There have never been more salmon in the world. It’s time we declare them a threatened species

Last year, global production of farmed Atlantic salmon amounted to 3.12 million tonnes. That amount is 8,000 times the catch of wild salmon and it is logical: to the extent that aquaculture has become the “pretty girl” of the fishing industry, these are not good times for wild salmon. And no, it is not something that only affects the cold waters of the Norwegian fjords. In Spain, in 2024, only 130 copies were sealed. He all-time low since control of the Asturian rivers began in 1949. And lthe situation is going to get worse. Why is it going to get worse? The reason it’s not obvious. When we talk about this problem, the first intuition is to think that it is a simple question of ‘attention’. Before we needed to take care of wild salmon habitats to ensure we could catch them. Now that aquaculture has made the wild supply dispensable, the incentives to maintain it have disappeared. But, in reality, it is worse. Because the truth is that the dynamics of aquaculture are actively working on the collapse of the wild population. We have well located the three big problems: 1) the hybrid salmon escapes (who have better farm fitness, but worse ocean survival) than They mix with wild animals and produce genetic problems.2) the spread of sea ​​louse because the concentration of fish in cages amplifies the parasite load and, finally, 3) the need for forage fish to feed the farms removes resources for other fish. And the consequences are visible to all. In Asturias it is not only that the season has started two weeks later than usual, it is that the first salmon (campanu) the latest day in history has arrived. But that’s only part of the story. In Norway, for example, only 323,000 wild salmon were observed in 2024. The previous year, the figures They amounted to 481,463 copies. In fact, last year fishing was prohibited in 42 rivers and three fjords. In Scotland, another of the great salmon-growing countries, the population of wild specimens has fallen by 80% since the 1970s. Is it only a problem related to aquaculture? No, it would be unfair to say this. The decline is global and has a lot to do with climate and food chain problems. But the evidence tells us that not even repopulating is of any use: we have been taking counterproductive initiatives for decades that reduce genetic diversity and make the species increasingly fragile. Image | Bruce Warrington In Xataka | We are drugging the salmon with cocaine and anxiolytics. And that’s causing them to behave strangely.

how to declare them and in which cases you must do so in the 2026 declaration

Let’s explain to you how to declare your cryptocurrencies in your Income 2025, which is the declaration we make in 2026 to account for the last fiscal year. You can now request and submit your draft online and from the mobilebut first it is advisable to pay attention to this. Let’s start this explanation by telling you in which cases you should declare your cryptocurrenciesso that you take into account if you have to do it. And then we will tell you the way in which you should enter them in the Income Tax return and the particularities of how they are declared. When should you declare your cryptocurrencies What you have to declare is everything you have won or lost in 2025 with the sale and exchange of cryptocurrencies. You must also declare when you exchange a cryptocurrency for a good or service, come on, when you have used them to pay for something. They are taxed like sharessuch as capital gains or losses. You have to declare all transactions, whether they generate profits or losses, regardless of the amount. This applies whether you mine cryptocurrencies or trade to buy and sell them. This is so because They are considered a part of your heritage and your income, and this makes them equivalent to when you earn money doing a job or selling stocks. It is important to make sure you declare everything, because You can have fines of up to 20,000 euros. If you do not declare movements, you will be fined around 20 euros for each undeclared data up to that figure. And if you declare incorrect data or data is omitted, the fine is 150 euros, although with the possibility of increasing to 0.5% or 1.5% of the amount of the operation. Losses or profits are calculated by the difference between the transfer value or the value at which you sold them and the acquisition value. You must also declare airdrops, which are those cryptocurrencies that a website can give you. exchange in exchange for registering or doing some operations in them. Besides, mining is also declaredand since it requires material or personal means to carry it out, it is an economic activity. Come on, you must register as a professional or businessman, and then declare the profits or losses by subtracting operating expenses such as electricity, equipment and so on, and the rewards or benefits obtained. How to declare cryptocurrencies Cryptocurrencies are declared in a specific section. You will have to use boxes 1,800 and 1,814, which detail the movements and operations carried out that are related to cryptocurrencies. When declaring the movements, you will have to write the name of the cryptocurrency, the key or what you have done with this asset, the value of the acquisition and the value of the transaction. And so with each of the movements you have made. For balances or holdings of cryptocurrencies abroad above 50,000 eurosyou will also have to fill out form 721. In addition, if the crypto balance abroad grows by more than €20,000 compared to the previous declaration, you must submit it again. Profits obtained are taxed in different ways depending on how much they amount to. They are taxed on the savings tax base, and these are their tax rates: Personal income tax of 19% for benefits of up to 6,000 euros. Personal income tax of 21% for benefits between 6,001 and 50,000 euros. Personal income tax of 23% for benefits between 50,001 and 200,000 euros. Personal income tax of 27% for benefits between 200,001 and 300,000 euros. Personal income tax of 30%: for benefits of more than 300,001 euros. Another thing to keep in mind is staking. If rewards are received for transferring the coins to a platform, it is considered a return on movable capital, which is taxed on the savings basis at a rate of between 19 and 30%. Meanwhile, if it is done as an economic activity, it is taxed on the general basis at rates that can range between 19% and 47%. Rewards obtained by staking are valued in euros at the time of receipt. You should also know that the Treasury uses the FIFO (First In, First Out) method. This means that the first cryptocurrencies you bought will also be considered the first to be sold. Additionally, if you suffer losses from cryptocurrencies you can offset them with other capital gains from the same return. In Xataka Basics | Stablecoins: what they are, how they work, advantages and uses of these stable cryptocurrencies

declare war on overtime

The idea of ​​getting a girlfriend doesn’t even cross Owen Cao’s mind. Let alone being a father. When in 2024 this Chinese university student shared his case with SCMP He combined his engineering classes with research and activities in the student club, in addition to of course his own hobbies. With such a workload, 24 hours a day fell short and left no room for appointments or thinking about children. Owen was at that time a twenty-something who had not yet finished his degree, but his approach to life is shared by many other Chinese for whom work it makes it difficult for them to plan a family life. Now Beijing is so desperate for encouraging their birth rate, which is beginning to embrace a radical idea: set limits to overtime in companies. What has happened? That in his (desperate) efforts to reactivate the birth rateChina has asked itself an interesting question: What if overtime in companies is limited? Would that help workers have more free time and energy to focus on their family life and (hopefully) have children? Issues similar to these are those that have been put on the table during what are known as ‘Two Sessions’sessions held every March in Beijing and during which topics of interest to the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) and the National People’s Congress (NPC) are discussed. Its objective is to listen to proposals and set certain objectives, such as GDP growth. “Significant impact”. Throughout the sessions Ideas have been proposed such as creating a new holiday that helps stimulate consumption or giving vouchers worth hundreds of yuan to families in the hope of boosting the economy. Another very present topic has been the demographic crisis that runs through China. Against this backdrop, Lu Ming, CPPCC member, university professor and advisor to the Shanghai government, slipped the possibility of putting limits on the time that Chinese people spend at their jobs. The goal? That they have more hours (and strength) to find a partner, get married and start a home with children. “Excessive overtime has a significant impact on employees’ physical and psychological health, their quality of life, willingness to have children, and marriage prospects,” claims Lu. Beyond its impact on consumption, the idea is that the new holiday also facilitates conciliation. The culture of ‘996‘. It is no coincidence that Lu focuses the focus on the workplace. As remember Financial Timesin certain Chinese companies, including those in the technology sector, it is common to apply the so-called “‘996’ work culture”which basically translates into grueling weeks during which employees work from nine in the morning to nine in the afternoon six days in a row. To that is added, remember the teacher“invisible overtime”, the time that employees remain aware of their companies through their mobile phones. Saturated agendas. The problem is not only how this dynamic affects the health of employees, but also the impact it has on their family life and to what extent it harms birth rates. China has long been is conscious that the agendas hypersaturated They are taking a toll on their demographics, a trend that is well identified, especially in the case of young people. In 2021 the newspaper China Youth Daily public a survey with more than 14,000 university students in which, among other issues, he analyzed his love life. Their result was striking: almost 70% of all those interviewed were single. There are those who believe that after the pandemic that percentage may have increased. “You can’t cover everything”. The phenomenon is not very different from that experienced by other countries (inside and outside Asia) in which birth rates decreased as societies became more competitive. A clear example is South Koreawhere this trend has made parenting more expensive. “Many people say that you have to manage your time well, but no matter how well you plan, you can’t cover everything,” Cao confesses. “I have limited energy, so I need to eliminate what drains me the most. First thing? Dating.” Of course, lack of time or the cost of parenthood are not the only factors that affect birth rates. Cultural and social conditions come into play and, in the case of Chino, the long shadow of the ‘one child policy’ applied for decades. Companies pending. It is also no coincidence that Lu places emphasis on the workplace. China has considered other similar measures to encourage its birth rate, such as betting on four day week. They are not shots in the air. The country relies on studies and experiences like Itochu’sa Japanese company that a few years ago prohibited its employees from extending their working day beyond eight in the afternoon, accumulating overtime. After a while, managers realized that not only profits per employee were increasing. So did maternity leave requests. Birth rate downhill. To the frustration of Beijing, the measures it has taken so far to encourage its birth rate (and there have been many) have proven to be ineffective. In 2025 the nation saw its birth rate plummet to a historic low: 5.63 per 1,000 inhabitantsthe lowest indicator since the Communist Party came to power 77 years ago. The problem is that in 2025 the mortality rate also rose to historic levels (you have to go back to 1968 to find a higher one), which translated into the loss of around 3.4 million inhabitants. Image | LYCS Architecture (Unsplash) In Xataka | After years of catastrophe, South Korea is increasing its birth rate. The question is whether it is just a “demographic echo”

The chips war is not over and the US is about to declare another one to China: that of the screens

In the holder of this article we do not exaggerate the least. The US Congress is pressing the Pentagon to officially include BOE, China’s biggest screens manufacturerin the list of Companies with narrow links with the Chinese army. However, this is not all. And as Chris Miller, the author of the very recommended essay book explains ‘The chips war’in Your new newsletterthe administration led by Donald Trump wants the screens used by American technology companies to be manufactured in the US. This strategy is exactly the same as the government has already launched within the semiconductor industry. And with great success. After all, TSMC, Intel, Samsung and other companies that are dedicated to the production of integrated circuits They are building new plants in the US To dodge the Trump administration tariffs, among other reasons. This Howard Lutnick’s statementthe Secretary of Commerce, clearly expresses what the US government has: “We need to have chips and need to have screens. We need these objects to be manufactured in the United States.” The screens are a critical component for China and the US armies The decisions that the US government will take in all likelihood with the double purpose of minimizing its current dependence on Chinese manufacturers and reinforcing the local screens manufacturing industry will be held on several pillars. The most obvious is that LCD and Oled panels are indispensable in a huge amount of electronic products and other items, such as mobile phones, tablets, televisions, cars, monitors, smartwatchesetc. An interesting note: BOE is one of Apple OLED matric suppliers. In the current geopolitical scenario it would not be surprising at all that the Trump administration penalize in the short or medium term with high tariffs the import to the US of LCD and OLED panels. However, before doing so, industrial fabric must reinforce within its own borders to offer electronic products manufacturers Alternatives of American origin to the screens from abroad. This probable measure It will not only affect BOE, TCL and other Chinese panel manufacturers; It will also have a direct impact on Japanese companies, and, above all, South Korean that produce these matrices, such as Samsung or LG. The largest shareholder of BOE is a state entity, and, in addition, 47% of its Chengdú factory belongs to several organizations backed by the State So far I have mentioned BOE three times in this article, and I have done it because this Chinese company is being very closely observed by the US administration. In fact, and this is another pillar of the strategy in which the US government is working, According to Chris Miller This company is being intensely subsidized by the Chinese State. Boe’s biggest shareholder is a state entity, and, in addition, 47% of its new Chengdú factory It belongs to several organizations that are directly supported by the State. The South Korean government You are also supporting subsidies To the Samsung and LG subsidiaries that manufacture screens, but so far it has never been done almost half of the property of a latest generation production plant. Miller holds that BOE has ties with the Chinese armyalthough it does not know if they are deeper than those with other Chinese technology companies. Who do seem clear that this link is intense They are some American congressmen. Otherwise they would not press the Pentagon to include BOE in his “blacklist.” If this request Prospera Boe could be excluded from the US market in the same way that at the end of the last decade Huawei and Zte were sanctioned. Curiously, According to BOE itselfglobal sales of screens for military use amounted to 1,330 million dollars in 2024. It is a modest figure if we keep in mind that this sector globally invoiced more than 156,000 million dollars last year. Even so, for Chinese and American armies the screens are critical components, just like chips. In fact, the US Department of Defense buys avant -garde screens, and, in addition, has expressly funded The development of next -generation visualization technologies. Image | Xataka More information | Chris Miller’s Newsletter In Xataka | China is ready to get fully into the OLED TV market and put South Korea against the ropes

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.