Aragon’s great plan to fill its reservoirs with solar panels has just collapsed due to a bureaucratic oversight

There is an image that sums up our times: reservoirs covered in solar panels floating like technological water lilies. It was the Government’s great bet to squeeze clean energy without consuming soil. However, that landscape has just collided head-on with the Supreme Court. According to the national climate roadmapBy 2030, Spain has to achieve a renewable penetration of 42% in final energy consumption and 74% in electricity generation. Swamp water, free of conflict over agricultural or forest land use, seemed the ideal setting. But the legislative rush has truncated the plan. The Supreme Court agrees with Aragón. The Fifth Section of the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court has declared null Royal Decree 662/2024, of July 9. It has done so by upholding an appeal filed by the Autonomous Community of Aragon. The ruling annuls the regulations by operation of law and condemns the State to pay the procedural costs. The Aragonese regional executive had full legitimacy to appeal, since, as the court confirmed, the execution of this decree directly affected its powers in territorial planning, the environment, tourism and hydroelectric development. But what did it consist of? Published in the Official State Gazettethe objective of the text was to develop the regime to which the installation of these plants in state-managed reservoirs should be subject. The preamble of the standard strongly defended the technology, ensuring that these systems have better energy performance due to the cooling effect of water, reduce evaporation by casting shade, and slow down the growth of phytoplankton in waters at risk of eutrophication. To put order in this deployment, the Government articulated a strict system of temporary concessions that limited the exploitation of the plants to a maximum of 25 years, including extensions. The regulatory text also imposed space limits according to the ecological state of the waters. Likewise, the conditions required the promoters to provide a provisional bond of 4,000 euros per megawatt (MW) installed only for the application – which became up to 12,000 euros per MW to respond for damage to the public domain -, all conditional on the presentation of environmental studies, monitoring of invasive species and a continuous monitoring program to evaluate water quality. The legal stumbling block: legislating without asking. The central problem was not the content of the norm, but how it was approved. The Government omitted the process of prior public consultation with affected citizens and groups. This is a procedure that the ruling considers inexcusable, and its omission has been the nail in the coffin of the decree. The State tried to justify this legal shortcut in the courts with two arguments that the Supreme Court has dismantled. Firstly, the State Attorney’s Office alleged that there was an extraordinary situation of public interest due to the increase in energy prices due to the war in Ukraine. The High Court rejected this premise, recalling its own doctrine: to skip public consultation, it is not enough that there is urgency; the rule must also be of a purely organizational or budgetary nature, something that does not happen in this case. Secondly, the Government tried to rely on an “urgent processing” route. The response of the magistrates It was forceful.: “In this case, the aforementioned procedure cannot be dispensed with because there is no declaration of urgency nor was the procedure developed on that legal basis.” There was no agreement from the Council of Ministers that supported the rush; therefore, the shortcut was illegal. Why it matters: form, not substance. There is a crucial nuance that changes the reading of this news. The Supreme Court has not ruled that putting solar panels on water is a bad idea or that it is harmful. In fact, it rejected the rest of the complaints presented by Aragón, resolving that the text did not violate the principles of good regulation or legal certainty. We are facing what jurists call a formal procedural defect. The law falls only because the Government did not listen to the parties involved before acting. It is especially ironic that the Council of State itself I would have already warned to the Executive during the draft phase that this matter was going to need, in the medium term, a much more complete and systematic regulation. And now what? The renewable energy sector, which saw floating platforms as an unbeatable alternative to avoid the controversy over the consumption of agricultural land, is left in limbo. All the regulations of the decree disappear, including the modification of the Regulation of the Public Hydraulic Domain of 1986 that articulated these concessions. Meanwhile, in the affected territories, caution is already a reality. The Ebro Hydrographic Confederation, for example, had previously vetoed the installation of these floating plants in the Cinca swamps. The legal basis that allows these facilities continues to exist in the Water Law. What has fallen is the regulatory development, so the Government can go back to square one and draft a new regulation. But he will have to do it by scrupulously complying with the steps that he ignored this time. It has been shown that the rush in the energy transition has a high legal cost. The decree that was going to order solar panels on water has been shipwrecked. For not having listened before. Image | RawPixel Xataka | Europe throws away 16 billion a year in electronic waste. Spain has just turned on the first oven in Europe to recover them

China and Nvidia star in the “great technological divorce” of 2026. A bureaucratic hell that is erasing it from the market

Talking about Nvidia is talking about artificial intelligence glue. The GPU giant has invested millions financing cocompanies like OpenAI or Anthropicbut along the way has not forgotten startups or to make purchases for strengthen your position in the market. The problem is that it is missing out on a potential $50 billion market: China. Because Nvidia is eager to enter China, but it is trapped between bureaucracy, the Trump Government, Xi Jinping’s Government, and the smuggling of its graphics cards. The great divorce. In a very short time, Nvidia has gone from dominating the Chinese GPU market for artificial intelligence to losing it completely. The restrictions of the Trump Administration and the intensification of the trade war between the powers left Nvidia out of the game. Either it would adapt its GPUs and create less capable versions of those it sold in the West or it would not be able to sell in China. For a time, Nvidia was selling the H20 to adapt to the new rules, but it is something that has taken its toll. As AI needs demanded more powerful GPUs and own chinese industry with Huawei, Cambricon and Moore Threads was developed, Nvidia was being left out of the game. Official quota. In the middle of last year, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang pressed Donald Trump to see reason: it was better for Nvidia to be able to enter China both to make money and to slow the accelerated development of the domestic industry, one that Western restrictions had given wings to. In the end, the US gave in previous tariffs of 25% and one condition: all GPU orders from Chinese companies to Nvidia would be reviewed one by one. There is a problem: the US body in charge of reviewing these export licenses has decreased by 20% in recent months, which is causing delays of months when it comes to fulfilling an order. From when a Chinese company asks for Nvidia GPUs until they are given an answer, the ‘chinese dragons‘They have already released some product. The result? Huang points out that Nvidia has gone from being a leader in China to have a 0% quotapainting the situation as a true drama and pointing directly to the strategies of both China and, above all, the United States as the cause of his company falling into the offside of the large Asian market. Furthermore, it is China itself that encourages its companies to, to the extent possible, use Chinese hardware that they is developing at accelerated rates. “Official” fee. But the fact that Huang claims that his market share in China is 0% does not mean that there are no GPUs for AI in China because it seems that there are H100, H200 and even B200 due to something very simple: smuggling. Despite the proprietary technological solutions they are developing, it is evident that a large part of the AI ​​industry is built with Nvidia GPUs and that implies that the tools are very well optimized for them. There are several occasions in which Nvidia AI chip smuggling networks have been reported, with modest seizures on occasions (just tens of millions of dollars) and somewhat larger seizures on others (hundreds of millions in a few months). Chinese companies obtain these chips through indirect routes from Hong Kong and Singapore and, although Nvidia tries to trace the origin, the clandestine flow and opaque chains make the task complex. trapped. Someone is lining their pockets and that someone is not Nvidia. And the problem is that Huang’s pressure had an effect, but the solution they gave him is not as agile as the market needs. Returning to the issue of bureaucracythe United States Office of Industry and Security, which is responsible for reviewing these export licenses, reduced its workforce by 19% in 2024. Specifically, those who develop standards linked to the semiconductor industry and review licenses have decreased by 20%. The result is an average of 76 days to resolve export requests, something that is extending so far this year and which is disastrous news for both Nvidia and others deeply involved in the AI ​​segment, such as AMD. From China, things are not much better, since companies must make it very clear why they need Nvidia AI chips and cannot meet their objectives using national alternatives. Jensen, almost excluded. In any case, it is evident that Huang does not like to be missing the AI ​​party in China, in the same way that he is going to miss the new trip of Donald Trump and other executives to a summit between Trump and Xi Jingping that will be held between the 13th and 15th of this month. Or so it seemed. This is an event in which conversations will focus on agriculture and commercial aviation, so a priori Jensen didn’t have much in mind. But of course, alongside Trump are CEOs like Elon Musk, Cristiano Amon or Tim Cook, among others. And, although it seemed that he was not invited, as we see in South China Morning PostIn a message from Trump on his social network, it was confirmed that Huang will finally accompany him on the trip. In the end, it’s about money. Jensen Huang doesn’t want China to have the best chips because He wants to save those for the United States.but it is a very large market in which Nvidia can offer chips strategically: it makes money while making companies opt for its product instead of that of the Chinese companies themselves. In Xataka | Nvidia’s superpower is not having money, it is making everyone work for it: Foxconn is the latest to join

the bureaucratic absurdity behind mercury pollution

When environmental prosecutor Carlos Chirre and his team arrived at the port after destroying 15 illegal dredges in the Colorado River (Madre de Dios), they did not find justice, but a mob. About 80 people armed with sticks cornered them, burned their boats and threatened to kill them. “This is how the people interdict,” one of the women leading the riot shouted. This scene, documented in an extensive report by Mongabay Latamillustrates a harsh reality: the Peruvian State has lost control of the territory. The gold rush doesn’t stop. As they warn in AP Newsillegal mining is spilling over into new areas of the Peruvian jungle, such as the province of Tambopata and virgin corners of Madre de Dios, leaving in its wake devastated jungles and rivers converted into toxic mudflats. Nobody is safe. The historic Panguana scientific station—with more than 60 years operating in Huánuco— has been surrounded by backhoes that operate day and night. Death threats against scientific personnel forced the area to be evacuated. Researcher Eric Cosio warns about the magnitude of this enemy: the degree of logistical sophistication of these miners far exceeds that of drug trafficking. They operate in broad daylight, extracting gold on a medium scale and in full view of everyone. The great legal trap. The tributaries are public and intangible goods, but the State itself is the one that has facilitated their invasion. According to the researchthere are at least 215 current mining concessions that cross five of the main basins in the region. The legal trick is perverse: although the concession title does not authorize the extraction of the mineral without having previously obtained environmental permits, in practice it is enough to have that paper in hand to install dredgers and deceive the indigenous communities, stating that the State has granted them that right. But the definitive shield of impunity has a name: the Comprehensive Registry of Mining Formalization (Reinfo). As detailed Wiredthis temporary registration (whose validity Congress has extended until 2026) grants criminal immunity to registered miners. As long as they appear “in the process of formalization,” they can be removing the river bed and using mercury—acts prohibited by law—without being able to be prosecuted as illegal miners. Political complicity. Here comes the factor that clearly explains the situation: Luis Otsuka, current regional governor of Madre de Dios and former mining leader, owns a concession called K-1 that overlaps the Tres Islas native community. Although the Judiciary ordered the annulment of these concessions to protect the indigenous territory, it was the Otsuka regional government itself that, years later, reactivated them. The imminent future. In the Loreto region, where mining is just beginning to emerge strongly, the health tragedy is already underway. According to research by the Amazon Scientific Innovation Center (Cincia), 79% of the residents evaluated in the Nanay River basin already have mercury levels in their bodies higher than the limit recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Claudia Vega, Cincia researcher, issues a terrifying warning: Because communities in Loreto eat fish daily, an expansion of mining would bring them closer to suffering levels of mass poisoning comparable to the historic Minamata disaster in Japan. At a global level, the crisis also takes its toll on the climate. The Pontifical Catholic University of Peru emphasizes that the paralysis of the measurement tower in Panguana directly commits to the international AndesFlux project. Without this key station in central Peru, the world loses vital long-term data to understand how rainfall forms and how the carbon cycle works across South America. From the river to the blood. According to Deutsche Wellepollution punishes indigenous peoples with greater cruelty. Julio Cusurichi, leader of the indigenous organization AIDESEP, denounces that studies in Madre de Dios already show mercury levels well above what is allowed in pregnant women, causing children to be born with severe neurological problems and malformations. This bioaccumulation is lethal. As Claudia Vega (Cincia) explainsmercury thrown into the waters is transformed into methylmercury and enters the food chain through carnivorous fish. But not only that: the burning of gold amalgam releases vapors that travel for kilometers, poisoning the air of urban areas and forests that do not even have direct mining activity. Behind this ecocide there is a thirsty international market. The German media points out that there is a multimillion-dollar traffic of mercury from Mexico to the Amazon. Furthermore, it exposes a global vacuum: the Minamata Convention—designed to stop this toxic substance—does not completely prohibit its trade, allowing it under certain exceptions for artisanal mining, a loophole that is ruthlessly exploited by mafias. Behind this ecocide there is a thirsty international market. The German media points out that there is a multimillion-dollar traffic of mercury from Mexico to the Amazon. Furthermore, it exposes a global vacuum: the Minamata Convention—designed to stop this toxic substance—does not completely prohibit its trade, allowing it under certain exceptions for artisanal mining, a loophole that is ruthlessly exploited by mafias. A perpetual damage. Mercury is not a problem that time can erase. “Mercury, since it is an element, we do not destroy it,” remember Claudia Vega. It doesn’t go away; it simply travels, filters down, and is passed down to the next generations. The gold that today leaves the Peruvian Amazon for global markets is stained by something denser than mud and mercury: it is stained by deliberate legal loopholes. The State has created a bureaucratic monster where being registered in a registry or having a concession on paper is worth more than the health of a native community or the natural channel of a river. As long as the laws continue to protect the destroyer rather than the destroyed, the Amazon will continue to lose the battle. Image | Marco Milon Xataka | There are two global superpowers fighting to gain a foothold on the coast of Peru: the United States and China.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.