There are people trying to kill migraine with surgery. Neurologists are putting their hands on their heads

Migraine is a relatively common neurological disorder among our population that can have dire consequences for those who suffer from it. as it can become disabling for several days in a row. This means that patients’ search for treatments has become desperate to avoid having to being locked in a dark room for several days without being able to go to worksince there is no cure. The problem is that the treatments that are proposed are sometimes not the best. Among these measures we have, for example, the famous piercing in the ear that promises control headaches or even botox therapy. But the reality is that now an operation is emerging that continues to raise doubts. What does it consist of? When suffering from disabling pain, the main thing for many patients is to eradicate it, and the reality is that they do not care how to do it. That is why trigger point decompression surgery, popularly known as “migraine surgery,” is beginning to become popular in the United States. And while in the United States it is gaining more and more ground, the Spanish Society of Neurology has raised the alarm due to its proliferation in private clinics by offering great results against this disease. His story. The story of this surgery does not begin in a neuroscience laboratory, as happens with other techniques that are put into clinical practice. To understand this technique we have to go back to the beginning of this century with the surgeon Bahman Guyuron who noticed something strange: many patients on whom he performed the lifting from the front, that is, the frontal stretch, they reported that after the operation their migraines had disappeared. From there, the theory of extracranial trigger points was developed. The hypothesis is that migraine is not just a brain event, but can be triggered by compression of peripheral nerves in the face and neck due to muscles or blood vessels. Surgery in this case basically consists of releasing these nerves through decompression or cauterization. of four specific areas of the skull: In the forehead region. At the temples. On the back of the head. In the nose area. The discussion. It is not logically conflict-free. On the one hand, there are American surgeons who They assure that between 70% and 95% of patients improve or eliminate their symptoms. However, when we turn to rigorous scientific literature, the numbers become considerably nuanced. The magazine Frontiers in Neurology, who analyzed the data of 627 patientsrevealed a very clear reality. Only 38% of patients undergoing this operation recorded a remission of headaches after 6-12 months. And this is a very controversial figure, since private clinics promise figures that are not what independent studies point out. The study explicitly warns that more elaborate and transparent tests are neededsince the risk of bias in patient selection is high. That is, those patients who are giving the best results are chosen, giving a success value that is not totally real as it does not follow the quality standards expected in a study. In Spain. Our country has gone up in arms against these types of surgeries that seem like a miracle, and the Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN) He does not see the physiological basis behind it that explains its effect. The first thing they see is that the studies are too small (which leaves the results obvious), but they also point out that migraine is a disease of the central nervous system and that “decompressing the nerves” outside the skull lacks biological plausibility. Specifically, the conclusion reached in the SEN is the following: There is no scientific evidence that currently supports that surgery has a therapeutic role for migraine. Therefore, any migraine patient is not recommended to undergo surgery for this disease. Migraine has been studied in depth, and there is no solid evidence that these nerves are compressed in migraineurs. And they go further by pointing out that “migraine has no cure, but there are many scientifically based therapeutic developments and more are to come.” Placebo effect. To understand it, we must know that surgery is an intervention that is imposed on anyone, and the simple fact of going through an operating room generates in a patient the feeling or expectation that they will be cured. That is why this is about measuring in the control groups, which are those patients who enter the operating room, but who do not receive nerve decompression (although they think they do). In these cases it has been seen that patients point out that their migraines have improved, when this is not the case. All motivated also because measuring the intensity of pain in a patient is not easy at all, as it is tremendously subjective, since each person perceives it in a specific way. Your application. In Spain, the technique moves in limbo. It is not financed by social security nor endorsed by the Network of Health Technology Assessment Agencies (RedETS), but it is offered on the private market with prices ranging between $5,000 and $15,000. But the recommendation of specialists in this case is that “any patient with migraine is not recommended to undergo surgery for this disease.” The only exception they make is that you are going to participate in a clinical trial. Images | Adrian Swancar Akram Huseyn In Xataka | Splitting an ibuprofen in half to take 600 mg instead of 400 is a bad idea: it destroys a key piece of its engineering

The new aesthetic luxury of “liquid surgery” that promises what the Botox no longer sells

In the new economy of the “invisible luxury”, the object of desire no longer hangs from the arm: it melts with the skin. Instead of great transformations, the aspiration is that “it is not noticed.” A lifting without scars, a brightness that looks like a repair dream. In that league the newly baptized “liquid surgery” plays: four -digit facials that promise a Botox effect without needles or rigidity. A new trend. After the rejuvenated reappearance of Lindsay Lohan, a reporter from The Times He went to the most exclusive spa by Beverly Hills to test the “MBR Best and Ultimate Liquid Surgery”, a 995 -dollar protocol. The session includes cleaning, toning, hyaluronic acid masks and, above all, the application of a star serum: 1,784 pounds the 50 ml bottle, sold as “viper venom imitator” to achieve a “more subtle” botulin toxin effect. The journalist described a “striking” difference after applying the product in half face and collected that the usual clientele includes local elites and celebrities that repeat monthly and complement at home. The text itself points out that the term “liquid surgery” was coined by a German marketing department: there is no scalpel, but a high -cost cosmetic ritual with immediate results. The spa presents it as the “less invasive” route towards the good face effect that was previously associated with visible injectables. Aesthetic luxury changes the skin. The turn responds to a broader trend: undetectable results. As we have detailed in Xatakathe deep flat lifting – which repositions muscles and ligaments in block to avoid rigidity – has become the standard among star surgeons. The effects last between 10 and 15 years, but prices easily exceed six figures. Given this situation, Botox has lost part of the story. In a report for Women’s Health They have described as Jennifer Aniston He has recognized that he tried the injections, but abandoned them for considering them “ridiculous” in excess. Instead, combine facials, lasers and radiofrequency (Themage) with a healthy lifestyle. The narrative now relies on bioestimulators: polynucleotides derived from salmon DNA (PDRN) that promise cellular hydration and regeneration, or exosomes, small vesicles that act as regenerative “messengers”. He Glow discreet becomes symbolic capital. Towards combined protocols. The immediate future points to repeatable treatments, expensive and continuous maintenance, which mixes apparatus (laser, radiofrequency) and cosmetic biology (polynucleotides, exosomes). That is today the “toolbox” that celebrities present as an alternative to click or go through an operating room with public visibility. On the cusp, the elite scalpel continues to mark status; At the base, four -digit facials sell the “invisible effect” in cabin format. This is how the term coined as “liquid surgery” fits at that intersection. The problems that are coming. The boom of “liquid surgery” and other less invasive treatments drag shadows that should look straight ahead: from the regulatory vacuum to unequal aesthetic pressure. On the one hand, The Newbeauty Portal Document The case of Victoria Nelsona client that denounced burns and scars after a “high -power” peeling and microneedling years performed, allegedly, out of the legal reach of a aestheticist in California. Dermatologists consulted recalled that procedures such as medical peels, microneedling, lasers or injections should be carried out in clinical environments and under medical supervision. A peeling, they underlined, is not a ritual of beauty but a “controlled chemical burn” that, if it runs badly, can leave irreversible sequelae. The case illustrates a hole between marketing, licenses and security. On the other hand, in other types of treatments science does not support a promise. Polynucleotides –extracted from salmon DNA and increasingly present in elite clinics– They have biological base and even a previous medical use in wounds and burns. Side effects, when injected, are usually mild (bruises, swelling), but robust studies are missing that support their long -term benefits. It also happens with exosomes that it is still consolidating in the scientific field and with collagen supplements, where the benefits are modest or contradictory and many studies have been financed by the brands themselves. There is an even broader background. The aesthetic pressure is not limited to the cabin of a spa. The cultural narrative has oscillated from Body Positive to ultra -launching standardsamplified by Fashionable thinning drug and Digital filters that multiply impossible expectations. In this field, scrutiny is deeply unequal. They carry the demand to stay young and with a double penalty: both those who are operated and those who decide not to do so are criticized. Sarah Jessica Parker has been insulted for showing wrinkles, while Pamela Anderson was criticized for exhibiting her naturalness without makeup. Men, on the other hand, usually enjoy indulgence: names such as Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise or Bradley Cooper have starred in speculation about touch -ups, but rarely face the same public trial. Even the data shows the gap: As we have pointed out in XatakaLiftings in men grew by 26 % between 2022 and 2024, but the media account presented them as a simple “set -up”, not as an “aesthetic obsession.” The result: eternal youth remains a female demand and an optional option for them. An eternal youth with conditions. The snake venom facial in Beverly Hills is more than an aesthetic whim. Summarizes a global trend: displacement towards less invasive procedures, more expensive and with an aura of exclusivity. An eternal youth reserved for those who can pay it, while the rest of society consumes supplements, collagen powder and digital filters as substitutes. The question, however, is still open: are these advances a real scientific revolution or a marketing mirage? Maybe how did The Times the chronicler When leaving the spa, the eternal youth does exist, but it costs the same as thirty beers in an airport. And, above all, it is still a luxury with class, gender and power more visible gender than any wrinkle. Image | Freepik Xataka | Surgeons are facing a new challenge: patients who want to resemble their double created by AI

Apple has not washed the iPhone’s face. Has subjected it to cosmetic surgery

Forget iOS 19 and stay with this name: iOS 26. This is the beginning of a new stage. The protagonist operating system of the WWDC 2025 that Apple is celebrating in Cupertino is that of the iPhone, and drinks directly from an interface we already knew: The Vision Pro. Apple’s most niche device is the one that will mark the way for the rest of the products. Some that, in this new stage, will have a name and A unified design language. Why iOS 26. The logical jump after iOS 18 It was iOS 19, that’s over. Apple will begin to rename its software platforms by adding a +1 a year in which they are launched. We are in the year (20) 25, adding that one we already have the 26. It is the name that the rest of their brothers will receive: Visionos 26, Watchos 26, Tvos 26 and Ipados 26. Next year, we will have versions 27 above the table. A name change that meets a concrete need of Apple: to try to make its operating systems to the fullest. Liquid Glass. The first novelty of iOS 26 has to do with its change at aesthetic level. Apple has been inspired by visionos to share its design language with the rest of the software platforms. And he has decided to call him Liquid Glass. The translation is simple: a system starring transparencies, rounded icons and even softer animations. The changes range from the application pitcher to the apps themselves, a work that the developers will have to begin to adapt to maintain coherence with the renewed system. News at Apple Intelligence. Apple wanted to start (in a very short way) its Keynote with news in its artificial intelligence functions. A good part of them, not yet available in Europe. Among them, The new Siri. One of the big changes is how applications will interact with Apple Intelligence. Developers can configure their apps to directly access Apple Intelligence, privately and even without connection. Image | Apple

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.