The raw milk that Haaland drinks is authorized and regulated. Even so, in your kitchen it can become a serious problem.

After seeing how it is performing in the World Cupmany people want to be like Erling Haaland. There are things that you are born with, like being almost 2 meters tall. Others are trained, such as their soccer skills, but you also have to have a certain innate talent. What we can try is to eat like him to be just as strong. That is why there are so many media outlets that have covered their diet, which highlights foods such as sourdough bread, eggs, coffee or raw milk. Yes, raw milk. The Norwegian footballer does nothing illegal, of course. In fact, buy raw milk from authorized farms for the sale of this drink that he describes as a superfood. The problem is that, even if purchased from authorized establishments, raw milk can be very dangerous. It is necessary to handle it at home following very specific safety measures, which are not always easy to achieve. If not done properly, an innocent glass of milk can become a food time bomb. Therefore, before increasing the hype of this type of food by announcing them as part of the stars’ diet, we should make these measures clear. What are the risks of raw milk? Raw milk is milk that has not undergone the pasteurization process to eliminate contamination by possible pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, its consumption can be very dangerous. Among these organisms are the causing diseases such as listeriosis, Q fever, typhoid fever, salmonellosis and brucellosis. The risk is especially high in vulnerable people, such as immunosuppressed or pregnant patients. In all of these people, the aforementioned diseases can become quite complicated. However, the consumption of raw milk can be a problem for the entire population, even without being vulnerable. Pasteurization is commonly used with liquid foods and consists of heating them to a certain temperature for a specific time and then cooling them quickly. This temperature varies depending on the type of pasteurization. For example, in what is known as slow pasteurization (LTLT)the food is heated to 63ºC for 30 minutes and then quickly cooled to 4ºC. Instead, the rapid pasteurization (HTST) resort to heating at 72ºC-75ºC for 15 to 20 seconds. Again, it is immediately cooled to 4ºC. Finally, there is the ultra high temperature (UHT) pasteurizationwith which temperatures of 135ºC to 150ºC are used for only 2 to 5 seconds, also followed by immediate cooling. The latter is what is normally used in milk, as it not only destroys pathogenic microorganisms, it also eliminates spores that could cause poisoning later. Although it is true that it may produce slight changes in flavor, the nutritional conditions remain intact. Therefore, it is the most worthwhile technique for this type of food. What security measures should be taken? Consumption of raw milk it is not prohibitedbut it is very regulated. In SpainFor example, only those establishments that have registered in the General Health Registry of Food and Food Companies (RGSEAA). Logically, these establishments must comply with a series of very exhaustive hygiene measures and undergo periodic health checks. Furthermore, milk must be sold bottled and inform on the label about a shelf life of less than three days after milking. On the other hand, the label must include recommendations for use and conservationsuch as the importance of boiling milk before consumption and the temperature at which it should be stored (from 1ºC to 4ºC). Dairy farms must meet very exhaustive criteria to be able to sell raw milk Where does Erling Haaland buy milk? As he himself has shown on his social networks, Erling Haaland buy raw milk at Greenoaks Farma dairy farm located in the English county of Cheshire. This establishment meets all UK criteria for the sale of raw milk. We can also assume that Haaland follows all subsequent safety regulations when handling milk at home. Even so, great care must be taken with the advertising of this drink, since, in reality, it is very difficult to comply with all the established safety regulations. Be careful when handling raw milk Livestock from farms that meet the safety criteria for the sale of raw milk undergo regular veterinary examinations. However, some bacteria as Escherichia coli either Salmonellathey can naturally be in the udders of healthy cows. Therefore, milk can also become contaminated and must be boiled. Now, boiling it is not as simple as we think. There are studies which suggest that, when heating milk at home, it must be exposed to 63ºC for 30 minutes, 72ºC for 15 seconds or a sustained boil. Very few people have a kitchen thermometer and, if they do, it is not easy to ensure domestically that all the milk has been subjected to the necessary temperature for an adequate time. Therefore, at home it is best to boil milk. The bad thing is that there is a problem. Milk rises very quickly when it starts to boil, so we usually rush to lower the temperature so that it doesn’t spill. Thus, it is not heated for enough time to eliminate all the microorganisms. That’s why, in a thread on his Twitter account from 2018food safety expert Gemma del Caño explained that it is advisable repeat the process 3 times. It is something that is not indicated on the labeling, so almost no one does it. Another thing that is not usually done is the rapid cooling that is carried out in pasteurization. On the other hand, not everyone has their refrigerator at the right temperature or does not handle milk properly once it has been boiled. The consequence is that, in many cases, boiling raw milk is not enough. What about Haaland? Haaland has no problem. We have already seen that he buys milk from an authorized establishment and, on the other hand, no one denies that he handles it properly. The problem is that he has been a benchmark for a long time, but he is becoming even more so in the current football competition, which is why many people want … Read more

China has just regulated something that really matters: whether AI ends up being our friend or our girlfriend

China has decided to put limits on a very specific type of AI: that designed to look like a person. Doubao (ByteDance) and Qwen (Alibaba) have announced that they will disable their custom AI agents before the regulations come into force imminently. Tencent had already done it with its Yuanbao model, but behind all these closures there is a much deeper idea. The blackout of anthropomorphic AI already has a date. Doubao has already warned its users that its personalized AI agents will stop working on July 15 due to “product adjustments” and that three months later they will not be able to access the stored conversations with said chatbots. With Qwen things will be even faster: the agents will disappear on July 10, and the rest of the functions will do so five days later. These measures are taken before the entry into force of the new Provisional Measures for the Administration of Anthropomorphic Interaction Services with AI, recently published by the Chinese government. In Xataka Millions of teenagers have turned AI into their go-to psychologist. It is an unprecedented challenge for medicine Conversational chatbots, yes… The interesting thing about the regulations is that they do not regulate generative AI in general. Leave assistants out to work, study, research or serve customers. What it regulates are the systems that “simulate personality traits, thought patterns and human communication styles to provide a sustained emotional interaction.” The problem therefore is not that AI can be more or less powerful, but that it comes to simulate the behavior of a person. …company chatbots no. The functions that disappear from these platforms are those that allowed a generalist chatbot to be turned into a fictional character, a friend or even a romantic partner. This personalization gave these AI agents a fixed personality, a memory and a characteristic conversational style that reinforced interaction with it. They were therefore not tools to replace the current search engine, but rather systems designed to trap the user in an increasingly personal and intimate relationship and conversation. Beware of emotional dependence. Here the Chinese regulation does not try to identify dangerous risks such as those traditionally discussed, for example, with the European Union regulation. Instead what it monitors are interactions in which there is an emotional dependencea potential addiction and even manipulation by these systems. In fact, these systems are prohibited from fostering emotional bonds that could lead to irrational decisions. All of this is stopped by regulations to avoid the potential deterioration of personal relationships. AI must analyze itself. According to the regulation, AI must intervene when it detects these types of situations. If a user shows too extreme emotions towards these chatbots or if it is perceived that there may be risks to their integrity, the AI ​​should encourage them to seek help or even activate certain emergency protocols. You should also warn if you see excessive usage and remind the user to rest after two hours of continuous talk. In a certain sense, these regulations are reminiscent of the “digital welfare” mechanisms that have been imposed on mobile apps that try to limit the use of social networks. In Xataka "As pathetic as it sounds, ChatGPT is my only friend": more and more people confess to having an AI as a friend Protection for vulnerable people. The measures pay special attention to underage users and also to older people. For example, these types of chatbots are prohibited from offering intimate virtual relationships, such as couples or artificial relatives, and they require parental consent. There is also an obligation to take precautions when the users are elderly, since this group is especially exposed to loneliness and a possible emotional dependence. AI should stay just that: be an AI. Although there have been advances in the psychological impact of these models in their relationship with people, this is probably the first major regulation that does not attempt to control how powerful AI models are, but rather how capable they are. to establish personal relationships with users. This discussion will probably end up reaching Europe and the US, and is a touchstone for a technology that has certainly been infiltrating the personal sphere for some time. Image | Andy Kelly In Xataka |Telling the AI ​​what worries you was only the first step: there are already bots that pose as registered psychiatrists (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news China has just regulated something that really matters: whether AI ends up being our friend or our girlfriend was originally published in Xataka by Javier Pastor .

Congress was regulated by food waste in Spain. And it has ended up approving wolves hunting

The Wolf It sneaks In Congress. Again. And this time with such resounding consequences and after such an unexpected turn that has even called attention of the foreign press. Yesterday the lower house He endorsed That the wolf loses the armor he had achieved in 2021 and can be funded again north of the Duero, something that the PP had tried In 2024. Moreover, Congress has also opened the door that if the community legal framework changes (and in Brussels They already work so that it is) the protection of the wolf is reduced to the south of the river. The curious thing is the shortcut that has been used to retouch the wolf’s legal framework: The law on food waste. What happened? That the wolf has begun to lose its legal armor in Spain. Or what is the same, it will fallen again. At the moment north of the Duero, although once changed The community regulatory framework (Something what He already works the European Commission) its protection could also be reduced to the south. The key step for this regulatory modification was given yesterday in Congress thanks to the votes of the PP, Vox, Junts and PNV. What exactly has changed? The legal framework. Yesterday, during the processing of the food waste law, the lower house gave green light to several amendments centered on the wolf and basically return the species to the situation in which it was before 2021when It was added to the list of wild species in special protection regime (Lespres), What in practice vetoed his hunt north of the Duero, something that already happened to the south of the river. To be precise, yesterday the Congress voted Several thingsnot always with the same distribution of support (Junts abstained in an amendment and backed others, for example). The most important points are basically two. The first is A change In the Royal Decree developed by Lespres to eliminate the protection of the populations of wolf north of the Duero, allowing autonomies to decide on their hunt. And the other modification? The second change looks beyond, both in the calendar and territorial level. During the vote of yesterday the Congress He opened the door that the protection of the wolf can also be reduced to the south of the Duero if the legal armor of the wolf is modified at the community level. Maybe it sounds like something distant or abstract, but it is not. The EU has already activated its Administrative machinery To reduce the status of the species now and go from “strictly protected” to “protected.” In December the CE itself He informed that his proposal had brought the support of the Permanent Committee of the Bern Convention. And once that initial obstacle has not surpassed, it has not taken long in get to work To retouch the habitat directive. How have they achieved it? In Spain the wolf has been starring in political chronicles for some time. That is not new. In April 2024 the Congress already gave A first step In the same direction so that the species cease to be untouchable. The really curious thing about yesterday’s movement, beyond the bottom, is the form. How it has been done. The PP took advantage of the new Loss prevention law and food waste to incorporate its amendment on wolf hunting during the previous process in the Senate. The turn is so curious that it has even caught the attention of The international pressalthough the popular amendment has managed to connect both issues: the food waste and the legal status of the wolf. Its main argument is that with their attacks on sheep and cows directly affect the sector, generating tons of waste. “They suppose an impact on the generation of livestock foods of four million kilos of meat, since there were more than 14,000 dead cattle between calves, cows, foals and sheep,” collect the amendment. Before even the vote in Congress, the Association for the Defense and Study of the Iberian Wolf (ASCEL) already labeled “offensive” and “abuse of power” that the legal status of the wolf is addressed in a law dedicated to waste. Have there been reactions? Yes. In every way. For the PP the objective is “End the nightmare” that thousands of farmers live. The minister for ecological transition, Sara Aagesen, sees it differently and He warned Wednesday that lowering the protection of the wolf in Spain would be a “precipitated, reckless” movement and “contrary to science.” Outside the political arc, the measure has generated different reactions. Yesterday the Royal Spanish Hunting Federation (RFEC) celebrated A decision that, in his opinion, will help “the conservation” of the species and its “coexistence” with livestock. In another release Much harder environmentalist in action spoke of “hate” and “killing”, and warned: the amendment “turns its back on science.” What do the figures say? Recently Juan Carlos Blanco, an expert in the species, explained to The country that right now in Spain there are between 330 and 340 herds of wolves, which would result in some 2,300 animals. The vast majority (95%) are distributed in areas affected by the normative change endorsed by Congress, in Castilla y León, Galicia, Asturias and Cantabria. The Ministry for Ecological Transition warned These days that you are collecting data precisely to advance in its “responsible management.” If the wolf has sneaked into the political debate, both Spanish and European, it is for another aspect: its impact on rural and livestock. Just a year ago The PP warned that communities such as Cantabria or Galicia are giving “subsidies for the protection of their livestock” because “there are 35 attacks on average.” Moreover, he estimated that since the wolf had legally armored the number of lost animals exceeded the million. Now, once the new modification was published in the BOE, it will be the autonomies that will determine how many wolves may be hunt. Images | AR Higher School of Environment (Flickr) and Rjime31 (Flickr) In Xataka | You … Read more

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.