“Meditation is related to increased performance on cognitive tasks”

Breathing is such an instinctive act that we rarely pay attention to it, since, although we do it about 20,000 times a day, we are in a strict physiological “autopilot” of which we are almost unaware. However, in recent years, neuroscience has begun to unravel the mechanisms behind a practice that has been with us for millennia, such as conscious breathing. to relax There are many techniques that are advertised on social networks, such as mindfulness or breathing control. But here are several questions we can ask ourselves: do these techniques really work? And why do they work? This is where science comes in, which has managed to map how the simple act of altering our breathing rhythm is capable of modulating attention, memory and the activity of our brain networks. The neurological basis of this phenomenon is strongly supported by the work of researchers such as Jack L. Feldman, who has dedicated his career to studying respiratory control and its deep link with emotions and cognition. But now we go one step further to understand that breathing control techniques are a way of communicating with the nervous system. The panic button. To understand why paying attention to how air enters and leaves our lungs has such a massive impact, you have to look at the brain stem. Here is a study published in Science in 2017 identified a small but critical group of neurons in the pre-Bötzinger complexthe true “pacemaker” of our respiratory rhythm. With just 175 neuronstheir projections made connections with the areas of the brain responsible for attention, alertness and panic. This is why slow, controlled breathing drastically reduces the activation of this center, and therefore acts as a way to put a biological brake on the brain’s alarm signals. Beyond relaxation. Although it is what they sell us most on a daily basis, the reality is that when we move to conscious breathing, focused attention is also improved, for example. This is what neuroimaging studies show that the brain ‘lights up’ in very specific areas when it is in a state of mindfulness. Specifically, areas related to emotional management, body awareness and focused moment-to-moment attention are activated. In fact, a study published in Scientific Reports in 2018 demonstrated that eight weeks of meditation based on attention to breathing not only improves performance in visual selective attention and working memory, but also optimizes the efficiency of brain networks. The new thing we know. The latest data is consolidating the idea that breathing is the main modulator between our body and our mind. Different research points to how interneuronal connections translate into tangible improvements in emotional control. For example, a work published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience concludes that slow breathing significantly reduces anxiety, improving medial frontal alpha asymmetry in electroencephalograms, which is a known biomarker of control over our emotions. It’s not magic. This is a very important nuance that we have to make here, since although studies agree that these mindfulness techniques are formidable for reducing chronic stress, anxiety and depression, they are not a miracle. What science here is not that we are facing a magical transformation, but rather a neurobiological training. Learning to breathe consciously is, in essence, learning to use a physical interface that evolution has given us to optimize the efficiency of our neural networks, improve our emotional regulation and maintain focus in an increasingly dispersed world. Images | Benjamin Child In Xataka | The best 18 meditation, relaxation and mindfulness applications to have better mental health

Science suggests that it is a great shield against cognitive deterioration

In our society, the fact that grandparents end up taking care of their grandchildren throughout the day or having to pick them up from school It is something quite normalboosted mainly by the problems of conciliation familiar. This is something that has been the subject of much controversy because, when you reach a certain age, carrying the burden of having a child under your responsibility can take its toll. But now science indicates that it has important benefits. New tests. A study published this year in the magazine Psychology and Aging points out that being involved in caring for grandchildren provides a benefit to cognitive health, although it has different important nuances related to sex and time dedicated. The science behind. This study focused on data from English Longitudinal Study of Aging where More than 1,700 grandparents over 50 years of age have been analyzed. In this case, to ensure maximum precision in the results, the researchers used a matching method, comparing grandparent caregivers with those who did not care for their grandchildren, but who did share demographic and health characteristics. What did they see? With this sample on the table, what was seen is that both grandmothers and grandfathers who are caregivers showed higher levels of verbal fluency compared to the control group. Furthermore, both genders had better episodic memory compared to matched controls. In this way, it can be concluded that grandparents who take care of their grandchildren tend to show better cognitive functioning than those who do not. Quality versus quantity. One of the most revealing conclusions of the study debunks a common myth: the amount of time spent is not the determining factor. In this way, spending more or fewer hours caring for one’s grandson or granddaughter does not predict the effect it may have on brain cognition. But what really affects brain health in this case is the diversity of tasks. What was seen is that grandparents who participated in a greater variety of activities experienced better cognitive outcomes. These activities include, for example, preparing food for your grandchildren, spending time playing with them, helping them with their homework, or picking them up from daycare or school. Gender difference. Although both grandfather and grandmother showed higher initial cognitive levels when caring for their grandchildren, with the passage of time it changed. In the case of both sexes, it was observed that both verbal fluency and episodic memory improved substantially over time. But the difference is precisely in the temporal decline, causing grandmothers who have cared for their grandchildren to have a slower cognitive loss over time than caring grandparents, who maintain the same speed of loss. Because? The researchers here suggest that these differences may be due to how they relate to different genders and how they collaborate on care tasks. In this case, grandmothers tend to become much more deeply involved in the physical and emotional care of children. If we turn to the grandparents, we find that they are involved in leisure activities and often carry out care tasks in the company of the grandmothers. This way, you are not as focused on care. The limit. Logically, Maintaining multiple productive roles, such as family caregiving, can promote a more active lifestyle that positively impacts people’s cognitive functions. However, research warns that adding care responsibilities to the usual activities of these grandparents can be stressful and leave our grandparents feeling overwhelmed and with little autonomy. Images | Vitaly Gariev In Xataka | Your grandmother is an evolutionary advantage: science already knows why they generate an indestructible bond with their grandchildren

The danger of using AI chatbots for everything is real: MIT has discovered the “cognitive debt”

A MIT study He has shown that chatgpt and similar tools generate what they call “cognitive debt”: students who resort to them for total use end up writing better, but thinking worse. Why is it important. The study contradicts the belief that AI is like a calculator: a simple support that frees us for more complex reasoning. Actually, these tools can atrophy the brain connections that build critical thinking. The facts. 54 university students have spent months writing essays, divided into three groups: Grupo LLM, which used Chatgpt. Search motor group, which used Google. And group Solo-Cerebro, without external tools. The researchers measured their neuronal activity with electroencephalograms and the results have been overwhelming: those who used a neuronal connectivity systematically lower in all frequency bands. Compared to the group that only used its brain, there was a lower activation in key networks that connect parietal, temporal and frontal regions, fundamental for attention, memory and semantic processing. In Xataka 81% of interviewers suspected the traps with AI in interviews: 31% have confirmed it without a doubt and they have put a brake The contrast. The essays generated with AI received better notes, both from teachers and evaluating algorithms. But their authors remembered worse what they had written minutes before and felt a minor authorship about their texts. When they forced the usual users to write without help, their brain patterns showed that dependence on external support. They had lost ability to reactivate the necessary neural networks to write independently. How to walk without support after years doing it with crutches. Yes, but. The students who learned to write without ia and then used it for the first time maintained their engagement neuronal They even showed better memory and reactivation of broad brain areas. The key difference: You need to know how to think before you can think with machines. In perspective. This pattern replicates what we see in other professions: The subway driver who feels alienated because the train drives alone. Translators turned into machine editors. 3D creatives that only retouch what the AI ​​generates. {“Videid”: “X9R6K72”, “Autoplay”: False, “Title”: “Chatgpt Pulse”, “Tag”: “Technology”, “Duration”: “67”} The threat. The study also analyzed university students who already had developed writing skills. The effects could be more severe in adolescents who are still building these cognitive abilities. As a Dartmouth teacher said: we run the risk of creating “an educated generation with AI shortcuts” that lacks independent thinking skills. And now what. The sequence matters more than technology. First, you learn to think. Then, you learn to think with machines. The brain needs to build those Neuronal highways before being able to delegate selectively in AI. The study concludes that educational interventions should “combine the assistance of AI tools with learning phases without tools” to optimize both immediate skill and long -term neuronal development. Outstanding image | Xataka In Xataka |What happens if the software doesn’t matter when you are the largest company in the software world (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news The danger of using AI chatbots for everything is real: MIT has discovered the “cognitive debt” It was originally posted in Xataka by Javier Lacort .

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.