Mexico hoped that the Mayan Train would change the country’s economy. It is not convincing either tourists or locals

Their locomotives started between promises of wealth generationemployment and progress, but almost two years after its first inauguration he Mayan Train (one of the most ambitious projects of former Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador) is far from the expectations of its promoters. It does not seem to be arousing special interest among tourists. Nor among the locals. In fact The Country just revealed a figure that gives an idea of ​​the extent to which it has started with modest results: it moves 5% of the expected demand. The big question is… Why? What is the Mayan Train? One of López Obrador’s star projects and probably one of the most ambitious infrastructures developed in recent years in Mexico. He Mayan Train It is a railway circuit of more than 1,500 km that crosses Chiapas, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatán and Quintana Roo, states located in the southeast, where some of the poorest regions of the country are located. Is it operational? Yes. After a construction marked by the controversychanges and a billion dollar investment which multiplied the initial budget, the trains began to circulate almost two years ago, although they were launched in a phased manner. In December 2023 A smiling López Obrador participated in the inaugural route on the Campeche-Cancún section. A year later, with Sheinbaum at the head of the Government, the implementation of the rest of routesincluded the lastbetween Campeche and the Chetumal airport. To celebrate and give an extra push to the structure, the Executive launched a tourist package especially to attract users for Christmas. Why is it news now? Because things don’t seem to be going especially well for the Mayan Train. This is what the revealed data by The Countrywhich claims to have accessed a report from the National Tourism Promotion Fund (Fonatur) which confirms that the start of the service has not aroused the expected interest. During its first year of operations, it transported an average of 3,200 passengers daily. The initial forecasts were for this figure to be around 74,000, which did not even reach 5% of what was expected. The reporters who write the report from Mexico they assure that in the middle of high season it is not unusual to find trains that run almost empty in some sections and that at the stations it is common to come across more guards and cleaning employees than visitors. When talking to tourists who visit the region, some admit that they had not heard of the Mayan Train. What is the cause of this puncture? The million dollar question. And it is not easy to answer it. The testimonies collected by The Country They suggest that the train has not yet managed to catch on in either of the two markets in which it should attract passengers: domestic and international. It does not convince locals to travel through the southeast of Mexico, but neither does it convince foreign tourists who want to get to know the region. The reason is a combination of economic, logistical, cultural factors and habits that are difficult to change. If we talk about locals, the Mayan Train loses appeal for a simple reason: the location of the stations. The military company that operates it offers them discounts, but they must add the transportation price to get to the terminal to the ticket price. “The train to my town is far away. If I wanted to travel by train, I would basically have to spend twice as much. To go to Mérida I take the bus, which is more direct and cheaper,” explains a tour guide. Added to this is the deep-rooted use of other means of transport, such as the bus itself, motorcycles or taxis. And what about tourists? Despite the efforts to establish the service among foreign tourists, the Mayan Train does not seem to be succeeding in that market niche either. The visitors they keep coming to the Yucatan Peninsula, but their travel depends largely on travel companies and their itineraries, often agreed with bus companies and hoteliers. Although users highlight that trains are generally comfortable and safe and has been invested Already in the promotion of the service, there are still tourists who come to the Yucatán without having heard not even talk about the Mayan Train. Others do not quite see its advantages over traditional alternatives, such as renting a car to move freely or paying for tours in advance. Why is it important? For several reasons. To begin with, because the Mayan Train has not been just an ambitious project. It has also been marked by controversy. Recently National Geographic published a report in which he explains how its implementation has polarized part of Mexican society, with positions divided between those who believe it will help energize the region and those who focus on the impact it has had on the environment. Beyond this debate about the pros and cons of the train, what is undeniable is that the project has cost a lot more than initially planned. In 2023 the BBC network assured that from the between 120,000 and 150,000 million Mexican pesos that were initially spoken of, it went to nearly 500,000 million. This great investment effort was accompanied by promises of its economic return. What is expected from the train? “It is a magnum opus, we are not exaggerating if we say that there is no one like it in the world today,” stood out two years ago, during his inauguration, López Obrador. And at the time it was even proposed that the train would help encourage tourism and employment in some of the most impoverished regions of Mexico, with a project that, in addition to the railway, includes museums, hotels, archaeological zones and hotels. In 2020, a UN-Habitat study even suggested that it would help lift people out of poverty. 1.1 million of people. What does the Government say? He claims that the start-up of the train has not been bad. In summer the Government assured that the service … Read more

A Bugatti Mistral costs five million dollars. Launching it includes convincing the police to organize a race

It’s not every day that you can brand new a Bugatti Mistrala supercar valued at more than five million and that the CEO of Bugatti himself come deliver it to you in person. However, it is not so common that for this delivery, the CEO has to convince the police that it is a good idea to cut off one of Miami’s coastal roads to traffic to debut the supercar by racing between the Mistral and a custom-built sports yacht for the same owner. Although it may seem very bizarre, these things can happen when you are millionaire enough. A very particular premiere in Miami The delivery of a Bugatti Mistral is never a routine event. It’s a exclusive supercar of which only 99 units were manufactured that were they sold the same day that was put up for sale. However, when you pay five million euros for one of these exclusive jewels, the least you expect is that the CEO of Bugatti himself will come to deliver it to you in person. According to published Luxury Launchesthat’s what happened to Anthony Hsieh, a millionaire from Miami who received the exclusive unit of this supercar. The staging, far from being limited to a simple presentation in the dealer who had sold it to himincluded an unusual proposal: a race in front of the sea competing head to head with one of the exclusive yachts for sport fishing that Hsieh’s company builds. Bugatti’s CEO also joins in Mate Rimac, founder of the brand Rimac supercarscurrent CEO of Bugatti and a true speed enthusiast, did not want to miss the race and got so involved that he finally ended up offering to drive the Mistral in its race against the yacht. Obviously, the CEO wasn’t going to risk getting pulled over by the police or having the car’s owner fined, so he opted to convince Miami traffic authorities to close one of Miami’s busy coastal roads for the race, and This is how he told it on his networks social. A routine delivery for a Bugatti. Bugatti Mistral W16 engine The Bugatti Mistral uses the brand’s legendary W16 engine, an engineering gem what brand the end of an era for the brand since this is the last production model that will carry this 8-liter, 4-turbo block that delivers a power of 1,600 hp. Such a beast catapults the Mistral at a speed above 453 km/h. Her opponent was not exactly a cruising yacht. It is about the Badco 50 Gameboata boat designed for sport fishing of tuna and billfish (a large species similar to swordfish) and therefore must have agile and powerful engines that allow it to navigate at speeds of up to 44 knots. Like the Bugatti, the Badco 50 are customized to the owner’s taste with materials of the highest quality and resistance. Saying that the Badco 50 is a simple fishing boat is like saying that the Mistral is just a car. Furthermore, it so happens that the company that manufactures the Badco 50 is Bad Company Fishing Adventures, It is owned by the millionaire who bought the Mistral, so organizing this race, which as you can see in the video that was recordedis more symbolic than real, the brand sought to turn the delivery of the supercar into an unrepeatable experience for its customer. It’s not every day that the head of a supercar brand makes you luxury chauffeur in the car that has just been delivered to you and all followed by a police escort. If at this point you are still wondering who was the overall winner of the racethe answer is more than obvious: Mate Rimac, and not just by driving the car fasterbut because he took in his pocket the five million that the Bugatti Mistral costs and the absolute loyalty of a customer who will never again receive a car like Bugatti did with his Mistral. In Xataka | Bugatti has discovered that millionaires no longer want to buy luxury cars: they want to buy unique works of art Image | Bad Company Fishing Adventures

Spain is rapidly stopping consuming it and no one has convincing explanations

There was a time when many things could be missing from the tables of Spanish homes, but never bread. Never that. The bar was an essential part of the diet, one of its pillars, so firm that it even ended up leaving a mark in the proverb. Things have changed and now it is increasingly difficult to find bread in homes at meal time. And for example, a button: its per capita consumption (at least domestic) has collapsed in the last decade. The big question is… Why? Less bread at home. On Spanish tables and cupboards it is increasingly difficult to find loaves of bread. Although for a long time they were one of the pillars of nutrition (so much so that it has crept into popular proverbs), households seem to be turning their backs on them little by little. And no one really knows why. The last reminder of the extent to which we have lost interest in bread was left yesterday by the EfeAgro agency in a chronicle which starts with a revealing fact: on average a Spaniard consumes 25% less today than just a decade ago. Has consumption dropped that much? To answer that question, it is good to take a look at the data from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. To be more precise to the figures of your consumption panelin which they detail “the food consumption data in Spanish households.” The nuance is important because its results basically show domestic behavior, purchases and consumption that are made within the home, not in the extradomestic channel. When the data on bread is analyzed, the reading is clear: today we consume less (much less) than a few decades ago. And as a figure always says more than a long explanation, here is a table with the evolution of demand. The data show annual per capita consumption measured in kg, although one detail must be clarified: the concept “bread” has remained unchanged in the historical series, but not its different classifications, which have changed, combining concepts such as “fresh bread”, “unpackaged” or “industrial bread” and “packaged”. Bread (total) fresh bread industrial bread 1990 56.4 52.9 3.5 2000 50.1 46.4 3.7 2010 36.3 30.8 5.5 2020 32.8 26 6.8 2024 27.4 21.5 5.9 looking back. The drop is even more pronounced if we broaden the focus and look at how Spaniards behaved in the 60s and 70s. Although the calculation criteria may have varied, the data from the Ministry of Agriculture show that in 1964 the “consumption of bread-making cereals in Spain” was around 92.5 kg per inhabitant per year. In the 70s that average was already 76.6 kg. He latest yearbook published by the Government, with data at the end of 2024, show that total per capita consumption of bread fell in the country by 0.2% compared to the previous year, although this decrease was not generalized: consumption of normal fresh bread ‘punctured’, while demand for whole grain, unsalted and industrial bread grew. Is it all negative data? No. Recently the Ministry of Food published a report with data from the year between August 2024 and July 2025 showing that bread purchases have generally increased by 3.9% during that period, leaving annual per capita consumption at 27.8 kilos. It remains significantly below the 34.9kg 2015, but it still represents an increase. Bread can also boast of having an almost absolute level of penetration in Spanish homes, reaching more than 99.8%, and generates a business of billions of euros. To be more precise, the data accumulated between August 2024 and July 2025 speak of 3.4 billion. Searching for the causes. The big question at this point is… Why do we consume less bread at home today than a few decades ago? EfeAgro remembers that in the last ten years its price has become more expensive almost 29%although the CPI data for September show that at least in the last year it remained below the general price index: 1.2% compared to the global 3%. The drop in consumption seems to respond more to changes in consumption habits: a greater availability of alternatives to bread, a more varied diet, a increase in consumption in places outside the home… “There has been a downward trend for years in Spain, it must be taken into account that when societies become more prosperous, consumption is reduced and other sources begin to be used”, explained already 2022 to The Spanish Jorge de Saja, from the Spanish Association of the Bakery, Pastry and Pastry Industry. Another key point from the sector is the increase in more satiating variants (such as whole wheat). “Don’t eat bread”. There are those who provide another explanation for the drop in bread consumption: “The perception that it is a food that can make you fat,” they regret from Asemac. Ángeles Carbajal Azcona, from the Department of Nutrition at the Complutense University of Madrid, also remembered it in 2016 in an article in which, citing other authors, I remembered that the “dietary advice” of some specialists to lose weight is: “Don’t eat bread.” “Epidemiological studies that try to look at the relationship between bread consumption and body weight usually see that people who consume bread more frequently have a higher risk of obesity, diabetes and weight gain,” he clarified in 2024. Jordi Salas-Salvadóprofessor, a The Country. “The problem is that these studies are done with current bread, which is not the same as traditional bread, with sourdough and long fermentation: bread has a high glycemic index, but artisanal bread has more fermentation process and that makes the glycemic index lower.” Image | Diana Krotova In Xataka | “We are the glitch in the Matrix of food”: the Madrid bakery whose reinvention of bread has gotten out of hand

This is how China is convincing their best minds to leave the USA

Song Chun-Zhu is one of the most prominent authorities in the field of artificial intelligence. After almost three decades developing in the United States, in 2020 Zhu returned to China. It is one of the most notorious cases, but it is not the only one. China has been offering better conditions and more resources with one goal: to recover its best minds to lead the technological career. What’s happening. At the end of the 80s, with the promise of better working conditions and more resources a lot of Chinese talent emigrated to the United States. It was the case of the aforementioned Song Chun-Zhu or Liu Jun, who became one of the most prominent statesmen in the United States. Both They have returned to China And they are the example that the trend that began decades ago is reversing. Why it is important. China is the largest engineers in the world And this has become a key factor in the AI ​​era. It is estimated that at least 38% of the United States’s experts are Chinese and have studied in China. A recent example we have in The new Zuckerberg Superintelligence team, where almost all are Chinese. That a talent escape (rather return) from the United States to China could occur could tip the balance of leadership in AI. Surveillance and tensions. In 2018, the United States promoted the ‘China Initiative’whose objective was to combat economic espionage by the Chinese government. This affected the work of many Chinese scientists, increasing by 75% the number of academics who decided to return to their native country in 2021. On the other hand, the growing tensions between the United States and China, added to The cuts Under Trump’s second mandate they have made the weather anymore. China takes advantage. There is another key reason and that is that the Chinese government is offering very juicy incentives so that the best minds return to their land. They tell the Guardian, that Zhu was offered “resources he could never get in the United States.” It is similar to the case of the Brainco Neurotecnology Startup. It was founded in Boston by Han Biceng and currently has its headquarters in Hangzhou; He returned for the incentives offered by the government. More facilities. This summer, the Chinese government announced a New visa aimed at young technology and science specialists. This visa offers more advantages as more entries, period of validity and longer stay. They can opt for children under 45 who have STEM studies and researchers. With this, the government seeks not only to recover the talent that went abroad, but to attract foreign talent itself. Cover image | Song Chun-Zhu, Gary Lerude In Xataka | There is a city in China that is measured face to face with Silicon Valley: welcome to Hangzhou, the house of the ‘Six Little Dragons’

convincing Nvidia and Qualcomm of the superiority of their 2 nm

Samsung is retaking the course little by little. Jay Y. Lee, the president of this company, sent in the middle of last March An internal statement in which it synthesizes very precisely What this company faces: “Our technological advantage has been compromised in all our businesses. It is difficult status quo instead of generating disruptive changes. “ The Samsung subsidiary specialized in the manufacture of semiconductors is largely the company’s engine, and to recover health it is essential that its competitiveness increases. However, to carry it out it is necessary that its integration technology of 2 nm pelee from you to you both with the equivalent lithography of Intel, and, above all, with that of TSMC. However, Samsung’s starting point is favorable. And it is because He has been working in which it is undoubtedly The most important photolithography in its history. Samsung is already testing its 2 Nm node for Nvidia and Qualcomm At the beginning of January 2025, several very reliable Asian media collected that Samsung had already started the evidence of 2 Nm semiconductor production with the purpose of consolidating the first agreements with several clients. The Japanese chips designer for artificial intelligence (AI) Preferred Networks (PFN) and a South Korean company specialized in the design of neuronal processing units (NPU) were already interested at that time when Samsung manufactured their designs in their new 2 Nm node. It is perfectly assumed that both Samsung and TSMC manufacture 2 Nm chips for NVIDIA and QUALCOMM There is no doubt that at the delicate moment this company is going through, having several agreements tied before its competitors initiate large -scale production with equivalent photolithographs is very important. However, this is not all. And is that just five months after that news the South Korean medium Chosunbizwhich in the matter of semiconductors does not usually give stitch without thread, ensures that Samsung has already started the tests in its 2 Nm node For Nvidia and Qualcomm. This test process does not guarantee that Samsung is finally going to manufacture integrated 2 Nm circuits for these two US companies, but their interest in the technology of this South Korean company is an oxygen ball. There is no doubt about that. In any case, if Samsung finally reaches an agreement to manufacture the GPUs for Games and the Nvidia and the Qualcomm, TSMC, TSMC does not have to stay in the stake. It is perfectly assumed that both Samsung and TSMC manufacture 2 Nm chips for these two US companies. On the other hand, and this is also very important, Samsung has expressed his intention to produce 2 nm semiconductors in its Texas factory (USA), which can help you so close agreements with US chip designers and dodge US tariffs. Image | Samsung More information | Chosunbiz In Xataka | This is the chips war: a former SK Hynix employee is suspected to deliver stolen technology to Huawei

Nvidia tries to placate the criticism of the distribution of the GeForce RTX 50. Your answer is not entirely convincing

Several weeks after its launch it is still very difficult to find in the stores a family graphics card GeForce RTX 50 with a price aligned with its official cost. The easiest model to get with a price Similar to the marked by Nvidia It is the GeForce RTX 5070but the others or have an important extra cost or are not available. In this scenario it is understandable that users who have decided to get one of these graphics cards are disappointed. Many of you have clearly expressed it in The comments of our articlesand forums dedicated to PC hardware are full of users They complain due to the low availability of the new NVIDIA graphics cards. Given the circumstances, the company led by Jensen Huang has been forced to face with the purpose of appeasing players and trying to explain what is happening. This is Nvidia’s response As we can see in the graphics that we publish on the cover of this article, Nvidia says that during the first five weeks after the launch has distributed twice the graphics cards of the GeForce RTX 50 family that on its day of the range GeForce RTX 40. However, this explanation deserves a calm analysis. And, as they point out in Tom’s hardware and Redditthis comparison does not scrupulously reflect what is happening. During the first five weeks of the launch of the GeForce RTX 40, only the RTX 4090 was available Jarred Walton, one of Tom’s hardware editors, explains very well: During the first five weeks after the launch of the GeForce RTX 40, only the RTX 4090. This graphics card arrived on October 12, 2022, and the RTX 4080 landed on November 16, just five weeks later. All users know that RTX 4090 is not an adequate graphic solution for a wide range of players or for its price or for their benefits. However, during the first five weeks after the launch of the GeForce RTX 50 family, the four graphics cards that are currently available: the RTX 5090, the RTX 5080, the RTX 5070 TI and the RTX 5070 arrived. The first two landed together on January 30, 2025, while the GeForce RTX 5070 TI arrived on February 20. Finally, the GeForce RTX 5070 appeared almost at the end of this period: on March 5. If we have all this present it is reasonable to conclude that the comparison made by Nvidia It is not balanced. Not even accepting the possibility that this company has added the RTX 4080 to the figure of the GeForce RTX 40 family. Hopefully both availability and prices are normalized as soon as possible for the good of users. Image | Nvidia More information | Tom’s hardware In Xataka | If Nvidia lived only from PC GPUs, she would be about to die of success. And US tariffs don’t help

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.