brothers

two similar brothers focused on very different audiences

by

Now that the new Xiaomi 17 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra have been announced, it is worth stopping to think about which one best fits what we are looking for. Should we opt for a better battery or a more versatile camera system? Do we want a smaller phone or do we prefer a bigger one? Let’s review the key differences of the new generation of Xiaomi. The differences between the Xiaomi 17 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra Bigger or smaller Xiaomi 17 (left) and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (right). The most obvious difference between the two phones centers on the size. The Xiaomi 17 has a diagonal of 6.3 inches while that of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is 6.9 inches. Here we have to play with experience: do we feel comfortable using a mobile phone that is almost 7 inches? If the answer is no, the choice is clear. Because in addition to size there is another factor that influences: the weight. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra weighs 27 grams more, something that can be noticed when using it with one hand. Stay with this: we have to know if when using a cell phone, or when putting it in our pocket, we will feel comfortable due to size or weight. Because in the design, these are the two big differences, since in everything else we are practically talking about twin brothers. For example, both phones offer a 120 Hz refresh rate so that the phone looks much more fluid when playing games or navigating through the menus. Both displays also offer 3,500 nits of peak brightness, ensuring they look great outdoors. They are also compatible with Dolby Vision and HDR10+, two image formats that add a broader color palette. What does vary is the resolution due to the size of the screens, but it is not something that is noticeable with the naked eye. Processor and RAM and storage configurations RAM and storage configurations of the Xiaomi 17 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra. While it is true that in the same generation mobile phones are usually differentiated by the processor (among other things), not here: both the Xiaomi 17 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra come with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5which is the most powerful processor currently available in Android phones. Where we do find a difference is in the RAM and storage configurations. The Xiaomi 17 is available with two configurations of 256 GB and 512 GB of internal storage, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra starts at 512 GB and is available with a 1 TB version. Depending on how many photos, videos, or files you want to save, you may want more or less storage. The same goes for RAM.: The Xiaomi 17 is only available with 12 GB, and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is only available with 16 GB. This is important because the market is moving towards artificial intelligence: if you want to process AI locally, the more RAM memory the mobile has, the better. If it is not something that is part of your plans, you will be able to notice the difference when running several apps at the same time, although in both cases you should not have any problems because 12 and 16 GB are good RAM figures for a mobile phone. More size does not mean more battery That a mobile phone is larger means that it can contain a larger battery, but this is not always the case and the new generation of Xiaomi makes it completely clear to us: the Xiaomi 17 incorporates a 6,330 mAh battery and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra comes with a 6,000 mAh battery. The difference is small, so will this be noticeable in practice? Yes, and it will probably be quite noticeable. The larger the screen, the more battery a mobile will consume. Taking into account that the Xiaomi 17 comes with a larger battery and a smaller screen, we will have more hours of autonomy on a single charge. In addition, it should also be noted that the two phones do not charge with the same power. The Xiaomi 17 offers 100W and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra offers 90W. The difference is small, but enough so that the cheapest mobile phone can have the battery fully charged in less time. A review of the photographic section Xiaomi 17 Ultra photography kit. The biggest difference between these phones is in their photography section. In both cases we once again have the Leica collaboration and both the front camera and the main sensor are the same. The difference is both in the ultra wide angle, which the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a larger aperture, and especially in the telephoto lens. The Xiaomi 17 incorporates a 50 MP f/2.0 telephoto lens, which means that it has a very interesting aperture for taking photos in environments with more complicated lighting, such as indoors or sunsets. Instead, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra comes with a 200 MP telephoto lens with variable aperture between f/2.30 and f/2.96, allowing you to capture photos with better resolution with or without zoom. In addition, there is a quite interesting point: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is the only mobile phone that is compatible with both photography kits of the brand. They are two accessories that are a great addition if what we are looking for is to have a photographic experience. In the previous generation (that of Xiaomi 15 Ultra) its corresponding photographic kit we liked it a lot. In summary: which Xiaomi mobile to choose according to your tastes and needs Why choose the Xiaomi 17 The Xiaomi 17 is no worse, it is a mobile phone that is focused on other types of users and that stands out in some sections: Best battery. The Xiaomi 17 has a larger capacity battery and its charging power is also greater. smaller size. As it is a smaller mobile phone, it is more comfortable to carry in your pocket. Good photographic section. It will not have the … Read more

We usually assume that the Wright brothers invented the plane in the US. In Brazil they think they have evidence otherwise

by

December 17, 1903. That morning, the brothers wibur and orville wright They got something apparently unpublished until then: A flight of only 12 seconds for posterity and just over 36 meters away that changed the world of aviation forever. They had achieved the first (controlled) flight of a machine heavier than the air, and the United States and the brothers would remain forever in the annals of the story. However, in Brazil they don’t have it so clear. A centenary rivalry. While in most of the planet there is consensus and the invention of the plane is attributed to the Wright brothers, in Brazil the conviction is kept alive that That was not like that. In fact, many think it was Alberto Santos Dumont who made the first flight considered real in 1906. The Brazilian narrative maintains that, unlike the Wright, Santos Dumont managed to take off its aircraft 14-BIS Autonomously and without mechanical assistance, raising before judges and journalists in Paris, without the need for catapults or favorable winds, which would make it, according to its defenders, the true “father of aviation.” To get an idea, he told the weekend The Washington Post That this version He has shown so deeply In the Brazilian culture, to the point that the image of Santos Dumont has figured in tickets, one of the main airports of Rio de Janeiro bears his name and his figure starred in the opening ceremony of the 2016 Olympic Games. Lula and the tests. Not just that. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has also put his grain of sand and has revived the debate During his current mandate, taking advantage of every occasion to discredit the US version and claim Santos Dumont as a pioneer. Lula accuses the United States of having imposed his story thanks to his Powerful film industry And he considers that denying Brazilian merit is a grievance to history and national self -esteem. For the politician and so many other defenders, the difference is very clear: The Wright Flyer In 1903 He needed catapultsconstant wind and auxiliary structures, while the 14-bis of Santos Dumont took off on its own, without any external device, flying 220 meters in front of the look of the public and the international press. Dumont’s 14bis The technical debate and science. And what do experts say? It is the big question, obvious. Historians and experts in aviation outside Brazil, Like Peter JakabEmeritus curator of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, they consider irrefutable that the Wright managed to fly before Santos Dumont. Under this premise, they argue that The use of non -disabling catapults The achievement, remembering that even today combat airplanes take off by catapults from aircraft carriers without its flight capacity. In addition, they emphasize that in 1905 The Flyer III of the Wright already made sustained flights up to 40 minutes and 38 km of travel, demonstrating a much more developed capacity than that of 14-bis. On the other sidewalk, for many Brazilians the crucial detail is not the duration, but The shape of takeoff: Without external aids and before witnesses. National background and mythology. In the end, the dispute has transcended the purely technical and has become a National Identity Question both in Brazil and the United States. For Brazilians, Santos Dumont represents not only a technological deed but A symbol of ingenuity and homeland pride. Its legacy goes beyond aviation: it is remembered for its simplicity, its contribution to the development of airships and its rejection of the military use of airplanes, cause that deeply affected it until its tragic end. In Brazil, in fact, its figure is more revered as A cultural hero that as a purely historical character, while in the United States it could be said that the history of the Wright brothers part of the founding story of the modern technological era. The dilemma: truth vs identity. One thing does seem clear: historical records tend to favor the Wright, although that has not prevented the debate from persists as a symbolic struggle between two nations with quite different visions about the history of aviation. In Petrópolis, saints city of Santos Dumont, its legacy is still alive, and its nephew-bisnieto, Alberto Dodsworth Wanderley, recognized in the post that the dispute has become more A matter of faith than verifiable facts. Polarization is such that, for each side, there are enough emotional and technical arguments to hold your position. If you want also, it is an obvious example (Another one) How nationalism can mold the interpretation of history. Image | John T. Daniels, Jules Beau In Xataka | In the 1960s the planes were going so fast that someone promised trips to the moon. And people bought them In Xataka | A piece of Wright Flyer I will fly on Mars, the NASA placed part of the world’s first plane in its naivety helicopter

The Prosecutor’s Office asks for 36 years in jail for the author confessed to the murder of the three brothers in Morata de Tajuña

by

The Prosecutor’s Office has requested 36 years in jail and 8 years of freedom guarded for the author confessed to the homicide of the three brothers found lifeless in their home in the town … (Tagstotranslate) Madrid

One guilty twin, another innocent twin: the tragic story of two brothers

by

Kevin Dugar He closed his eyes as he heard the echo of his cell door closing once again. He had been in an Illinois prison for a decade, facing the weight of a wrongful conviction that had taken away his freedom, his relationship with his daughter and his dreams of a better life. In 2013, when autumn filled the cells with cold, an unexpected letter changed his life: his twin brother, Karl, admitted to being the real person responsible for the crime for which Kevin had been sentenced. Kevin and Karl Dugar shared much more than their identical appearance. They grew up in an impoverished Chicago neighborhood, dressing alike and playing at confusing teachers and friends. They were inseparable, known by their common nickname, “Twin.” “We will always be one,” they used to say as children, but that promise fell apart over time. During their adolescence, both fell under the influence of local gangs. Although Kevin tried to leave that dangerous world behind, Karl sank deeper into violence. On March 22, 2003, that disconnect between their paths came to a head when a rival gang member, Antwan Taylor, was shot and killed. Witnesses described the shooter as a man dressed in black who fled to a nearby park. The police investigation quickly linked the case to the Vice Lords, the gang to which Kevin had belonged. Although there was no physical evidence, The testimonies of 2 witnesses affirmed that he was responsible. One of them, Ronnie Bolden, claimed to be able to distinguish between Kevin and Karl, but did not know their real names. The inconsistencies in the testimonies went unnoticed at the trial, and in 2005 Kevin was sentenced to 54 years in prison. Kevin’s battle to prove his innocence From the beginning, Kevin maintained his innocence. The detectives offered him a deal: confess to the crime in exchange for a reduced sentence. However, he flatly refused. “I am not going to plead guilty to something I did not do,” he declared repeatedly. Despite his efforts and his lawyer’s arguments about the lack of concrete evidence, the jury found him guilty. While Kevin was serving his sentence, Karl visited his brother in prison. Although Kevin shared the details of his case with him, Karl remained silent about his own responsibility. It was 10 long years before Karl confessed the truth in a letter sent from another prison. The confession that defied the judicial system “Brother, I am the one to blame. “I can’t go on living with this,” Karl wrote in the letter Kevin received in 2013. In it, he admitted having been the author of the crime that had destroyed his brother’s life. Kevin was paralyzed as he read the words he had been waiting for for years. Despite the shock, she mustered the courage to ask Karl to turn himself in and testify. In 2016, Karl declared in court that he was responsible for the murder. However, his testimony was dismissed. Prosecutors argued that Karl, who was already serving a 99-year sentence for another crime, had nothing to lose by taking the fall. Even the judge expressed doubts about their credibility, citing the twins’ history of swapping identities to deceive others. Kevin’s case attracted the attention of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful Convictions. A team of lawyers and law students took up his case, analyzing the inconsistencies of the trial and the importance of Karl’s confession. They argued that a jury would have reached a different conclusion if they had access to all the evidence. Finally, in 2021, an appeals court granted Kevin a new trial, recognizing that the circumstances of the case warranted review. Although this did not mean an automatic declaration of innocence, it opened the door for Kevin to regain his freedom. On January 25, 2022, Kevin Dugar was released from Cook County Prison after nearly 2 decades behind bars. Although being out of prison is a step forward, his path is far from easy. He currently lives in a halfway house, under strict conditions, while he awaits a final resolution of his case. Kevin faces the challenge of rebuilding his life. He dreams of restoring his relationship with his daughter, who grew up without him, and finding a way to heal after years of injustice. “I have no hard feelings towards Karl. He’s my brother. He is not to blame for my being in prison; “That was the system,” Kevin told The Guardian. However, his words carry an emotional weight that reflects the complexity of his situation. Reflections on an imperfect judicial system Kevin Dugar’s story is not an isolated case. It highlights the systemic failures of a judicial system that often ignores critical evidence and relies excessively on unreliable testimony. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of initiatives such as wrongful conviction centres, which work tirelessly to correct miscarriages of justice. The case also shows the devastating impact of individual decisions in the context of a close family relationship. Karl ultimately chose to confess, but only after years of silence condemned his brother to a life behind bars. Kevin’s future remains uncertain, but his determination to rebuild his life and stand firm in his innocence inspires those fighting against a system that too often fails those who need it most. Keep reading: * Texas father guilty of capital murder after strangling daughter during video call* Iowa man sentenced to 55 years in prison for kidnapping ex-girlfriend* Man sentenced to 9 life sentences for decades of sexual abuse of girls

Antonio Orozco reveals in ‘Martínez and brothers’ his most embarrassing moment with Luis Fonsi

by

The visit of Antonio Orozco to the program Martinez and Brothers has left moments of confessions. One of the stories that caught the most attention was the one he shared about his great friend Luis Fonsifrom whom, inadvertently, he stole a very special exclusive: announcing the birth of his first daughter. © Four Orozco recounted how it all happened. “It was 2012, we were at some awards in Miami. Luis told me that he was very excited because he was going to be the father of a girl. We celebrated it together and it was a beautiful moment,” he explained. However, what started as a conversation between friends soon turned into one of the most embarrassing moments of his life. The next day, Orozco traveled to Mexico to complete a round of promotional interviews. “In the first interview, the journalist asked me if I had been with Luis Fonsi, and I, excited, began to say that I was happy because I was going to be a father and that I would have a girl. “I didn’t realize I was giving an exclusive!” he commented between laughs. © Four The program team was quick to react, and the news became the headline of the day. “At that moment I froze. It was something completely involuntary. I called Luis and said, ‘I think I just cost you a lot of money.’ He replied: ‘Don’t worry, friend,’” he recalled. Although Fonsi showed his understanding, Orozco assures that he did not remain calm. Since then, he has not stopped apologizing. “I have bought him guitars, I have sent him ham… To this day I continue to compensate him!”, he confessed during his intervention on the program Dani Martínez. © Four This anecdote, which at the time caused remorse, is now an example of the friendship that unites both artists. But this was not the only story that Orozco shared in Martínez and Brothers. He also talked about a night with Alejandro Fernandez and his father, Vicente Fernández. At five in the morning, Alejandro asked him to sing I’m made of little pieces of you as a tribute to his father on his birthday. “It was one of the most special moments of my life”He said excitedly. © Four Antonio Orozco’s time on the program made it clear that, in addition to being a talented artist, he is a true friend. His confessions in Martinez and Brothers They reminded us that even “mistakes” can become good stories when there is friendship involved. Because if something defines Orozco, it is his ability to celebrate every moment, even the most embarrassing ones, with his heart in his hand.

Hearing for new sentence in case of the Menéndez brothers postponed until March 20 due to fires in Los Angeles

by

Los Angeles – The Los Angeles prosecutor’s office reported this Friday that The hearing to consider a new sentence in the case of brothers Erik and Lyle Menéndez will be postponed to March 20 and 21due to the devastating fires. The Postponement of the hearing, originally scheduled for January 30 and 31, “is due to the impact of the recent forest fires in the parties’ extensive preparations for the hearings,” added the brief signed by Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman. This hearing, which had its first motion on November 25seeks pave the way to change convictions and prison sentences for the murder of his parents in 1989 after existing Newly discovered evidence that both were victims of child sexual abuse by their fatherJosé Menendez. Among them, a letter written by Erik Menéndez admitting to another family member that he was being abusedas well as the testimony of a worker from the father’s company who alleges that he was abused by José Menéndez. The brothers were found guilty in a second trial of the murder of Kitty and José Menéndez at his Beverly Hills home on August 20, 1989, in a controversial case in which The young people reported having suffered sexual abuse by their father. After 35 years in prison, The brothers regained public attention due to the hit Netflix series ‘Monsters: The Story of Lyle and Erik Menéndez‘, to which was added a documentary and the commotion of a new generation that looks with different eyes at those who were previously seen as ruthless killers. Keep reading: Who are the Menéndez brothers accused of murdering their parents in 1989, whose story was recreated in “Monsters” Netflix turned the Menéndez brothers’ house into a tourist spot

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.