The three hantavirus deaths on a cruise ship suggest something problematic for something else: the colonization of space

What happened on the Argentine cruise ship in which three people died from hantavirus is very sad and, of course, must be investigated. However, many news stories are being read in which it is used to bring to mind bitter pandemic memories and generate an unnecessary stir. The risk for the general population is extremely low, as many experts have been quick to assure. However, it does show how dangerous it can be to let a pathogen circulate in a closed, moving place, like a boat. We can even go a step further now that the space race is in fashion: what would happen if something like this happened on a spaceship? It couldn’t happen. Typically, hantavirus It is transmitted by rodentslike rats and mice. Generally, infection in humans occurs through inhalation of contaminated particles (usually dust) with their feces or urine. This means that, in most cases, the contagion is a zoonosis. The virus passes from an animal to a human. That in space would be impossible. Spaceships are monitored under a magnifying glass, it would be impossible for a mouse to enter without being seen. It is true that there is a specific type of hantavirus, the Andes virus, in which cases have been documented due to human-to-human contact. However, according to has explained to Science Media Center the researcher at the MRC-University of Glasgow Viral Research Center Liam Brierley, contact must be very very close. Contact on spaceships, where a few people must spend a lot of time together in a very small space, would be very close. But don’t panic. Sterility and quarantines. Each of the modules that make up the spacecraft are assembled in white roomsunder strict sterile conditions. Thus, microorganisms, pathogenic or not, are prevented from traveling into space attached to their surfaces. Regarding astronauts, they undergo all kinds of medical examinations to verify that they are not infected with any pathogen. Also, before traveling to space They must spend time in quarantine. This prevents the incubation of something that cannot be detected in medical examinations at the time of starting the journey. It wasn’t always like this. In reality, quarantines began to be implemented after the astronauts of the Apollo 7, 8 and 9 missions had to deal with a cold in space. Although none of them became seriously ill, they did report that the symptoms were especially bothersome in this very different environment. Therefore, it was decided to take even more measures to prevent something like this from happening. The Apollo 7 crew had to deal with a cold. Not all microorganisms stay on land. It is impossible to strip a human being of all the microorganisms that live in his body. The microbiota is the set of microorganisms that are naturally found in our body. Many of them are beneficial for us, as they protect us from pathogens or help us carry out processes such as digestion. All these microorganisms always travel with us, so it is impossible to separate ourselves from them. And even if you could, it would be dangerous to do so. Others that cannot be avoided. Nor can latent viruses be avoided, like shingles. Once a person passes the infection, these remain asleep in the organism. They may never come forward again or they may do so, usually at a time when the immune system is weakened. It has been seen that reactivations of this type of virus are quite common in space and the truth is that it is not rare, since it affects the immune system at many levels. Three basic pillars. Microgravity, cosmic radiation and the stress of being in such an inhospitable place are the three main reasons why the immune system is affected by space travel. Everything in its place. Microorganisms that are completely harmless in a person’s microbiota can be harmful to another individual, either because they are immunosuppressed or because their defenses are not well trained against that organism. enemy. It is something that, for example, happens with many microorganisms on the skin. It should also be taken into account that there are microorganisms that are harmless in some organs, but harmful in others. It occurs, for example, when bacteria from the digestive system pass into the urinary system. Be careful which direction you wipe when going to the bathroom. We cannot get rid of our microbiota. And thank goodness. Malted pathogens. We have already seen that it is very difficult for pathogenic microorganisms to travel to space. But it may be the case that an apparently innocuous microorganism appears where it should not. Or it may no longer be harmless due to spatial conditions. It is known that cosmic radiation, extreme temperature conditions or microgravity can influence the genes expressed by a microorganism. For example, in pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella typhimuriumit has been observed that in space They express a genetic pattern very different from the one they use on Earth. Besides, they become more virulent when they are off the planet. We do not know if some apparently innocuous microorganisms could also develop certain virulence due to this change of environment. An eye on the future. For something like this to happen today would be very strange. However, there are two scenarios in the future in which, perhaps, one of these situations could occur. On the one hand, microorganisms are deliberately introduced into the ships. For example, there could be microorganisms that transform lunar regolith into arable soil. It would be necessary to see if it is worth taking the risk of putting them on a spaceship. On the other hand, in the future space travel will be much more the order of the day. Then there may not be as many controls as there are now or, out of so many, some may fail. Just as globalization has led some pathogens to travel faster around the world, it would not be unusual for something similar to happen in space. We’re speculating, but it’s worth thinking … Read more

Nintendo insists that there is no such thing as the “Nintendo Cinematic Universe.” The facts suggest otherwise.

Fox McCloud in a Mario movie, Yoshi voiced by Donald Glover and the post-credits scenes pointing directly to other Nintendo games. ‘Super Mario Galaxy: The Movie’ sweeps the box office with 372 million dollars in its first global weekend, but Nintendo still does not confirm that we are facing a “cinematic universe.” However, Marvel’s precedent is more than obvious. The figures. With 372 million dollars in its first weekend worldwide (188 million in the United States), we have a start only slightly below its precedent, which reached 387.8 million in five days. But the bombshell is indisputable: the only animated franchises with more than one installment with opening weekends above $100 million are DreamWorks’ ‘Shrek’, Illumination’s own ‘Despicable Me’ and Disney’s ‘Frozen’. Mario is also the only one that has exceeded 350 million with two deliveries. And there is still Japan. Fat cameo. But let’s analyze some very relevant elements of the film. A week before the premiere, Universal revealed that Fox McCloud, protagonist of the ‘Star Fox’ saga, had a relevant role in the sequel, and it would not be a mere cameo, but a character with his own narrative arcwhose presence in the Mario universe is justified argumentatively with a certain coherence, drawing on the always loving parallel universes. By the way, Glen Powell, who provides his voice, entered the movie after calling the production company to tell them that if a Star Fox movie was ever made, he wanted to be there. Something similar happened with the presence of Donald Glover, voice of Yoshi after asking the production company to participate “in any way” in a Nintendo film. Intersecting IPs. The fact is that Miyamoto had no initial intention of crossing Mario with ‘Star Fox’, since as he told Forbeshad to remind Illumination that Nintendo IPs don’t mix. But he made an exception, saying that “as the creator of ‘Star Fox’ and this movie being set in space, I wanted to see that. I wanted to see what would turn out. But I also sensed that there might be significant resistance internally.” That is, it had to be worked on at Nintendo, but it was achieved. And it is a more important step than it seems, because it opens the door to not having a Mario Universe, but an entire Nintendo Universe. More cameos: Donkey Kong. Another example of a Nintendo character that points to a larger universe than the one we glimpse here. Although he was one of the most celebrated characters in the first film, here only appears in the background in a sequence starring Yoshi in New York, causing destruction in a half-built building, like in the old days. The truth is that in July 2025, Nintendo and Universal registered a project described as “Untitled Donkey Kong Project”. Seth Rogen, who voices the character, stated after the first film that he saw “a lot of opportunity” for a spin-off set in the world of ‘Donkey Kong Country’. Universe, but without going overboard. In recent interviews Miyamoto has openly stated: “I don’t think we’re going to have a situation like ‘Super Smash Bros.’ where all the Nintendo characters come together.” From Illumination they confirm that the creative process has nothing to do with a team of strategists with graphics on the wall planning ten years of narrative crossover, in clear reference to the MCU: “Our process is very different. It arises from conversations about what would be funny in a specific scene.” The mention of Pikmin appearing in a sequence because it’s just cool is a good example of that approach. Marvel’s mirror. But although Nintendo has no intention of following in all of Marvel’s footsteps, the parallels are indisputable, especially with the process that was followed between 2008 and 2012 to propose the MCU. Some examples: A popular secondary character becomes the protagonist in later installments: Black Widow, secondary in ‘Iron Man 2’, or Scarlet Witch, presented in ‘Winter Soldier’, or Nick Fury, built cameo by cameo. A dormant IP is rehabilitated with a cameo in a successful franchise: Doctor Strange, a comic book character for very coffee lovers, appears as a mere wink mentioned in ‘Winter Soldier’; Black Panther, barely known outside of the comics, is supporting in ‘Civil War’ and soon got his own movie; and Spider-Man was known but his franchise was worn out and he was rehabilitated since ‘Civil War’. Quietly Registered Copyright: Marvel and Disney have a documented history of registering trademarks for characters long before announcing projects. They recorded ‘She-Hulk’, ‘Ms. Marvel’ and ‘Moon Knight’ or ‘Eternals’ as brands years before confirming the Disney+ series and movies. The same pattern as the “Untitled Donkey Kong Project”. Post-credits scenes as de facto advertisements: Continuously. The original was Nick Fury and the Avengers Initiative in ‘Iron Man’. ‘Thor’ ends by showing the Tesseract, thus announcing the Thanos saga. ‘Ant-Man’ closes with a scene where Steve Rogers and Bucky appear in a situation that only makes sense if you’re already producing ‘Civil War.’ Thanos at the end of ‘Avengers’ appears for three seconds, does not speak, and his presence retroactively turns the entire film into a prologue. The difference between both companies is that Marvel ends up putting Kevin Feige on stage at Comic-Con to explain the plans for the next ten years. Nintendo lets fans guess and then Miyamoto denies it. Marvel announced its multiverse early on, with dates, and Nintendo hasn’t even suggested that anything like a Nintendoverse exists. However, anyone who comes out of watching ‘Super Mario Galaxy’ wonders what the next episode will be. In Xataka | Japan hates its most devious tourist trap: the Super Mario karts that refuse to die

The figures suggest that the domain of blockbusters in Hollywood is not over. In fact, it will go worse

In the post-pandemic Hollywood that we live, of completely consolidated cycles and trends, commercial cinema reigns at its expression: sequelae, remakes, reboots and blockbusters that do not leave space to medium and small movies. And although one might think that it is a passing situation with a visos to change, the truth is that such a panorama (at first glance, a transition state) does not stop consolidating. The figures. Let’s look at a few figures, which Pau Brunet gives in Your Newsletter Box Office Alchemy: During the first semester of 2025, the five highest grossing films in the United States have concentrated 82% of income. It is a rise in that domain if we compare it, for example, with 2019, when those five films generated 75%. At first glance the figures do not seem to indicate excessive growth, but let’s look at the rest of the movies. Top 6-10 represents 11.7% of the box office, a 35% drop compared to 2019. And beyond Top 10, the figures are abysmal: they represent 6.3% of the income, a 53% drop. That without counting the general fall of income (which shows that this domination of a few films is not the panacea): in these first six months, those first five films have generated 22% less income than in 2019. And what does it mean. That as much as we rabiem and kick because last year The ten most viewed films were all sequelsremakes, reboots and several fritas (not even ‘WICKED‘He escaped, being how is the adaptation of a musical inspired by a book that, in turn, is based on’ The Wizard of Oz ‘), is what works and is what the public demands. A few months ago We contemplated stunned How Disney Barría at the box office with ‘Lilo & Stitch’, and this week we have The premiere of ‘Superman’to which the first box office figures (at the time of writing these lines, the presale of Thursday) predict a great result. We can celebrate the success of unusual bets as ‘sinners’ (which Apparently it will not become franchise), But it is still a drop in the ocean, an absolute rarity in the current context. Problems for indies. Of course, this points to severe problems for the indie sector of cinematographic production, and that is increasingly cornering in the billboards. Brunet himself spoke In a previous newsletter of the aid that in Hollywood are taking place, by producers’ coalitions, to the cinema that does not have the support of the great studies. And this is going to be the only way for independent cinema, authentic basic oxygen for industry, continues to exist, because the dynamics of distribution have it marginalized. The rooms: horror, horror … The figures are clear, but you just have to go to any room to check the absolute domination of the cinema mainstreamto which the brutal is added Shortage of exhibition windowsin search of rapid benefits: after a few weeks in rooms the films go to PPV, and from there to streaming. And start again in a dynamic that not only burns products at infernal speeds, but also admits anything that is not blockbusters. The Terabusters. Brunet puts a name to this phenomenon: Terabusters. A step beyond the blockbusters, like Kaijus of cinema, the movies already They are not blockbusters, but events that bring together all the efforts of a producer for months … and hopefully return that effort in the form of dividends that allow them to finance the following monster. But you have to take care of the cinema base fabric, or the industry is in danger of devouring itself, or working only based on movies that we saw ten years ago (or less). Header | Warner In Xataka | There are many people who hate Santiago Segura movies. The problem is that they “save” Spanish cinema every year

Recent studies suggest that cocoa was not born in Mesoamerica, but in the current Ecuador

Talking about cocoa is talking about your Impact on Mesoamerican societies. Cocoa arrived in Mexico at some point in 1900 AC and esteem That it was the Olmecs who domesticated the plant at some point between 1200 and 400 AC was the pillar of different Mesoamerican cultures and became more than a food. However, recent studies have challenged that idea. The reason? Neither olmecs, nor Maya, nor Aztecs: the first who used cocoa were the Amazonian cultures that bound with Ecuador and Colombia. We go in parts. The food of the gods. As we say, cocoa is something cultural In Mexico. The Maya They considered which was the “food of the gods” and used it as a sacred drink. It was very different from the sweet we know today, since it was prepared with cocoa in pieces, flour, chili, cinnamon and hot water, resulting in a dense and bitter mixture. Had presence In its rituals, but it was also used as an offering to ask for something from the gods, it could be used as a currency and even as a status symbol. The Aztecs They refined Something else the formula, since they roasted the grains, grind them and mixed with ingredients such as vanilla or aromatic flowers. Subsequently, they added hot water and thus the Techocolat. Hello, Ecuador. But the two cultures had something in common: it was not a simple food. Although cocoa knew that it appeared in the high Amazon, in regions that are now Ecuador and Colombia, the domestication of the plant occurred thanks to Mesoamerican societies. But, as we say, recent studies They have put this belief upside down. Researchers and archaeologists at the University of Berkeley, from the University of Columbia Britanic and the French Development Research Institute According to him firsttraces of cocoa uses in containers of about 5,300 years ago indicate that the civilizations that inhabited these tropical jungles already gave use to cocoa well as food, or as an offering. This indicates that its use dates back about 1,500 years to which we considered the first in the Mesoamerican civilizations. Archeococin. It all started with the discovery of elaborate ceramics that would have belonged to culture May-Chinchipewhich occupied the Western Amazon about 5,500 years ago. Michael Blake is one of the researchers and commented on Science that those vessels were similar to those used to make cocoa. That was when he asked his colleagues “Is there any possibility that these vessels were used to make cocoa?” And the answer was “nobody has proven it.” He assumed the task and, by scraping different parts of the containers, they found that there were remains of starch with a composition that is only seen in the pods of the seeds of the cocoa tree. They also found theobromine, a compound present in mature cocoa seeds. Thus, they could affirm that this civilization was already doing cocoa routinely before Mesoamerican cultures. Evidence of the first areas that used cocoa Domestication or non -domestication? Rosemary Joyce is a researcher at the University of Berkeley who has studied for years the origin of cocoa and its deep relationship with Mesoamerican cultures. It is important because he commented on this joint study between several universities and, although he found unquestionable that this Ecuadorian culture was already working cocoa, he asked if they really managed to domesticate the plant. Because there is an important difference between using the seeds found sporadically and really having an industry supported by the plant. This domestication of cocoa is something that is also thoroughly being investigated and, before the study we mentioned, it was published other that dated domestication 3,600 years ago in Central America. Blake and his colleagues are convinced that it was the inhabitants of South America who domesticated the plant due to the amount of different artifacts in which they found traces of cocoa elaborations. Impact on Mexican identity. Joyce, who was not very convinced with the new theory of domestication in Ecuador, commented in a article Subsequent that “after decades of research, new discoveries show that one of the most widely repeated statements, such as cocoa cultivation began in Mexico or Central America, should be reviewed.” And a question that may arise is how these discoveries affect Mexican identity, which for hundreds of years consolidated their predecessors such as those who dominated the cocoa plant and began using their fruits to make food. The answer is … that something like this should not be a cultural earthquake. That traces of the early use of cocoa are traces in another totally different area is an archaeological achievement and that continues to teach us about the civilizations of the past, but it will “invent” that invented it, the relevance of cocoa between Mesoamerican cultures is indisputable, being a pride For Mexico. Spread. Now the mystery is to match that first crop in the area of ​​Ecuador and the arrival of plants to Mesoamerica. Joyce considers that, with these revelations, “a new stage begins in the history of cocoa: to link its early history in South America with that of Central America and Mexico.” In the 2018 Science study, the researchers already affirmed that the search for that relationship is something that they should study more thoroughly ”, since the current mystery is how cocoa trees made that trip of thousands of kilometers until they reached Central America. Cocoa seeds They lose quickly their viability, so they are not easy to transport and that are reproduced in a new land (especially with the methods they had thousands of years ago). In the end, the finding does not take importance to the role of cocoa in the Mesoamerican culture, but it does enriches the history of the plant itself and gives us clues to throw for future investigations. Images | UC Berkeley In Xataka | How much does a cup of coffee in each country in the world cost, explained in a fantastic map

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.