The Pope is asking priests not to use ChatGPT to write their sermons

Artificial intelligence may hallucinate from time to time and make things up, but there is one thing it does quite well: prepare texts from a base. Although the results depend greatly on what you ask for in your prompt, it is great for writing to the OTA about a fine they have given you or making a summary of photosynthesis. And why not: also to explain a parable from the Bible to you grounding it to everyday reality. A sermon from the old priest, come on. Well no. I’m not saying it, he says it the current Pope of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church Leo XIV. A few days ago, the Augustinian religious was at a meeting with the clergy of the diocese of Rome and there he remembered the technology, issuing a warning to anyone who is tempted to entrust homilies to AI because “to make a true homily, which is sharing the faith, the AI ​​will never be able to share the faith.” That is to say, although language models undoubtedly have the capacity to smooth out the readings of the Bible to bring them down to Earth, bringing them closer to everyday life, one thing is explain the earthly and quite another is providence. In short, spirituality is an exclusive quality of humans and not machines. Perhaps it could help the church staff precisely to select readings from the long list offered by the book par excellence of Christianity and to synthesize what is important so that later they are the ones who, in their own handwriting (it is a way of speaking), write the sermon in the old-fashioned way. What the Pope says goes to mass In any case, Robert Francis Prevost continued with statements that align with science: “like all the muscles in the body, if we don’t use them, if we don’t move them, they die, the brain needs to be usedso our intelligence, your intelligence, must also be exercised a little so as not to lose this capacity” because the exercise of searching the Bible, reading thoroughly and staying with what is important is undoubtedly a mental exercise that, if not done, reduces mental exercise. Another part of his speech was directed at the use of mobile phones and that current paradox of being more connected and more alone than ever, ensuring that there is no human contact and that another type of friendship experience must be sought to establish bonds. In Xataka | Pope Francis made his opinion clear on end-of-life medical ethics. The one we don’t know is that of the Vatican In Xataka | The Vatican, a holy and renewable city: the Pope’s plans to make the small Catholic state more sustainable Cover | Flickr

Who should host Pope Luna’s skull

In life Pedro de Luna y Gotor (1328-1423), Aka Benedict XIII, Aka Pope Luna, was a figure as fascinating as controversial. However attracted that it was his life (and it was) what probably never imagined the famous “Antipapa” Aragonese is that with the passing of the centuries his skull would end up starring in a worthy story of a Thriller of Dan Brown and facing two villages that have been throwing in A legal pulse to clarify who deserves to host the relic. Now that story writes a new chapter. What happened? That incredible as it may seem, Pope Luna, a character who died more than 600 years ago, is starring in a heated legal dispute Between two Aragonese villas: Illueca and Sabiñán. The two locations are separated for 15 minutes by car and together do not reach 3,500 neighbors, but when it comes to Pope Luna they maintain two postures in an irreconcilable appearance: both claim to be the place of legitimate rest of the remains of the “antipapa”. Why is it news? The lawsuit between Illueca and sabiñán on account of Pope Luna’s skull, which is the little that is preserved from his body, is nothing new. Both locations They have been Battleing to clarify which of the two you have the most right to be the resting place of the skull, something that already led to the fact that in 2023 To the Superior Court of Justice of Aragon was pronounced in favor of the Consistory of Sabiñán. The novelty, like He has just revealed The Aragon newspaperIt is that the Illueca City Council does not seem willing to give up and has hired a lawyer to reopen the process. To achieve this, it proposes to submit a new demand, something that, as the regional newspaper progresses, will happen In September. What do you argue? What he resolved does plus two years Aragonese justice is that Pope Luna’s relic belongs to the Sabiñán City Council. Now Illueca focuses on his claim from another angle and argues that the key is not in whom he is the legal owner of the remains, but what was the original will of the “antipapa”. “We are not going to instigate the judge to say who is the owner of the skull, but to say who can better fulfill the will of Pope Luna’s descendants,” Comment to The newspaper Jorge Español, the lawyer signed by Illueca. It is not the first case on heritage that reaches your office. Spanish already became famous for defend to the City of Sijena in front of the Generalitat. And where does the dispute come from? To solve that question before, you have to know the peculiar (and attributed) history of the bones of Pope Luna. After his death in 1423, in Peñíscola, his nephew claimed the body and transferred it to the Castle Palacio de Illueca, the same town where the “Antipapa” was born in 1328. There, in his native villa, the bones of the controversial Pope Luna remained the following centuries until at the beginning of the XVIII ended up desecrated. It is said that Between 1701 and 1707 The French troops that supported Felipe V in the war of succession took the remains of his grave and that from the evil bones of Pope Luna only the skull was recovered, a skull fragment that moved to the Argillo Palacein Sabiñán. There it rested as many centuries until with the arrival of the 21st century the skull again starred in another truculent chapter. What happened? That in April 2000 someone stole the relic. The skull was guarded in a wooden urn located inside a chapel, but that did not prevent this spring for more than 25 years ago for two young people to loot it. The skull ended up hidden in a booth while the looters tried that the mayor of Illueca pay them a rescue of one million pesetas. The news of the robbery went around the world, but did not last too long. Months later the police recovered what was left of the head of the “antipapa”. To confirm that those bones were effectively those of the deceased Pedro de Luna underwent an exhaustive exam that included carbon dating 14 and a digital exam. The results were favorable and after years of analysis (and a trip to Florida through) the relic moved to the Provincial Museum of Zaragoza. In 2021 He returned to Sabiñán already with the label of good of cultural interest (BIC). To guard the remains It was conditioned The Chapel of Santa Ana of the Church of San Pedro Apóstol. And what is the situation now? It depends on whoever is asked. A few years ago justice confirmed that the relic is owned by the City of Sabiñán since He received it of the Olazábal-Bordiu, the family of the Palacio de Argillo. The truth is that this was the town where the remains of the “antipapa” rested between the 18th century and the theft of 2000. But Illueca sees things differently. Your lawyer remember that to understand the history of the relic well, it does not come with the 18th. It is time to go much further, to the fifteenth century, when the Aragon crown authorizes the transfer of the body to Illueca at the request of the Pope’s nephew, which, the town maintains, gives a track of what the desire of the relatives was. Why is it important? That the skull of Pope Luna is generating such a stir and in front of two neighboring villas is not explained only by its patrimonial value or as Bic heritage. The key is who was the protagonist of the story and the enormous fascination that continues to generate more than six centuries after his death: Pedro de Luna y Gotor, also known as Benedict XIII or Pope Luna, was one of the great figures of the end of the Middle Ages. He was proclaimed high pontiff in Aviñón, in 1394, … Read more

The choice of the first American Pope has nothing casual in it

Sinodal Church, blessing of gay marriages, sacraments for divorced, celibacy, deacons women … the first hours of the pontificate of Robert Francis Prevost (Now and for eternity, Leo XIV) have been marked by The debate The elucubrations on their ideological coordinates and to what extent it will advance or put the reverse in the measures promoted by Francisco I. Beyond religious issues, the new Pope has before him another cyclopean task of a much more mundane nature: to replace The huge financial mess in which the Vatican is plunged and in which The powerful church The US can play a key role. The task is not less if they are taken into account open wounds With the most conservative sector of the American Church during the Pontificate of Francisco I. In his favor, Leo XIV has an important factor: he knows the country well, its culture and its prelates. After all, he was born in The Bronzeville neighborhoodin Chicago Question of faith (and money). The Vatican is the heart of Catholic Christianity, but also a complex and prone economic challenge with which Francisco I had to deal during his 12 years of pontificate, just as he will have to do it from now on León XIV. Although the Roman Catholic Church handles a lavish portfolio of real estate, art and investments and the Vatican bank manages assets by value of value of value of billions of dollarsthe Holy See Receive income basically from Three sources: Donations, entries to museums and investments and the performance obtained with its property portfolio. The picture is complex, but usually all “Task lists” which must assume Leo XIV include two priorities: to advance in the improvement of the supervision and transparency of finance initiated by Francisco I and face the deficit of the Holy See. In An article entitled “The financial mess of the Vatican that Francisco could not solve”, Wall Street Journal (WSJ) slides two revealing data on an “more and more indebted microstate”: its budget deficit has grown with Bergoglio and Your pension fund supports A millionaire liabilities. Red numbers in Rome. The theme has been very present these weeks in Rome. And it is logical. In September Francisco sent A letter to their cardinals in which they asked them “greater effort” to “that the ‘zero deficit’ is not just a theoretical objective” and advocated the “cost reduction”. In another posterior letter Bergoglio went further and faced another fundamental issue, the delicate health of the Vatican pension box. All this between news of the Salary cut of the prelates or information that have come to place the Holy See “On the verge of bankruptcy”. Last summer the newspaper The repudica revealed That in 2023 the Vatican registered an operational deficit of 83 million euros, five more than the previous year, with a short -term perspective not especially flattering given the evolution of donations. As for the pension system hole, over the last months different data has been published, but they are not usually flattering: The Pilar Calculate that a decade ago its undefined liabilities amounted to almost 1.5 billion euros and Reuters talks about a deficit of 631 million In 2022. In search of donations. In addition to seeking greater transparency and supervision in finance, Francisco proposed Another challenge Before dying: achieve more donations. In fact, days before he entered the hospital, he ordered the creation of a “donation commission for the Holy See.” The movement is understandable. The income received by the Holy See through its museum network suffered a varapalo with the pandemic and in 2024, according to Reutersthe Vatican reported a profits of 45.9 million with their investments. The other crucial leg in the financial architecture of the Holy See are donations, which throughout the last decade have remained on average in the 45 million euros Annual, although some year that figure has come to exceed 70 million. His contribution to the Vatican coffers is fundamental. According to the data provided by the Vatican in 2023 the bottom of the San Pedro Obol It reached an income of 52 million euros, of which 48.4 correspond to offerings and the remaining 3.6 to financial income achieved with the remuneration of goods. Two data: 52 and 109.4. In The statement Shared by Vatican News, the information portal of the Holy See, it is underlined that compared to 2022 donations increased by almost five million euros, but that does not prevent the balance sheet from being bittersweet: the agency itself recognizes that the total expenses were much superior and amounted to 109.4 million euros. The data is interesting for several reasons. The first, because the background is dedicated to meet the needs of the Church and sustain initiatives. The second is because that deficit is not new and is added to the one already registered in previous exercises. In addition, although between 2022 and 2023 there was effectively an increase in donations, the obolus remains below the proceeds Just a decade ago. A crucial country: USA. The statement From the Vatican slides another important fact: most of these funds left diocese (31.2 million), well above the flow of private donors (2.1 million), foundations (13.9) or religious orders (1,2). What countries left the contributions? Because largely from the United States, from afar the greatest benefactor, with a contribution that in 2023 amounted to the 13.6 million euros28.1% of total income. Italy, secondly, contributed 3.1 million, and Brazil was the third with 1.9. Why that weight? Partly because the US is one of the countries with greater Catholic population from the world and its church has a strong financial muscle, which has conferred an influential role in the Church .. in September 2015, when Francisco had just two years of papacy, BBC I slipped now that the US parishes collected through Sunday donations about 8.5 billion euros per year. A good part of that money stays in the communities themselves, but still Jack Ruhl, professor at Western Michigan University, highlights the “important role” played … Read more

Everyone has reasons to be half happy and half concerned with the new Pope

At 18:08 of May 8, 2025, in the fourth round of voting on the second day of the conclave, Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was elected Pope. It is not exclusive, or any mystery. These days we have lived what is possibly the most broadcast conclave in the history of humanity and, at this point of the week, almost everyone knows everything that needs to be known about the new Vicar of Rome. In fact, everyone knows too much about Leo XIV. A series of extraordinarily well measured gestures. Today, Italian newspapers comment that Prevost He took many votes already in the first vote of the conclave. It is not something we can know for sure, but that is the explanation that his speech from the balcony was so long. He had time to think about words, gestures and emphasis. Also in the symbols. Leon XIV went out to the Plaza de San Pedro dressed in the traditional habits of the Supreme Pontiff. Something that Francisco did not do. And, in fact, he has chosen a very rich name symbolically. Everyone is talking about Leon XIII (“father” of the rich social doctrine of the Church, but also of Syllabus, the great refutation of the ‘main errors’ of the modern world); But you could talk about Leon i (whose papacy, According to Benedict XVI“It was undoubtedly one of the most important in the history of the Church”) or even Fray Leonone of the closest collaborators of San Francisco de Asís. And that has been noticed … “The decisions of Pope Leo XIV of adopting a traditional name and appearing with the traditional papal outfit – as Benedict XVI did and not Francisco – are small but encouraging signs of a man who subordinates to the papal trade and understands the importance of continuity with the past.” Those words are from Edward Fester One of the best known conservative theologians today. A few minutes later, I even praised his temperament. Burke either SarahFrancisco’s staunch enemies have also been hopeful. On the opposite side, Jesuit James Martín (one of the church members closest to the LGTB opening) He said he knew that “Pope Leo XIV is a kind, open, humble, modest, determined, worker, reliable and feet on the ground. A brilliant choice.” How is it possible? Because, even if it may not seem, the reading that the media are making of why Leon XVI has been chosen ignores the dynamics and political of the Church. The constant temptation to interpret what happens in the world according to the narrow framework of socio -political references in which we move, makes the debate about the conclave seen as primary to Pope: but without trying to understand what is happening in an international organization with thousands of problems and very complicated solutions. Things like flying old Premost tweets against Trump’s immigration policytake advantage to ask that there are women in the conclave or the widespread regrets because lTo Church doctrine about abortion is “outdated”They show that these last days have been nothing more than a huge projection exercise. In illo one unum. His pontificate’s motto is not a coincidence. In addition to his 12 years as a prior of the Augustinians (a huge order with global implementation), Prevost was known, above all, by The diplomatic feat that led to closing the agreement of the last synod of the bishops in which the most reformist groups and the most traditionalists were about to declare war. As the motto you have chosen suggest: it seems that its mission will be in tenders and heal a Catholic Church that He has been “harassed by the wolves for many years”. However, hope has a dark back. In the same way that all ecclesiastical groups have reasons to be hopeful, everyone has reasons to walk. No one knows for sure what will do or stop doing Leon XVI. As in the case of Francisco or Juan Pablo II, the choice of someone relatively unknown in Rome opens the set of play in a radical and unexpected way. And that, in an organization of the size and power of the Catholic Church that is a lot. Image | Infoweather1 | Wikimedia In Xataka | In 1958 the Church applied a small change in the funeral of Pius XII. Ended the deceased exploiting (literally)

67 years ago Pope Pius XII starred in the most macabre goodbye of the Church. The reason: exploded in full funeral

Throughout his almost two decades as Pope, Pius XII had to deal with the complex scenario of World War II and The Holocaustwhich has made it A controversial figure. His critics accuse him of having silent before the Nazi extermination. His supporters see in him a strategist who maneuvered to save lives and prevent Hitler’s wrath from being on Christians and Jews. Curiously and After the death of Francisco Ithese days his name is playing for a very different reason: His caulitous funeralthat probably make the burial of Pius XII the most macabre and commented of the long history of the Vatican. After all There are few chronicles that they argue that during their funeral one of the worst things occurred that can happen in such circumstances: his body exploded for the past of the curia and the doctors. Literally. A goodbye with controversy Pius XII had a pontificate convulsive. And very much in spite of (and that of the church) their last days were fogged by the same feeling. Although his agony was not especially long (he felt bad October 6 of 1958 and died only a few days later, on Thursday 9) everything related to his health status became an obsession for the press. So much interested and such was the fight to publish in first the death of the Pope that some media decided to use a first level source: the doctor Riccardo Galeazzi-Lisiwho for decades had been a friend, confidant and personal doctor (Pontifical file) of Pius XII. “In those days the Vatican was extremely hermetic and it would not have occurred to him He remembered in 2005 The journalist Alexander Chancellor. When in 1968 he put himself at the head of the Reuters delegation in Italy, he himself met an old red phone in the office that, as his colleagues explained, had been installed there ten years before to be able to contact Galeazzi-Lisi. The problem is that the doctor turned out to be a source as influential as unreliable and lack of scruples. Over time Galeazzi-Lisi It would end up expelled of the Vatican for allegedly wanting to take advantage of his position at the Holy See while the Pope agonized. To be precise, They accused him to strain a camera in their room to photograph the dying and then sell the material. The reward was juicy. ABC remember that there were magazines and editorials that offered him $ 3,200 for the snapshots and another 20,000 for his story. It was not the only thing that the doctor was accused. From Riccardo Galeazzi-Lisi, it is also said that he promised to give a journalist’s death exclusively. The pact was allegedly that when Pius XII had gone to better life, the doctor would open a window of the papal residence. With what they did not tell, neither the doctor nor the press was that the heat of the Roman October took a nun to open that same window to ventilate the building, which led the reporter to misunderstand the signal. Other sources They assure that what Galeazzi-Lisi had committed was to stir a handkerchief and that the journalist confused him with a curtain moved by the wind. Whatever the right version, the truth is that on Wednesday, October 8, when the Pope was Agonizing but still aliveseveral media went out with a news as resounding as false: “Il Papà è Morto”. There were still several hours for Pius XII to die due to a “circulatory disorder.” The news was made public another better doctor, Antonio Gasbarrini. The most curious thing is that the main (and infamous) participation of Galeazzi-Lisi in the last goodbye of Pius XII began just then, after the death of the Pope. A frustrated embalming Although Francisco I simplified Papal funeral In order for the ceremony to look more like that of “a shepherd” than to “a powerful man of this world”, his funeral has made clear once again that the burial of a high pontiff is an unusual event. It is estimated that in just a few days about 250,000 people They passed before the coffin, in the Basilica of San Pedro del Vaticano, to say goodbye to him. In times of Pius XII something similar happened. The body used to stay Exposed for days so that the faithful could transmit their goodbye. And that, of course, required trying to remain preserved in the best possible conditions as much time as possible. The usual thing was that they retired part of the body of the body, but that idea did not seem like Pius XII too much, determined to be buried “As God created it”. In His memoirs Galeazzi-Lisi recounts how to these misgivings he decided to speak to the Pope of a new conservation technique that he had developed with a colleague of Naples, a simple, little invasive method of a mixture of herbs and essential oils. The technique was known as “Aromatic osmosis”it had been prepared by Galeazzi-Lisi with the help of a embalder called Oreste Nuzzi and one of its great advantages was that it barely required to manipulate (or eviscerate) the body of the deceased. It arrived with submerge it in the oil and aromatic herbs preparation and then wrapped it in layers. The doctor assured that the method was similar to that used by the Egyptians in their rites or the one that had been used with Jesus Christ. In his galeazzi-lisi memories even He recounts How he showed Pius XII a hand treated with his mixture. “He was amazed to see his appearance”. Did the Pope accepted that new technique to his body? It is not clear. What seems to be that Galeazzi-Lisi managed to achieve the approval of the Church. The works started on October 10 and priori followed the doctor’s guidelines: the body of the Holy Father was treated with the preparation of herbs and oils and then covered with a kind of cellophane to “conserve volatile aromas and ensure the best … Read more

The Pope has died, so millions of people have put the same worldwide: see ‘conclave’

He Death of Pope Francis Last Monday by a cerebral stroke has caused reactions of all kinds in the world of society and culture, but especially unexpected is the revitalization of one of the most acclaimed films of the last season. This is ‘Conclave’, which addresses an issue that is undoubtedly hot today, the intrigues that are unleashed in the Vatican for the Pope’s succession after his death. Vision of the future. Specifically, ‘conclave’ tells how after the sudden death of the Pope because of a heart attack, the Cardinal College gathers to choose his successor. The main candidates to hold the position represent different currents Within the Church: an American progressive, a social conservative of Nigeria, a Canadian conservative and an Italian traditionalist. With thriller format that does not reveal its letters until the end, the film explores struggles of power, conspiracies and moral dilemmas within the Catholic Church. 283%catapult. According to Variety accountthe film starring Ralph Fiennes has experienced an increase of 283% in its visions in streamingwhere at the moment he is only for rent (except in Prime Video in the United States, where his subscribers can already see it). For example, on April 20, before the death of the Pope, ‘Conclave’ had seen 1.8 million minutes. The next day, after the death, that figure rose to 6.9 million minutes. Mystery revealed. The reason for this increase in interest in the film is not only in its unquestionable quality (with a BAFTA for Best Film and EIGHT OSCAR NOMINATIONS), but in its treatment of power struggles within the Vatican, to the point that there are those who have played to relate Potato candidates of the film with the real pools They are handled to succeed Francisco. In any case, the secretism of the Pope’s choice, which for the profane is often limited to “Habemus Papam” and the White Small, is a fascinating theme that ‘conclave’ helps to clear. And in cinemas. The Spanish distributor of the film, of course, will not miss the opportunity to take advantage of this interest, and has announced that it will be reset this weekend. After getting 900,000 spectators in its first cinema pass, the film will return to 150 rooms, to try to endorse what is its most noticeable title: the highest grossing adult film so far this year, exceeding 6 million euros of collection. A rising trend. Although streaming is the queen in that sense (for example, prime video has premiered the hilarious madness of terror and action ‘The Pope’s exorcist’), the cinemas begins to demonstrate more waist to be more competitive and re -restrain movies linked to the present. For example, after the death of Olivia Newton-John in 2022, ‘Grease’ was re-re -ied in US cinemas, and part of the collection was destined to the investigation against breast cancer, taking advantage of the media impact. Something similar happened when Isabel II died in 2022 and ‘the King’s speech’ was re -stared. They are strategies that provide momentary and non -definitive impulses, but that reflect a growing trend: cinemas and platforms take advantage of the news to relaunch or highlight titles that emotionally connect with the public at a given time. The immediacy of streaming It has accelerated the phenomenon, but movie theaters are increasingly reacting faster to this type of current events. and flexibility to the great headlines. The Pope interests. It is not the only audiovisual production with potato on board that has experienced a rise in its figures: ‘The two potatoes’, an exclusive Netflix production of 2019, tells the withdrawal of Benedict XVI and Francisco’s choice, in a drama starring Jonathan Pryce and Anthony Hopkins. Since Sunday, your audience has shot 417%, from 290,000 minutes of visualization to 1.5 million. In Xataka | Much Lirili, little lyrele: Francisco has been a much less “revolutionary” pope than he is accused

We have been asking who is the oldest person in history to be recorded on video for years. And maybe it’s a Pope

The history of art is the history of its protagonists. And that includes both its great creators, so let’s talk about painting, sculpture, poetry or music, as well as their patron, muses and models. Da Vinci It has been fascinating for years to historians, but it is difficult to address their biography without explaining at least past who was Lisa Gherardinithe woman who probably inspired the celebrated ‘Mona Lisa’. The same goes for the enigmatic Elisa to which Ludwig Van Beethoven dedicated her catchy Bagatela Woo 59 either Margherita LutiRafel’s great muse. With photography and cinema something similar happens. And although their origins are more recent than those of painting, music or sculpture, historians who take care of their study face questions equally complex and fascinating: who was The first person to go out in a photo? And the oldest? Who is it The oldest voice captured in a support that allows us to reproduce it? And if we talk about cinema, Who is the oldest person filmed? Did technology and art arrive in time to capture in a recording the gestures and movements of someone born in the eighteenth century, which saw the French revolution wave War of Independence from the US? And if so, can we see it? The “vestustos” of the image and sound The question is fascinating because photography has allowed us to see static images of people born in the 18th. This is the case of Conrad Heyera veteran of the US War of Independence that was born in 1749. He was portrayed in 1852, with more than 100 years, thanks to the technique of daguerreotype, so There are those who believe which is the most ancient person (not the first photo, eye) photographed. The title nevertheless has some “but” than another. Heyer’s image is fascinating, but Other experts think that if we talk about vetustez the merit of being the oldest person portrayed with a camera is John Adamsa worker of Worcester born a few years before Heyer, in 1745. Other sources speak of a slave named Caesar, protagonist of a 1851 daguerreotype conserved in New York Historical Society and who in theory was born in New York in 1737. If what we are talking about is about the voice, the story is equally fascinating. We keep A recording 10 seconds from 1860 Taken with a spell and that is attributed to Édouard-Léon Scott by Martinvillea French inventor born in the Paris of 1817. Again if what we are talking about is of antiquity, perhaps The most ancient voice that we keep engraved is nevertheless Helmulth von Moltkea Prussian marshal who lent several recordings at the end of the 1880s. The surprising thing is when Moltke was born: in 1800. And at the dawn of the cinema? Who is the oldest person than we keep a moving recording? The answer is complicated again, although equally surprising. At the end of the 1870s EADWEARD VERYBRIDGE elaborated in A protopeic in which you can see the gallop of a horse with your rider. Your identity? Some sources They point to C. Marvinborn In 1839. If it scratches in the origins of the celluloid it is, however, to meet even older “actors”. And also some other surprise. For example, It is usual that when talking about the oldest person ever filmed, the looks are directed to one of the great personalities of the nineteenth century, the Pope Leo XIIIwho also holds the merit of having been The first Pope filmed. The movie, by William Kennedy Dickson For the Biograph company, was shot in 1898 (there is who attributes it to Vittorio Calcina and the date in 1896) and although it is fascinating and iconic, any Oscar will hardly win. After all, he shows the Supreme Pontiff in more or less everyday situations: on a car or sitting in a chair in the Vatican gardens while making a blessing in the camera. The really surprising is not however What does Leo XIII doif it is the first pontiff recorded in a movie or who, when and where he took those images for history, but the year of birth of the Pope: Leo XIII He was born in the Lacio region with the name of Gioacchino Vincenzo Raffaele Luigi Pecci in March 1810. That is, for ten years he was not a character of the XVIII. Does that become the oldest person ever filmed? Depends. For some The answer is yes. For others that merit is not so clear. In the articles that address the subject, there is talk of a Rebecca Clark allegedly born in 1804 or Mammy Louof the same year. However, there would be an older candidate, a figure that once aroused much less interest than Leo XIII and to which, therefore, it is also more difficult to follow the historical clue: dismiss. That your name does not tell you anything is understandable. Despina was an old woman from the Balkans who among other tasks dedicated the hours to spinning wool in the company of her daughters. In 1905 it ended up portrayed in A brief movie that lasts a few seconds. The important thing is its date of birth: it is said that Despina was then 114, which would have been born at the end of the 18th century, In 1791. How did an old woman from Avdella end, then part of the Ottoman Empire, recorded spinning wool for the subsequent and turned into a key figure in the history of cinema? Simple: because it was the grandmother of Ianachia and Milton ManakiBalkan cinema pioneers and film authors ‘The weavers’. We already said it at the beginning: the history of art is the history of its creators … and of their circumstantial protagonistsamong which there are farmers, war veterans, shoemakers, centennial spinners and even a 19th -century Pope. Images | Wikipedia 1 and 2 In Xataka | Who was the oldest person ever photographed?

When the Pope dies, his rooms are sealed and his ring is destroyed. It is the beginning of a ritual that ends in white smoke

As Cardinal Kevin Farrel has confirmed, the Pope Francis has died At 88 years of age. With his death, a protocol as old as ancient, a meticulous process designed for centuries of ecclesiastical tradition has been automatically activated. This has begun a kind of choreography of ancestral rituals that regulate the transition of the most emblematic spiritual power in the world. These are all the phases that will end in white smoke. Sealed for centuries. As we said, after the death of the pontiffthe head of the Vatican Health Department, the Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrellcurrent head of the position, ha officially verified Death. The body will now be transferred to the Pope’s private chapel, dressed in a white cassock and liturgical ornaments, and placed in a zinc -lined wood coffin. Next to him They will be deposited His miter, the canopy and a bag with coins of his pontificate, in addition to a “rogito”, a scroll that summarizes his life and legacy, which will be read aloud before closing the coffin. Meanwhile, the Pope’s private room, located in the Santa Marta housewill be sealed, and the fisherman’s ring (the official seal of the Pontiff) will be ceremonially destroyed with a small hammer to prevent any type of falsifications. Farrell will write a Official Death Act and will be responsible for ensuring the Pontiff’s personal documents. The period called then begins vacant headquartersduring which ecclesial leadership is in the hands of the Cardinals College, but without faculties to make transcendental decisions until the new successor is chosen. Public tribute. Faithful to his style austere and away from the boatoFrancisco had already reformulated the rules Papal funeral home in 2024. He did it by eliminating many elements of the traditional pomp. Namely: your body will not be Exposed in a catafalco high or transferred for private views of ecclesiastical hierarchs, but will be displayed directly inside the coffin in the Basilica of San Pedro so that the people can pay tribute. Thus the nine -day mourning will begin to be known as novel. Francisco had abolished the tradition of the three coffins for the deceased pontiffs, replacing them with A single simple coffin of wood and zinc. This decision, contained in the new edition of the Ordo Exsequiarum Romani PontificisI was looking for (in words From the master of liturgical ceremonies, Diego Ravelli) “show that the funeral of the Roman pontiff is that of a pastor and disciple of Christ, not that of a powerful man in the world.” Funeral without ostentation. The procession to the temple will be directed by Camarlengo Farrel, and the Cardinals College will set the date of the funeral, planned between four and six days After death (that is, from Monday). Throughout nine days, funeral masses and prayers will be held throughout Rome. In addition, and contrary to the custom of burying the Pontiff in the Vatican crypts, Francisco has also arranged REposar in the Basilica of Santa María la Mayor, place of deep personal devotion and frequent fate of prayer during his papacy. With this choice it will become the First Pope in a century in being buried outside of San Pedro. The conclave. Fifteen to twenty days after death, the College of Cardinals will be summoned by its dean, the cardinal Giovanni Battista reto give Start the conclave which will designate the new Pontiff. Only cardinals under 80 can vote (about 120 approximately) and all must swear absolute secret before being isolated in the Sistine Chapel, the sacred space that becomes the headquarters of the most hermetic and solemn process of the Church. By the way, the term conclave (From Latin cum key“Under key”) refers to the obligatory confinement that prevents delays and guarantees confidentiality. Voting, which can be repeated up to four times a day, require a two -thirds majority for a candidate to be chosen. White smoke After each vote, the ballots are burned together with chemical additives that generate smoke: black if there is no agreement, white if there is. Once the consensus is reached, the chosen one is asked if he accepts the position and what papal name wishes to adopt. As a reference, Francisco’s choice (first non -European pontiff in 1,300 years.) He required five votes in 24 hours, but in the past there were conclaves that extended for months or even years. Habemus The new Pope is then dressed in the White Sotana in the next sacristy, and after greeting his voters, he goes to the central balcony of the Basilica of San Pedro. There, before thousands of faithful gathered in the square and millions of viewers worldwide, a cardinal announces in a solemn voice: Habemus Papam. Now, the new Pontiff greets and offers his first blessing Urbi et Orbithus opening a new chapter in the millenary history of Catholicism. No doubt, the figure of the Pope, in addition to being a spiritual guidance of more than one billion faithful, exerts a remarkable moral and diplomatic influence on the global scenario, and his choice will surely be observed with attention both by believers and by international leaders. Meanwhile, Francisco’s legacy (marked by a preaching focused on humility, social justice and institutional reform) will be sealed not only in his Rogitobut also in the memory of an era in which the throne was occupied by a man who chose to “walk among his.” The truth is that the death of a Pope remains an event of enormous global resonance, wrapped in a solemnity and a symbolism that transcends the religious to become an expression of historical continuity and spiritual power in the 21st century. Image | Diariocritical, Penn State In Xataka | Pope Francis made his opinion clear about the medical ethics of the end of life. The one we do not know is that of the Vatican In Xataka | In the sixteenth century it was believed that coffee was a satanic drink. So Pope Clemente VIII decided to “baptize him”

Pope Francis made his opinion clear about the medical ethics of the end of life. The one we do not know is that of the Vatican

With Pope Francis in the hospital, he already hopes to know how the respiratory crisis evolves in the midst of his hospitalization for pneumonia, many things have stopped in the Vatican. The Holy City and “Renewable”For example. The Pontiff’s plans to make the small Catholic state more sustainable have remained in Stand By. Controversial issues have also been revived that have always been on the table. Without going any further, Francisco’s possible final. An unavoidable question. I told it a few days ago The New York Times Bringing a topic that the Vatican has preferred to avoid: What happens when a pontiff faces a prolonged deterioration of his health, loses his faculties and approaches at the end of his life? At 88, Francisco has spoken in the past about ethics in medical decision making in terminal cases, but has never revealed its own preferences in this regard. Although He left a letter of resignation in the Vatican in case of disability, its content is unknown and it is not known if you have designated someone to make medical decisions in their name. The silence of the “house.” The Vatican, faithful to his tradition of secrecy, has replied that “It’s too soon” To discuss these issues, despite the growing concern within the Church. Meanwhile, medical bulletins have also been prudent, informing that the Pope’s condition It remains stable And that, after its respiratory crisis, has been able to do without mechanical ventilation (He has even spoken). Be that as it may, uncertainty persists and the lack of a public protocol on how to manage the end of the life of a pontiff is sufficient reason for debate between theologians and ecclesiastical experts. The moral dilemma. The Catholic Church teaches that life must be defended From conception to natural death. However, within the doctrine there is a margin of interpretation When it is legitimate to stop prolonging it artificially. According to the Magisterium of the Church, the Use of “Extraordinary Media” To keep a patient alive, they can be suspended if they suppose disproportionate suffering or do not offer real improvement. The problem is that there is no clear definition of what constitutes an extraordinary medium, which leaves space for various interpretations within the Catholic clergy and bioethics.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.