The new aesthetic luxury of “liquid surgery” that promises what the Botox no longer sells

In the new economy of the “invisible luxury”, the object of desire no longer hangs from the arm: it melts with the skin. Instead of great transformations, the aspiration is that “it is not noticed.” A lifting without scars, a brightness that looks like a repair dream. In that league the newly baptized “liquid surgery” plays: four -digit facials that promise a Botox effect without needles or rigidity. A new trend. After the rejuvenated reappearance of Lindsay Lohan, a reporter from The Times He went to the most exclusive spa by Beverly Hills to test the “MBR Best and Ultimate Liquid Surgery”, a 995 -dollar protocol. The session includes cleaning, toning, hyaluronic acid masks and, above all, the application of a star serum: 1,784 pounds the 50 ml bottle, sold as “viper venom imitator” to achieve a “more subtle” botulin toxin effect. The journalist described a “striking” difference after applying the product in half face and collected that the usual clientele includes local elites and celebrities that repeat monthly and complement at home. The text itself points out that the term “liquid surgery” was coined by a German marketing department: there is no scalpel, but a high -cost cosmetic ritual with immediate results. The spa presents it as the “less invasive” route towards the good face effect that was previously associated with visible injectables. Aesthetic luxury changes the skin. The turn responds to a broader trend: undetectable results. As we have detailed in Xatakathe deep flat lifting – which repositions muscles and ligaments in block to avoid rigidity – has become the standard among star surgeons. The effects last between 10 and 15 years, but prices easily exceed six figures. Given this situation, Botox has lost part of the story. In a report for Women’s Health They have described as Jennifer Aniston He has recognized that he tried the injections, but abandoned them for considering them “ridiculous” in excess. Instead, combine facials, lasers and radiofrequency (Themage) with a healthy lifestyle. The narrative now relies on bioestimulators: polynucleotides derived from salmon DNA (PDRN) that promise cellular hydration and regeneration, or exosomes, small vesicles that act as regenerative “messengers”. He Glow discreet becomes symbolic capital. Towards combined protocols. The immediate future points to repeatable treatments, expensive and continuous maintenance, which mixes apparatus (laser, radiofrequency) and cosmetic biology (polynucleotides, exosomes). That is today the “toolbox” that celebrities present as an alternative to click or go through an operating room with public visibility. On the cusp, the elite scalpel continues to mark status; At the base, four -digit facials sell the “invisible effect” in cabin format. This is how the term coined as “liquid surgery” fits at that intersection. The problems that are coming. The boom of “liquid surgery” and other less invasive treatments drag shadows that should look straight ahead: from the regulatory vacuum to unequal aesthetic pressure. On the one hand, The Newbeauty Portal Document The case of Victoria Nelsona client that denounced burns and scars after a “high -power” peeling and microneedling years performed, allegedly, out of the legal reach of a aestheticist in California. Dermatologists consulted recalled that procedures such as medical peels, microneedling, lasers or injections should be carried out in clinical environments and under medical supervision. A peeling, they underlined, is not a ritual of beauty but a “controlled chemical burn” that, if it runs badly, can leave irreversible sequelae. The case illustrates a hole between marketing, licenses and security. On the other hand, in other types of treatments science does not support a promise. Polynucleotides –extracted from salmon DNA and increasingly present in elite clinics– They have biological base and even a previous medical use in wounds and burns. Side effects, when injected, are usually mild (bruises, swelling), but robust studies are missing that support their long -term benefits. It also happens with exosomes that it is still consolidating in the scientific field and with collagen supplements, where the benefits are modest or contradictory and many studies have been financed by the brands themselves. There is an even broader background. The aesthetic pressure is not limited to the cabin of a spa. The cultural narrative has oscillated from Body Positive to ultra -launching standardsamplified by Fashionable thinning drug and Digital filters that multiply impossible expectations. In this field, scrutiny is deeply unequal. They carry the demand to stay young and with a double penalty: both those who are operated and those who decide not to do so are criticized. Sarah Jessica Parker has been insulted for showing wrinkles, while Pamela Anderson was criticized for exhibiting her naturalness without makeup. Men, on the other hand, usually enjoy indulgence: names such as Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise or Bradley Cooper have starred in speculation about touch -ups, but rarely face the same public trial. Even the data shows the gap: As we have pointed out in XatakaLiftings in men grew by 26 % between 2022 and 2024, but the media account presented them as a simple “set -up”, not as an “aesthetic obsession.” The result: eternal youth remains a female demand and an optional option for them. An eternal youth with conditions. The snake venom facial in Beverly Hills is more than an aesthetic whim. Summarizes a global trend: displacement towards less invasive procedures, more expensive and with an aura of exclusivity. An eternal youth reserved for those who can pay it, while the rest of society consumes supplements, collagen powder and digital filters as substitutes. The question, however, is still open: are these advances a real scientific revolution or a marketing mirage? Maybe how did The Times the chronicler When leaving the spa, the eternal youth does exist, but it costs the same as thirty beers in an airport. And, above all, it is still a luxury with class, gender and power more visible gender than any wrinkle. Image | Freepik Xataka | Surgeons are facing a new challenge: patients who want to resemble their double created by AI

There are people asking Chatgpt how to inject Botox themselves

There are people injecting Botox and Hyaluronic acid themselves, in their homes. But there is not the thing. Some of them are asking chatgpt advice to know where to inject, how depth or what materials they should use. We have seen how there is people going to chatgpt instead of the doctor And there are even those who use them to Write medical studiesbut asking him how to fill his lips we didn’t see him come. What’s happening. They tell it in Futurism. In a Reddit community called DIYAESTHETICSusers share their experiences and exchange advice when carrying out medical-aesthetic procedures in their homes. There are a few who support Chatgpt to guide them. This user He used it to know if he should wear gloves while injected. In none of the 16 responses they shave the fact of having asked the AI. In fact, many other threads in this community mention similar things. In the case of This other userafter injecting herself she noticed that the cheek had deformed him and went to Chatgpt, who told him that perhaps a small amount of substance had migrated to that area, but that “it will surely dissolve.” This time there is A user that begs you not to use chatgpt for medical advice. And there is More examples. Doctor Chatgpt, what happens to me? We have already seen that more and more people are going to Chatgpt as if it were a psychologist And there is even chatbots that get through one. If it is happening with mental health, it is not surprising that it is also happening with physical health. There are even A study that affirms that chatgpt responded better for doubts than online care services with real doctors, although This other It concludes that it gives more than 30% wrong results. Anyway, There are more and more people who tell their symptoms to AI In search of a rapid diagnosis and, in many cases, cheaper than going to the doctor (the tendency to inject yourself at home is born precisely from this) AI and health. The irruption of AI has raised numerous ethical debates and that of its health use is one of them. However, there are countless examples in which AI is being a Very powerful tool in the health sector. Recently we have known that China has an AI that helps in the detection of pancreatic cancer. Has also helped Accelerate research in the resistance of some bacteria And there are companies dedicated to APPLICATION IN THE MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS. The AI ​​problem for everything. IA tools can be a great help and make ourselves more efficient, or we can end up using it to do something as risky as botox at home. There are studies that claim that Chatgpt is diminishing our intelligencea historical fear that has emerged with almost every new mass adoption technology. But the problem is not AI, it is How we use itand in areas such as health it is a particularly delicate issue. In summary: AI and health, yes. AI to get Botox at home, not better. Image | Gemini In Xataka | Artificial intelligences are close to overcoming doctors in the most difficult: understand patients

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.