Convenience stores were an emblem of Japan. Until the demographic crisis has revealed the dark side of opening 24 hours

The stores japanese convenienceknown as konbini, are not simple shops where you buy fast food or basic products, they are a deep part of the social fabric of the country. Its success is measured not only in numbers (more than 55,000 establishments spread across the 47 prefectures) but in the way in which they accompany daily life: they allow you to pay bills, send packages, print documents, buy tickets for shows, resolve unforeseen events, take refuge in case of emergency or simply take a break in them. And now that the country doesn’t stop agingthe stores are mortally wounded. The konbini. Let’s think that, in urban neighborhoods, rural towns or isolated coastal areas, these establishments have become the minimum infrastructure indispensable where there used to be post offices, banks or small family businesses that have now disappeared. The store, therefore, is not just a business: it is a safe space, open and available 24 hours a day, an emotional and logistical support point that has shaped the Japanese daily rhythm and has captivated even to millions of touristswho find in these establishments a mix of efficiency, warmth and aesthetic thoroughness that is difficult to replicate. Efficiency and expansion. I remembered the new york times in summer that the development of the Japanese konbini has been the result of an evolution of decades. Since 7-Eleven opened your first store In Japan in 1974, the combination of non-stop hours, quality fresh food (onigiri, bentō, noodles, seasonal desserts) and integrated services made the model a unique phenomenon. For many residents, these stores are literally the closest store, the most accessible ATM, the place to go when something is missing or something happens. The associated image is one of precision: perfectly organized shelves, impeccable coffee machines, attentive employees, continually renewed food and a sense of total availability. From Japan to the world. This internal success was projected outwards, so that 7-Eleven, today Japanese owned, is the largest retail chain on the planet, and global expansion plans aim mainly to North America. The konbini became an exportable image of Japan: efficient, friendly, reliable. The hidden reverse. But not everything shined the same. one piece from the Financial Times has revealed that behind that facade of functional perfection A franchise system is under increasingly intense tensions. Japan agesthe active population is decreasing and small businesses are experiencing increasing difficulties to hire staff. The model requires stores open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and the pressure not to close falls squarely on the owners. He Akiko’s case and her husband, a 7-Eleven manager who worked without a day’s rest for six months until dying by suicide, starkly revealed the human price of this silent perfection. And more. It was not an isolated case: a labor inspection recognized the relationship between death and overwork, but the root of the problem is structural. Franchisees must deliver between 40% and 70% of gross profit to the parent company, which reduces their margin and exposes them to absorbing personnel, overtime and unforeseen charges. Visible efficiency therefore has an invisible cost. The crisis of the model. Faced with the problem, the chains 7-Eleven, FamilyMart and Lawson have tried make schedules more flexibleintroduce automatic checkouts, ordering systems assisted by AI and robots cleaning to reduce the need for labor. But none of these measures solve the main equation: fewer available workers and more opening hours supported by fewer people. Domestic consumption is also not growing as before, which limits the owners’ ability to increase payrolls. As minimum wages rise, margins narrow even more. many managers they work for free for dozens of hours to keep their stores open. Some they confess that, in the current state, closing would be a more rational option than continuing to operate. The fragility of the system thus becomes visible: if there are no new franchisees willing to take over, the model can collapse. Adaptation or goodbye. The response of the companies points towards a profound transformation of the model. 7-Eleven study contracts renewed from 2027, possibly moving towards the “mega-franchise” model, where the same owner manages multiple stores and distributes human resources between them. However, this implies a concentration of the business and could further displace the small independent owners who historically defined the konbini as a community space. The central question is whether the konbini will continue to be a connected capillary network to the territory or whether it will become a centralized corporate system, more profitable but less close. The great dilemma. If you will, the konbini was born as proximity symbol and frictionless service, and became part of emotional memory from Japan: open places when everything else is closed, spaces where the daily routine has a friendly pause. But that same ideal has been held for decades by people whose efforts they have become invisible beneath the surface of efficiency. Today, the system faces a limit that is not technological, but human. The future of the konbini will depend on whether Japan manages to rebalance the contract between the community, the company and those who keep the doors open at any time, 365 days a year. If it manages to adapt without sacrificing those who support it, it will continue to be an intimate and essential institution. If not, it could become the emblem of a society that knew how to take care of every detail… except for the people who made it possible. Image | Pexels, Japanexperterna, Shankar S. In Xataka | While half the planet aspires to retire, in Japan the opposite is true: 100-year-olds who only want to work In Xataka | The aging population and a poor pension system have a new symbol in Japan: grandmothers are rented

Openai and Microsoft’s convenience marriage touches its end. The divorce, surprisingly, is being friendly

Openai and Microsoft have reached a preliminary agreement in which the new terms of their business relationship are established. In it Official announcement It is made clear that the terms of the agreement still have to define themselves, but there is a clear thing: the idyll is finally ended. Why is it important. What began as a idyllic relationship It has ended up becoming almost a toxic relationship that was preventing both companies from looking for other paths. Between 2019 and 2023 Microsoft invested more than 13,000 million in OpenAiwhat according to The New York Times gave Microsoft about 49% of OpenAi’s future benefits. OpenAi getting rid of their chains. The firm led by Sam Altman has been trying to change its structure and get become a profit company (“For-Profit”). The agreement with Microsoft, who did not want to give up his privileges, was one of the obstacles, but this agreement seems to pave the way for that business transformation. The discord clause. The original agreement included a clause that He rescinded access from Microsoft to OpenAi’s most advanced models when it is I would decide that had reached the famous General Artificial Intelligence or AGI. This clause is still part of the new agreement but has been modified according to sources close to the process Possible outposive. The agreement could “unlock” Openai both in its passage to “for-profit” and for a potential outlet. Right now OpenAi cannot get money from the general public and the traditional investment market, But it would remain managed by the NGO. The startup also indicated that it would offer at least 100,000 million dollars to the non -profit organization that will continue to control Openai’s future once it is transition to its new format. Bret Taylor, company manager, affirmed that in this way the NGO would be “one of the philanthropic organizations with more resources in the world.” Sources close to the agreement indicate that this NGO would have an OpenAI participation that would exceed 20%. What both were looking for. The long commercial relationship has been beneficial for both parties, but market growth has caused one and another to seek ways to continue growing in the AI ​​market and this agreement blocked them largely. According to sources close to the aforementioned negotiations In axios: Microsoft wanted to continue having access to OpenAi’s technology and products, something logical considering that he reverts them Like your Copilot services. Openai wanted freedom to move forward with his restructuring plans and to reach agreements with other infrastructure providers, as has happened with Oracle this week. A friendly divorce. In recent times it has been seen how both OpenAi and Microsoft have been making movements that were clearly aimed at search for a plan B In the AI ​​race. That was causing a delicate situation that now seems to soften satisfactorily for both companies. In Xataka | The marriage between Openai and Microsoft is broken at times. The problem is that both are still needing

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.