Someone had the brilliant idea of ​​sorting the IKEA catalog by assembly difficulty: it was just what we needed

It has happened to all of us at some point: we see a piece of furniture, a lamp or any small home accessory and for a few seconds we imagine the final result, already placed, as if it had appeared there by magic. Then comes the second image, much less pleasant: the box on the floor, the pieces spread out and that doubt as to whether we have the patience, the time and the necessary tools to finish it without regretting it. Buy something to ride It’s not just choosing a product; It is also accepting a small future task. That’s where it comes in IKEA Complexity Indexa website as simple as it is effective that turns that previous suspicion into a sortable table. It is not an official IKEA tool, and the site itself makes it clear by presenting itself as a fan project, but its starting point is very recognizable: gathering more than 21,000 products from the store and classifying them according to the effort that assembly may require. To accomplish its mission, it calculates a score from steps and parts, and adds data such as manuals, estimated time, and ease ratings. This allows us to look at the catalog from a very different question than the usual one: not how much it costs, but how much it will require of us. The price tells how much work remains ahead The page does not try to impress with design. As we can see in the screenshot, we have a table, a search engine, a category selector and a very specific filter to only be left with products that have a single PDF of instructions. From there, we can sort by price, steps, part types, total parts, manual pages, complexity or estimated time. There is an important precision: the prices are in dollars and the items link to the American IKEA store, so not everything has to be available in Spain or other European markets. IKEA Complexity Index has a simple design When we start sorting by complexity, the table leaves some quite curious scenes. At the bottom, products with a score of 1 appear, such as FÄLLSVIK mini glass door for BESTÅ furniture wave NYMÅNE work lamp with wireless chargingtwo articles that the index dispatches as minimal assemblies. At the other end, when consulting the page, a PAX corner wardrobe with 175,348 points and an estimate of 624 minutes. It is a large combination, with several associated manuals and a clear warning on the IKEA sheet: it takes two people to assemble it. The FÄLLSVIK mini glass door has a score of 1 on the IKEA Complexity Index The index also serves to dismantle a fairly convenient intuition: thinking that the most expensive will necessarily be the most difficult. By consulting the table, the JÄTTEBO Sectional six-seater It appears with a price of $5,345, but with a score of 684, very far from the PAX that we just saw. And something similar happens downwards: STRÅLA decorative screen and the UTSÅDD hook shaped like a cat cost $2.99, but they don’t demand the same by this metric. The first scores 40 points; the second, 6. The PAX corner wardrobe reaches 175,348 points in the IKEA Complexity Index The usefulness of this classification is better understood when we look at a job published in 2022. The Journal of Business Research analyzed reviews of IKEA products and found that ease of assembly weighed on satisfaction and subsequent recommendation. That is to say, it is not enough for the furniture to be pretty or cheap: how it treats us during the process also matters. The famous “IKEA effect” adds another angle, because putting something together can make us value it more, as long as we manage to finish it. In Xataka Neither buy nor rent: Navarra launches a housing model that also rescues barracks, mills and convents The best thing about this project is that it allows us to look at the catalog from another perspective. It is enough to organize a column so that a piece of furniture stops being just a pretty photo, a price or some measurements, and also becomes a promise of work. Before falling in love with a purchase, perhaps it is worth knowing how many pieces separate the initial illusion from the final result. And someone has thought about helping us in the process. Images | IKEA | Screenshot | Xataka with Nano Banana In Xataka | The canonical “living room furniture” in Spain in the 80s and 90s is dead. That says more about us than it seems. (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news Someone had the brilliant idea of ​​sorting the IKEA catalog by assembly difficulty: it was just what we needed was originally published in Xataka by Javier Marquez .

AI is turning software programming into a assembly chain

AI is not only transforming the labor market, but also It is changing the nature of the work itself and the tasks that They make up every position. What was previously a highly Specialized and well paidlike that of Software Engineernow Run risk If becoming much more routine, segmented and, above all, accelerated. Something closer to an operator in a assembly chain. According to The New York Timessome Amazon engineers already begin to feel like that. From the industrial revolution to digital automation The impact of AI is already beginning to be noticed among the Technology template. Not so much for the destruction of jobs, as for the transformation of Those who already existed. Often It is equated The arrival of AI with the Industrial Revolution for the change of technological paradigm that was lived. The History has demonstrated that, in the medium term, the automation was not linked to the destruction of employment, but to A displacement and transformation of labor tasks. During the industrial revolution, and then with the passage to Model ‘Fordist’ Mass production with assembly chain, no jobs were destroyed. Its nature was changed. With the Ford assembly chain, the manufacture of cars in workshops was replaced in an artisanal way, by workers located in A assembly line They specialized in doing a very specific task. That was the key to Increase productivity and reduce costs. Automation allowed workers to will focus on specific functionswhile the machines assumed the heaviest or repetitive work. According to A study conducted by MIT researchers and the University of Pennsylvania, Amazon, Google and Microsoft are using their AI tools in a similar way. Software operators With the As a co -pilotlarge technological ones are automating certain tasks of their software engineers that previously required working hours. That liberated time dedicate it to Improve existing products or get new products in less development time. That is, this process is taking a new level, where IA begins to play the role equivalent to industrial machinery of the nineteenth century. Andy Jassy, ​​CEO of Amazon, acknowledged in A LinkedIn post That thanks to this automation with AI, the company had “saved the equivalent of 4,500 years of development work.” Amazon Robotic Warehouse Amazon logistics centers can serve as an example of what is happening now in their software development offices. Some years ago, the employees who prepared Amazon shipments had to travel the long halls of their stores to gather the products of each order. However, now technology It has robotized This whole process to eliminate that search task. With the automation of its centers It has not been dispensed with of those jobs, but are now dedicated to specific tasks. of packaging, the number of orders that each employee can process and His work has been devalued. That warehouse staff now assures that his work is monotonousrepetitive and poorly paid. The same that happened with the operators of the assembly chains. Software engineers begin to notice the same symptoms, with an acceleration of their workflows and greater automation. “If they tell you that you have to review the code, it is never a fun part of work. When you work with these tools (of AI attendance), it is most of the work,” assured Simon Willison, veteran programmer and blogger. The consequences of this automation are already beginning to be noticed in the Junior positions of different sectorsand the programming is exempt. The agents of Which generate code They do the task that the Junior previously developed and, of that practice, acquired the experience that allowed them to ascend. Without this learning, senior engineers will not be trained that tomorrow can review the code generated by an AI and detect errors, or face adequate development strategies. In Xataka | No one is considered a working class in Spain: the percentage has fallen from 50% to 16% in twenty years Image | AmazonUnspash (Adrian Sulyok, Global UI UX Design Agency procreator, Kseniia Ilinykh)

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.