Naples Airport has rejected a Boeing 787 with 200 passengers on board for a single reason: two meters long

Two meters. Not one more, not one less. Those have been the culprit that Naples airport had to reject a flight with origin in Philadelphia. Everything seemed to work without shocks on the morning of June 3. Until the passengers who had to land in Naples received the unpleasant surprise that they would land in Rome. The reason: the plane was too big for the airport. Six meters. That is the distance that differentiates a Boeing 787-8 from a Boeing 787-9. Both They are part of the Dreamliner family (which is also part of the Boeing 787-10) and are common on transatlantic flights since their autonomy widely exceeds 10,000 kilometers and have more than 200 places for passengers. The size in all cases is 60 meters but its length grows as the last name number increases. Thus, the Boeing 787-8 measures 57 meters long but the 787-9 already extends to 63 meters long. The 787-10 reaches 68 meters long. A small (big) difference. Those six meters long suppose a problem that is called 8 RFFS category airport (Rescue and Fire Fighting Services, for its acronym in English). This name refers to the aircraft that an airport can manage, according to the emergency and fire extinction services that it has at your disposal. In this case, the 8 RFFS category allows aircraft to be operated with a maximum size of 61 meters long. That is, it can handle the Boeing 787-8 but not the Boeing 787-9, which exceeds in two meters the dimensions established by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization). In order to manage the landing of a Boeing 787-9 it is necessary for the airport to have a 9 RFFS category where airplanes are allowed to land up to 76 meters long. Better to Rome. This scenario did not contemplate in American Airlines when they decided that, for operational reasons, a Boeing 787-9 had to operate the Philadelphia-Naples route that the airline keeps open. Usually, this journey is made by a Boeing 787-8 (smaller) since They open the route last summer. In fact, in the press release of the Naples airport it is specified that the plane used will be the smallest of the Dreamliner line. But, as we said, last week American Airlines decided to send Naples a Boeing 787-9. When the plane It was 70 miles of his destiny he had to turn around and deviate to Rome. The problem was evident, from Naples they reported that they could not host the flight because their category prevents it. The plane was too big. Specifically, the two meters that exceeds an airport with 8 RFFS category can operate it. By bus. They explain in Business Insider that passengers had to cover the distance between both airports by bus, on a trip that took them from two to three hours, or by plane, in Routes operated by Ita Airways. The company apologized and alleged the American media that “operational limitations” had occurred that had prevented the plane in southern Italy. In CBS They point out that 231 passengers and 11 crew members who received, for any response from the company “apologies for the interruption of the trip” were traveling on board the aircraft, in a statement rescued by the media. Photo | Dominic Bieri and Flightware In Xataka |

The Board of Directors has officially rejected its offer

“OpenAi is not on saleand the Board has unanimously rejected the last attempt of Mr. Musk to alter its competition, ”said Bret Taylor, president of the non -profit organization of the AI ​​company, said Friday, In a message posted in X. In this way, the offer of 97.4 billion dollars launched on February 10 by the CEO of Tesla has been officially discarded by its recipient. This is an important setback for the businessman’s plans and a victory for Sam Altman. Musk gave the impression of being very sure Musk’s purchase attempt seemed to affect the plan set by Altman to transform the startup commercial arm In a public benefit corporation (PBC)liberating it in addition to entity control Nonprofit To get more investments. Musk’s lawyers even said this week that their client would withdraw the offer if the Openai Board promised to “preserve the mission of the beneficial organization and stipulate that the sign of ‘is sold’ for sale ‘of its assets stopping its conversion.” “Openai is not on sale, and the Board has unanimously rejected the last attempt of Mr. Musk to alter its competition. Any possible reorganization of OpenAI will reinforce our non -profit organization and its mission to ensure that Agi benefits all humanity. ” Let us remember that Elon Musk sue Openai and Sam Altman with the argument that the company was moving away from its founding mission to develop AI to “benefit of humanity“And that he had made a” de facto fusion “with Microsoft. Well, it has not been necessary for OpenAi to have to change its plans to avoid the attempt to acquire Musk, but it has been the organization that has directly rejected it, although it is yet to be seen what collateral effect can have this. Although Musk’s present offer has lost validity, there is the possibility that it has influenced the compensation value that Openai must pay to your entity without profit to separate from it. We have explained it in detail in another article. Images | OpenAI In Xataka | Openai wants to square a circle with GPT-5: earn money and become the “new Google” offering something free

Feyenoord rejected Milan’s offer for Santi Giménez and asks for $42 million for the Mexican

Italian media reported a few days ago that Milan has great interest in signing forward Santiago Giménez. They would even have put an offer on the table to Feyenoord for the transfer of the Mexican which was worth $31 million dollars. However, the most recent information from the Italian journalist Luca Maninettiel They claim that the Dutch club rejected this offer and he would only sell Giménez in the summer market and for a figure close to $42 million dollars. “El Bebote”, as he is often nicknamed, has had a great half of the season with 15 goals in 18 games with Feyenoord. Therefore, the interest of big clubs is beginning to be noticed. Santiago Gimenez during a Champions League match.Credit: MAURICE VAN STEEN | AP Even last summer Giménez was already scouted by elite clubs in Europe such as Milan, Liverpool and even Real Madrid, according to several rumors. A possible arrival at Milan would be a dream for Giménez, who already commented last December in an interview for ESPN which is one of his favorite clubs. “On the last day of the market, Milan looked for me and did not agree that day, because the price and time were short. Going to Milan would be a dream for me, and when I was a boy I grew up with Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Kaka. In the end it didn’t happen, but the fact that there is interest makes you feel important, and that option is still open,” he explained on that occasion. For now Giménez has a contract with Feyenoord until 2027. So if he does not extend his contract soon, he could leave next summer as long as an agreement is reached for his transfer. Currently the Mexican forward, although born in Buenos Aires, tIt has a market value of $40 million dollarsaccording to the specialized site Transfermarkta figure in line with what Feyenoord would be asking for his token. Keep reading:Santi Giménez would have an offer from Milan on the tableThey once again proclaim Real Madrid as the best club in the worldKylian Mbappé dissociates himself from controversy with Neymar: “I respect him a lot”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.