While Europe looks at Ukraine, the US has sounded the alarms for Spain on a closer front: losing two autonomous cities

In July 2002, a handful of Moroccan soldiers landed on the islet of Perejil and raised a Moroccan flag there. The Spanish response came days later with a military operation so rapid and measured that it ended up becoming one of the diplomatic-military episodes strangest of the recent Mediterranean. What worries Spain. While Europe concentrates much of its military attention in Ukraine and the eastern flank of NATO, a much closer concern is growing in Spain: the south of the Strait. The problem is not just Morocco or the military balance in the Maghreb, but the change in the United States’ attitude toward the region. The appearance in Washington of official documents that describe Ceuta and Melilla like cities “under Spanish administration” in Moroccan territory has generated unprecedented alarm because it breaks a historical diplomatic taboo. For decades, the sovereignty of both cities was considered out of the question for Western allies. Now some American political sectors are beginning to treat her as an open dispute susceptible to future negotiation. US pressure. Spanish concern does not arise solely from a parliamentary report, but from the political context that surrounds it. Republican congressman Mario Diaz-Balartclose to Marco Rubio’s entourage and aligned with positions very favorable to Rabat, has not only publicly defended that Ceuta and Melilla are “in Moroccan territory”, but that the own report encourages the State Department to promote diplomatic talks about their status. All this coincides with the deterioration of the relationship between Donald Trump and the Spanish Government for military spendingNATO and the disagreements over Iran. In certain strategic Spanish sectors, the feeling is beginning to spread that Washington increasingly considers most useful to Morocco as a regional and less essential partner to Spain within its Mediterranean architecture. Morocco and the new balance. The most profound change may be occurring on the other side of the Strait. Morocco has been accelerating for years its military modernization through agreements with the United States, Israel, Türkiye and France, while also promoting its own arms industry. Since 2021, industrial projects linked to drones, weapons and advanced military production have multiplied. At the same time, Rabat has consolidated his diplomatic position in Washington after the American recognition of Western Sahara. For many Spanish analysts, the problem is no longer just migratory pressure or specific border crises, but the emergence of a regional power much more militarily connected to the West and increasingly secure in its strategic position. Spain is left out. The other big concern is that Spain seems have been left out of the new network of military alliances in the Maghreb. Italy has become the main strategic partner of Algeria in the Mediterranean, expanding defense agreements, industrial cooperation and military coordination with one of the most powerful armies in Africa. Morocco, meanwhile, close ties with Washington, Paris and Tel Aviv. Spain has managed to rebuild diplomatic relations with both neighbors, but it hardly has any relevant agreements on defense matters. This vacuum is beginning to be perceived as a serious problem in certain strategic circles, especially when linked reports to the Ministry of Defense they already admit that “South of the Strait of Gibraltar, military pressure is a reality.” Ceuta and Melilla as vulnerable points. That is why the reports of the Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies raise with increasing clarity the need to a specific plan defense for Ceuta and Melilla. The focus goes far beyond the military and includes logistics, cybersecurity, maritime surveillance, institutional resilience and protection of critical infrastructure. Fear does not necessarily point to an open conventional conflict, but rather to hybrid scenarios constant pressure: migration crises, diplomatic tensions, partial blockades or political attrition campaigns. Autonomous cities thus appear as especially sensitive enclaves due to their logistical dependence and geographical isolation. A brutal return: geography. If you like, all this reflects something broader: the return of geography as a central factor of European politics. For years, Spain observed the Maghreb mainly from a migratory and commercial perspective, while the greatest threats seemed to be far from the western Mediterranean. But the war in Ukraine has accelerated regional rearmament and has reorganized alliances throughout the area. And in the midst of this transformation, Spain begins to discover that one of its potentially most delicate fronts is not in the Baltic or in Eastern Europe, but just in the other side of the strait. Image | US Army In Xataka | The US threatened to take the Rota base to Morocco. Spain has buried it with an unbeatable offer: more territory In Xataka | ANDhe tunnel between Spain and Morocco seemed like a chimera. Now a tunnel boring machine manufacturer says it is viable

Replacing workers with AI sounded spectacular. There are already companies backward

That an AI takes away our work is A fear That is being realized. More and more companies that bet on replacing human employees with automated processes with AI. At the same time, the potential that the AI agents It seems almost unlimited. The reality is much more complex and there are already some companies that have had to give reverse in their plans. Yes, but to supervise her humans. There are many companies that have begun to draw a plan to replace their employees with AI, especially in the sector of the customer service. However, according to a survey of Gartner, 50% of companies are abandoning this path due to the challenges that the transition to a service managed only by AI is assuming. 95% of the executives surveyed claimed that they would bet on a hybrid approach combining AI and Human agents. In the words of Kathy Ross, director of the Gartner customer service: “IA offers significant potential to transform customer service, but it is not the panacea. The human touch remains irreplaceable in many interactions.” The Klarna case. Perhaps the most popular case of a company that has regretted betting on the AI ​​is that of Klarna. In February 2024, his CEO presumed that an AI was doing the work of the 700 employees who had just fired and also assured that he was receiving the same score from the clients. A year later, the quality of service offered by AI received many criticisms and had to back to hire human labor Ensure that customers can always talk to a human agent. Not so quickly. Although currently the agents of AI are not so reliable As Altman promisedit does not guarantee that they will not improve in the future. In addition, there are cases of other companies to replace humans for AI has gone well. Like the CEO of this Indian startup that He fired 90% of the template And a year later he states that it has been A success. And it is not the only one. Duolingo, for example, fired 10% of its translators to replace them with an AI. Other large companies such as UPS and Cisco They have followed similar paths. The case of IBM It is particular, since, although it has opted for AI, it has also had to hire more workers precisely to manage that AI. IA agents. With the generative AI in decelerationsince the end of last year there is another concept that has gained relevance, that of the AI agents. While chatbots can only attend one request at the same time, an AI agent is able to perform more complex tasks. For example, you could organize the holidays only to mention the dates and destiny. The promise of autonomy, the ability to handle several tasks at the same time and make decisions make the AI ​​agents A threat to many jobs. Unreliable. We can all make mistakes and in this it seems that AI agents are very human. The problem is that if an AF agent makes an error, he continues to repeat in successive tasks, making the error increasing And the final result is also wrong. We have also seen other uses of AI tools at work that have not fully went well, such as disastrous work interviews conducted with AI. A revealing experiment. A experiment carried out by researchers from the Carnegie Mellon University He suggested that they are still very green. They created a fictitious software company whose employees were AI agents. They used Google, OpenAi, Anthropic and Meta models, to which they assigned roles such as finance, administration or software engineering. The result was disastrous: they only managed to complete 24% of the tasks assigned to them. AI and labor market. The impact of AI on the labor market is undeniable. According to the last World Economic Forum Reportit is expected that by 2030 92 million jobs will be destroyed due to AI automation. But there is another face of the currency. At the same time, they will be created 170 million new positions And the AI ​​will be one of the job creation engines, something we have already seen with Salesforce’s case. Cover image | Pixabay In Xataka | The workers have stopped fear of AI as a machine to destroy jobs: software engineers do not think the same

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.