GPT5

GPT-5 has many versions, but Openai decides which one to use for you

by

Openai wants to simplify our lives, but maybe he has made a mistake in doing so. When you use GPT-5, you won’t know which GPT-5 version you will be using. Because although Openai has raised it as a “unified model”, it is actually using variant distress according to the scenario and, of course, according to what you pay. And not knowing what he is using at all times is a blessed? problem. Welcome to the era of the opacity of AI. GPT-5 are many GPT-5. In his “system card“Openai stands out how GPT-5 It is a “unified system” that actually consists of several versions. Some more powerful, others less, and others that reason. But unlike what happened so far-you chose if you wanted to use the lighter model or one that would think more-GPT-5 will choose for you. As? On the one hand we have the “external” names of the variants of GPT-5 and on the other the inmates. The “real -time router” will be responsible for deciding which is used at each moment. Source: latent.space A “router” that chooses for us. To know what variant you have to use, GPT-5 uses a “real-time router that quickly decides which model to use based on the type of conversation, complexity, or the need for tools.” As they point out In Latent Space The idea is remarkable, and helps to avoid That name chaos We had so far. Of course: the only way to “force” the type of model to use is to express it clearly in the prompt when using chatgpt. Thus, if we ask him something and ask that “think a lot about this”, we will activate that reasoning model so that the router does not make mistakes by choosing perhaps a less capable model. Opacity. Although OpenAi indicates that he uses these arguments to decide which GPT-5 variant USA, here we face the dichotomy of opacity. That GPT-5 chooses for us is on the one hand good and on the other bad. Simplifies the use of chatbot, no doubt, and that brings it closer to the novel public. But at the same time Advanced users steals control or those who have enough knowledge to know how to decide which version of GPT-5 would like to use. With an expected exception. We can already say goodbye to this old model selector. For better, and for worse. Beware of simplifying. The simplification problem of complex technologies is that it can cause unwanted side effects. For example, that users do not understand the differences between the models. That leads to reducing its ability to make informed decisions about which tool is more appropriate for each specific context. Openai raises something like a “technological infantilization”: do not worry, dear users, that GPT-5 will already do everything for you. Even choose how to work. If you pay, choose. If you are one of those advanced users who know how Chatgpt Pro (200 dollars/month) In order to activate any of the different internal models of GPT-5 Correspondence between the “old models” and the “new models.” Source: OpenAi How are they compared to previous models. The arrival of this new family of models assumes that now each of the above It has its replacement with one of the Variants of GPT-5. Thus, the old GPT-4O would be the new GPT-5 Main, while GPT-4O-mini will be GPT-5-Main-Mini and O3 will be GPT-5-Thinking. And so with the rest: Goodbye, old GPTS. As explained in the version notes Published in OpenAI, the arrival of GPT-5 supposes goodbye to the models that were used so far in Chatgpt. Chatgpt Pro subscribers They can continue to have access To these ancient models, at least for now, but for other users the option is clear: the pre-GPT-5 models are retired, and among them: GPT-4O (will continue to be used for voice mode) GPT-4.1 GPT-4.5 GPT-4.1-mini O4-mini O4-mini-High O3 O3-PRO GPT-5 should explain your decisions. Although the idea of having a unified model is not bad, that lack of control and information about the way of functioning of GPT-5 is worrying. One of the solutions is to introduce that selection of ways (available in Chatgpt Pro), but another is even simpler: Chatgpt would be enough to indicate which version of the model has used at all times so that we know what to stick to … and if we can force that in such questions a more capable (or less) model is used. In Xataka | The AI has so far a nice accessory: with GPT-5, OpenAi wants to place it in the center of all things

With GPT-5, Openai wants to place it at the center of all things

by

Microsoft and Apple defined the PC segment and They made him a Commodity. The computer became in something standardcommon and easily interchangeable, Without too much differentiation. Those who ended up winning that battle, however, were Microsoft and Intel, who took a good part of the benefits. Then the mobile would arrive. It is clear that those who have won this segment have been Apple (with iOS) and Google (with Android), but be careful, because those who defined it were two companies. The first, the aforementioned Apple, which also triumphed with the APP Store paradigm And it has ended up taking about half of the income. The second, a company where perhaps not many would have thought: Amazon. The electronic commerce giant would end up promoting the cloud with its Amazon Web Services, and It also ended up turning that cloud into another Commodity. And as happened with Microsoft and the PC or Apple and the mobile, Amazon ended up monopolizing a good part of the benefits of the cloud. A cloud we considerably access (for example, through the iPhone), but to which we don’t even pay too much attention: It is there and works, as before the PC and now the mobile. As explained by analyst Ben Thompson In StratecheryThey are everything Commodities. Well, there are those who expect AI to end up becoming another Commodity. That this segment for which now They compete a multitude of companies It ends up becoming (perhaps) a duopoly like the one created by Microsoft and Intel in the PC or Apple and Google on the mobile. Foundational models are the new PC/mobile, and although there are strong candidates to end up winning that race, everything is yet to be defined. AI like Commodity And that is where GPT-5 comes into play, which wants to be something like Apple’s App Store or Amazon AWS: that platform that Turn it in the company that defines the AI race and manages to win it. And that over time also influence that conversion of AI in a Commodity. With this OpenAi launch you play a lot. Sam Altman has been living in two things for years. On the one hand, of the success of Chatgpt, a remarkable product, but for the moment not revolutionary. On the other, Above all, of Hype. Of promises and moments wow like the one they gave us With GPT-4O or with them Studio Ghibli Style Images. Because we insist, Chatgpt is a good product that has proven useful as an assistant in all types of tasks, but especially in programming. Has unusual an unusual fever for the generative AI and data centersand has caused many companies to trust their future –or rather they bet– To this technology. But revolutions, for the moment, few. Comparisons with phenomena such as PC, Internet or mobile are inevitable. And in all of them discourse and evolution were similar. There were doubts and skepticism at the beginning, exaggerated bets later –Hi, bubble Puntocom– And, indeed, revolution. And it is expected that something like this passes with the pass, although in fact the most devout of this technology claim that this will go further. Others, much more skeptical, believe that This is a bubble that will end exploding … although it can end it deriving the true revolutionas happened with the Internet. Whether there is bubble and explodes as if not, GPT-5 is for Openai a key model for your future. And the paradox of this model is that the company needs the greatest jump in the history of AI Just when it seems most impossible. It is about to see how good the model is really, but the company cannot suffer Another fiasco like GPT-4.5 or your reputation will be very damaged. Will Openai achieve with GPT-5 and the AI what Microsoft, Apple or Amazon already achieved in their respective segments? That is the big question. And we will have to wait a bit to answer it. In Xataka | There are too many AI models. That raises a true death sentence for Anthropic and Claude

GPT-5 will be better than its predecessors. The point is that for Openai that is no longer enough

by

It smells in the environment. GPT-5 is falling. Well, not only is he smells: it is also Sam Altman already shown that He is using it. There are many indications that point to an imminent launch, and it is therefore good time to assess what we expect from this new foundational model and its impact for the industry. Downward expectations. In general, the sensation of media and analysts coincides: the quality jump that we will see from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will not be much less that we saw between GPT-3 and GPT-4 when the latter He threw himself In March 2023. The reason is simple: climbing (dedicate more computation capacity and more training data) It no longer raises such notable improvements like those raised. Expected deceleration. That “Founder of AI“It was already expected – engineers knew that this better rhythm was not sustainable – and precisely the rescue came things like modes of reasoning. To make the model “reason” work: That allowed not to respond immediately, and instead the model explores several paths and ends up deciding the best. The problem? If “reasons” it takes longer to answer, and if it takes longer to answer conversing with it it is no longer useful. And that’s where GPT-5 enters. The off -road model. If we expect something from GPT-5, it is something like “the model to dominate them all.” So far there was a real chaos in OpenAi and its models: we have chatgpt as a unifying layer, but from this chatbot you can choose different models and different ways (reasoning, research, etc). GPT-5 is expected to automatically adapt to user’s needs (although being able to select modes manually does not seem a bad idea for advanced users) and becomes an off-road model that Unify everything. Better in everything, but maybe not too much. Of course, GPT-5 is expected to represent a sensitive leap in the capacities of this founding model. There are many rumors about what will be especially trained to program and to solve mathematical and even scientific problems. Advanced reasoning. It is also expected to have an advanced reasoning capacity, and here there may be two psible striking improvements. The first, that the model reasons better but also does it faster and more efficiently. Or that reason better (and slower) but reason as well as now, but at the same time that does not prevent chatting with it in that way. In both cases the result will be the same: more precise and detailed responses. Deep Think. The second, which perhaps Openai implements the same idea that Google has already implemented in Gemini: a Model “Deep Think” that combines the power of several instances of the same model so that they all reason and end up reaching the best conclusion. This second option, of course, raises the arrival of an even more expensive subscription plan, because this mode of reasoning is very expensive and using it intensively will be oriented only to very specific scenarios in areas such as the scientist or academic. Agentic. OpenAi already recently presented Your chatgpt agentand GPT-5 is expected to have a key participation in the future of that option. Right now, the agthic capacity of that service is surprising – it takes the control of the browser and you ask you to do something – but also limited (it takes a long time in everything, it is often wrong). With the new foundational model its performance should end up improving in a sensitive way too. A model of AI that threatens more jobs. THE IMPACT IN THE INDUSTRY It is certainly uncertain, but if these capabilities are really notable, there will be more threatened jobs. GPT-5 could, for example, being a strong candidate to even replace people in customer service and technical support: their ability to talk in real time-and to remember more and more details of users-is very striking in this regard. Sectors such as health, with improvement of diagnostic prelminar, or education adapting more and better to each student, such as They have already profiled with their mode of studyThey are clear candidates to be affected. After the failure of GPT-4.5, OpenAi needs a total success. A few months ago OpenAi suffered The greatest failure in its history with GPT-4.5a model that cost a lot to launch and did not show really striking improvements. He ended up going back and now he needs GPT-5 to represent a decent (at least) jump. Keep burning money. The role of GPT-5 is also key to maintaining the good reputation of the company. They live in much of it, and demonstrate the gigantic investment rounds that it has achieved over the last years. In Openai they continue to burn money as if there were no tomorrow, and although it already generates respectable income – it is estimated that will enter 12,000 million dollars In 2025— he is far from profitable. Fierce competition. The threat is also multiplied against rivals like Google and now also a goal. The first is Your most direct competitor (together with Anthropic) in terms of quality of commercial foundational models. The second has become a real toothache, especially since it has so much money (and generate both thanks to Instagram and Facebook) that does not need external investment and can waste money without apparent problems. For example, stealing talent without stopping. Please subscribe to chatgpt. Chatgpt’s popularity is undeniable, and today many users associate “AI” with “Chatgpt” when using any of the available models. That has allowed its number of weekly unique users either 700 million “Four times the one who was a year ago,” exceptional growth. Subscriptions, yes, are slower: at this time OpenAI has five million business business users, while the figure was three million in June. He needs many more to deal with his astronomical expenses, and GPT-5 should listen to get it. In Xataka | The AI war intensifies: Anthropic cuts Claude’s access to OpenAi. He has done it before the launch of GPT-5

Anthropic cuts Claude’s access to Openai. He has done it before the launch of GPT-5

by

The AI race is very intense lately. The last episode is stars in Anthropic, who have cut access to Openai so that they cannot access their family of models Claude. The company claims to have caught the engineers of Chatgpt wearing Claude programming toolswhich has not fallen very well. This, According to a spokesman From the company to the medium Wired, it is “a violation of its terms of service”, so they have restricted access to the API. What has happened exactly. Openai connected Claude to his internal tools through his API, instead of the conventional chat interface. This allowed the company to carry out comparative evidence between Claude and its own models in areas such as programming, creative writing and security -related responses. The results helped Openai evaluate the behavior of their models and make necessary adjustments. An endless war. This decision goes beyond a simple contractual dispute: marks a turning point in the relationship between two of the main powers of the generative AI. Anthropic was born in 2021 precisely from an Openai split, when several key researchers, including the brothers Dario and Daniela Amodei, left Altman’s company due to differences on the direction and safety of AI. Since then, The tension has been palpablealthough it had remained in the background. The justification of Anthropic. “Claude Code It has become the preferred option of programmers everywhere, so we were not surprised to know that Openai’s technical staff were also using our programming tools before the launch of GPT-5“said Christopher Nulty, spokesman for Anthropic. The company considers that this constitutes a direct violation of its commercial terms, which expressly prohibit using the service to” build a competitive product or service “or” make reverse engineering. “ Openai’s response. Sam Altman’s company He has defended its practices as “standard in the industry” to evaluate other AI systems and improve security. “Although we respect Anthropic’s decision to cut our access to the API, it is disappointing considering that our API is still available for them,” said Hannah Wong, director of communications of OpenAI. Between the lines. What we see now is the materialization of a cold war that has been being taken for years. Anthropic has positioned Claude as the “safer and more ethical” alternative against Chatgpt, while Openai has maintained his leadership for mass adoption and general abilities. This rivalry is not only business: it is also philosophical, with very different approaches on how to develop and market the AI. In addition, the blockade of the API is not an isolated case in the technological sector. As They mention In Wired, Facebook also blocked Vine In his day and Salesforce He recently limited access to competitors. What is clear is that this reflects how competition in AI is becoming more aggressive and territorial. Important nuances. Despite the blockade, Anthropic has clarified that will maintain OpenAi access “for benchmarking purposes and security evaluations”, a practice considered standard in the industry. However, the company has not specified how this current restriction will affect these activities. And now what. This climb arrives at the worst possible time for OpenAi, especially considering that we would be officially knowing GPT-5, which promises significant programming improvements. Therefore, everything indicates that Anthropic is willing to use all the tools at their disposal to stop the advance of its competitors. The worrying thing is that this could only be the beginning of a more open war between the Big Tech and the use of AI. In Xataka | The investment in AI already represents 2% of the US GDP. The problem is that it doesn’t even work well

GPT-5 is being a tortuous path for OpenAi and points to an uncomfortable reality: the era of the head is over

by

Chatgpt-5 is falling. They have not confirmed it directly, but Sam Altman is already in ‘Hype’ mode and all Rumors They point out that the new model will be presented this month. That GPT-5 It will improve its predecessors is evident. However, as has happened in other industries (Did anyone say smartphones?) The rhythm of the advances is slowing down and everything indicates that GPT-5 will not be the revolution that were previous versions. A discreet jump. They tell it in The Information. Sources close to OpenAI say that, although with improvements, the qualitative leap will not be as great as it was with GPT-3 and GPT-4. This contrasts with Altman’s constant mentions The close thing that is to achieve a general artificial intelligence (AGI), an AI capable of matching the smartest human being in all areas of knowledge. But Chatgpt-5 is far from being AGI and also OpenAi has encountered numerous obstacles along the way. The GPT-5 that was not. At the end of 2024, Openai was working on an internally nicknamed model and that was the candidate to become GPT-5. However, the jump with respect to the previous version was not large enough and finally OpenAi decided to launch it as GPT-4.5, an intermediate version that Nor was it a great improvement With respect to its competition. In Xataka A group of experts in AI attended a party in a mansion. The topic of conversation: what will be when AI ends humanity The one that will be. Openai has continued working on what GPT-5 will be and is about to launch. According to internal sources, the new model improves especially in programming and also does so more efficiently; It is able to produce higher quality code without consuming more computing power. Openai wanted to improve this area, where Anthropic takes a lot of advantage with Claude Code. GPT-5 will also improve its agricultural skills and will be able to follow complex instructions to function without human supervision. In The Information they cite an example about a customer service agent. Giving it a list of rules, GPT-5 can decide when a client must receive a refund, while in previous models they needed to see many complex cases to do it well. Although there will be improvements, The shadow that will not be surprising continues to fly over. Obstacles. The Tensions between Openai and Microsoft They have hindered the advance of the new model. There have been internal friction between both companies, especially for intellectual property issues. Openai accused Microsoft of anti -competitive behaviors. Microsoft accused Openai of not giving access to his most advanced models. They also faced a shortage problem of quality training data and, more recently, the Discompassed talents to the team of Zuckerberg Superintelligence and Google by removing Windsurfhis commitment to the Vibe-Coding. {“Videid”: “X9N4GWC”, “Autoplay”: False, “Title”: “OpenAi has presented chatgpt agent”, “Tag”: “chatgpt”, “duration”: “47”} The challenge. Openai has encountered a problem: that specialized reasoning can be taken to a chat with which we can talk naturally. It is what happened to them with O3, the reasoning model that They presented in April and that will feed GPT-5. Both this model and O1 were trained by reinforced learning, but O3 provided much more processing capacity and obtained surprising results. However, by turning it into a version of chat, that performance fell into chopped and I lost many capabilities. The reasoning model is so powerful that the response time increases a loteven for very simple questions. GPT-5 is expected to be at an intermediate point. Continuism. GPT-5 improvements may be more than enough for OpenAI continues to feed your machinerybut it seems clearer that there is a deceleration of the generative AI. At the end of 2023 Bill Gates already said that I did not believe that GPT-5 would be much better than GPT-4 and that the generative AI was close to its roof. It is an almost natural process and that we have seen with other industries such as smartphones: a lot of innovation and qualitative leaps in the first years, followed by a continuous stage in which the novelties are lower and the sensation is progress, but much slower. Image | Wikipedia, Pexels In Xataka | There is a chatgpt fever among public officials. What we do not know is how it will affect us as users (Function () {Window._js_modules = Window._js_modules || {}; var headelement = document.getelegsbytagname (‘head’) (0); if (_js_modules.instagram) {var instagramscript = Document.Createlement (‘script’); }}) (); – The news GPT-5 is being a tortuous path for OpenAi and points to an uncomfortable reality: the era of the head is over It was originally posted in Xataka by Amparo Babyloni .

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.