessary. But summaries of the year, made by individuals and seen with a little irony and constructive criticism, can be very good. And so we come to the Crying Wrapped or summaries of crying of the year. #llanterawrapped. On TikTok, thousands of users (mostly Generation Z girls) are documenting all the tantrums they’ve had during the year. He hashtag #cryingwrappedand also #crywrapped They accumulate millions of views with videos that present, in PowerPoint presentation format or Spotify-style infographics, personal statistics on how many times they cried in 2025 (and also the year before), where they did it, at what time of day, what caused it and what their “highlight crying episodes of the year” were. Gloriously detailed. The categories include “crying due to personal relationships”, “crying in the office bathroom”, “crying while driving”, “crying caused by episodes of series”, or even rankings of songs that generated the most tears, because (and this is the important thing) we are not facing a list of misfortunes, but rather a fun and original form of emotional overexposure. There are bar graphs with the monthly evolution of the crises, others identify their “peak month of crying”… Following in the wake of the mythical viral video of user @rachel_ginterthis trend turns suffering into gamified content, making vulnerability hide behind the corporate and mechanical language of viral videos and power points. The Wrapped phenomenon. In 2016, Spotify launched its first Wrappedan experiment that would end up redefining how digital brands interact with their users. The streaming platform took the millions of listening data from each user (artists, songs, genres, total minutes) and transformed them into a visual narrative, designed to function as content on social networks. The result was remarkable: in 2024 More than 2 million people already expressed the desire for the feature to arrive in early November, almost two weeks before its official launch. The key to success, as Sprinklr tells it, lies in having converted individual information into “shareable entertainment based on personal data.” Wrapped not only reflects musical tastes: it is a statement of identity, and Spotify understood that, at the same time as giving it the attack on physical formatsunderstood that sharing music has always been a social act. Epidemic Wrapped. Spotify’s success created a domino effect that has transformed December into the month of personalized digital digests. Letterboxd, Duolingo, Reddit, Hulu, all the block streaming services… until the users themselves decided to start creating their own summaries. With Google Sheets, Canva templates to design infographics and apps like Notion To document each crying episode, these users have built emotional monitoring systems. And with this, they have turned Wrapped into viral language. The reality after the tantrum. Behind this epidemic of crying (funny because they themselves take it as a joke, of course), there is a not so funny reality: we are facing a generation going through a mental health crisis without historical precedent. He McKinsey Health Institute global study with more than 42,000 respondents in 26 countries revealed that 18% of Generation Z rate their mental health as poor or very poor. And to this is added that Gen Z’s relationship with social networks is deeply paradoxical: the same study says that this generation is the most likely to report negative effects of the use of digital platforms, but simultaneously more than half identify benefits such as self-expression and social connectivity. The same apps that fuel toxicity and anxiety are also spaces for identity and community construction. Humor as therapy. This is interesting UCLA analysis of dark humor on TikTokwhich analyzed hundreds of comments on videos about trauma, grief and existential crises, and came to the conclusion that for Generation Z these jokes function as “language of solidarity.” They do not trivialize suffering: they make it bearable by laughing at it. While the millennials Using sarcasm to create distance, Gen Z mixes irony with sincerity, adopting a confessional style that embraces vulnerability. But there is a dark side to this mechanism: this analysis explains that there is a fine line between humor as catharsis and the normalization of destructive thought patterns. Cry Wrapped operates exactly in that ambiguity: emotional processing or transformation of suffering into social capital? In Xataka | Someone believes that part of Drake’s 37 billion Spotify streams are fake. And it’s impossible to know

Spain has an antidote to mental and emotional exhaustion: the nap

In Spain, the tradition of the siesta has long been a cultural habit. However, today science claims it as a valuable resource to combat mental and emotional exhaustion. Different studies show that a well-planned nap not only helps you regain energy, but also improves cognitive functions and mood, something especially useful in times when stress and fatigue are the order of the day. Therefore, napping is an effective strategy to maintain active and balanced mind throughout the day. A mental reset called a nap The importance of the nap lies in its ability to refresh the brain and body, allowing people to face their daily tasks with better spirits and concentration, as highlighted a study from the University of Coruña. A quality nap increases energy, alertness and relaxation after rest. Improves concentration, memory and logical reasoning, promoting better performance in activities that require attention and mental speed. Besides, helps stabilize moodreduces impulsivity and makes it easier to calmly handle the frustrating tasks that often appear during the day. The scientific evidence indicate that even very short naps of just six minutes can be effective in improving sleep. processing of ideaswhile longer naps help consolidate long-term memories. For the nap to be effective, its ideal duration this between 15 and 30 minutesenough time for the brain to recover its capacity, but without entering phases of deep sleep that could cause drowsiness when waking up. Likewise, the best time to take a nap is between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., a time that coincides with a natural drop in energy during the day. If the nap lasts too long or takes place after three in the afternoon, it can negatively affect nighttime sleep, generating insomnia or a phenomenon known as “sleep inertia“, which consists of a feeling of drowsiness and difficulty reactivating after rest. Additionally, if naps become frequent and long without any noticeable improvement in performance when you wake up, it could be indicative of a sleep disorder underlying that should be evaluated by a professional. The nap is a break, not a substitute It is essential to clarify that the nap should in no case replace the need to sleep between seven and nine hours a nightsince this night rest is essential to maintain good general health and ensure efficient recovery, something that is only achieved when the brain reaches certain phases of sleep. “Sleeping well is much more than the time you spend in bed. The first is the number of hours you sleep. The second is the quality of sleep: having restful, uninterrupted sleep. The last is a regular sleep schedule,” assures Dr. Marishka Brown, sleep expert at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Not all people experience the same benefits of nap; The effects may vary depending on individual factors such as lifestyle and health. When you rely too much on long naps to compensate for fatigue, could be a symptom of health problems that require medical attention. In fact, some studies indicate that prolonged naps they associate in certain cases with metabolic problems such as obesity, although a direct causality has not been confirmed, but rather other factors related to lifestyle intervene. In Xataka | Sleeping in 90-minute cycles seemed like a magical solution to wake up like a rose: science doesn’t think the same Image | Pexels (Kaboompics.com)

His commitment to emotional computing goes much further

There is something very interesting happening in Apple. The most hermetic company in the technology industry, that of the permanent secretism, He is publicly showing his advances in robotics. It is no accident. Apple published a video ago showing a suspiciously similar robotic lamp to Luxo, that of Pixar, which moves with surprisingly human gestures. It is not a product, but a research project. The mere fact that they show it is a good sign of where the company is directed. While Google, Microsoft and Openai are competing for creating the best conversational, Apple seems to be betting on something very different. Something we could call “emotional computing”in the “spatial computing” line with which it designates the Vision Pro. Apple does not want you to talk to your digital assistant, but you feel it as a partner. It is a very Apple movement. It is the company that humanized domestic computers (ASA, typefaces, the iconic “hello” manuscript). It is the company that turned the mobile phone into something intimate and personal. It is the company that now wants to humanize AI. And does it in its own way: through design, movement and nonverbal expression. Apple’s robotic lamp is not Alexa with arms. It is something more subtle and deep: An expressive computing exercise that demonstrates that machines can also transmit emotions without words, only with movements of a very concrete style. Pixar taught us (by the way, bought and driven by Steve Jobs) with Luxo: there is no need for a face to have personality. The strategy makes a lot of sense: It clearly differs from competition. They are creating the best chatbot, Apple wants to create the first really empathic robot. Play with Apple’s historical forces: human-machine design and interaction. You can solve the biggest problem of the current AI: its inherent coldness. He Timing It is also important. Apple does not expect to launch its first robotic product until 2026 at best, probably later, As Mark Gurman anticipated months ago And now he has endorsed Ming Chi Kuo in X. Why shows your cards now? Surely for attracting proper talent, but also because they prepare a cultural change. The massive adoption of domestic robots VAA require not only oootro spending, but also a deep change in our way of thinking about technology in our homes. It is not just functionality, it is a matter of trust, of emotional comfort. It is a bet that is not risk -free. The consumer can reject the idea that a robot simulates emotions. Privacy concerns will be there. And the cost of these devices, especially in the first waves, will be prohibitive. But if a company can get it, it is Apple. They did it with the iPhone turning something that seemed science fiction in an indispensable part of our life. Since then, despite successes of a certain size (Airpods, Apple Watch), he has been asking him to replicate him. Apple sure that you can build expressive robots convincingly, but an even more important part is missing: That we are ready to let the machines not only enter our house, but make us feel an emotional bond. That can be much more difficult to get to put the bug at home. In Xataka | The decline of the “Apple culture”. Blind devotion has evolved towards critical enthusiasm Outstanding image | Apple, Xataka with Mockuuuups Studio

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.