Now their big techs are looking for talent at the institute

China is quietly redefining who counts as tech talent. Some of its large companies in the sector have begun to skip university and recruit directly from institutes in a movement that indicates that creativity and learning ability are worth more than degrees. What until now seemed anecdotal is beginning to consolidate as a widely accepted deliberate strategy in search of talent. what’s happening. Beyond specific cases such as the signing of Chen Guangyu, a 17-year-old student from the Shenzhen technology hub, as an intern for Moonshot AI and who already signs first-level technical reportsthe trend is better understood with some examples: Huawei Genius Youth. Since 2019, the company has had a recruitment program looking for young geniuses. The Shanghai talent incubator by Zhang Yiming, founder of ByteDance: their goal is to hire 30 reserve researchers between 16 and 18 years old each year to train them in computer science and AI. Geely has an internship program for senior high school students with direct mentoring from their executives. Tencent has been running its Spark Program since 2019, an annual program to select students with high potential for internships in the company. The technology company also has an exclusive summer program for only 10 middle and high school students, such as pick up Sitx Tone. Why is it important. For decades, technological recruitment has operated on two axes: companies signed up for universities and the sector’s imagination celebrated the genius who left them. That companies as large as Tencent, Huawei, ByteDance or Geely skip both steps and go directly to the institutes is no coincidence: it is a sign that the speed of change in AI is making traditional training obsolete. If the talent that companies need is not in higher education when they need it, the market looks for where to find it. And he’s finding it sooner. Context. China has been stepping on the accelerator for decades in training: It is a world pool of engineers and is diversifying towards FP. It is true that behind this reality there are State plans that, without going any further, are currently erasing arts careers in favor of other strategic ones such as those related to AI. The icing on the cake is the perception of Chinese universities and their tendency towards memorization to the detriment of critical thinking and creativity, a criticism that has been documented for decades, as wield this Harvard report. And one layer below, there is need: the Asian giant’s race for technological talent is exacerbated by Western restrictions on the most advanced critical technology. In this scenario, self-sufficiency is an absolute priority, whether technological or human capital. The justification of the sector. Sixth Tone picked up the statements of Li Shufu, president of Geely, at the presentation event of its internship program: “In the era of AI there is a gap between the talent that companies need and what universities currently offer.” It also provides the statements of a human resources person from an artificial intelligence company who speaks directly about creativity. Those younger people who do not yet have fixed mental schemas can imagine different solutions and products, outside the academic canon, which in some contexts can be a competitive advantage. Crossing borders. The questioning of the university degree as a talent filter is a global phenomenon that is beginning to cross borders. One of the most aggressive companies in implementing it is the American Palantir, which last year recruited to 22 people who had recently graduated from high-level secondary school (they were aiming for the top universities) for paid internships with the possibility of direct hiring. It’s your “anti-scholarship”. Sergey Brin too has declared that Google hires a lot of people without a degree and that they are able to get by in a peculiar way. The signals are converging: the recruiting model from Shenzhen to Silicon Valley points to a shift in the most advanced segments, prioritizing ability over titles. In Xataka | China looks at VET: why more and more generation Z students prefer trades over university degrees In Xataka | China has a huge youth unemployment problem. So much so that some people pay to pretend to work Cover | kimmi jun and LYCS Architecture

OpenClaw is the total AI agent that challenged Big Tech. Big Tech’s response: buy it, of course

Peter Steinberger It was a great unknown to the vast majority of the planet until less than a month ago. His project, which he initially called Clawdbot (later Moltbot and finally OpenClaw), became the new sensation of the internet and the world of AI. Its growth has been so spectacular that the majors in this segment set their eyes on it and, inevitably, began to fight to sign its creator and acquire his project. We already have a winner of that bid: OpenAI. What is OpenClaw. OpenClaw is what we could define as “the total AI agent.” A system that uses one or more AI models such as those from OpenAI, Anthropic or Google to do things for you. Here are some differences from using those models in a “traditional” way: You can chat with your AI agent using messaging apps like Telegram or WhatsApp, as if it were just another contact OpenClaw takes full control of the machine you install it on, whether it’s an old PC, a Raspberry Pi or a VPS, for example. You have permission to do whatever you want inside that machine, which also involves risks The capacity of current models, such as Opus 4.5, makes the agent certainly autonomous and proactive and, for example, suggests things to you or makes decisions based on the conversations you have with him? she? it? OpenAI buys OpenClaw. Last week Steinberger I already commented in an interview with Lex Fridman that OpenAI and Meta had made offers to sign him and acquire his project. Those intentions crystallized on Saturday, when the creator of OpenClaw advertisement that he had signed with OpenAI and that the OpenClaw project “will become managed by a foundation and will remain open and independent.” It was a more than reasonable exit for Steinberger, who will probably have received a significant sum of money and prestige, but that leads us to the eternal question: can you compete with the big companies? Short answer: probably not. Large companies have always been hampered by their own size when it comes to reacting quickly to new trends, and even the largest AI companies suffer from this same problem. OpenClaw was doing something that none of them had dared to do – partly because this type of agent has too much “power” – but with these projects and with startups that are beginning to emerge, the same thing always happens: either the big companies copy the idea and they end up burying the originalor they buy that startup that threatened to compete with them. For many startups, in fact, the “exit” or future strategy of the project happens to be bought by a large company. A creator who didn’t want to be CEO. Steinberger explained in his post how his project opened up “an endless string of possibilities” for him, and confessed that “yes, I could really see that OpenClaw could have become a giant company. But no, I’m not excited about that. I’m a creator at heart.” Steinberger has already created a company and dedicated 13 years of his life to it, and “what I want is to change the world, not create a big company, and partnering with OpenAI is the fastest way to bring this to the entire world.” One person’s first unicorn? The appearance of ChatGPT soon made will be spoken of the ‘Solo Unicorn’ phenomenon, a startup created by a single person and which, thanks to AI, would be valued at more than 1 billion dollars. We do not know what price OpenAI has paid for this signing, but it is likely that it will not reach that much. What does seem evident is that OpenClaw was the type of project and idea that certainly could have turned it into that “Solo Unicorn”. The era of custom AI agents. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, confirmed the news in X. There it indicated that the creator of OpenClaw had joined OpenAI “to lead the next generation of personal agents”, and highlighted that “we expect this (personalized AI agents) to quickly become an integral part of our product offerings.” In addition, he assured that OpenClaw will remain open source, something that was probably one of the essential conditions that Steinberger set to join the ranks of OpenAI. And now what. That the project remains Open Source and independent is great news and theoretically that will allow OpenClaw to continue functioning as before, but having OpenAI’s resources can undoubtedly make it grow exceptionally. It remains to be seen whether that will end up having a negative impact in any way, but what also seems clear is that these types of “full AI agents” could soon also be an integral part of the offering of other AI companies. Welcome to the era of total AI agents. We had already partially seen what OpenClaw does with projects like Computer Use from Anthropic, Project Jarvis/Mariner by DeepM Mind u Operator from OpenAI itself. Both allowed AI would do things for us in the browser, but OpenClaw does things for us with all the applications on the machine on which we install it (the email client, the command console, etc.). We are facing an interesting stage for this type of systems. In Xataka | OpenClaw is one of the most fascinating and “dangerous” AIs of the moment. A Malaga company has come to the rescue

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.