Someone had the brilliant idea of ​​sorting the IKEA catalog by assembly difficulty: it was just what we needed

It has happened to all of us at some point: we see a piece of furniture, a lamp or any small home accessory and for a few seconds we imagine the final result, already placed, as if it had appeared there by magic. Then comes the second image, much less pleasant: the box on the floor, the pieces spread out and that doubt as to whether we have the patience, the time and the necessary tools to finish it without regretting it. Buy something to ride It’s not just choosing a product; It is also accepting a small future task. That’s where it comes in IKEA Complexity Indexa website as simple as it is effective that turns that previous suspicion into a sortable table. It is not an official IKEA tool, and the site itself makes it clear by presenting itself as a fan project, but its starting point is very recognizable: gathering more than 21,000 products from the store and classifying them according to the effort that assembly may require. To accomplish its mission, it calculates a score from steps and parts, and adds data such as manuals, estimated time, and ease ratings. This allows us to look at the catalog from a very different question than the usual one: not how much it costs, but how much it will require of us. The price tells how much work remains ahead The page does not try to impress with design. As we can see in the screenshot, we have a table, a search engine, a category selector and a very specific filter to only be left with products that have a single PDF of instructions. From there, we can sort by price, steps, part types, total parts, manual pages, complexity or estimated time. There is an important precision: the prices are in dollars and the items link to the American IKEA store, so not everything has to be available in Spain or other European markets. IKEA Complexity Index has a simple design When we start sorting by complexity, the table leaves some quite curious scenes. At the bottom, products with a score of 1 appear, such as FÄLLSVIK mini glass door for BESTÅ furniture wave NYMÅNE work lamp with wireless chargingtwo articles that the index dispatches as minimal assemblies. At the other end, when consulting the page, a PAX corner wardrobe with 175,348 points and an estimate of 624 minutes. It is a large combination, with several associated manuals and a clear warning on the IKEA sheet: it takes two people to assemble it. The FÄLLSVIK mini glass door has a score of 1 on the IKEA Complexity Index The index also serves to dismantle a fairly convenient intuition: thinking that the most expensive will necessarily be the most difficult. By consulting the table, the JÄTTEBO Sectional six-seater It appears with a price of $5,345, but with a score of 684, very far from the PAX that we just saw. And something similar happens downwards: STRÅLA decorative screen and the UTSÅDD hook shaped like a cat cost $2.99, but they don’t demand the same by this metric. The first scores 40 points; the second, 6. The PAX corner wardrobe reaches 175,348 points in the IKEA Complexity Index The usefulness of this classification is better understood when we look at a job published in 2022. The Journal of Business Research analyzed reviews of IKEA products and found that ease of assembly weighed on satisfaction and subsequent recommendation. That is to say, it is not enough for the furniture to be pretty or cheap: how it treats us during the process also matters. The famous “IKEA effect” adds another angle, because putting something together can make us value it more, as long as we manage to finish it. In Xataka Neither buy nor rent: Navarra launches a housing model that also rescues barracks, mills and convents The best thing about this project is that it allows us to look at the catalog from another perspective. It is enough to organize a column so that a piece of furniture stops being just a pretty photo, a price or some measurements, and also becomes a promise of work. Before falling in love with a purchase, perhaps it is worth knowing how many pieces separate the initial illusion from the final result. And someone has thought about helping us in the process. Images | IKEA | Screenshot | Xataka with Nano Banana In Xataka | The canonical “living room furniture” in Spain in the 80s and 90s is dead. That says more about us than it seems. (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news Someone had the brilliant idea of ​​sorting the IKEA catalog by assembly difficulty: it was just what we needed was originally published in Xataka by Javier Marquez .

Da Vinci was not only one of the most brilliant thinkers and inventors in history. It was also very good

He Da Vinci painter. The sculptor The engineer. The Tuscan wise man who devised flying machines at the end of the 15th century. The one with mirror writing and the muse with a disturbing smile. That of the enigma that does not go away five centuries after his death. With a long beard, sober look and clear forehead, Leonardo di Ser Piero da Vinci is by far one of the most magnetic characters in history. Hundreds of myths and theories have been founded on his genius, rivers of ink have flowed and bestsellers have even been written and movies made in the most genuine Hollywood style. The last helping of conspiracies was served a few years ago, when the Salvator Mundi canvas was sold. for the astronomical amount of 450 million dollars News followed that again questioned the authorship of the painting. However, before being a consummate artist, a curious man with a voracious appetite and even a modern scientist (some maintain that he was the first, anticipating Galileo), Da Vinci was simply a Sir from Tuscany. With his quirks and flaws, overshadowed by the fascination that the character arouses. A muscular, flirtatious Vinciano with a peculiar sense of humor, who hated meat and who liked to be a fan of things. This is the least known Da Vinci. Da Vinci, Renaissance gymbro The author of The Mona Lisa He was a good-looking guy, with a handsome face and athletic body. And to prevent the passage of centuries from erasing that image, there is plenty of evidence that reminds us that the Tuscan was a true beauty. “He was by nature courteous, cultivated and generous, and his face was extraordinarily beautiful,” wrote the humanist Paolo Giovio. Perhaps to curl the curl and elevate him almost to the category of Adonis, his biographer Vasari (who never met the Tuscan) describes him as a “tall, extraordinary beauty and infinite grace” gallant. There is no doubt that he liked to dress well and take care of his appearance. He used to dress up in pink tunics that reached his knees, fur cloaks and rings. Also carefully comb your hair, curly and long. In one of his notebooks he wrote advice on how to become a real dandy. Do you want them to turn around? square at your pace? Well (recommends the Tuscan) “drink fresh rose water and moisten your hands with them.” Da Vinci, liking himself, around 1478. In any case, it was best not to criticize his appearance. Although there are many testimonies of his pacifist spirit, the chronicles tell us of a Da Vinci endowed with a force exceptional. “With his right hand he could twist a horseshoe or the iron ring of a knocker as if they were made of lead,” explained Vasari, who once again seems inclined to exaggerate a bit of Leonardo’s qualities. The Tuscan’s fixation on elegance went far beyond his appearance. Da Vinci was a clean and conscientious man who liked to surround himself with rigorous order. “If you want to know how a person’s spirit inhabits his body,” reads one of his notebooks, “look at how he treats his dwelling; if it is disordered, in the same way the spirit will maintain the body in a confusing way.” The Full Pantomime of its time Leonardo is remembered as a thoughtful, severe, taciturn and reserved man. Although those were undoubtedly fundamental aspects of his character (this is how he showed himself in his very famous self-portrait from Turinin which she presents herself with a melancholic expression), was far from the only one. Throughout his life he dedicated great efforts to making people laugh. in the book Leonardo, the flight of the mindCharles Nicholl points out the irony that his most famous painting is The Mona Lisa (the jubilant one, in Spanish). There is no doubt that the Tuscan liked jokes. The satirical and sophisticated word games, but also the crudest ones. In his notebooks we find funny notes written down relatively frequently. One of them (which invites us to think of a Leonardo holding his stomach with great laughter and tears in his eyes) says: “They asked a painter why he painted such beautiful images, even though they were of dead things, while his children were so ugly. To which he replied that he made his paintings during the day and his children at night.” “Paparl, paparl, take me to the circus.” (Self-portrait of Da Vinci himself in his younger years) His sense of humor also appeared in his artistic work. Their cartoons They are very well known. Also the decorations and gadgets that he designed for the celebrations of the Sforza family or at the court of France, which in a way made him “the king of the party.” Vasari once again collects another anecdote that, this time, gives us a glimpse of Da Vinci’s humor. On one occasion a gardener gave him a large lizard that he had hunted. Leonardo decided to stick some wings he made with scales on its back. Every time the suffering reptile walked, those membranes trembled to the terror of the public. “He made it eyes, horns and a beard and then domesticated it,” says Vasari, “he used to keep it in a box and whenever he took it out for his friends to see, they ran away scared.” Da Vinci, pop star and veggie Yes, musician. Engineer, painter, anatomist, sculptor, architect… And musician! The Tuscan’s fingers not only showed his virtuosity with the brush. There are multiple references that there was nothing wrong with the lyre of braccioan instrument with which he liked to let inspiration take him from time to time. And just like Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin) has its iconic two-neck GibsonLeonardo also showed off his peculiar instrument when he performed: an elegant silver lyre in the shape of a horse’s head, built by himself. Although Leonardo’s musical side is often overlooked, there are clues that indicate he played an important role. For example, it … Read more

“They are brilliant researchers under the control of an authoritarian government.” Anthropic’s CEO has spoken about Depseek

In the midst of the stir caused by the latest models of the Deepseek, the CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, has published An analysis on its personal website in which it questions the narrative of the “Chinese miracle” in artificial intelligence. Why is it important. The debate on Chinese capacity to develop advanced AI has monopolized the agenda in recent days after Deepseek’s releaseswhich have come to provoke A 17% drop in Nvidia shares. The facts. Deepseek claims to have developed its model V3 for just under 6 million dollarswhile Amodei explained that Claude 3.5 Sonnetthe last and most advanced Anthropic model, required “some tens of millions” in training. Far from the “thousands of millions” that were speculated. “Deepseek has produced a model close to the performance of US models 7-10 months ago, for a rather lower cost, but not in the proportions that have been suggested,” said the CEO. Deepseek operates with about 50,000 generation chips Hoppera capacity that Amodei considers similar to that of the main American technological ones. According to his analysis, Deepseek’s advances reflect the natural reduction of costs in the sector, estimated at annual 75%. The context. Deepseek has presented two models: V3, which uses traditional training. And R1, which incorporates reinforcement learning. For Amodei, real innovation is in V3, not in R1, which according to him, follows roads already explored by other technological ones. Turning point. The development of an AI superior to human intelligence will require millions of chips and tens of billions of dollars in the coming years. “Between 2026 and 2027 we will see which will be smarter than almost all humans in almost all tasks,” he said. In this scenario, he has defended Export controls as a strategic tool. Amodei has also recognized the talent of Deepseek engineers … although he has warned about the implications that a company operates under the control of the Chinese government. For him, The growing efficiency In the development of AI justifies reinforce, and not relax, commercial restrictions. In fact, he has had some words of praise for Depseek’s team, but not for his nation: “They are brilliant and curious researchers who only want to create useful technology, but are subject to an authoritarian government that has committed human rights violations and He has behaved aggressively on the world scene. “ In Xataka | “Google gives you links, perplexity gives you answers”: we talk to the CEO of the startup that wants to kill the father Outstanding image | Techcrunch

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.