Amazon forces its engineers to use AI and measures who uses it the most. The employee response: anti-AI memes

AI gurus keep selling us that this technology is going to change the world and? the AGI is about to fall. From the outside, everything is promises of automation and productivity, but from the inside the feeling is very different. Yesterday we learned that the engineers who are working on Google AI They don’t stop making fun of her on internal channels. Well, exactly the same thing is happening on Amazon. Sloppenheimer. It’s one of the memes that Amazon employees have shared in the Slack channel called #actual-aws-memes. In it they mock tools like Kiro (Amazon Web Services’ code platform), Claude Code, and the AI ​​agent Meshclaw. They tell it in 404mediawhere they have spoken with several company employees who wanted to remain anonymous. These employees admit that anti-AI memes started circulating quite some time ago (in late 2024), which is when the company started putting more pressure on them to adopt AI tools. Of course, although mockery of AI is very common, they assure that there is a variety of opinions on the matter. Kiro AI. It is the tool that receives the most ridicule. There are several memes that suggest Kiro is pretty mediocre, such as the one that includes the text “Kiro: I confirm I have the full picture” over an image of an iceberg with much of it underwater. Discontent with this tool reached such a point that Amazon closed Kirorank, an internal leaderboard that measured and rewarded employees’ use of Kiro. Amazon’s official version is that employees had already integrated AI into their daily lives and ranking was no longer necessary, but what really happened is that engineers started cheating. They automated absurd and totally useless tasks for the sake of climbing the rankings, adding to the company’s AI bill. Amazon is not the only one. As we said at the beginning, this anti-AI rebellion based on memes is not exclusive to Amazon, exactly the same thing is happening at Google. While CEO Sundar Pichai boasts that 75% of Google’s code is written with AIemployees use an internal channel to make fun of that very thing. For example, while Google announced news in the Google I/O 2026a meme appeared on the channel saying that they were announcing “new ways to slop.” Memes can be voted on with a reaction system and this immediately added 100 thumbs up. They also make fun of the AI bros who do not stop evangelizing about the benefits of AI and point out the enormous work it is to review the code made by AI, often riddled with errors. What companies say. There is an evident disconnection between the official discourse and the internal feeling of the employees. Amazon has responded to the leaks by trying to downplay them. In an email to 404media, Amazon assures that the negative comments come from a few individuals and do not represent the majority. For its part, Google sent a statement to the same media in which they said they encouraged their employees to test and criticize their internal tools, even through memes. And a curious thing, Google sent two almost identical statements, the only difference is that in the first they mentioned that it was “essential that we keep humans in the process, including supervision.” In the second that phrase had disappeared. Image | Xataka with Magnific In Xataka | From “tokenmaxxing” we have moved on to “tokenwasting”: the level of waste in AI is reaching unprecedented levels

The Valencian Community has an “anti-AI” plan so that no one cheats on competitive exams

Much of the success of AI glasseslike the Ray-Ban Metait is precisely that they do not look like a technological device. They look like normal glasses that integrate perfectly into our look. AND that is exactly the problem. There is the issue of recording people without their consent and also using them to cheat on exams. It is precisely what the Generalitat Valenciana wants to avoid. The plan. They count in Lift EMV that the Public Function area of ​​the Ministry of Finance has set its sights on AI glasses, and has already detailed a plan against their use in competitive examinations. The plan is to carry out a physical inspection upon entering the exam that verifies “the absence of electronic components.” To do this, they will provide training to supervisory personnel so that they are able to detect these devices, which, as happens with glasses, go very unnoticed. You will have to look for frames that are thicker than normal and lights that activate when recording. There is more. In addition to the physical inspection, an even more effective option is also being considered: installing frequency inhibitors. With this, if a security guard loses smart glasses or a watch, they should be useless as long as they remain in the range of action. They also highlight that for some time now they have been including complex questions whose answers require analysis and critical thinking, so that AI cannot answer them so easily. The new ‘chop’. Gone are the times when we kept a piece of paper with the lesson up our sleeve, now it is copied with AI glasses and smartwatch. This is what an applicant did in the MIR exam this year in Santiago de Compostela. It has not been revealed what model of glasses and watch he was wearing, nor how he planned to use them, but everything indicates that he read the questions with the glasses and got the answer on the watch. A seamless plan, except that someone noticed and got caught. His grade was a zero. AI so you don’t copy. Paradoxically, there are universities that use AI for precisely the opposite purpose: to prevent students from copying. We recently talked about the VIU, also in Valencia, and how thanks to AI and facial recognition they could control exams remotely. A very complex system that It has cost the university 650,000 euros for violating the General Data Protection Regulation. The problem with AI glasses. That someone can cheat on an exam is wrong, but there are things that are even worse. For example, in Spain we have the case of man who was arrested for recording women without their consent with the Ray-Ban Meta. They have also been made modifications in glasses that allow strangers to be identified on the street and there are more and more places where its use is being restricted. Wearing AI in your eyes can be very useful, but anyone you pass on the street could be recording you is intrusive, and even more so if the person wearing them is in, for example, a gym locker room. Or if it is the person who has to shave your crotch. Even if the LED indicator is off, I don’t think anyone could shake the feeling of being recorded. Image | Xataka, Unsplash In Xataka | When you put on your new Meta glasses something else happens: everything you record is recorded in Kenya to train the AI

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.