The United States is creating “the iPhone of AI”. China is doing “the Android of AI”

There is an interesting paradox in the current development of AI that says more about geopolitics than about technology:

• USAtraditionally leader in proprietary software and monetization, is building closed models of AI.
• Chinahistorically more restrictive with the flow of information, it is leading the open source AI.

An investment that is not accidental: each block adopts the strategy that best serves its structural interests.

→ United States (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), is building the equivalent of the IPhone of the AI:

• Very sophisticated systems.
• Vertical integration.
• PUPLE POLIDED PREMIUM EXPERIENCES that justify charging for access.

The logic is clear: when you control the best GPUS, the main cloud services and you have the capital to train the most advanced models, monetizing that advantage through payment APIs makes immediate economic sense. It is the model that has holding American software for decades.

→ China, on the other hand, with Deepseek, Qwen and Minimax Mastering the rankings of open models, it is creating the Android of the AI:

• A free and modifiable ecosystem.
• Downloadable for local use without depending on payment APIS.
• Permissive licenses without business restrictions, Unlike Meta with Flame.
• Accessible source code for independent research and development.

As we said at the timethis approach is not due to altruism, nor by cultural difference. It is a strategy based on creating global dependence on a Stack Chinese technological when American becomes inaccessible. Or at least, to present it as a very attractive alternative even before seeing its results.

It is true that he calls is American and is also in the league of the greats being open source (With an asterisk of the size of Mestalla). A habitual hypothesis also seems feasible: that target was released precisely because it was behind. The classic defensive strategy to erode the advantage of leaders.

China does it from another position: growing strength. And in addition, having to deal with access restrictions to western markets. When your rival controls chips and cloud platforms, and can cut the tap at any time, the only way to create an alternative ecosystem is to make it so accessible that the world cannot ignore it.

Soft Power Technological: give today to dominate tomorrow. That, or cling to developing markets plus the gigantic domestic market. This is how Huawei stopped competing to build a parallel reality.

The numbers speak alone. According to the Benchmarks of artificial analysis (based in California, not in Shenzen), The three best open source models leave China. Each startup that Depseek uses instead of GPT, each country of the southern hemisphere that displays Chinese models because they are free, each university that trains over Qwen instead of Claude, is another node of the ecosystem that the United States cannot censor, regulate or disconnect unilaterally.

It is a story very similar to that of The slow but unstoppable Chinese independence of GPS: In two decades it is no longer that I do not need it, it is that Beidou has reached 140 countries.

It is also true that There are traps in both strategies:

• The American model generates immediate income but creates incentives for the rest of the world to look for alternatives, especially when commercial wars are intensified. Competence.
• The Chinese model conquers users but at some point it will need to monetize without frightening its base.

The latter is something that Google learned with Android for the bad ones: after conquering 70% of the world, it began to monetize it aggressively and ended up receiving huge fines in Europe, antitrust demands in the United States and Chinese alternatives … as Harmonyos de Huawei. The circle closes.

The lesson is that giving technology to create dependence works, but monetize that dependence once established attracts the attention that nobody wants: that of regulators. It is the dilemma that China will eventually face its “free” models of AI.

The real battle is not for today’s best, but to control the Intellectual infrastructure Tomorrow.

• The United States sells the premium service.
• China gives the universal operating system.

And the outcome will be that of two historically successful, but opposite philosophies: the American persistence by aggressively monetizing in front of Chinese patience to invest decades if necessary until it can lead. Immediate income against long -term dependence.

Time will say.

In Xataka | Four AI companies are monopolizing the intellectual future of humanity. They are not good news

Outstanding image | Ilgmyzin in UnspashAlibaba, Xataka