Copilot

Microsoft continues to confuse the world with its obsession with Copilot. Almost no one is very clear if Office is alive or not

by

“But then, does Office exist or not?” It is a question that seems trivial, but it is not so, and with good reason: the constant name and brand changes have meant that the Microsoft office suite is being the latest victim of his obsession with AI and with its avalanche of products with the Copilot surname. The usual Office is no longer what it was. The evolution of Office was relatively stable until 2020. The office suite, officially launched in 1990, made it possible to bring together all the office applications that Microsoft already had and that it would later expand. This is how we soon saw an Office that consisted of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, Outlook and even Access and other tools. Changes and more changes. Since then the suite has been undergoing paradigm shifts… and name changes: 2010: The Office 365 brand is introduced as a cloud version of the traditional office suite. The goal: compete with Google Docs 2013: After the launch of Office 2013, Microsoft begins to promote the Office 365 service as the main alternative to access office tools 2017: Microsoft presents a second evolution of these services, which this time were aimed at companies and which it named Microsoft 365. This platform combined Office 365 with volume licenses for Windows 10 Enterprise, as well as some additional solutions. 2020: Office 365 change your name to Microsoft 365 2022: Microsoft announces that the branding “Microsoft Office” would be abandoned in favor of the “Microsoft 365” brand. Even so, Microsoft continues to sell perpetual Microsoft Office licenses for local installations. The latest version Today it is Microsoft Office 2024. 2025:Microsoft rename the Microsoft 365 app to Microsoft 365 Copilot, referring to the “Office/Microsoft 365 Hub.” This application is actually like an aggregator of the different Microsoft office tools (Word, Excel, etc.). And Perplexity adds fuel to the fire. A few days ago those responsible for Perplexity published a tweet in which they seemed to indicate that Microsoft had changed the name from “Office” to “Microsoft 365 Copilot app.” In reality, what had been renamed, as they point out in Windows Latestis the “Office/Microsoft 365 Hub”, but this name change had already been announced a year ago, in January 2025, as we indicated. Perplexity also added that this decision had caused “400 million users to become “AI users” overnight.” Both the tweet and that statement were somewhat exaggerated, and did not help clarify a situation that is already confusing. Microsoft clarifies it. Microsoft officials have indicated in The Verge and other means that: “We have not made any recent changes to the names of our Office applications. Word, Excel and PowerPoint, the Office applications included in the Microsoft 365 productivity suite, remain unchanged In November 2022, we just renamed the Office hub app for web and mobile to the Microsoft 365 app. In January 2025, we updated it to the Microsoft 365 Copilot app to reflect its role in bringing the Copilot and Microsoft 365 productivity experiences together in one place.” More trouble with the Office.com website. Although Microsoft hasn’t just “killed” the Office brand, it doesn’t seem to want it to be used much either. In fact, if one goes to the office.com website What you see as soon as you load it is a message that says “We welcome you to the Microsoft 365 Copilot application”, or in other words, that “hub” or aggregator from which you can launch the different office tools in the Microsoft suite. It doesn’t seem like a lucky decision. like others in this line in recent times. How to destroy a recognizable and recognized brand. The truth is that Office was a brand recognized by users, but for years Microsoft has wanted to transform it into part of something bigger. The intention, we believe, was to try to make it clear that Microsoft 365 was more than traditional office tools, but the only thing that has been achieved With these changes it is adding more and more confusion. Office is still alive as a product and as a brand, but it has ended up being absorbed by these new brands and, of course, because of Microsoft’s obsession with AI and with Copilot. In Xataka | Thanks again, Microsoft, for letting us buy Office 2024 instead of putting up with another subscription

The latest condemnation of LG TVs is that they install Microsoft Copilot by default and cannot be uninstalled

by

LG Smart TV users have noticed something in recent days. Some of them have seen a new “tile” appear on their televisions in the main interface. And it corresponded to an application that they had not installed or requested: Microsoft Copilot. The criticism has been enormous, and rightly so. Why is it important. The appearance of this new application is the latest example of the loss of control that users end up having over the devices they buy. You pay for it, but you don’t actually own it. It is a condemnation that we are seeing everywhere in digital products and services, and what LG and Microsoft have done is the latest example of this. What does Copilot do on my TV?. There are several Reddit users who have denounced how the latest software update for its LG televisions includes a new tile that is displayed on the main screen of the webOS interface and that corresponds to Microsoft Copilot. And you won’t be able to uninstall it. The worst thing is not even that LG and Microsoft have agreed to offer this app for good. The worst thing is that users can’t even uninstall it. The only thing you can do is hide the icon so that it is not visible in the main interface, but Copilot will still be available and installed even if you never use it. Microsoft, enough is enough. The movement is one more drop in a glass that has long exceeded the patience of users. Microsoft has not stopped flooding all its products with co-pilots even though It seems clear that almost no one uses their AI. What they are getting is not brand recognition, but an almost frontal rejection of Copilot. Not because it is necessarily better or worse, but it is everywhere, even if we have not asked for it. This isn’t a “do you want to try it?” It is an imposition. LG already (half) warned. At CES 2025 the company confirmed its plans to integrate Microsoft Copilot into webOS as part of its “AI TV” strategy. In their presentation they highlighted that Copilot was an extension of that AI experience on TV that was designed to answer questions and offer content recommendations. The current integration looks more like a shortcut to Copilot’s web interface, not a native app built into the TV. In reality, at that CES we already saw the same intentions announced by Samsung or Google… that he kept his word few months ago. TYour TV spies on you (again). Other Reddit users talked about a setting for LG Smart TVs called “Live Plus.” If one activates this tool, the content shown on TV can be recognized and that information can be used to offer personalized services such as recommendations and — of course — advertisements. In LG’s documentation they describe Live Plus as an “enhanced viewing experience.” Fortunately, this option can be disabled from Settings -> All settings -> General -> Additional options. From there just deactivate the Live Plus service. One more time, TVs try to know everything we do with the excuse of improving the experience. TV, you are left without internet. Faced with this avalanche of invasive options, the solution is clear: disconnect the Smart TV from the Wi-Fi network and/or the cable network (Ethernet) and do not use that main interface except in specific cases of image or sound adjustment, for example. The Google TV Streamer/Fire TV are the option (more or less). For everything else, the recommendation is clear: buy a streaming device like a Fire TV or a Google TV Streamer (or similar)… although the latter have also become advertising showcases. There are alternatives in those cases: we can use alternative launchers like Projectivy on those devices to avoid that advertising and regain control over what we see and how we see it. And we can also opt for other “TV Boxes” which also give the option to regain that control. In Xataka | Google has killed the Chromecast. Goodbye to a friendly and affordable product that helped us enjoy television more than ever

Microsoft has reduced its ambition with AI. It has been realized that almost no one uses Copilot, they say in The Information

by

There is Satya Nadella, in his office, like an influencer. Since the Excel World Championship has been held, he wants to see how good he is at handling it… with the help of Copilot. The video is nice and seems to show that Microsoft’s promise that AI will be able to do many things for you is fulfilled. However, reality says otherwise, and the company itself seems to recognize it, because its sales objectives have been cut, according to The Information. Optimism has cooled. According to internal sources in the Azure division cited in said newspaper, the company has made an unusual decision: lowering sales growth quotas for its AI products and services. The objectives were not achieved in the fiscal year that ended in June, and that has now caused the sales teams’ goals to be adjusted downward, reaching close to 25% growth. That Microsoft makes such a change is a clear indicator that the market is not responding at the speed expected. Microsoft denies it. The Information’s claims have been denied by Microsoft. Those responsible indicated on Bloomberg that that article “inaccurately conflates the concepts of growth and sales quotas” and that “aggregate sales quotas for AI products have not been reduced.” Which chatbot is used the most? (in USA). Meanwhile, the consulting firm FirstPageSage has published the market shares of the main chatbots on the market in the US. According to this data, ChatGPT clearly dominates that market with 61.30% of queries, while Microsoft is second with 14.10%. However, it is interesting to look at the details of the estimated growth: at Microsoft it is only 2%, while at Gemini it grows 12% and Claude 14%. AI chatbot usage rate in December 2025 in the US. Source: FirstPageSage AI doesn’t quite work. Corporate clients are finding it difficult to justify the return on investment from AI. It is difficult to measure the real savings that AI represents for writing reports or analyzing sales leads, for example. But there are sectors such as finance or cybersecurity in which the tolerance for error is zero. We still cannot trust AI, and that means that its real scope, especially in companies, is limited. An MIT report already warned that 95% of companies that have opted for the use of AI they have seen no measurable return in real income. An example. In the topic of The Information we talk about the Carlyle private equity fund. They started using Copilot Studio to automate meeting summaries and financial models, but hit a technical roadblock: the AI ​​was having trouble pulling reliable data from other external applications. Given the situation, Carlyle reduced its spending on AI and is now much more selective with the AI ​​solutions it pays for, although its overall investment in technology is growing. Bad on one hand, good on the other. It must be made clear that the AI ​​business is not in crisis, but it is very polarized. Azure is still going strong and GirHub works really well, for example. The problem is convincing traditional companies to pay extra for automated AI agents. Especially when using them is much more complex than installing a simple chatbot and starting to use it. Even OpenAI adjusts expectations. OpenAI itself, they also indicated in The Information, has had to review its expectations with the agent market. Their new estimates have reduced AI agent revenue by $26 billion over the next five years. To compensate for this drop, OpenAI will focus its income on ChatGPT subscriptions. Patience is running outeither. The industry is certainly not throwing in the towel, but it is beginning to lose patience. Brian Spanswick, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Cohesity, summed up the current situation: there is hope, but evidence is lacking. His company is creating its own code that allows it to connect Microsoft agents with its internal data, and they hope that this will demonstrate a real return on investment in a few months. Whether they succeed is another story, but one thing seems increasingly clear: the promises of AI remain unfulfilled. At least, those that Microsoft did with Copilot in companies. Images | Microsoft | OFFICIAL LEWEB PHOTOS (CC BY 2.0) In Xataka | People are so, so fed up with AI in Windows 11 that a developer has created an app to eliminate it

Microsoft had a saved secret. His new AI model for Copilot is the clearest statement against Openai’s domain

by

Since the fever broke out by generative AI, Microsoft has opted for OpenAi models to give life to key functions in some of its most important products. It is not strange if we remember that those of Redmond They invested more than 10,000 million dollars in the startup directed by Sam Altman. However, this alliance of convenience It has been showing fissures for months And, as time goes by, The rivalry between both parties becomes more evident. It was Microsoft itself that, a year ago, included OpenAI in his list of competitorstogether with Amazon, Apple, Google and Meta. And it is OpenAi who, According to The Informationinsists on not wanting to share its avant -garde technology when it arrives, if it arrives, the AGI. Even if you try to make up, the link is no longer as solid as in its first days. And now there is another chapter underway. Microsoft AI begins to show their own letters Mustafa SuleymanCEO of Microsoft AI, who assumed the position when the association with Openai had been consolidated for years, It has just presented two internally developed models. They are advanced proposals that users can already prove and reflect the company’s ambition: “Create AI applied as a platform for products.” One is a real novelty and another we already knew. Let’s look at the details. Mai-1-Preview. It is the great novelty. It is a Mixure-OF-Experts model, in the style of GPT-4O or GPT-5, designed to offer great capabilities in resolution of instructions and useful responses for daily consultations. According to Suleyman, it is the first model trained from beginning to end in Microsoft AI’s own laboratories. The most striking thing is that it can already be tested. Just enter LMARENAselect Direct Chat and choose Mai-1-Preview. In the coming weeks it will also arrive in Copilot, although only “for certain cases of text use.” It is paradoxical: the text functions of the Microsoft Chatbot work thanks to OpenAi, but now it will begin to live with its own technology. Developers can also request anticipated access to API. MAI-VOICE-1. It is a voice generation model that stands out for its expressiveness and naturalness. For some time now it promotes functions such as Copilot Daily (news summaries) and Copilot Podcasts, although only in English. It is also available in COPILOT LABSwhere you can try different voices, styles and narration tones. One of its strengths is efficiency: it can generate a complete minute of audio in less than a second using a single GPU. With this, it is one of the fastest and most effective voice systems that exist today. Microsoft defends that the voice will be the interface of future assistants of AI. And he wants to advance with a high fidelity solution capable of responding in different scenarios. Could I have resorted to Openai and your GPT-4o in audio version? Yes. Do you want to do it? Everything indicates not. “Much more to come. We have great ambitions for what comes next: advances in the models, an exciting roadmap in computation capacity and the opportunity to reach billions of people through Microsoft products. We are building an AI for all,” said Suleyman in X. It remains to see what course the relationship between Microsoft and OpenAi will take. What is clear to users is that there will be more variety and more tools to experiment. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | Goal wants us to use AI when we don’t know what to say at WhatsApp: This is how your new option for writing assistance works

Chatgpt’s mobile app generates 30 times more money than Claude, Copilot and Grok together. Still not enough

by

If there is a chatbot that stands out in popularity over the rest, that is undoubtedly chatgpt. His mobile app was launched in May 2023 And since then he has occupied the download tops of the main stores, becoming The most downloaded app in the world A few months ago. Openai has reached another milestone with its app: since its launch already has generated 2,000 million dollars. To put it in context, this would be approximately 30 times more than what Claude, Grok and Copilot combined have generated. However, not everything is as beautiful as it sounds. Undisputed leader. According to figures AppfiguresOnly for 2025, the Chatgpt app has generated 1,350 million dollars, which represents a growth of 673% compared to the same period of 2024. Chatgpt is generating 193 million dollars per month, while the next on the list is Grok with 3.6 million per month. If we look at the average download per expense, ChatgPT goes to the head with 2.91 dollars, followed by Claude with $ 2.55, Grok with $ 0.75 and finally co -pilot with only $ 0.28. It is clear: Openai is winning the battle of mobile apps. Still not enough. 2,000 million are many millions and that only with its mobile app. Adding all your services, only In July 1,000 million entered And it is estimated that they will enter 12,000 million this year. However, It is still light years of being profitable And the reality is that they enter much less than they spend. The company did An internal study in which they estimated that the losses between 2023 and 2028 would amount to 44,000 million dollars. According to their forecasts, they will not be profitable until 2029, when they expect to enter 100,000 million dollars annually, almost ten times more than they invoice now. The Big Tech are on the right track. The great technology have invested amounts of authentic madness in AI And it has not been until recently that they have begun to see A slight green outbreak in its results. After several years burning huge amounts of money, Google, Amazon and Microsoft have seen how their income is finally to cover the investment so tremendous. However, it is still not thanks to the products AI directly, but to the cloud services. Even so, the reality is that None is making gold with AI. Mission: Monetize the AI. If there is something that brings to the business of AI is How to monetize your chatbots. Subscriptions “pro” have become the appeal to get income, Some like Claude Max cost a real fortune and OpenAi He followed his steps with O3 Pro. The Subscriptions are getting more expensivebut they are not yet enough to reach the level of expenses. There is no azure or a web service that can get the chestnuts out of the fire as it is happening with the Big Tech. The exit seems clear. Advertising. At the end of last year there were rumors that they could start putting advertising in Chatgpt. At the moment it has not materialized, but Rumors have not ceased and seeing the numbers may be a solution to the profitability problem. They have not been the only ones who have flirted with this idea, Perplexity was also testing it And Elon Musk recently confirmed that There will be advertising in Grok. Very careful. Implement advertising in a chatbot is delicate since we could find ourselves in a scenario in which it ends up losing the trust of users. For example, if we go to a chatbot in the process of buying a car, we could doubt whether the recommendations are based on an advertising campaign. Integration should be clear to avoid possible confusing situations. What seems clear is that, given the serious problem of profitability, advertising stands as a more than attractive option for AI companies. In Xataka | Big Tech have buried thousands and billions in AI. They are earning money, but not thanks to the AI

Microsoft is one of the world’s largest companies. He has had to abrive his workers because they didn’t even use Copilot

by

In case it was not enough pressure for Microsoft employees, after announcing the dismissal Now he has decided to take a radical turn in his internal strategy and requires his employees to use tools for In your workflow. What was only a recommendation before, now it has become a demand in the toughest line of the “Ai Fluency” that has already been established in companies Like Duolingo, or Canva. According to published Business Insiderthis change responds to the imperative need for Microsoft to accelerate the adoption of AI among its own template, especially considering that only a few They used their github co -ilot. At the blacksmith’s house, stick knife. AI is no longer optional. Microsoft’s address has made it clear that “the use of artificial intelligence is no longer optional.” As published by the American media, Julia LiusonPresident of the Microsoft developer division, sent a forceful email to Microsoft managers: “AI is now a fundamental part of our way of working. Just like collaboration, data -based thinking and effective communication, the use of AI is no longer optional: it is essential for all roles and all levels.” This message implies that all employees, regardless of their position, must carry out literacy in AI and incorporate artificial intelligence into their workflows with the objective of Automate bureaucratic tasks or repetitive processes. Do not use it penalizes. To encourage their use, Microsoft managers received the order to incorporate the knowledge and use of AI among the factors to assess when evaluating their performance. “(AI) It should be part of their holistic reflections on the performance and impact of each individual, “Liuson instructed to those responsible for team. Although there is still no unique metric in all departments, some teams are already assessing establishing concrete ways of measuring this aspect in the next annual performance reviews. The enemy at home. This change seeks to solve what Microsoft considers that Github Copilot’s too slow adoption among its own workers. The pressure to adopt the AI ​​not only comes from within. Satya Nadella’s firm faces hard competition between models of programming assistanceas cursor or Replitwhich are winning growing in number of users, to the point of overcoming it in some segments of use. Citing a Barclays report, the American media says that “cursor would have already overcome Copilot in a key segment of the development market.” Technology currently allows its employees to use external AI tools provided they meet certain security requirements, which shows that not even in its Github Copilot bosom has the monopoly. Business Carambolas. Microsoft’s alliance with Openai is about to give a new fruit, since Sam Altman’s company is tantling the purchase of Windsurfmain cursor rival in the Nic of AI agents for programming assistance. Since Microsoft has an agreement with the Chatgpt creator, this acquisition would give indirect access to the intellectual property of Windsurfwhich would help you improve co -ilot performance. With this New movement Nadella’s masterful, Microsoft would have access to the heart of its main rival, something does not go unnoticed for Windsurf and OpenAi managers. In Xataka | Microsoft fired him after 23 years but continues to go to the office: “I feel responsible for my team and my clients” Image | Unspash (Salah Darwish, Tai Bui)

The best PROMPTS to save working hours and do your homework with Chatgpt, Gemini, Copilot or other artificial intelligence

by

Let’s tell you a series of prompts for Save work hours using artificial intelligence To perform your homework. In the examples we are going to use chatgpt, but they are prompts that should also serve you with other AI, such as Gemini, Copilot, Deepseek or any other. In each of these examples we will give you both the explanation of what you are going to get as the prompt to do so. These prompts are generic, it is not copy and paste, since in many cases you will have to modify them to specify what you want me to do to you. They are like templates, go. Learn concepts in the simplest way This is one of the most classic and veteran tricks of artificial intelligence, that of Ask him to explain something as if you were 5 years old. You can also modify it to explain it to another level, as to a person of another age like 12 years in the event that you need something slightly more advanced. Sometimes you can find terms and concepts difficult to understand, and When someone tries to explain it you may stay the samein the same way that when you read explanations you cannot finish understanding it either. This is where this prompt comes into play, with which you will save a lot of time trying to understand it by reducing the explanation to the lowest level: “Explain to me the theory of relativity as if I was five years old” And if this is not enough, you can also ask for extra context: “Explain to me as if I had the theory of relativity five years and why it was so important for history.” Check texts before sending or publishing them In the event that you work by writing texts, or that you have to review a job you have written, you can also Ask the AI ​​to check your writing To find spelling failures. It can also help you with grammatical errors or typographic failures of those that can be escaped to all. The way of proceeding is first to give the instruction, and when the OK you hit the full text. “I’m going to send you a text and I want you to review it, and tell me the spelling and typographic errors that I have” In addition to this, you can ask you to do a more thorough analysis, taking into account other aspects: “I’m going to send you a text and I want you to review it, and tell me the spelling and typographic errors that I have. I also want you to tell me the words that I have repeated too much, and that you tell me how to improve it.” Change the tone of your writing Imagine that the problem is no longer so much in the text and spelling as in the way you have expressed yourself. Maybe you have been more colloquial when it should be a serious or professional text, and here there is little to do beyond rewriting everything. However, another thing you can do is present the text to ChatgPT and Ask him to rewrite him by changing the tone in which it is written. Again, it is best first to give the order and when I tell you that ok then hit the text. The prompt would be something like this: “I’m going to send you a text, and I need you to analyze it and rewrite it in a much more formal tone” As you can understand, you can modify it to specify a different tone. You can also add any detail or thing that you think you should take into account when rewriting it. Use AI as a translator Another of the important functions of artificial intelligence is that can act as a translator. In addition, in many cases IA can surely translate better than tools such as Google Translator, and you can write very long texts to translate them. “I’m going to send you a text in English, and I want you to translate it into Spanish from Spain” Another of the advantages when using AI as a translator is that you can customize the way you want translations to be made. You can take advantage to change the tone, so that it makes you corrections, or even simply ask that the translation is natural for a Spanish reader. Create exams to test your knowledge Imagine that you are getting the driving license or you are opposing, and you need test your knowledge. For this you can search for pages with tests on the Internet, but you can also ask Chatgpt to do a test on a specific topic. Here, just remember that artificial intelligence bots can make mistakes, and it is possible that not all questions or the tests of the test are true. However, despite it is or remains a very interesting tool that should be taken into account. So you can ask you to take the exam “I am an opponent and to practice for my exam I need to improve my knowledge about a law. Could you ask 30 test questions about Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the common administrative procedure of public administrations?” After asking for the exam, you can also ask to tell you what questions are correct and reason why. “Now you can explain what is the right option in each of the questions, and why?” Create study sheets Another useful thing for students is Create study sheets or flashcardswhich are small basic data cards that help you memorize concepts, formulas or dates. They can be very useful for studying for an exam and need to memorize key data. “I want you to do a study tab or flashcards to learn about relativity.” It also helps teachers Beyond the exams to test, if you are a teacher you can also use AI to Create exams for your classes. It is true that perhaps it is not … Read more

Microsoft reinforces Copilot. The problem is that he does it with options traced to those of his competitors

by

Microsoft He turns 50 today Since its creation, and to celebrate it, it presents a new niche of characteristics for its artificial intelligence platform. Copilot is reinforced With interesting options, but the problem is not that: none is essentially differential. In fact, all of them have been available for some time in the AI ​​models of their competitors. Here it shows for example how Microsoft continues to adapt options of the AI ​​model of its main partner, OpenAi. Mustafa Suleymanhead of the AI ​​division in Microsoft, explained in the statement the objective with this announcement. He remembered how Bill Gates’ ambition when creating Microsoft was to put a PC in each home. That of this Microsoft today is to create “an AI partner for everyone.” And that tries Copilot, which as we say has been updated with new functions that try to make this chatbot more versatile than ever. The novelties are the following: COPILOT ACTIONS: Here Microsoft’s AI acts as an AI agent capable of performing actions autonomously. In the example shown searches and filled forms to find a storage or reserve a restaurant. Once again it remains to be seen how far this type of octive can go, which, As Operator demonstratedit is one of the great market trends. COPILOT PAGES: Through this option the user can collaborate with Copilot in real time, talking with him to edit answers adding files and context. The proposal is identical to the characteristic Canvas of chatgpt. Deep Research: In Microsoft they also offer – as for weeks– This mode of functioning that allows much more detailed analysis of our requests to search on the Internet, analyze data and start from showing a more “meditated” and theoretically more precise and detailed response. COPILOT VISION: This option is especially striking Artificial vision that allows Co -ilot to “see your screen” and help you complete tasks that you don’t know how to do in it. It also indicates on the screen what you have to do, something especially useful. Copilot Memory: If you give your permission, Copilot will remember your interaction with the model to be more useful and be more adjusted to your preferences over time. In this way, when using this information, for example for travel or restaurants recommendations. Copilot Search: As they already did Perplexity (In January 2023!) And also Chatgpt Search, now Copilot also gives access to a search engine that is also based totally on references and sources that is quoting in the answers. Copilot Podcasts: This chatbot is now capable of generating podcasts with voices synthesized with Ia. The idea is basically the same with which Notebooklm conquered us A few months ago. Copilot Shopping: A reinvention of aid for products searches, offers alerts and AI -based price analysis. Another segment in which there is also and there will be fierce competition, but that of course provides another useful option for the Copilot ecosystem. As we said, many of those options have been launched by OpenAI in recent weeks and it is natural that they end up arriving in Co -cilot given the alliance between both companies. In other cases what it does is offer characteristics that we had already seen for example in Google or Anthropic models. The advance is to thank and strengthens Microsoft’s proposal, but here the feeling is that the company will rely instead of leading this segment. That does not mean that Microsoft does not have plan B. They have been working on their own AI models for many months –Phi-4, which we tried in Xatakait is a good example – this is already sure It is more a “update” of its offer of services of AI than anything else. There are no revolutions here, but an expected evolution and that at least allows Microsoft to continue to be in that fight. In Xataka | “Google gives you links, perplexity gives you answers”: we talk to the CEO of the startup that wants to kill the father

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.