We knew that LaLiga IPS blocks have been massive and indiscriminate. What we didn’t know was to what extent

In the last three months There are many users and companies that have complained about indiscriminate blockages of IPS Sorted by LaLiga. Analysis had already appeared that these blockages They affected thousands of websitesbut in reality its dimension is much greater. 2.7 million affected domains. Jaume Pons (@jaumepons), Systems administrator, it has been monitoring how LaLiga IPS blocks have affected various domains and websites. In its last analysis, it highlights how on the last weekend league day it reveals that in total 2,699,517 .com, .net and .org domains have been affected. This expert has also published the listings with all the affected domains. Thousands of domains .es. The parallel analysis of this expert during the weekend revealed how only Saturday afternoon-even from the celebration of Barça-Madrid) on Sunday They affected 15,432 domains .esthat again they were inaccessible to Spanish Internet users. They are Digi data. We have been able to talk to Jaume Pons and explained that his analysis focuses on the blockages that end up being managed by the DIGI operator, which is the one he has hired. In other operators the situation may be different. A massive analysis. This systems administrator explained the analysis process, which begins with A petition to Icann of the DNS zones of the domains that this organism manages (.com, .net,, org, among the main ones). There are about 300 million, but Pons then focuses on those who point to the cloudflare DNS, which makes the list reduce about 16-17 million. Crossing data. From there it is possible to make a tracking by solving those DNS to know what IPS these domains point to. When doing Digi requests it is possible to detect if it appears The typical warning message which shows the temporary block warning or not. And in doing so the domains of the original list that have effectively have been blocked by DIGI during the emissions of the LaLiga matches are confirmed. The complete analysis process is completed in about two hours, and allows us to understand the enormous dimension of the problem. Very visited websites are inaccessible. Pons himself explains that the Builtwith platform creates a list with the million most important domains per traffic every month. Laliga IPS blockades affected this weekend 21,914 domains of those who integrate that list. Among the examples are many electronic commerce stores that may undoubtedly have suffered economic and reputational losses. Among those affected, Steam and X (Twitter). But there have also been platforms like Steam or X (Before Twitter) with which users have had problems. So much In that social network as In Reddit Messages appeared indicating how some games of games and even saved games disappeared from the Steam Deck. Incalculable economic and reputational damage. The damage to users and companies is perpetuated with these blockages. We already talked to several of those affected, and in one of the cases it was indicated how the blockages had caused that of the 70,000 euros per month they entered had come to enter about 40,000. A list of affected collects estimates of losses by these companies, and those who have signed up already claim to have lost More than a quarter of a million euros Because of these blockages. The season ends. The blockages will foreseeably end when LaLiga ends at the end of May, but until then users will continue to suffer those problems of access to hundreds of thousands of websites. The question, of course, is whether these blockages They will continue to be produced When you start next season. Damage to third parties continues. It doesn’t matter that affected web domains have greater or lesser traffic: Damage to third parties existsand we are always talking about legitimate domains and websites. At the moment justice still does not act, and in fact rejected the request for nullity of the sentence that allows LaLiga to continue ordering those blockages. Image | LaLiga In Xataka | LaLiga has found the best way to beat Cloudflare: ally with its competition

After the surprise, ‘La Revuelta’ is discovering to what extent ‘El Hormiguero’ is a complicated colossus to win

Although in its first months of life the fight between ‘El Hormiguero’ and ‘La Revuelta’ He was fiercewith victories in audience almost alternating Mathematical, the situation has changed. David Broncano has not advanced ‘El Hormiguero’ for weeks, which puts the star program of the Nights of La1 in a hurry: he needs to find a way of counterattacking. A 2025 fall. The competition during the first months of ‘La Revuelta’ resulted at the end of last year with A tight victory: 15.7%against 15.6%, with Broncano beating more clearly in the strip of strict coincidence (16.3%/15%). But Something seems to be failing in 2025: The first quarter 46 days of ‘La Revuelta’ and 47 of ‘El Hormiguero’ were issued, and Antena 3 imposed on LA1: it obtained an average of 14.8% compared to 13.4%. In 35 days he won ‘El Hormiguero’. Second quarter with a clear winner. But in the April months And May the thing has not gone much better: in these five weeks, only three days got ‘the revolt’ to beat ‘El Hormiguero’ (April 2, 3 and 15, the last one being the motorcycle program a replacement). That is, the Broncano program has been advancing its rival for more than a month, with figures that are close to 10% of Shareeven often without exceeding it, while ‘El Hormiguero’ is accommodated closer to figures around Share 13-15. That is, not only does it advance to his rival, but his audience has dropped: he is far from that 14.8% he averaged in 2025. Is it a ‘the revolt’ disaster? Actually, they are not bad figures, especially if we compare with the average audience that La1 made in that strip of Access before the arrival of Broncano (for example, in the first half of 2024 the 1 averaged 9% share). Thanks to Broncano the 1 passed in the annual ranking of Ser the third most watched chain of 2024 to be the second (With the additional impulse, yes, of the Eurocup and the Olympic Games in June and July: it was in those months the most watched chain, after 12 years without leading a month). The figures of ‘La Revuelta’, as a whole, are not disastrous, but Broncano resists leadership. There is no surprise anymore. There is another possible reason for this fall: the known as “wow effect” (that is usually used in marketingbut it also serves any content proposal for the general public, such as television programs) is no longer that of the early days. Gone were the reaction to the theft of a guest with a Documentary about the Berrea del Ciervo By way of response, the splendid Amaia’s performance which closed 2024 or how two icons of the program, such as Broncano and Lalachús, attracted the attention in the New Year’s Eve bells. Since then, few actions in the program have achieved that effect: perhaps the Short around the lottery raffle or the striking LEIVA LIVE performance With numerous invited stars. Little thing for a program that has not been assigned to Trends of social networks, something that A few months ago I got almost daily. ‘La Revuelta’ no longer surprises the same. A formula that accuses tiredness. What could happen? One possibility is the exhaustion of the surprise effect: ‘La Revuelta’ started as ‘the resistance’ in Movistar Plus+ in February 2018, which is seven years in which the formula has barely experienced variations. It is an exhaustion that It does not affect the much more veteran motorcycle program: The solid but well -founded structure in some collaborators and sections that have been among the most watched on television make not evolving a problem for Broncano. For motorcycles, however, and as it has demonstrated by liquidating A rival behind another, His monolithic scaffolding is his main weapon. The TV family does not take off. It is not the only proposal of the renewed TVE that Sergio Calderón directs that does not finish finding its space before the competition. On its third day on antenna, after a Dubitative start with a ride‘The family of TV’ It fell yesterday to a very lazy 6.2%with only half of the fee that the winner, an increasingly grown Jorge Javier with 12.1% of Share. It was the most ambitious bet of this first half of 2025 for RTVE and the return of Belén Esteban to the front line awakened expectation, but the result does not seem to be convinced in its week of debut to the public. Header | Atresmedia / RTVE In Xataka | Broncano, Giró and Buenafuente: the plan of the new director of TVE to put the audience war upside down

A percentage illustrates to what extent there is no going back in the war war against teleworking: 14.6%

The Covid-19 pandemia accelerated the adoption of teleworking in Spain, five years later, the mantra that the teleworking had arrived to stay admits some nuances. While it is true that it does not record the adoption figures of 2020, it does seem to have stabilized by the advantages it offers To companies. Gone were the days when going to the office was the only option and Teleworking was a science fiction thing. With almost 15% adoption, teleworking double They value conciliationor as a talent collection tool for companies. Teleworking is stabilized. As we already pointed out in October 2024, Teleworking has started a consolidation stage in the labor market after its boom and subsequent fall. According to data collected in the last Randstad Workmonitor Report14.6% of Spanish employees Teletrabajan. This implies the highest figure of the last three years, and a considerable increase with respect to 5% teleworking that was recorded in 2019. This means that approximately one in six workers has adopted this modality, either teleworking full time or in a hybrid day format that combines days in the office with days at home. The most significant thing is that, despite the increase in the policies back to the office that some companies have undertaken, the slight rebound of the last quarter of 2024 registered by the INEThey reveal that teleworking has maintained the guy. More flexibility and conciliation. This percentage represents a significant change in the labor market, in a country with a strong face -to -face work such as Spain. “The new hybrid work models are consolidating in Spain and in the rest of the developed countries as a result of a demand by employees to implement measures that facilitate the conciliation between working and staff life,” says Oriol Mas, general director of Randstad Enterprise. Although teleworking has not meant the total revolution that some predicted, it has been consolidated as a tool for Time and conciliation flexibilityas well as to maintain productivity before specific or meteorological events that in other times would have involved stopping business activity. An example was the Dana that Valencia sufferedor recent meteorological alerts in which great companies recommended Your employees work from home. The secret of success: hybrid day. The factor that has made this increase in teleworking have been the appearance of The hybrid dayswho have gained prominence in recent years. This model allows to maintain the cohesion of the equipment with face -to -face days, and make the day with teleworking days. In absolute terms, the Randstad report indicates that only 7.5% of the total employees who telework do so full time, while the remaining 7.1 does so regularly in a context of Hybrid Day. Where do you telework more. Teleworking is closely linked to the nature of the companies that offer it, so the type of companies in a territory decisively influences the percentage of teleworking. According to him Randstad studythe autonomous communities where the most telework are usually those with a greater concentration of technology companies and large companies. By communities, Madrid leads teleworking with 25.9% of total workers betting on this modality. 13.5% do so regularly (3 days or more), while 12.4% do so occasionally (less than three days per week). It is followed by Catalonia (16.2%), Community Valencian (14.4%), Basque Country (13.1%) and Galicia (12.4%). Teleworking percentage by Autonomous Communities In contrast, those communities with the greatest predominance of manufacturing industry or the primary sector are those that register a lower incidence of teleworking in their labor market. La Rioja with only 6.3%is the one with the lowest percentage of Teleworking, followed by the Canary Islands (8.2%), Navarra (9%), Castilla y León (9.3%) and the Region of Murcia (9.4%). In Xataka | Teleworking dominated the world during pandemia. Five years later your reality is very different Image | Unspash (DFY)

We knew that US Big Tech had a problem with the costs of their AI. DeepSeek has just shown to what extent

DeepSeek is the new darling of AI. This family of models, developed by a Chinese R&D laboratory of the same name, has achieved what seemed impossible: compete with the OpenAI or Meta models and do so, according to them, at a much lower cost. Is that true? A development 18 times cheaper than GPT-4. The Chinese startup released DeepSeek V3 671B at the end of December 2024. Its gigantic model was trained in just two months with a budget of 5.58 million dollars according to SCMP and analysts cited in Financial Times. Its performance is comparable to OpenAI’s GPT-4, but the latter cost about $100 million to develop according to Sam Altman. That’s almost 18 times more if we take into account both the data revealed by SCMP and Altman’s estimates. Comparative cost of the main chat and reasoning models today. DeepSeek’s price is incredibly lower than its competitors. Data: DeepSeek, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta. Amazingly cheap. The cost of DeepSeek’s API is incredibly low when compared to its competitors. If we take the data from DeepSeek, Goal, OpenAI, Google and Anthropic It seems to be clear that the cost of using DeepSeek through its API is much lower than that proposed by its rivals. We have included the cost of GPT-4o mini which seems to be the only one comparable, but its performance is much lower than DeepSeek V3. DeepSeek V3 is superior to most of its competitors, although it is true that Meta has released for example Llama 3.3 in recent days and that comparison varies frequently. And it is (theoretically) superior to all. As they point out on RedditDeepSeek V3 prices are promotional: starting February 8 they will be $0.27 per million input tokens (almost double) and $1.10 per million output tokens (almost four times more) . This makes the comparison somewhat better for the competitors, especially for Llama, the only one that can compete in cost although the Chinese model is superior to that of Meta (and almost also to the rest in many metrics) according to the benchmarks carried out in DeepSeek. DeepSeek also “thinks” cheaper. The cost comparison is not only in favor of DeepSeek in the area of ​​traditional chatbots, but also in the area of ​​reasoning models. According to its internal benchmarks, the spectacular DeepSeek R1 It is significantly superior to OpenAI’s o1, but using the o1 API costs 27 times more than that of DeepSeek R1. Hallucinatory. Price drop in sight. As expert Ethan Mollick points out, the market will adjust to these DeepSeek-driven price drops fairly quickly. According to their estimates, the cost of a GPT-4 level AI was reduced 1000 times in 18 months, and a 95% drop in the price of the reasoning models, which right now are clearly higher than the AI models behind ChatGPT, for example. a chinese tsunami. The launch of the DeepSeek models is a great little revolution for all types of developers of AI-based solutions: they now have access to much cheaper models that are comparatively equal to or superior to those of the competition. This puts their rivals in a lot of trouble, and we will see how they react. Good news for users. The truth is that for us, the users, as well as for the developers, this is great news, especially because these prices make access to these functions incredibly cheaper. The market has been following this trend clearly, but DeepSeek has made the jump in cost reduction suddenly drastic. Image | Xataka with Freepik Pikasso In Xataka | OpenAI prepares a PhD-level AI. It is so promising that he will first show it to the US Government

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.