“Although the inheritance has not been distributed yet. The Treasury already considers you the owner”

Three brothers inherit their parents’ two apartments. One of them is rented to tenants who pay their monthly fee without fail. The three brothers they cannot reach an agreement in the distribution of the inheritance. Nobody gives in, nobody signs, nobody distributes anything. Years go by and the apartments are still there, rented, but none of the brothers were awarded it. Each month they contribute money that no one declares to the Treasury because, according to them, since the inheritance has not been distributed, “they belong to no one.” This reasoning has a serious flaw: for the Treasury, those apartments do belong to someone. Of the three at the same time, from the moment their parents died, although legally the inheritance has not yet been resolved. This is confirmed Alina Dragos and Aitor Fernandeztax advisors TaxDown They see this mistake over and over again among their clients. Co-owners before signing anything. As Alina Dragos confirms, when someone dies, their assets are not left without an owner for a single day. The law distributes property among heirs from minute one even though no one has signed or accepted anything yet. “For the Treasury you are a possible heir to this legacy that is lying,” explains Dragos. This means that, if there are three brothers, each one “temporarily” assumes one third of each asset that makes up the inheritance and assumes its tax costs jointly and severally until its final award is resolved. It is not necessary to distribute anything for the obligation to exist. “Each one has to include the property for one third in the declaration,” says Dragos. And the same thing happens with any income that that property generates. That is, if it is a rented apartment, each heir will pay taxes on the corresponding percentage of the benefit generated by the property. What is a recumbent inheritance?. The name sounds a bit strange, the idea is quite simple. A recumbent inheritance It is the time that passes between someone’s death and the formal acceptance of their heirs. The heritage exists, it has debts and rights, but at the moment it does not have a unique and defined owner. As and as indicated From the Vilches Abogados law firm, this period can last weeks, or extend up to 30 years, depending on how long it takes the heirs to resolve the inheritance. Meanwhile, the property continues to generate income and someone has to answer for it to the Treasury. To do so, the Treasury assigns its own NIF to the inheritance for which its designated heirs will be jointly responsible until its acceptance. Why the obligation is born with death, not with the distribution. The law establishes a period of six months from death to settle the inheritance tax. Whether there is a distribution between the brothers or not. That is, we must “settle the inheritance tax that is six months old,” insists Aitor Fernández, no matter what happens between the heirs. And it’s not just that tax. The rest of the obligations of the heirs on that estate begin to run from that same day. And until it is distributed, it remains “a percentage of each of that property.” It doesn’t matter that the paperwork takes years to resolve. It is not that the inheritance enters a limbo and has no owner during that period of time between death and acceptance of the inheritance. The thing is that everyone is the owner until they agree on the final percentages of the distribution. As such, they must comply with the tax obligations of the inheritance assets from day one. What happens with rents, income and investments in the meantime?. If the inherited apartment is rented or generates some type of income, each heir must declare their share of the rent. It does not matter if the money reaches a single account, or only one of the heirs. It is not only limited to real estate, it also happens with dividends on shares or interests that were part of the deceased’s estate. They belong to the heirs from the first day, whether they have been distributed or not, according to the Tax Agency. Leaving the apartment empty does not free you from the Treasury either.. As an easy-to-understand example, we have talked about tax obligations when one of the assets was rented and generated income before accepting the inheritance. But the tax obligations are there even when the property is not making additional profits and no one lives on it. The Treasury assumes that it could also provide income. It is the well-known income imputation. In this case, a value of 2% of the cadastral value is applied, or 1.1% if the value has been reviewed in the last ten years, which is paid only for have an empty home in your name, or that of several heirs, as happens in an undistributed inheritance. When the distribution of the inheritance finally arrives, each heir will declare the final percentage that corresponds to him and, what was previously divided equally between everyone, now falls only to the person who keeps each asset. In Xataka | If the question is how much money can be donated to a child without declaring it to the Treasury, the law makes it clear: none Image | Unsplash (Towfiqu barbhuiya)

There are people sharing their court cases with AI. The problem is when a judge considers the conversations as evidence

More and more users have an AI chatbot as a companion for everything, whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claudeor any other. The problem comes when we decide to share sensitive data with this type of tools, especially with commercial models produced by large technology companies where we will always have the doubt of where our data travels. In this sense, there are those who share their legal data with the assistant, which can lead to something like what recently happened in New York. And a city judge just set a precedent historical by considering that any conversation held with a chatbot is public and therefore not protected by attorney-client privilege. That is to say: everything you share with the AI ​​can end up being used against you in court. The case. Bradley Heppner, an executive accused of fraud worth $300 million, used Claude, Anthropic’s chatbot, to ask questions about his legal situation before being arrested. He created 31 documents with his conversations with the AI ​​and later shared them with his defense attorneys. When the FBI seized his electronic devices, his attorneys claimed those documents were protected by attorney-client privilege. Judge Jed Rakoff has said no. Because No. Just like share Moish Peltz, a lawyer specializing in digital assets and intellectual property, in a post on X, the sentence establishes three reasons. First, an AI is not a lawyer: it is not licensed to practice, owes no loyalty to anyone, and its terms of service expressly disclaim any attorney-client relationship. Second, sharing legal information with an AI is legally equivalent to telling it to a friend, so it is not protected by professional secrecy. And third, sending ‘non-privileged’ documents to your lawyer afterwards does not magically make them confidential. The underlying problem. As the lawyer recalls, the interface of this type of chatbot generates a false sense of privacy, but in reality you are entering information into a third-party commercial platform that retains your data and reserves broad rights to disclose it. According to Anthropic privacy policy In effect when Heppner used Claude, the company may disclose both user questions and generated responses to “governmental regulatory authorities.” Dilemma. The court document reveals Also an aggravating factor: Heppner introduced into the AI ​​information that he had previously received from his lawyers. This poses a dilemma for the prosecution, according to account Peltz. And if you try to use those documents as evidence at trial, defense attorneys could become witnesses to the events, potentially forcing a mistrial. What does it mean to you? If you are involved in any legal matter, according to this ruling, what you share with an AI can be claimed by a judge and used as evidence. It doesn’t matter whether you are preparing your defense or seeking preliminary advice, as each query can end up becoming a factor against you. And it does not only apply to criminal cases: divorces, labor disputes, commercial litigation… any conversation with AI on these topics escapes legal protection. And now what. Peltz points out that legal professionals must explicitly warn their clients of this risk. You can’t assume that people understand it intuitively. The solution he mentions involves creating collaborative workspaces with AI shared between lawyer and client, so any interaction with artificial intelligence will occur under the supervision of the lawyer and within the lawyer-client relationship. Cover image | Romain Dancre and Solen Feyissa In Xataka | Folding clothes or taking apart LEGOs has always been a tedious task. Xiaomi’s new AI for robots has put an end to it

China considers softening its rare earth blocking, although not for everyone. It is great news for Europe

On April 4, just 24 hours after Donald Trump announced the taxes that he was going to apply to the importation of most products from abroad, The administration led by Xi Jinping responded. And he did it with forcefulness. In early December 2024 He chose to prohibit The export of some critical minerals to the US, among which were three essential metals for the chips industry: Gallium, Germanio and Antimony. Shortly after the Chinese government added two more critical metals to its list of export restrictions: Scandio and Disposio. These chemical elements are probably less known than metals prohibited by China previously, such as Gallium or Germanio, but are at least as important as the latter because they have a fundamental role in the industries of integrated circuits, telecommunications and the manufacture of storage devices. China has Europe at its feet The ability to put pressure from China had not yet been extinguished. Just ten days later, on April 14, the Administration did not hesitate take another step forward With the purpose of putting in check, in addition to the industries that I just mentioned, those of electric cars, aeronautics and advanced armament. To achieve this, it effectively suspended, in addition to the export of the most valuable rare earths, that of high -power magnets that have a critical role in the industries that I have cited in this same paragraph. China’s export controls are mainly directed to the US, but the old continent does not remain unscathed Chinese authorities are retaining in ports throughout the country not only rare earths, but also high -power magnets acquired by electric cars manufacturers throughout the planet, aerospace companies, chip factories and armament companies. Many of these organizations have high -power magnet reservations made with rare earths, but possibly They will only allow them to subsist a few months. Europe in particular is in an extremely delicate position. China’s export controls are directed mainly to the US, but the old continent It does not remain unscathed. At least for the moment. In fact, in Germany, which as we all know is the heart of the European car industry, There are already experts who assure that if China continues to retain rare earths and electric motors some essential parts of the electric cars production chain They will stop in no more than six weeks. For the European car industry this blow would be very difficult to fit. European companies that are dedicated to the manufacture of semiconductors are also in a very compromised situation. According to Reuters Many European chip production lines They will stop very soon Due to the shortage of crucial supplies, which has led the European Chamber of Commerce to meet with officials of the Ministry of Commerce of China to ask them to allow rare earth supply to European companies that are dedicated to the production of integrated circuits. The result of this meeting has not yet been officially completed, but the information that has been leaked maintains that China is willing to relax its export controls for some European companies. Image | Peggy Greb, US Department of Agriculture More information | Reuters In Xataka | The US will not be able to contain the technological development of China. Experts from the chips industry forecast it

Barcelona is the city of Spain with more motorcycles. Now the Generalitat considers limiting its circulation

Spain has a mobile park of 4,162,850 motorcycles. Of these, 22.8% are registered in Catalonia. In total, there are 947,895 motorcycles that circulate through the streets of the Autonomous Community, according to Statistics Institute of Catalonia. The figure shows the enormous weight that the motorcycle represents In Catalonia. No other vehicle is so popular if compared to the total cars volume of the country. While motorcycles, as we said, exceed 20%, Catalonia has 13.8% of cars registered. Buses (14.5%) and vans and trucks (14.1%) are also far from the previous figure. Of the almost million motorcycles that Catalonia has registered, 713,033 of them are counted in the province of Barcelona. Anyone who walks through the city can verify that it is a boiler of two -wheeled vehicles. According to RACC data of 2022in the city about 450,000 motorcycle displacements occur every day. AND Already in 2019 it was alert of the difficulties that the city had to park all two -wheeled vehicles that circulate through its streets. For all of the above, the IMPULSE PLAN TO THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE 2025-2030 presented by the Generalitat de Catalunya herself in which a Reduction of combustion motorcycles with measures that facilitate their limitations. A plan that has been sold as the prohibition of motorcycles with combustion engines from 2030 (although this is not true) and that has raised blisters in the world of motorcycle who are considered discriminated against in front of any other type of vehicle. What happened? A controversial plan Presented by the president of the Generalitat de Catalunya, Salvador Illa, and collected on the official website of the agency, the IMPULSE PLAN TO THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE 2025-2030 It has been presented as the master lines to be followed in the coming years to transform the Catalan mobile park and gradually clean the pollutant emissions of the same. In that plan we can read initiatives such as TRIPPLY the penetration of electric vehicles In Catalonia to be at the middle levels of Europe, bend the number of public loaders (especially the rapids) and electrify 90% d the fleet of the Generalitat of Catalonia. In the program, which has five key points of action, there is no talk at any time to remove vehicles from the circulation or references to the low emissions areas of the Catalan cities and their restrictions by environmental label. Tours, buses, trucks or vans are completely omitted in the aforementioned plan. However, there is a clearly indicated type of vehicle: motorcycles. Literally, the plan includes in its second point that it will work on the following: “Promotion of the gradual limitation of combustion motorcycle. Parallel to the implementation of gradual restrictions on combustion motorcycles with environmental labels B and C, an industrial transition program will be established to promote the production, distribution and repair of electric motorcycles Although from some media and on social networks it can be read that Catalonia will prohibit combustion motorcycles from 2030, the truth is that this is not true. There is no established date in which it is specified that these vehicles will not be able to circulate through the streets. However, the warning that “the gradual limitation of combustion motorcycle” will be promoted, it gives an idea that the intentions of the Generalitat of Catalonia is to end motorcycles with environmental labeling B and C. Of course, Specifies that the intention is to promote the sale of motorcycles with cleaner labeling. The measure is controversial because, as they point out from Anesdor (National Association of Companies of the Sector Two Wheels), in the program No mention is made to other types of vehicles such as cars, buses, vans or trucks. That despite the fact that motorcycles are not contemplated in the prohibition of combustion engines for vehicles that are still going (we will see if definitively) in the European Union from 2035. They also emphasize that, at the moment, 58.1% of the motorcycles circulating in Spain have environmental labeling C. is another of the label paradoxes designed by the DGT. Collect in The confidential that the average data of Nox emissions of a Euro 5 motorcycle (DGT tag) reach 0.0156 gr/km. However, they point out in the digital medium, the environmental labeling is controversial. A Euro 6 car emits, average 0.3137 gr/km of Nox. That is, they have the same sticker despite having contaminated much more. That if they do not have Soft hybridization that has a minimum impact on the accounts but automatically delivers the DGT echo label. They also have Echo more polluting vehicles that the aforementioned motorcycles such as the CNG and LPG (0.0350 gr/km of NOX on average). Only gasoline hybrids They reflect better data but the difference is minimal (0.0133 gr/km of Nox). That is, no one has forbidden that motorcycles with combustion engines can circulate in Catalonia but the intention of the Generalitat is to promote those actions that limit their movements and press so that consumers jump to electric vehicles. Photo | Nan Zhou In Xataka | Runrún returns about changes in DGT labels: this is all we know

China is devouring the televisions market. So much that Panasonic considers abandoning it

Samsung is the manufacturer who has been selling the most televisions for 18 years. His imperturbable leadership in such a competitive market is unusual, but This domain is being threatened. And not for its compatriot LG, the company with the one that has dealt with more intensity during most of his reign. TV manufacturers that are growing most in the world market They arrive from China. And they seem willing to snatch Samsung his throne. According to the consultant Counterpoint Research During the third quarter of 2024, Samsung’s fee in the global televisions market was 15%, while Chinese and TCL companies reached 12%. However, it is interesting that we also observe the trend. The Samsung quota was slightly reduced to the second quarter of 2024, while that of Hisense increased by 19% compared to the same quarter of 2023. Panasonic is making a very difficult decision in uncertain times Hisense seems unstoppable. His growth has allowed him to place second only behind Samsung during the third quarter of 2024. In fact, he has surpassed TCL. And these two Chinese brands have beaten by 2% the LG market share during that same quarter. This “photography” helps us identify in what state is the television market today, but we can do something else. We can investigate the always interesting segment of prémonic televisions. If we stick to the high range the Samsung market share fell from 43% of the third quarter of 2023 to 30% during the third quarter of 2024 Again according to Counterpointif we stick to the high range the Samsung market share fell from 43% of the third quarter of 2023 to 30% during the third quarter of 2024. The interesting thing is that in this same period the fees of Hins and TCl experienced A very different evolution than Samsung’s. Hisense went from 14 to 24%, and TCL from 11 to 17%. It is important that we take this into account because it reflects that Chinese brands do not sell only low -price televisions; They also do well with high -end models. At this juncture and without deviating from the Prémona segment, LG has gone from second position in this category with a 20% market share to fourth position, with a fee of 16%. He has Samsung not only; Also to Hisense and TCl. In recent years I have had the opportunity to Analyze several televisions Of these two Chinese brands, and objectively their technology is very competitive. In fact, they are not only intimidating South Korean companies; Japanese brands are also suffering. And a lot. Yuki Kusumi, the president of Panasonic, declared Yesterday that the company that leads is willing to part with its televisions manufacturing division. “We are prepared to sell it if necessary, but we have not yet decided,” Kusumi said. Panasonic has embarked In a deep business restructuring which seeks to increase its medium -term competitiveness and enhance its agility when making decisions to adapt to the market. A last interesting note: for 2024 the Chinese televisions manufacturers with TCL and Hisense at the head managed to get More than 50% of the Japanese market. More information | Forbes | Nikkei Asia In Xataka | Panasonic has ready its two 2025 flagship televisions. And one of them is committed to a spectacular OLED panel

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.