In 1955, someone secretly stole Einstein’s brain and stored it in mayonnaise jars. That was just the beginning

Seven hours after Albert Einstein’s death, Thomas Harvey was preparing to perform an autopsy on the body at the Priceton Hospital morgue. It was April 18, 1955 and Otto Nathan, friend and executor of the famous physicist, was present: old Albert had become in the “greatest rock star of the 20th century”but he wanted the cult of his person to end there. The pathologist would perform the autopsy, the family would collect the body and secretly cremate it before scattering its ashes in the Delaware River. And so it was. Or, well, that’s what the family believed. Not in my lair. Because inadvertently, without prior documented permission and as quickly as he could, Thomas Harvey removed Einstein’s brain and kept it (in a jar full of formaldehyde). At first he kept it a secret, but no one steals the brain of the great genius of the 20th century to keep it a secret. The news, in a matter of hours, spread like wildfire. And, in fact, on the 20th the New York Times posted that something was happening with the brain. The family panicked, but shortly before publication (and following a fait accompli policy) Harvey managed to convince Hans Albert Einstein, the eldest son, to give him retrospective permission. I imagine Hans didn’t have much room for maneuver: Harvey had the brain in his possession. It was ‘give him permission’ or, perhaps, lose him forever. Einstein’s son set conditions, of course: the main one is that the organ be used for scientific purposes. It wasn’t going to be possible either. Especially because Harvey ‘fell in love’ with the brain and, despite Princeton Hospital’s efforts to have him deposit it, the pathologist repeatedly refused. To the point where, at the end of the year, he is fired. That’s when he took the brain to the University of Pennsylvania and, in a friend’s lab, divided it into about 240 pieces and created 12 sets of slides. Fired and sidelined, Harvey sent 42 of the samples to different forensic experts and neurologists for investigation. That was their plan to return through the front door: the majority did not respond and those who did did not find anything notable. So things really started to go wrong. As a result of his stubbornness, his marriage breaks down. At some point in the 1960s, divorce forces him to take the glass jars containing his brain out of the basement and go to the Midwest. And, deep down, he was lucky. On the one hand, none of the affected institutions wanted to speak publicly about this so as not to compromise their prestige. On the other hand, the courts were not as involved in American life, nor did information flow with the same ease. So found a job in Wichita and he kept the brain in the same refrigerator where he had the beer. Until someone finds it. That someone is Steven Levy, a journalist for New Jersey Monthly. In August 1978, Levy told your brain search of the physical. When she found him in Kansas, Harvey didn’t want to talk, but he quickly loosened his tongue. And, of course, it was a scandal. Throughout the 1980s, he sent samples to some researchers (a Marian Diamond, Berkeley neuroanatomistsent him four samples in a mayonnaise jar), but his ambition was to study it himself in his free time. Things get complicated. Because at the end of the 80s, Harvey lost his license and moved to Lawrence, Kansas, to work in a plastic extrusion factory. He spends his nights getting drunk with William S. Burroughs and welcoming those who come to see him. Convinced by journalists, he did a lot of strange things: from cutting pieces on a cheese board to taking, now in his eighties, a trip to California to talk to Einstein’s granddaughter. Finally, between 1998 and 2007 (when Harvey died), was donating parts from the brain to Princeton Hospital. However, that is the most interesting thing we have been able to get out of this organ of contention: its delirious history is more interesting than what scientists have been able to get out of it. Something that reminds us of a phrase normally attributed to Richard Feynman: “it’s worth having an open mind, but not so much that your brain falls out” (or has it stolen). Image | Taton Moise In Xataka | Einstein’s first violin had passed unnoticed. Until an auction house put it up for sale.

Ben Affleck had been secretly setting up an AI company for filmmakers for four years. Netflix just got it

Netflix has acquired InterPositivethe post-production AI tools company that Ben Affleck founded in 2022 and that was quietly developing tools. Its 16 employees go to work for the platform and the actor and director takes on advisory roles. The operation occurs just a week after Netflix will abandon the bid for Warner Bros. Discovery. What InterPositive is NOT. It is worth starting with what InterPositive does not do: it does not generate movies from a prompt of text. It’s not soraor anything similar. InterPositive starts from the already shot material of a series or movie (in any production, what is known as the dailiesthe raw footage that is recorded each day) and trains a specific AI model according to the characteristics of each production. This model then allows manipulate material during post-production: correct color, relight shots, add visual effects, reframe shots or redo shots that were not filmed. The company’s first model, for example, was trained to understand what Affleck calls “visual logic and editorial consistency”, respecting the real conditions of a shoot: the model solved common problems such as missing shots, details in the backgrounds that need to be corrected, incorrect lighting… All oriented towards filming techniques, not the actors’ performances. AI yes, but with nuances. At a conference in 2024, Affleck argued that AI “will eliminate the most laborious, least creative and most expensive aspects of filmmaking,” reducing barriers to entry. His stance is born from a specific concern for preserving what he calls “judgment”: the ability to make creative decisions that are only built with decades of experience. Affleck spoke to Netflix executives from InterPositive for the first time last fall, and acknowledged initially feeling “scared” at the idea of ​​computers playing a central role in production. Netflix, in favor. The acquisition fits into a strategy that Netflix has been defining with some consistency since 2024. At that time, the Argentine ‘El Eternauta’ included the first AI-generated scene in the final footagea sequence that was completed ten times faster than it would have been possible to do it with conventional effects. In ‘Happy Gilmore 2’ they used AI to digitally rejuvenate actors, and in ‘Pedro Páramo’ as well, with a total budget equivalent to what the visual effects of ‘The Irishman’ alone cost five years earlier. That timing Well. It’s very curiousand it is not clear if it means anything, that the purchase of InterPositive is announced just a week after Netflix withdrew from the bidding for the studios and streaming from Warner Bros. Discovery. Netflix saved, in the words of its financial director, “2.8 billion dollars.” The acquisition of InterPositive, although certainly of much smaller dimensions (although nothing is known about figures), indicates where it can direct part of those resources: basically, its own production. Disney, on the other side. Meanwhile, one of Netflix’s biggest competitors, Disney, has signed a three-year license agreement with OpenAI which allows Sora users to create short videos with more than 200 characters from Disney, Marvel, Pixar and Star Wars. One billion dollars of investment that goes in the opposite direction to what Netflix intends, which is to make its own productions cheaper. Regardless of the position of each player in this game, Hollywood experiments more and more openly with AI in all phases of production, from pre-production to visual effects. A new landscape is opening up for film production and Affleck’s company is just one of the first chapters. In Xataka | ‘Critterz’ will be much more than the first AI-animated film: welcome to the new era of machine-made cinema

Anthropic wanted to secretly scan and then destroy millions of books to train its AI. It hasn’t been so secret

A language model for AI needs input if it is to be trained to be more accurate and effective. The issue is how the information is obtained and whether there is an ethical way to do it that is profitable for the technology company in power. There is no doubt that the preferred option for companies has been to use all possible physical and digital content without anyone’s permission. There is also evidence. A judicial leak reveals that Anthropic invested tens of millions of dollars in acquiring and digitizing literary works without permission from the authors. According to account Washington Post, the project, internally called “Panama”, was part of a frenetic race among big technology companies to accumulate massive data to train their artificial intelligence models. How it all started. The Panama Project was launched by Anthropic in early 2024. According to internal documents revealed per the Washington Post, the goal was to “destructively scan every book in the world.” Furthermore, these documents also explicitly state that the company did not want anyone to know that they were working on it. In about a year, the company spent tens of millions of dollars buying millions of books, cutting their spines with hydraulic machines and scanning their pages to feed the AI ​​models that power Claudeits star chatbot. According to the media, the books, once digitized, ended up being recycled. Because has come to light. The details of the project have been revealed in a lawsuit for infringement of rights copyright filed by literary authors against Anthropic. Although the company agreed to pay $1.5 billion to close the case in August 2025, a district judge decided to make more than 4,000 pages of internal documents public last week, exposing the entire operation. They are not the only ones. Court documents reveal that other technology companies such as Meta, Google and OpenAI had also participated in this race to obtain massive information to train their models. According to revealed According to the documents, an Anthropic co-founder theorized in January 2023 that training AI models with books could teach them “how to write well” instead of imitating “low-quality internet slang.” On the other hand, an internal Meta email from 2024 described access to a digital library of books as “essential” to be competitive with rivals in the race to dominate AI. However, the documents revealed by the media also show how Meta employees expressed concern on several occasions about the legality of downloading millions of books without permission. An internal email from December 2023 indicates that the practice had been approved after being “escalated to MZ,” apparently referring to CEO Mark Zuckerberg. According to court records to which the media has had access, the companies did not consider it “practical” to obtain direct permission from publishers and authors. Instead, they found ways to mass-acquire books without the writers’ knowledge, including downloading unauthorized copies from third-party sites. Chat logs from April 2024 show an employee asking why they were using servers rented from Amazon to download torrents instead of Facebook’s own. The answer: “Avoid the risk of tracing” the activity back to the company. Data torrent. The documents to which the Washington Post has had access also they test that Ben Mann, co-founder of Anthropic, personally downloaded over 11 days in June 2021 a collection of books from LibGen, a gigantic library of copyrighted content. The outlet further revealed that, a year later, in July 2022, Mann celebrated the launch of the ‘Pirate Library Mirror’ website, which boasts a massive database of books and openly claims to violate copyright laws. “Just in time!!!” Mann wrote to other Anthropic employees, according to the outlet. Anthropic stated in legal documents that it never trained a revenue-generating business model using LibGen data nor did it use Pirate Library Mirror to train any full model. Anthropic’s legal solution. According to point the medium in its article, faced with the legal risk, Anthropic changed its strategy. The company hired Tom Turvey, a Silicon Valley veteran who had helped create the project Google Books two decades earlier. Under his direction, Anthropic considered purchasing books from libraries or secondhand bookstores, including New York’s iconic Strand bookstore. The company ultimately ended up buying millions of books and stacking them in a giant warehouse, often in batches of tens of thousands, according to court filings. The Washington Post assures In addition, the company worked with used book sellers in the United Kingdom. A project proposal mentions that Anthropic sought to “convert between 500,000 and two million books in a six-month period.” What the law says. Most legal cases against AI companies are still ongoing, but the media mention two court rulings that have considered that the use of books to train AI models without permission from the author or publisher may be legal under the “fair use” doctrine of copyright. In June 2025, District Judge William Alsup determined that Anthropic had the right to use books to train AI models because they process them in a “transformative” way. He compared the process to teachers “teaching schoolchildren to write well.” That same month, Judge Vince Chhabria ruled in the Meta case that the authors had not shown that the company’s AI models could harm the sales of their books. In the Anthropic case, the physical book scanning project was considered legal, but the judge determined that the company may have infringed copyright by downloading millions of books without authorization before launching Project Panama. The final agreement. Instead of facing a trial, Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to publishers and authors without admitting guilt. According to point According to the media, authors whose books were downloaded can claim their share of the settlement, estimated at about $3,000 per title. Cover image | Emil Widlund and Anthropic In Xataka | If AI is going to leave us without jobs, in the United Kingdom they are already seriously discussing the solution: a universal basic income

Have you gotten married secretly?

Adriana Lima and Andre Lemmers They plan to go through the altar, sealing before their family and close friends a love from which a two-year-old baby named Cyan. Or have they already gotten married? The Brazilian model and Victoria’s Secret Angel has left us speechless by publishing this Tuesday a photograph of the stunning engagement ring that the producer has given him, a portrait as beautiful as it is cryptic that could make us think that The couple said “I do” secretly. © Getty Images Adriana Lima reveals her dazzling engagement ring He’s good at misleading. In 2017, having divorced her first husband, Adriana lit up the networks by publishing a photograph in which she was wearing a diamond ring that pointed to a new commitment. However, she quickly clarified that it was a different kind of love: “What about the ring? It’s symbolic,” she wrote in the image’s description. “I’m committed to myself and my own happiness. I’m married to me. Girls, love yourselves,” she concluded. © adrianalima This time, in case we suspected that it was another gesture of self-love, the model has cleared up any potential doubts with a short phrase: “Officially, Mrs. Lima Lemmers, alias Limers💍👰”. He shared the snapshot through Instagram stories, which – as is well known – are deleted after 24 hours. And although we usually use this format to announce our most special moments live, not delayed, a look at the previous publications of the Victoria’s Secret Angel He confirmed to us that the engagement, without a doubt, occurred a few weeks ago. © adrianalima The details of the enigmatic photo We see that, in the image of the advertisement, the couple is surrounded by endless sand dunes and a clear sky that is repeated in another publication that Adriana made on December 9 as part of a compilation of photos from her last trip to Abu Dhabi. Dabi. The look that Adriana wears also gives her away, as it is the same set of vest with ecru linen shorts. “A visit to remember✨”he wrote at that time without revealing what had really happened. © adrianalima And what was Adriana doing in Abu Dhabi? We know that the model attended the Etihad Airways Formula 1 Grand Prix held at the Yas Marina circuit as a guest of the Government. In 2021, he had attended the races in Doha, Qatar, so his presence at the event did not surprise anyone. She is a sports lover, like her future husband, who was by her side at all times. © Getty Images He wasn’t hiding his commitment either, as we might think. On December 5, in Miami, the draw was held for the group stage of the first edition of the Club World Cup, a competition in which 32 teams will compete for the title. That day, Adriana Lima was one of the participating stars who drew the names of the clubs from the crystal bowl, and in view of all of us was that dazzling ring, with its large cut diamond baguette. © Getty Images © Getty Images I had left clues In recent weeks, Adriana has dressed almost exclusively in whiteboth on the street and at his gala events, giving us clues about the step he is about to take with the American producer. We’re not just talking about the suit he wore in Miami; This luminous color range took over his travel suitcase to Abu Dhabi, but even so, not even his most loyal fans had suspected. © adrianalima Following the publication of the story in which the ring is shown up close, this Tuesday, December 17, there is speculation that the model has already married the father of her youngest son. However, this has not been confirmed first-hand and we can only assure that She has been wearing this ring on her left hand for approximately two weeks.. © adrianalima © adrianalima The truth is that the Brazilian officially refers to herself as the “Mrs Limers” (a fusion between her surname and that of the producer). We will be attentive to any details that may arise about the engagement, which has been carried out in absolute secrecy, and the mysterious wedding. © Getty ImagesThe ‘Limers’ family, as they call themselves, at the premiere of ‘The Thicket’ Did you get married in September? On the red carpet The Thicket, that took place in September, a reporter asked her what her favorite part is about being executive producer of the project led by Lemmers, to which she responded bluntly: “Being with my husband.” At that time, he didn’t even have the ring that sparked this commotion in his hands. © Getty ImagesAndre Lemmers and Adriana Lima at the premiere of ‘Shit.Meet.Fan’, November 18, 2024 Her love story with Andre Lemmers After five years of marriage to the former Serbian basketball player Marko Jaric, the model had a famous courtship with the Turkish writer Metin Hara, they put an end to the relationship in 2019. Months later, an Instagram story, in which she holding hands with a mysterious man, set off alarm bells again. Indeed, this man was Andrew Lemmersa successful American film producer. We found out a year later, arriving at the red carpet of the 2021 Venice Film Festival, when they made his official debut in front of the cameras. Adriana has two daughtersValentina, 15, and Sienna, 12, who she shares with her ex-husband Marko Jarić, while Andre has two children born from a previous marriage, who get along wonderfully with their new sisters, as we can see in the photograph family that rests on these lines. As a result of this relationship between the model and the producer, who will soon seal their love at the altar, it is little cyanonly 2 years old and baptized with this curious name because of the color of his eyes.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.