Whoop is already worth 10 billion and wants to be your doctor

Whoop just closed one $575 million Series G which values ​​it at 10,000 million. Among its new investors there are profiles that contextualize this company well: the Mayo Clinic, the sovereign fund of Qatar, LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo. Capital, health and sports. Quite a declaration of intent about what market Whoop is serious about. Between the lines. The market for elite athletes has never been worth $10 billion. Whoop knows this and that’s why it has been transforming for years: hired its first medical director in 2022obtained authorization from the US FDA to record electrocardiograms, integrated blood test analysis (forgive the redundancy) into its platform and has gone from selling bracelets to selling subscriptions of between $149 and $359 a year that combine hardware with health services. The bracelet is the hook. The personal health platform is the business. And it’s getting clearer. The money trail. With 2.5 million active subscribers and reserves that exceeded $1 billion in 2025, doubling those of the previous year, Whoop was not in any financial emergency, it did not need this money to survive. It needs it to scale: the 575 million will finance an international expansion throughout Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Persian Gulf, and will almost double its current workforce of 800 people with 600 new hires. The logic is that of any subscription company that has found a fit between its product and the market: grow before someone else does. Yes, but. The road is full of corpses. In recent years we have seen the birth, growth and fall of Pebbleto Jawboneto fitbitalso to other examples of independent hardware beyond health, such as Human AI either Magic Leap: The consumer hardware sector has destroyed capital with remarkable efficiency. And Whoop doesn’t play in a quiet niche: the Apple Watch is the wearables best seller in the world and includes increasingly advanced health functions, Xiaomi and Huawei are breathing down your neck, and Google still has Fitbit although Your future only passes through the Pixel Watch. Additionally, Whoop cannot yet compete with the sports market that requires a screen to view exercise tracking (Garmin, Suunto, Coros, etc). Competing against companies with ecosystems of billions of users and enormous balance sheets is a peculiar gamble for a Boston startup, no matter how well funded it is. But no one can take away from him what he has achieved so far, which is a lot. The big question. Whoop’s answer to that problem is the same as any company that can’t win on generic hardware: specialize until comparison is impossible. His recent integration with Soaak Technologieswhich uses the bracelet’s real-time physiological data to adjust sound frequency compositions to the user’s state, points in that direction: building a third-party ecosystem that makes switching platforms increasingly expensive. The goal is not to be the best-selling bracelet, that is a lost war. It is being the health platform to which the most things are connected. Go deeper. An IPO is on the table. In November, its founder, Will Ahmed, spoke about the possibility of this operation over a two-year horizon. With 575 million fresh in, Whoop can afford to wait for the right time, wait for a quieter time than this warlike spring of 2026, and show up when it has more users, more recurring revenue, and a fuller story to tell. The question is not whether it will go public. It will come out. It’s whether the market will continue to believe in those 10 billion when that time comes. In Xataka | The Nike Mind 001 are the strangest shoes I have ever tried. And that is precisely why they are being sold Featured image | Whoop

In 1888 an English doctor dissected a corpse down to its nerves. And illuminated forensic science along the way

If you stop by the bookstore of the Faculty of Medicine of the Drexel Universityin Philadelphia, you’re most likely in for a scare. Fright that will be followed by an uncomfortable gesture. Discomfort from which you will jump to surprise. And surprise that will give way to absolute fascination. There, locked in a glass display case located in the Student Activities Center of the faculty, received visitors until at least a couple of years ago, a dissected human body, tall, well bleached and with bulbous eyes with an expression of superlative and perennial surprise. The most curious thing is that the corpse does not preserve the skin. Not even the muscles. Not even the veins. Not even cartilage. Not even the bones. The corpse, baptized “Harriet”, is pure nerve. And it is in the most literal and full sense of the word. “Harriet” is the result of the surgical virguería of the late 19th century, the result of meticulous and pioneering work – it had so much of both that there were those who believed it impossible – prepared more than 130 years ago by the Dr. Rufus B. Weavera former professor of Hahnemann Medical Collegenow known as Drexel College. Maybe in the era of 3D printing Harriet’s vision is less moving than in 1900, when medical students observed her; but the effect revives when you know two things. One, that Harriet are the remains of a real person, a former employee of the center who died at the age of 35; two, that to give it shape Weaver had to arm himself with patience and separate, filament by filament, the entire nervous system. The process took five to six months. and it only failed in the intercostal area. This is your story. With the eye of an anatomist and the pulse of a seamstress By the late 1880s Dr. Weaver was a well-established and respected professional. He was almost 50, had made a name for himself by identifying and removing bodies from fallen soldiers at Gettysburg and had been working for some time as a professor of Anatomy at the Hahnemann Medical College. In mind, however, Weaver had a project that would allow him to gain fame in the United States and abroad: completing a total dissection of the cerebrospinal system. During his travels through Europe he had seen partial works, but none that showed a complete “x-ray”. Help for his task came, it is believed, from where he least expected: from Harriet Cole, a young African American who was dedicated to cleaning the anatomy laboratory. Although he was only 35 years old, Cole’s health was very delicate. He suffered tuberculosis and his forces were greatly undermined. Before he died in 1888, however, he decided to donate his body to science and offer Dr. Weaver the opportunity he was looking for for his ambitious nervous system project. Over the next six months, Professor Weaver, armed with patience, eyesight and a seamstress’s hand, set about extracting the entire cerebrospinal nervous system. It takes a look at the result to understand that the work was anything but simple. Only the base of the skull required two weeks of dedicationalmost half a month during which he cut the bones piece by piece to keep the dura mater intact and that the eyes remained attached to the optic nerves. With the help of a very fine needle he separated the cranial nerves, the spinal cord and its nerves. Then he used bandages, gauze and pads soaked in alcohol and applied white lead-based paint and shellac to preserve them. Extracting and preserving the intricate system of filaments that shaped Harriet Cole’s system was only part of the challenge. To shape the composition that still today, 13 decades later, continues to amaze Drexel medical students, he had to suspend the mass of fibers from a special board with thousands of pins. The result, named “Harriet” in a nod to the donor, was used by Weaver for his anatomy classes at Hahnemann Medical College; but his virguería soon transcended the walls of the laboratory and even the limits of Philadelphia. In 1839, about three years after the professor’s death, the board was presented and achieved distinction in the famous Word’s Columbian Exhibition. Since then, Harriet’s image has been reproduced in books, articles… Even today, more than 130 years later, the Legacy Center in Drexel University welcomes applications of teachers who want to use their images for their classes at universities or secondary schools. Who was Harriet? As time has passed, the focus has also been placed on Cole herself. Years ago precisely the Legacy Center decided to go beyond inherited history since the end of the 19th century and delve into the figure of the former Hahnemann cleaner. Specifically, he asked himself some questions: Did Harriet really exist? And if it was so, who was it? Why did he donate his body? Under what circumstances did you decide it? Did she know what Professor Weaver would use her corpse for? During their investigation they found many clues and circumstantial evidence, but no conclusive data. The Legacy Center located an 1870 census entry referring to an African-American woman named Harriet Cole who worked as a domestic servant and lived in Philadelphia, right in the same district where Hahnemann College was located; also a death certificate with his name signed in March 1888 and which attributes the cause of death to tuberculosis. What’s more, the center dedicated to medical study is designated as the “place of burial.” Does that mean that Harriet is the same person that, stripped of muscles, veins, bones and cartilage, we continue to see pinned at Drexel University? The institution recognizes that it is very difficult to know. The gaps in the center’s records between 1869 and 1900 make it difficult to go further. In any case, slip that it is not crazy think that Harriet Cole was a poor woman who, faced with the prospect of imminent death, decided to bequeath her … Read more

ChatGPT is already our first line doctor (although we don’t want to admit it)

ChatGPT has become one of the biggest attention grabbers in historyand now ChatGPT Health is going to take that further. Not competing with the GP, but yes occupying that space that we have filled with nightly Google searcheswith visits to forums where a stranger tells you that that mole does not have to worry you, or with the brother-in-law who knows a little about those topics. We’ve been delegating our fears to slightly ridiculous spaces for years, and now OpenAI is going to offer one that’s a little less ridiculous. The interesting thing is not that AI knows medicine. The LLMs They have been passing clinical exams for years and have resolved, better or worse, several doubts. The interesting thing is that we trust it more than real institutions or people. Two hundred and thirty million people asking ChatGPT about their health every week is a fact that says a lot about our psychology. We’d rather ask a chatbot than wait three weeks for an appointment or bother a friend at eleven at night. Everything before admitting out loud that that pain scares us. ChatGPT Health presents itself as a kind of “pocket doctor”, but it functions as a confessor. Because “should I worry about this?” It is never just a medical question. It’s existential. And the app never judges you, never gets tired, never makes you feel like you’re overreacting. He responds instantly, in a reassuring tone, citing studies that you will never read but that make you feel informed. Deep down, we know he can skate and invent things, but that doesn’t matter as much to us as gaining peace of mind for a while.and that feeling does manage to convey it. Even though There have been shady cases that have ended badly. OpenAI says this is not a replacement for the doctor. Of course not. But functionally it is already doing it. Not in a serious diagnosis, which is where we still go to the hospital, but in who decides when something is worth worrying about. Who immediately interprets those blood test numbers, or who tells us if we should change our diet or exercise routine. In the daily practice of managing a body, the doctor has become the second option, ChatGPT is now the first line. It may be uncomfortable, it may displease, but it is what is already happening. That is, in fact, the awkward twist: ChatGPT’s competition is not so much with doctors as with the emotional support network we used to have. We asked our mother, our partner, our friend who studied nursing. Now directly to ChatGPT. And with Health, this will go even further. Because it’s immediate, it’s fast, it doesn’t make you feel vulnerable and you can delete the conversation if the response starts to scare you. ChatGPT Health is the consolidation of the symptom of structural loneliness that we have not even consciously chosen. It’s just that annoying someone has become emotionally costly, while asking a machine that simulates empathy (sometimes Claude calls me ‘brother’) is fluid and simple. OpenAI did not invent this dynamic, it just came naturally when people made ChatGPT a habit and now he has optimized it to better monetize it. In Xataka | ChatGPT has been a tool. If you start remembering all our conversations, it’s going to be something else: a relationship. Featured image | Xataka

turning ChatGPT into a pocket doctor

More than 230 million people ask ChatGPT questions about health and wellness every week. It is not an estimate, it is data from OpenAI published alongside the announcement of ChatGPT Healthyour new personalized section for medical and wellness consultations. ChatGPT Health. ChatGPT Health was presented just a few hours ago as a new section within the app, designed to go beyond the specific queries that users already made. The goal is more ambitious: centralize health data and medical history in a single place, turning ChatGPT into something closer to a health monitoring platform than a simple conversational assistant. How it works. Currently available for “a small number of early adopters” in the United StatesGPT Salud will be integrated as another section within the app. It will allow you to make queries like any other GPT, with some key points: We can integrate it with Apple Health (and all your data on mental health, steps, weight, heart health, etc.) We can integrate it with wellness apps like MyFitnessPal It is specially developed to upload our clinical history and most recent tests In detail. In addition to these integrations, ChatGPT Salud is designed to function as a healthy habits assistant. It will also be integrated with apps like Peloton to suggest classes or guided meditations, apps related to creating recipes like Instacart, or Weight Watchers to guide nutrition in GLP-1 medication users against obesity and diabetes. Why is it important. OpenAI works closely with health experts in the development of its models. Still, ChatGPT has not been without controversy, especially in the mental health space, where the model generated various criticisms and forced response guidelines to be adjusted in recent updates. The launch of GPT Salud is not a rectification, it is a declaration of intent: AI not only does not turn back in the clinical field, but rather aspires to consolidate itself as a “pocket doctor”, always available, increasingly integrated and with a growing role in everyday decision-making related to health. Yes, but. AI-fueled psychotic breaks, demandsand people asking ChatGPT how can you inject botox to herself. OpenAI makes it clear that ChatGPT health is not coming to replace your GP, but use the app as if it were He is a regular. Fairly recent surveys show that 17% of the adult population uses chatbots at least once a month to search for information related to their health. Dependency and retention. ChatGPT is still, by far, the most used AI chatbot in the worlddespite the advance of alternatives such as Google Gemini, DeepSeek or Grok. But OpenAI cannot rest on its laurels, and a of the best ways to stop the drop in users What Gemini is causing you is dependency and retention. ChatGPT is still by far the most used AI chatbot in the worlddespite the push of alternatives such as Google Gemini, DeepSeek or Grok. But OpenAI cannot afford complacency. The growth of Gemini is having an impact on retention of user (with a significant drop in GPT) and, given this, health is a clear winner. They are not one-off queries, they are recurring. By including clinical information, ChatGPT stops being a question and answer chatbot, it becomes a medical agenda. The health app market continues to grow in users, and integrating them natively into ChatGPT retains the user even more Image | Pexels In Xataka | ChatGPT is writing medical and economic studies. We know this because he uses strange words

When in 1907 a doctor tried to demonstrate the existence of the soul using a scale

When We are going to bedthe brain Beast begins to work. It is when we review the day, We can think of great ideas that we do not point and ask ourselves questions of all kinds that We do not usually remember the next morning. Duncan Macdougall did remember what may be asked just before sleeping: How much does the human soul weigh? The concept of soul It is complicated, since there are those who see it as an intrinsic element to the body, but also something that fades “when we die. Macdougall, a doctor from Haverhill, Massachusetts, had to say “science is not done alone” and got to work to test a hypothesis. What hypothesis? That, if the soul exists and is inside the body, it must have a weight. His theory was that, if at the time of death the soul escapes our body, it could measure its weight. And he got to the work of the most handmade work possible. Also of the least scientific. Science is not done alone, you have to do it He is romantic, almost tender, now think about his reasoning. But he had all the logic of the world to respond to something so complex: at the time of death, there should be a detectable loss of weight because the soul abandons the body. As if the soul were the “pilot” who jumps from the plane before crashing. To test his theory, Macdougall built a fairly special scale: a bed mounted on a weight capable of detecting differences of up to five grams. His plan was not very ethical, but all for the sake of science and to try something so important: place dying patients on top of the scale and monitor weight changes just before and after death. It took his thing. Between 1901 and 1907, Macdougall conducted this experiment with six terminal patients. Four of them had tuberculous, one was diabetic and the other had no specified causes. They were chosen conscientiously and should be people who had conditions that depleted them mentally. They had to move as little as possible when they died so that the measurement was more precise. Macdougall was pending at all times of those final moments of the patients and, when he detected that one was about to die, he placed the bed on the scale and made the measurements. And the results soon arrived. According to the doctor, the first patient lost, exactly, 21,26 grams just after exhalation. It is the most famous case and the one that gave name to the experiment. The second patient also lost weight, but the amount was not recorded correctly. And with the other four … Things were even more complicated: the technical problems when registering the weight appeared for two other records, another showed a gradual loss (he died with his mouth open and Macdougall said it could be air) and another showed no changes. For any scientific eye, the success of the experiment would have been very questionable, but the doctor clung to those 21 grams of the first death to affirm that this was what weighed the soul. In fact, he did not stay at Anecdote: he published a study in the magazine American Medicine with the title “Hypothesis Concering Soul Substance Together With Experimental Evidence of the Existence of Such Substance”, although before it had already appeared in the New York Times. With animals, MacDougall went from thread Although MacDougall ‘chained’ that data, in his internal jurisdiction he should know that he needed another control group. If it had taken six years to weigh six dying, I could not “waste” more time, so he tried to try his theory with animals. There was some red flag in all this. The New York Times article published before the scientific article To begin with, Macdougall was convinced that humans had a soul, something that animals lacked. He had already observed “problems” when measuring the weight of the human soul, so everything that was a scale without measurement changes in the case of animals, he would take it as confirmation that, indeed, animals had no soul. The experiment was already conditioned and Macdougall ended up measuring the weight of a fortnight of dogs. The researcher wanted to use sick or dying dogs to prove his thesis, but did not find enough and There are those who point that, directly, poisoned healthy dogs. Scientific community with the lifted eyebrow The doctor’s results were not long in causing a stir and there was another doctor who considered the experiment a hoax. Augustus P. Clarke argument That everything was easily refatible from the medical point of view: when we are in that situation, the lungs stop cooling the blood, the body temperature increases and the skin sweats. And in the case of animals, as they do not have sweat glands, because they do not lose weight after death. Macdougall did not convince and starred in a ‘Beef’ in medical magazines for a few months. Over time, other scientists joined the MacDougall Experiment Discrediting process, being a clear case of rejection by the scientific community both for the methods and for the “fraud” when obtaining the results. Apart from randomness, One of the criticism is that six cases do not represent a reliable sample. In fact, in A subsequent investigation With sheep, lambs and rams, it was observed that, indeed, the weight varied after death, but they did not lose it: they won it. Specifically, from 18 to 780 grams that they won at the time of death, but that over time lost to recover the initial weight. However, it is undeniable that Duncan went down in history. Not for what I would have liked, be that person who showed that the human soul had a weightbut as an example of Selective informationhow to use a vague fact to affirm a preconceived idea. Also by that scientific spirit that, although poorly applied, tried to use evidence to measure something as … Read more

‘Doctor Strange 3’ is officially underway at Marvel

Good news for Doctor Strange 3. The fans of Marvel Cinematic Universe They just got a great reason to celebrate. And, after a few months of rumors, it is confirmed that Doctor Strange He will have a new solo adventure. A point that makes it clear that the Sorcerer Supreme will have a prominent participation in the future of the saga. Much more, that the magical world of the character is just beginning to be explored and that the upcoming film probably shows all its possibilities. Benedict Cumberbatch confirmed the above during an extensive interview with Variety. In the text, the star revealed that there are ongoing conversations between him and Marvel Studios about the immediate future of the character. Something that includes your participation— or not — in Avengers: Doomsday and secret war yes. For now and in light of the information, something seems certain. Stephen Strange will be part of a good part of the franchise’s immediate plans. What it means an indication of where the stories to come from The House of Ideas may be headed. According to the actor’s words, Strange is a figure of enormous importance when it comes to Marvel adventures. A twist that involves resuming the character’s story, after his last solo appearance in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness2022. In Sam Raimi’s film, the Sorcerer confronted Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen), but also discovered a worrying fact. In alternate realities, Strange is considered a threat. A point that could be explored in the future. A new world to explore for Marvel But in addition to starring, Benedict Cumberbatch revealed that Marvel Studios asked his opinion about who could direct and write the script for the third feature film in the subfranchise. From what is evident, the interpreter’s knowledge of the character, It will be crucial to shape the ongoing project. Much more, when everything seems to indicate that once again, he will have to face a cosmic threat that he must deal with through his special abilities. As you may remember, Strange’s latest film introduced to Clea(Charlize Theron), character’s wife in comics and current Sorcerer Supreme in the publishing world. For Benedict Cumberbatch, playing one of the most fascinating figures in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is quite a challenge. So you have multiple ideas of where you could go. In his words, Strange has hidden dimensions that still need to be explored. “He is a complex, contradictory and problematic human “He has these extraordinary abilities, so there are powerful things to play with.”commented the actor. What can we expect from ‘Doctor Strange 3’? For now, there are no concrete details regarding what story or under what aspect the next Doctor Strange movie could take place. The production is reportedly moving forward in terms of development. However, there are no answers about which characters will be part of the plot or If it will be connected to the upcoming films of the saga. For now, the only clear thing is that the film would be released from 2027after Avengers: Doomsday and perhaps also Secret Wars. Which indicates that Strange could also help kick off the franchise’s next film saga after the Multiverse Saga. That, after being a key character in the upcoming Multiversal War.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.