McDonald’s has not learned from Coca-Cola and has presented a Christmas advertisement made with AI. The reactions have been even worse

Everything indicates that the negative reaction to use of AI in Coca-Cola Christmas ad It has set a precedent… but it has not discouraged large corporations. MacDonald’s has made its own greeting with synthetic images and the reaction has been so overwhelmingly negative that the company has decided to remove the spot from social networks. Once again, issues such as creativity, aesthetics, profitability over ethics and, above all, what majority reactions they are generating are put on the table. What has happened? McDonald’s Netherlands has withdrawn its Christmas campaign generated entirely with artificial intelligence after facing a avalanche of criticism on social networks (and after being forced to disconnect comments on their profiles). The advertisement, ironically titled “It’s the most terrible time of the year”, is a perversion of the classic Christmas carols, and showed disasters with a festive atmosphere: traffic jams in which Santa Claus is involved, rebellious fir trees, unpalatable family members… the whole pack of suffering of these dates, to remind us that at least we have McDonald’s left. The problem. As happened with Coca-Cola, the problem is twofold. Aesthetically, the result is spooky.: Disturbing physics, expressionless faces, slapstick humor taken to the extreme because of that strange elastic and surreal violence of the AI. But above all, it makes viewers and critics wonder about the ethical legitimacy of this type of operationswhich completely dispense with human capital to produce more and faster. We are facing the first steps of an experimentone that corporations will put into full gear as soon as public rejection eases. Who has done it. The burger brand had entrusted production to the Californian duo MAMA (Mark Potoka and Matt Starr Spice), together with the AI ​​division The Gardening.club of the studio The Sweetshop. In a post that has since been deleted, the directors defended their work: The announcement required “seven intense weeks” of work, investing in it “more hours than in traditional production. Their central argument: “AI didn’t do it. We did it.” The controversy with Coca-Cola. The McDonald’s disaster represents the year’s second major Christmas controversy involving AI-generated advertising. A month ago Coca-Cola ignited a similar debate by launching its remake of the iconic 1995 ‘Holidays Are Coming’ spot, this time produced using generative artificial intelligence and starring animals… after the poor reception that a spot with the same concept but starring people had in 2024. The Atlanta multinational hired three specialized studios (Secret Level, Silverside AI and Wild Card), but the reaction from the public and critics was devastating. A reflection on that rejection, in reference to the 2024 ad with non-existent humans: Tim Halloran, who worked for a decade in Coca-Cola’s brand management division, stated that the campaign constituted “a violation of the brand promise” of Coca-Cola since, “for years, the core of that brand has been the idea of ​​authenticity.” Toys R Us too. Ahead of Coca-Cola’s first spot, in June 2024, Toys R Us debuted “the first commercial ad created with Sora,” OpenAI’s text-to-video tool. The one-minute spot narrated the origins of the company through its founder Charles Lazarus, combining images of the boy who would end up creating the store with the mascot Geoffrey the Giraffe in completely synthetic sequences. The industry reaction was almost unanimouswith people like Joe Russo stating in X that the ad It was “shit”. The impact on brand perception was measured Marketing-Interactivedocumenting negative reactions from 53.4% ​​of the spot’s viewers. The problem of authenticity. Behind the rejection of these ads there is a deeper problem than mere poor technical execution. In December 2024, NielsenIQ published research that revealed how viewers cognitively processed AI-generated advertising, and the result was not very promising: consumers consistently rated these contents as “annoying,” “boring,” and “confusing,” even when the technical quality was high. Neeraj Arora, professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, explained why the rejection is particularly acute in the Christmas context, with special attention to the Coca-Cola spot: “The holidays are a time of connection, of community, of coming together with family, and that’s a big part of what the holidays are about. But when you introduce AI into the mix, it doesn’t fit: it doesn’t fit with the festive moment, but also, to a certain degree, it doesn’t fit with Coca-Cola and what the brand stands for.” Christmas, traditionally a space of emotional authenticity, collides head-on with the synthetic nature of AI. Controversial results. The cases of McDonald’s and Coca-Cola illustrate a contradictory reality: the speed of production and cost savings that AI promises do not necessarily compensate for the loss of emotional connection with audiences. The consumers are developing rapidly the ability to identify synthetic content, and their immediate reaction is rejection. In Xataka | The secret formula of Coca-Cola is in a safe in a town in Valencia. The same one who claims his authorship

Sam Altman, after reactions to GPT-5 launch

Some changes arrive as an improvement and end up breaking what was already working. It happened when Microsoft eliminated the classic Windows 8 start menu, generating rejection in part of its users. Also when Instagram replaced its classic grid with vertical miniaturesaltering profiles designed at the millimeter. GPT-5 It adds to that list. It is not a debate about whether it is better or worse than the above, but about how it has arrived sweeping with dynamics that many had perfectly refined. The community’s response was swift. In Reddit, the community went from the surprise to the open complaint in a matter of hours. Reddit complaints mark the GPT-5 premiere A user described their situation: “For months I was in perfect tune by changing between O3, O3-Pro, 4.5 and 4th, depending on the task. I knew exactly what each model could offer. Now they have gone and it is my turn to readjust myself to GPT-5” Another, used by GPT-4OIt was more direct: “They just removed the best model so far to write fiction.” The messages are repeated: “RIP GPT-4O“,”Bring GPT-4o back”A coral lament that marks the tone of this weekend. What has changed for so many users to feel? The answer is in the way Openai reordered chatgpt. The arrival of GPT-5 is not a simple addition: it is the withdrawal of eight models in a single movement. OpenAi eliminates GPT-4O, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5GPT-4.1-mini, O4-mini, O4-mini-high, O3 and O3-Pro, redirecting all the activity towards GPT-5 and its variants. It should be noted that GPT-4O has not completely disappeared. Openai keeps it operational in the chatgpt voice mode and in the integration of the application with macOS, iOS and ipados, although outside the model selector and with a much more limited use than before. The migrations were automatic. If a conversation was in GPT-4O, 4.1, 4.5 or its mini versions, it now opens in GPT-5. Those used by O3 go to GPT-5 Thinking, and those in O3-PRO move to GPT-5 Pro, accessible only for Pro and Team users. The impact depends on the plan: the free level is limited to GPT-5 with 10 messages every five hours and a daily use of Thinking; Plus goes up to 80 messages every three hours and 200 per week with Thinking; Pro and Team maintain unlimited access and the option of activating “legacy” models temporarily. With noise already on, Sam Altman went out to explain the situation. He acknowledged that the launch had been “more rugged than expected” and explained that, during part of the previous day, a failure in the Autoswitcher He prevented GPT-5 from alternating between fast responses and GPT-5 Thinking when the task required it, which caused it to seem less capable of the usual. Among the immediate measures, he announced adjustments in the way in which the system decides when to activate its way of deep reasoning and greater transparency so that the user knows which model is responding at all times. He also advanced a change in the interface to manually activate GPT-5 Thinking and double the use limits for Plus plans once the deployment ends. “We are studying allow PLUS users to continue using 4th. We want to collect more data on the commitments/costs of that decision” In addition, he opened the door to a possible return of GPT-4O for Plus users, although he warned that the decision will depend on the data they collect in the coming weeks. Beyond the controversy, Openai insists that GPT-5 represents an important leap for Chatgpt. For Openai, GPT-5 is not just a new model: it is the centerpiece of a simplified chatgpt. Replace the list of models with a system capable of deciding for yourself when to give a quick response and when to activate your deep reasoning mode, GPT-5 Thinking. The company ensures that this architecture allows you to pay better in all types of scenarios, from complex works – code, data analysis, information synthesis – to daily writing or search tasks. With support for all Chatgpt tools, the goal is to be the fastest, most precise and versatile model they have launched. The bet fits with an idea that Altman had been defending time: simplify access to models. The change that GPT-5 brought responds to an idea that Sam Altman had been defending time: simplify chatgpt. The model selector, with names and versions that for many were cryptic, was a recurring complaint among users. It was not always clear if a model was faster, more precise or more creative, and the experience varied even with similar tasks. GPT-5 intends to end that uncertainty. A single system automatically decides when to respond instantly and when to activate your deep reasoning. However, this order comes to the cost of limiting control to those who used the selector as a strategic tool. That is why the discussion has not closed. The community pressure has already caused an official response and some adjustments in record time. It remains to see if OpenAi will go further and allow GPT-4O to return, at least for part of the users. Meanwhile, the debate is still open: better a single model that decides everything or the freedom to choose according to the task? Tell us: Do you miss the model selector? Images | OpenAI | Xataka screen capture In Xataka | Good news, you don’t have to choose model using GPT-5. Bad news, it is GPT-5 who chooses it without notifying you

JoJo Siwa’s Wild Outfit For New York Fashion Week Gets Mixed Reactions

Siwa has been doing quite the rounds lately, recently jetting off to Poland to promote her song “Yesterday’s Tomorrow’s Today” — which was topping the country’s charts — before spending 24 hours in London, heading quickly back to Los Angeles and eventually traveling to NYC. The reality TV star claimed she was in talks to represent Poland at Eurovision next year, however, people in charge of the nation’s Eurovision entry said they haven’t had a conversation with Siwa about her possible submission into the competition, according to BBC. Polish broadcaster TVP, a media company involved in choosing Poland’s Eurovision performers, alleged they haven’t started speaking to any artists nor made any decisions about who will be chosen to represent the country at Eurovision in 2025 despite Siwa insisting she’s had “real” discussions about Poland entering her as their artist for the international song competition next year.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.