For thousands of years, human beings have avoided crossing the Taklamakan Desert. Now China is raising fish there

For more than 1,500 years, the merchants who traveled the Silk Road dared with oceans, mountains and jungles, they dared with endless walks, with warlords, with hunger and pain and the cold; with one of the most destructive epidemics in history; but they did not dare with the Taklamakan. That sand hell (whose name comes from the word ugiur for “abandon, leave alone, leave behind”) is not only the second largest dune desert in the world, but it moved, invaded and devoured everything around it. It’s been a nightmare for thousands of years. Well, now, China is farming fish right there. As? As it sounds, Xinjiang has been committed to producing fish and seafood “in the middle of the desert” for years. And no, obviously, it has nothing to do with “releasing fish in the sand” as if it were worms from Arrakis. The key is saline-alkaline water, lined ponds and recirculation techniques. It is not a revolutionary approach (already We have talked about similar techniques), but without a doubt Chinese producers are taking it to another level. Xinjiang aquaculture production was 196,500 tons in 2024. And, of course, the “desert seafood” boom raises questions about water, energy and scalability. From the promise of fresh fish… We are talking about a very harsh physical context (annual rainfall of less than 100 mm, very high evaporation and salinized soils): thus, the entire Tarim sub-basin depends on melting snow to provide water. Therefore, on the table, there are two clear approaches: the first, which has become popular in the Westtalks about the construction of monitored ponds. And this is already, in itself, very effective: “species such as grouper, mullet, shrimp, oysters and pearl musselsyes reach commercial size with survival rates close to 99%”, always according to the available data. But that’s just the beginning; just a proof of concept. …to the promise of mar. As explained by several chinese mediathe final horizon of the project is much more ambitious: creating a sea in the middle of the desert. That is, take advantage of the water associated with saline-alkaline soils and saline lakes to simulate marine conditions with technical adjustments, circulation systems and cultivation of microorganisms. And thus be able to breed species normally linked to the sea. But can that be done? Of course you can. We have the technology to do it. In a world where aquaculture already exceeds extractive fishing in volume, the interesting question is not that: the question is whether the model is scalable without aggravating tensions over water in a hyper-arid region dependent on snowmelt. What the industry that sees tons of fish emerging from the desert is asking is something even more basic: is it possible that the beginning of the end of commercial fishing is beginning? Image | On Magnet | China is exporting millions of shrimp with antibiotics to the world. And they could end up on your table

Wikipedia opted for AI to summarize her articles. Its editors have avoided it through a rebellion

The Wikimedia Foundation has paused an experiment which showed summaries generated by AI in the upper part of the articles after an avalanche of criticism of their own editors. Why is it important. Wikipedia remains one of the last great bastions of human content on the Internet, in front of the survey wave that has degraded other platforms. His model, which is committed to democratic governance, has just stopped an important technological advance. What has happened. He “Simple Summaries” experiment He was born with the intention of making complex articles more accessible through automatic summaries marked as “not verified.” These summaries were made by an aya model of COPE. The editors responded with comments such as “very bad idea”, “my strongest rejection” or simply “Puaj”. The background. OpenAi continues to advance in Your plan to become the next GoogleGoogle herself He has embraced the generative AI even in his search engine. In this environment, Wikipedia has maintained the quality of its articles for its human commitment. In fact, its editors actively filter the content generated by AI, and that makes the platform a reliable information refuge. You know knowing that there will be no Slop. Marked in red, an example of Wikipedia’s summaries. Image: 404 average. Between the lines. These protests speak of something deeper than the simple acceptance of synthetic content: Wikipedia must evolve to attract new generations … … but its editors fear that AI destroys decades of collaborative work. “No other community has dominated collaboration to such a wonderful point, and this would throw it down,” said an editor quoted by 404 average. Yes, but. The Foundation has not ruled out the AI ​​completely, at least for the moment. He has promised that any future function will require “participation of editors” and “human moderation workflows.” It sounds like tactical pause. In addition, the experiment was born precisely from discussions in Wikimania in 2024, when some editors did see this format potential. In summary. The question now is if Wikipedia will be able to maintain its enormous historical relevance, already eroded since Chatgpt reached our lifewithout sacrificing part of the human criterion that distinguishes it. The answer to this question, which will not arrive tomorrow, will be what determines whether Wikipedia remains a reasonably reliable knowledge … or another space in automated internet noise. Outstanding image | Oberon Copeland @seeyinformed.com in Unspash In Xataka | Wikipedia is being filled with content generated by AI. So much, that you already have a team dedicated to finding it

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.