They will now require VPN providers to also block IPs

According to an information note from LaLiga, the Commercial Court No. 1 of Córdoba has issued several orders granting LaLiga and Telefónica precautionary measures “unaudita parte” (“without hearing the other party”, without previously hearing the defense). These measures specifically target two of the providers of VPN services best known on the market: NordVPN and ProtonVPN. The consequences are very important. Dynamic blocking obligation. The court order – to which we have not had access, and which is mentioned in LaLiga – requires that both NordVPN and ProtonVPN must: “Immediately implement in its internal systems the appropriate measures to make it possible for the IP addresses provided by the plaintiffs, in which the illegal broadcast of protected audiovisual content has been verified, to become inaccessible from Spain.” Is absolutely unheard of. VPN providers as part of the problem. These orders, they say in LaLiga, “recognize that VPN service providers are technological intermediaries” that are within the application of the European Digital Services regulations, and therefore must prevent infringements from being committed through their infrastructures. The proceedings also highlight that VPNs are an “extremely effective and accessible means of generating the possibility of access to content that is not accessible in certain geographic locations.” Javier Tebas, president of LaLiga, I already pointed out recently to the objective of imposing its demands on VPN providers. And on top of that take advantage of that activity. According to the documents cited by LaLiga, these VPN service providers not only facilitate access to geographically restricted content, but also actively advertise this ability to bypass the massive IP blocks ordered by LaLiga. According to the judge, these campaigns “distort the real location” and contribute to avoiding the restrictions already decreed by other courts. Unheard of part. That legal term sounds complex, but its meaning is quite direct. It literally means “without hearing the other party.” We are – if the orders are confirmed, to which we insist, we have not had access – facing a unilateral resolution. The normal thing is that the other party can defend itself, but we are facing a (another) legal exception reserved for emergency situations that they have taken advantage of in LaLiga for their policies of massive and indiscriminate blockades, regardless of the damage to third parties. NordVPN and ProtonVPN may oppose each other. In LaLiga they talk that we are facing precautionary measures, something also important because with them we do not have a final sentence. The affected companies have the right to oppose these measures once they have been notified to try to have the judge revoke them after hearing their arguments. Even so, LaLiga also indicates that the measures are for “immediate implementation”, which leaves these companies in a difficult defensive position. What ProtonVPN says. A company spokesperson has indicated in comments to Xataka Móvil that they were “not aware of any proceedings that may be underway” before the information came out. Likewise, it states that any court order issued “without due notification to the affected parties” would be “invalid from a procedural point of view.” They want the opportunity to present their case before a binding ruling is made. What NordVPN says. At Xataka we have contacted those responsible for NordVPN to clarify the matter. At the moment we have not received a response, but we will expand this information if we obtain new information. AND the tests, what? LaLiga also indicates that the orders oblige LaLiga and Telefónica to “preserve sufficient digital evidence of the illicit broadcast of the protected content” to notify the defendants. This requirement is a measure to legally ensure that the IPs that are ordered to be blocked were actually being used for these illegal broadcasts. They are not Spanish companies. There is some uncertainty here about whether these companies, which have headquarters outside the EU (like Panama in the case of NordVPN), will comply with an order from a Spanish court of first instance. If they don’t, national operators could be forced to block those VPN providers’ own nodes, but this is an even more drastic and terrible scenario: under the current announcement, users can continue using NordVPN and ProtonVPN normally for everything, but they will be just as affected by the blocks as if they were not using those VPNs. If this other measure were applied, it would not be possible to access these providers conventionally in Spain. VPNs filtering content? If they have to comply with these regulations, VPNs could become dangerous intermediaries for all the content that is transferred through their services. Many users take advantage of the layer of privacy these VPNs offer for teleworking and secure connections, but if VPNs agree to filter content, users could lose critical network access tools. What LaLiga says is one thing, what NordVPN and ProtonVPN do is another.. This entire process is still at an uncertain moment, because no matter how much LaLiga has achieved such privileges, it remains to be seen whether these suppliers will comply with these decisions. So, we will see how these suppliers respond to these demands. In Xataka | Football has become the anchor of operator subscriptions. And LaLiga is making more money than ever

China is filling up with “quadricycles” that do not require a driving license. And they are a problem for road safety

The two times I have been to China, two things about its automobile fleet have caught my attention: the furor for electric cars in terms of brands, models and dealerships, because you can almost find one on every corner of any central street in the big cities. And on the other side of the coin, I was also struck by the enormous amount of motorbikes (scooter is saying a lot) and cars without licenses parked in any side and circulating any manner. Don’t call it a light quadricycle, rather say laotoule. There they are known as “laotoule”, something like that like the joy of the old man. Because if in Spain the light quadricycles you see are usually driven by older people, in China too. They began to be seen back in the 90s from tuk-tuk modifications three wheels in rural areas, although today they have capacity for up to five people and a very diverse aesthetic. From occasional mobility to a vehicle for everything. Although the older ones are the star group, they are not the only ones: they are vehicles with very clear profiles of occasional use and short and (relatively) simple trajectories. As collects China Dailythese vehicles are the main means of transportation for running errands or picking up elderly grandchildren, but in recent years they have expanded their range to younger people: they offer a closed space and solve the problem of having to travel at a low cost. According to the China Electric Vehicle Associationannual sales of these lightweight non-highway quadricycles increased from 1.1 million in 2017 to 2.1 million in 2023, of which 1.4 million went to seniors. According to an investigation According to Banyuetan, the magazine linked to the official Chinese news agency Xinhua, these cars are flooding rural roads and urban peripheries. And its proliferation has aroused the suspicion of the authorities. The legal vacuum of laotoule. Because unlike Spain, where any motor vehicle requires a technical sheet and a license plate, in China they have been marketed as if they were devices for personal mobility, something like a scooter or an electric wheelchair. Thus, the bulk of laotoule are sold without registration or approval or the need to pass your MOT. In fact, they are increasingly sold online. like low cost imitations of luxury cars. There is even a Porsche Cayenne without a license. Because there are brands and models of Chinese electric cars to bore, in a light quadricycle version, too. In fact, There are even Maseratis and Porsche Cayenne modelsor rather, Maserati style and Porsche style, because they are not official from the respective houses. And because the Maserati costs about 3,200 euros in exchange. Is take a look at the Alibaba website and find models for all tastes, such as this Mini. Also There is a version without a license of Xiaomi’s second electric car, the ambitious Xiaomi YU7as you can see below these lines. From afar they hit the mark, up close already such. Under that attractive bodywork they hide electric motors of low or medium power and a top speed of up to 70 km/h. Tap to go to the post. The card-free version of the Xiaomi YU7 The real problem is road safety. Leaving aside industrial property issues, laotoules look like miniature cars but they are not: they lack basic elements that are found in passenger cars, such as steel frames or airbags. The Banyuetan report echoes of a fatal hit by a 59-year-old driver in a laotule in Hebei, northern China. From prohibition to regulation. Some local administrations have already made a move: since January 1, 2024, cities such as Luoyang or Beijing banned circulation on public roads to low-speed three- and four-wheel electric vehicles. However, there is a middle way: China issued a regulation of technical specifications and safety requirements for electric vehicles, finally classifying laoutoule as motor vehicles. From here and as explained by Lu Yong, researcher in the low-speed electric vehicle sector for Sixth Tone: “We must recognize the real demand for low-speed vehicles and strengthen the design at national level, both for industry development and traffic management. Clear and enforceable rules must be quickly introduced for both product and driving standards, as well as for road access.” In Xataka | China has so many electric cars running on its streets that it is going to use them to generate energy for homes In Xataka | China is the only country in the world where car prices are falling. So much so that the Government is taking measures

India will require pre-installing an indelible app on all mobile phones. And that poses a serious challenge for Apple

In today’s technological debate, few issues generate as much attention as privacy. India has implemented a significant change: incorporate a state applicationthat will remain on iOS and Android phones without the possibility of deleting it. The measure coincides with a stage in which Apple emphasizes its security model more than ever. That crossroads, between the Indian regulatory commitment and the Cupertino company’s approach, may have a key point in this story. The movement began to take shape with an instruction from the Indian Department of Telecommunications sent privately to the main manufacturers. The document, dated November 28, establishes a period of 90 days for the application Sanchar Saathi appears on all new mobile phones and comes accompanied by another obligation: distribute it through updates to devices that are already in circulation. Telecommunications Minister Jyotiraditya M. Scindia He announced in an interview with CNBC-TV18 that the public order will be issued “in the coming days.” A tool against theft and fraud. According to information from the Indian Governmentthe application allows you to block and track lost or stolen mobile phones on all networks in the country, generate traceability if someone tries to activate them and verify the authenticity of the terminal using the IMEI number. It also offers a channel to report international calls that present themselves as national, a practice linked to fraud, among other functions. The Executive defends that these functions facilitate the response to theft and fraud in telecommunications. From utility to potential control. The rollout of Sanchar Saathi does not come alone. India is also pushing other guidelines that expand the ability to identify users, such as requiring that encrypted services like WhatsApp be associated with the SIM card’s IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identity). Combined with a pre-installed and non-uninstallable application, this environment transforms the mobile phone into a device with much greater traceability and represents a significant change in the relationship between citizens and telecommunications networks. For its part, the iPhone incorporates its own mechanisms designed to make access to data difficult and limit the value of a stolen device. The default encryption, together with the isolation of the Secure Enclavekeeps critical information safe, and the combination of Find My with v aims to prevent the reactivation of the terminal without the owner’s account. Apple complements this model with measures such as Advanced Data Protection, Face IDamong others. Between the Indian regulatory framework and its global strategy: India’s growing importance to Apple, both as a manufacturing hub and an expanding market, comes with a more interventionist regulatory environment. The China precedent shows that the company has had to adapt services and functions when local regulations required it, including the iCloud data transfer to infrastructures controlled by a state partner and the removal of VPN apps. The scenario presented by India confronts two different models of understanding digital security: one based on a mandatory integrated state application and another based on internal functions of the device that depend on the user’s control. Apple has not yet expressed how it will respond to this demand, but its growing industrial presence in India, a country where it manufactures more and more iPhones, it will possibly make any decision not go unnoticed. Images | Apple In Xataka | Apple had its ecosystem under lock and key. Chinese brands are blowing it up

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.