MicroLED promises to be the Holy Grail of televisions. That is your big problem today.

There are technologies that are born with enormous promise. He MicroLED is one of them. Since Samsung introduced “The Wall” at CES 2018the sector has been telling us for years that this technology is going to revolutionize the way we watch television. And he is right. The problem is that this revolution has not reached anyone’s living room. who is not a billionaire. The technology has become the Holy Grail of the television industry, but the enormous cost of its manufacture means that only the most exclusive models and, let’s say it without frills, extremely expensive, can integrate this technology. Unlike what has happened with OLED or MiniLED, manufacturers have not managed to reduce production costs of these panels to make them competitive in mass manufacturing. What is MicroLED and why is it so special? To understand MicroLED you have to know how current screens work. Traditional LED TVs have a layer of pixels that filters light coming from an array of LED lights installed on the back. It is, therefore, a backlighting technology that offers very good brightness power. The problem is that when those screens need to display pure black, the screen can’t turn off pixel by pixel, so it turns off areas of those rear LEDs. The more dimming zones you have, the better the light control and the more control over the blacks you have. Even so, it is inevitable that some light will sneak in. It’s not really black. The result is very dark grays at best. The technology OLED solved that problem years ago, making each pixel on the screen emit its own light that can be turned off individually. Here, the result is a perfect contrast, but it has its own limits. The LED diodes that make up each pixel are organic, so they degrade over time and are susceptible to burn-in, leaving a permanent mark on the screen after many hours with a static image on the screen. In this sense, the promise of MicroLED technology is to provide the perfect balance between OLED and LED, but without any of their drawbacks. Like OLED, it uses microscopic LEDs as a pixel, but made with inorganic materials that are much more stable and resistant to burning. In this way, the screens MicroLEDs are capable of reaching OLED contrast levelsbut with a much higher shine and with a useful life that is measured in decades. It is literally the best of all worlds. And there is also its trap. The problem: manufacturing the MicroLED is a nightmare A 4K display has about 8.3 million pixels. In the latest MicroLED panels, each of those pixels needs three individual LEDs, leaving us with almost 25 million microscopic chips that must be manufactured, placed and connected with nanometric precision on a panel the size of a television screen. This level of miniaturization required by MicroLED has limited its production to large-inch formats before the challenge it poses fit so many millions of diodes into a 55″ or 65″ panel. The process of mass transfer of these chips, what the industry calls mass transferis extraordinarily complex, and today, also extraordinarily expensive. How much expensive? To put it in context, one of the few MicroLED models that can be purchased in stores is a 89 inch Samsung and has a sale price of 109,000 euros. He LG Magnitaimed at the extreme luxury market, was around 230,000 euros in sizes of 118 and 136 inches. That price range makes them unviable as home televisions (at least for most mortals’ homes). Hence its market figures are very small at present. In all of 2024, they were manufactured less than 1,000 units of MicroLED televisions in the entire world. Samsung sells that many conventional televisions in a matter of minutes. However, although these panels do not reach the living rooms, it does not mean that the MicroLED is stagnant. In fact, it is in development. This technology is growing strongly in those niches where price matters less than performance. In large format signage it has been the standard for years. film and television studio fundslobbies of luxury buildings or private movie theaters. In automotive, the dashboards of the future want bright, durable and efficient screens. And in the wearables segment and augmented reality, both Apple and Samsung have been investing for some time in bringing MicroLED to smart watches and AR glasses, where extreme pixel density is critical and having smaller production volumes makes the cost more manageable. As indicated in an analysis According to Yole Group, the global MicroLED market could grow to nearly $5 billion in revenue by 2032, although most of that will come from those niche segments, not the living room TV. There are MicroLED and “MicroLED” The high production cost made manufacturers explore other ways to make this technology profitable and evolve. One of the solutions was to use as backlight system behind an LCD panel, rather than as self-emissive pixels. Strictly speaking, although the latter have MicroLED technology, they should not be considered as such. However, some brands use it interchangeably in their trade names for advertising purposes. By having a smaller scale, MicroLEDs allow much better control of light and enhancing the colors, but they still require an LCD panel that separates the colors of each subpixel. That is, it would act more like a MiniLED or a conventional LED than an OLED. The good news is that, as brands showed like Hisense and Samsung have already evolved MicroLED technology with white diodes, towards the RGB MicroLEDwhich already has a self-emissive RGB diode for each pixel that, now, would be closer to the operation of an OLED. This evolution, as before MicroLEDs they made other technologiesrepresents the first sign that these panels are beginning a path of optimization to reduce production costs. In fact, the models launched by Samsung during the last CES 2026 It would be around $30,000.. It seems like an exorbitant figure for a television, but it must be taken into … Read more

The Vitruvian Basilica is the “holy grail” of Roman architecture. Also a huge enigma that we have finally solved

If there is one thing that abounds in the presentations of archaeological finds (no matter where, when or who makes them) they are superlatives. Each discovery is the most important, the definitive one, the last missing piece to complete the puzzle. Another thing is that it really is like that. In the province of Pesaro and Urbino (Italy) the authorities they just announced a finding in which the opposite occurs: yes, there are superlatives, but they fall short. In the end, what they have unearthed there is neither more nor less than the “holy grail” of Roman architecture. In a stroke of luck, archaeologists have found the basilica erected 2,000 years ago by Marcus Vitruvius, which concludes a search for more than five centuries. What has happened? That Italy has put an end to a 500 year adventurethe time that archaeologists, architects and historians have been searching for perhaps the “holy grail” of Roman architecture: the legendary Vitruvian Basilica. Scholars placed it in Fanum Fortunae (current city of Fano) and for decades they probed its soil in search of vestiges or at least some indication. In vain. things changed about three years agowhen during the renovation works of the market square they found themselves (shortly half a meter deep) some remains that, we now know, belong to the basilica. “Millimeter correspondence”. What we have found under the cobblestones of Fano are Roman columns. So far nothing exceptional considering that we are talking about an ancient coastal city in the Marche region of Italy. The curious thing is that these vestiges fit closely with the description that Marcus Vitruvius left us of the basilica in his famous treatise. ‘Of Architecture’. The columns, their arrangement, the shape and layout of the nave coincide. The “definitive confirmation”, clarify from the Italian Ministry of Culture, arrived after the discovery of a fifth pillar that confirms both the position and orientation of the property. A planimetric reconstruction based on the description left by Vitruvius finally provided the guide. The coincidence is so precise that the authorities speak of a “millimeter correspondence”. “Imposing structures”. “The columns, around five Roman feet in diameter (147-150 cm) and about 15 meters high, rest on pillars and pilasters that supported an upper floor,” points out the Italian Government, which recalls that in 2022 experts were on the trail after discovering some “imposing masonry structures and marble floors” on Via Vitruvio. The confirmation that the remains belong to the old basilica does not complete the work. In fact, Cultura is already advancing that it will continue researching with the support of community funds. “Everything necessary will be done to recover and promote this exceptional find,” guarantees the regional president, Francesco Acquaroli. “Like Tutankhamun’s tomb”. During the presentation neither Francesco Acquaroli, nor the Minister of Culture, Alessandro Giuli, nor certainly the mayor of the town, Luca Serfilippi, spared praise (and superlatives). “The column behind us changes the history of the region. It is a discovery comparable to that of Tutankhamun’s tomb,” celebrated the regional leader. Giuli has used similar effusiveness, for whom the location of the mythical Roman basilica, erected ago two millenniabrand “a before and after” in archaeological history. “History books and not just journalistic chronicles will document this day and everything that will be studied about this exceptional discovery in the coming years. The scientific value is of absolute caliber,” he emphasized the Minister of Culture. “The vestiges discovered clearly demonstrate that Fano was and is the heart of the oldest architectural wisdom of Western civilization.” Is it so relevant? Whether the discovery of the Vitruvian basilica is comparable to that of Tutankhamun’s tomb may perhaps be discussed, of course what is undeniable is that it is one of the great archaeological news of the year (and that at the very least). The reason is not only the value of the building but that of its creator, Marcus Vitruvius (1st century BC), architect, engineer, treatise writer and author of ‘Of Architecture’a fundamental manual to understand Renaissance architecture. In his treatise Vitruvius addresses the three axes that would mark architecture for centuries: firmitas (firmness), utilities (functionality) and venustas (beauty). His work influenced, among others, León Battista Alberti, Andrea Palladio and Leonardo Da Vinci, who was inspired by its proportions to create one of the most iconic (and recognizable) drawings of all time: the ‘Vitruvian Man’. In ‘De Architectura’ the Roman architect does something else: he describes in detail the basilica that has now been found (finally) in Fano, a project in which was directly involved. In fact, the Ministry of Culture remember that it is the “only building attributable with certainty” to the Roman writer. Now we no longer need to imagine it. Images | Office Stampa e Comunicazione MiC In Xataka | We have discovered (again) the secret of Roman concrete. It’s less impressive than it seems

Regenerating tooth enamel is the holy grail of dentistry. And they have achieved it using a part of the sheep

Cavities are a real nightmare for many because of the pain they cause and also because of the mandatory visit to the dentist, which for some It resembles hell itself. And it is no less a problem, since untreated tooth decay is one of the most common problems in the world, affecting some 2,000 million patients worldwide, such as point the Global Burden of Disease 2019. A serious problem. A cavity requires quick dental treatment, since it is impossible for them to cure on their own or with a simple pill. This is because mature tooth enamel, what we see of the tooth, is a hard tissue, without cells and, therefore, cannot regenerate itself once it is damaged by bacteria. In this way, if not treated, cavities progress, destroys the tooth and takes us straight to the dentist’s chair for a filling. This is where the dentist must remove all damaged enamel and replace it with some kind of putty that hardens to look like enamel, although it really isn’t. The objective. For years, science has been searching for the “holy grail” of dentistry: a method to regenerate enamel biologically. However, getting the enamel compound to grow in an aligned and orderly manner, as biology does, is a nearly impossible thing. The now. A team of researchers from King’s College London has achieved something radically new: using keratin, the protein found in our hair or even in the wool of sheep. With this project, the researchers, instead of betting on a “patch” as now, keratin self-assembles into a fibrous network and forms structures as if it were the perfect scaffold. This is where the magic happens. This keratin scaffold guides the ordered growth of the molecules that make up the tooth. The study discovered that the keratin structure itself is flexible and reorganizes itself during mineralization (changing from β-sheets to α-helices), actively orchestrating the formation of the new mineral layer. It has already been tested. To check If this new material worked, they took human teeth and artificially caused “white spot lesions,” which are the first visible stage of a cavity. With this base, the keratin film was applied and incubated in a mineralization solution, resulting in a comprehensive repair of the tooth with an adequate structure. The future. The most important thing is that this regeneration is not just aesthetic; It is functional. The study measured the mechanical properties of the repaired enamel and the results surpassed one of the current standard treatments: resin infiltration. Both in the hardness and mechanical properties tests, it was seen that the result was really positive when it came to being able to use the tooth as if it were the integral version. In this way, this study establishes a preclinical framework for using a platform based on keratin, a cheap, abundant and biocompatible material. The manufacturing process is simple and does not use solvents. This could represent a “paradigm shift” in the clinical management of early caries. Instead of just having to drill and fill them, the possibility of curing and regenerating them is offered to restore both aesthetics and mechanical properties. Images | Pierre Villedieu Ozkan Guner In Xataka | If you always brush your teeth after eating, science has something to tell you: you’re doing it wrong

The US pursues the AGI as if it were the Holy Grail. In China they are more pragmatic and are applying AI to plant tomatoes

The long AI career continues its course, and although it seemed that the United States had taken the lead, China has managed to recover the lost terrain and stand up to the Big Tech. The funny thing is that The approaches of these two countries are totally differentand that makes great losers and winners here. In short and long term. US for the AGI. The North American country has a very different strategy from that of China in regards to artificial intelligence. Large technology companies are investing billions of dollars in search of that holy grail called AGI (General artificial intelligence). China, more pragmatic. On the other, China, which has adopted a different and much more pagmatic strategy. Rather pursue great objectives that a priori are far from being achieved, the Chinese government, led by Xi Jinping, is prioritizing The development of AI practical applications that are above all efficient and have limited implementation and, if it can be, low. Promises, promises. The difference between both visions is huge but highlights the mentality with which both countries face their efforts. The US companies that work in the US believe that the AGI is close despite Some experts They are clear that The generative AI is not the way. The Manhattan Project of the IA. That seems to give equal to visionary theorists looking for that AGI, because according to them, this mile military advantage that can suppose. For certain sectors politicians in the US the development of an AGI It is comparable What the Manhattan project was and the construction of the atomic bomb during World War II. But as they explain Some expertsthat project was not the three years of work, but rather supported studies and research that had been running for three decades in an US that at that time looked in the long term. China wants to be useful today. That way of contemplating the career of AI contrasts with that of China. Its leader, Xi Jinping, has not shown special interest in AGI, and its approach is much more pragmatic: he seeks to focus AI on applications for practical purposes. That has led to the Models of the AI ​​developed in China are already taking advantage of everyday tasks. Practical applications. For example, they point out In The Wall Street Journalhttps: //www.wsj.com/tech/ai/china-hasthe qualification of access exams to high school, the improvement of weather forecasts, or assistance to agriculture with methods to optimize crop rotation. It should be noted that the US also uses AI in these areas, at least in the form of projects such as Google Weather Lab either Alphafold 3 For the development of medications with AI. Chinese government support. Although there are efforts by both countries for that practical approach, the difference here is that in China there is a very fortune government support. Beijing is investing significantly in that vision with a Investment fund of 8,400 million dollars To support new startups, and both local governments and Chinese state banks have launched their own investment programs. And open models. Another of the key points that differentiate both strategies is that of the closed and owner of the models of the large US companies and Open and open source vision of Chinese models. These open models allow to be downloaded and freely modified, and also reduce the cost of implementing this technology for companies that want to adapt it to their needs. The trade war conditions everything. It is also true that commercial restrictions imposed by the US condition the Chips development and AI software in China. That has caused the Asian giant to have adopted a curious tactic: to let the US assume the enormous costs of exploring new paths to develop AI, and then follow its steps as quickly as possible but without having to face those strong economic investments. Risk aversion. Although Xi Jinping may raise a strategy that the AGI pursues, experts say it will only do it when I see that you have enough guarantees of succeeding. Kendra Schaefer, from the trivium Chinese consultant, explained How the Communist Party does not want to be threatened by an AGI that condition its future. According to her, the Chinese government is “one of the most reluctant governments to the planet’s risk.” Outstanding image | Xataka with Midjourney In Xataka | China has declared the war on private school: why he predicted the prolific “tutorials”

The 80/20 rule seemed the Holy Grail for mobile batteries. It is not as infallible as it appears

Scientific evidence points to a clear path if we want to take care of our phone’s battery: keep it between the 80 and 20%. It is a common practice among smartphones manufacturers, but also among some of the most popular electric cars in the market. However, this law is not infallible. In fact, developers of Grapheneosone of the safer Roms in the Android world, they have explained why Google’s operating system occasionally skips this limitation although we have specified in the settings we want. The 80/20 law. It is not something new. He is quite studied That maintaining the battery between 80 and 20% of its capacity minimizes its chemical wear, avoiding load ends. These are the ones that most degrade batteries, so working away from these areas has direct implications on the useful life of our pile. The manufacturers use it. Apple and Google have been implementing time native measures So that if users decide, the phones can limit their load. In other words, if you want your phone not to load beyond 80%, you can leave it scheduled like this to protect your useful life. In fact, this section is usually found in the battery health submenus and load optimization. But they do not always fulfill it for a reason. One of this week’s conversations have precisely to do with this rule. From Android 15 QPR2 Users began to complain that their phones were starting to carry up to 100%, deducting that the battery protection system had been deactivated. On the contrary: this 100% load is more than necessary. The developers of Grapheneosa rom that follows the rhythm of Android Stock updates, have explained why this happens. The reason. Although loads of 20 to 80% are beneficial to maximize the life of batteries, 100% charges are eventually necessary to recalibrate the estimated battery capacity. If all cycles are made without 100%, the reading on the remaining battery will not be accurate. 100% load. Similarly, loading up to 100% is beneficial to challenge the individual cells of batteries themselves. Lithium ion batteries are made up of multiple cells and, over time, some can be downloaded faster than others. When the battery reaches 100%, energy redistributes the load along the cells so that it is equal, something that only happens with the mobile loaded completely and without using for a few minutes. Image | Xataka In Xataka | How to load your mobile as quickly as possible with these tricks

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.