2,000 years ago someone screwed up in a foundry. Thanks to her we have discovered a Roman workshop hidden in Germany

When a piece of metal goes wrong, the normal thing in an artisan workshop is that it ends up being discarded. Well, something like this must have happened 2,000 years ago and that chance discovery of a lead ingot at an excavation in Rothaargebirgein the German region of Sauerland, has helped discover, understand and reconstruct how this metal was produced in the Roman Empire. The discovery. It all started with a large cast lead ingot, with a characteristic workmanship from the Roman imperial period, which found Brilon resident and metal prospector Peter Hoffman. Then he notified the authorities: the ingot was not a unit lost in transit, but a casting failure that was probably left there with the idea of ​​remelting it to use it, something that fortunately (for archaeology) never happened. With that clue, the archeology team of the Westphalia-Lippe Regional Association (LWL) The excavation campaign began in June on an elevation of the Rothaargebirge massif, near Brilon. What they found there confirmed his suspicions: There was a lead processing area from Roman times, something unique until now in southwest Westphalia. Why is it important. It may not be as spectacular as tombs or treasures, but this defective lead ingot serves to fill a gap in history: it is the first solid archaeological evidence that a metallurgical production chain existed in Sauerland, something that until now was not known. This is how he fills in a piece to better explain how the Roman economy worked. Furthermore, since ingots are direct products of mining and are marked with seals or engravings, they allow their distribution chain to be traced: the place of origin (the manufacturing workshop is close to the mine), their trade and distribution networks. In fact, there is a corpus which brings together some 2,250 Roman ingots documented from Scotland to Morocco and from Portugal to Israel. Context. As explains the Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochumlead was a metal widely used in Roman times for all kinds of things: pipes, weights, sling projectiles or sarcophagus linings… and sometimes it was linked to the extraction of silver, so it is common to find the production of both together. Precisely this relationship between lead and silver is essential to explain Brilon. According to the doctor in archeology of the LWL Manuel Zeilerrelatively small amounts of lead were found at the site, which suggests that the objective was to produce lead efficiently and not generate waste derived from silver exploitation, an important detail because in many ancient sites both activities go hand in hand. Previous works by LWL already indicated that in the area around Brilon there were deposits rich in mineral and that Roman metallurgists had visited the area with the interest of obtaining lead, but it was not clear how. In detail. The team, led by Sebastian Magnus Sonntag, documented that there were ceramic fragments of pre-Roman tradition and numerous small fragments of lead related to the process of obtaining the metal, in addition to a base built with carefully arranged stone slabs. Both these slabs and the clay soil beneath showed signs of fire and heat and in the gaps between stones there were remains of charcoal, still to be analyzed, but the team’s hypothesis points because that place was a roasting point: there the galena (the most common lead sulfide in the region) was heated along with charcoal to reduce its sulfur content and then melt the resulting metal and pour it into molds and obtain ingots like the one found. Yes, but. The excavation only lasted a couple of weeks and the conclusions are still preliminary, but there are some things that still do not add up: the ceramic fragments probably point to the beginning of the Roman imperial era, but it is a relative and not an absolute dating. The key will be in the dating of the vegetal carbon remains. But the big underlying question was who worked the metal there: whether they were Romans, Germans or local artisans in contact with Roman technology. In Xataka | “For 2,000 years they have been inaccessible. Finally we can read them”: archaeologists now know how to decipher the Herculaneum papyri In Xataka | The “Mud Rome” of Hispania loved board games and wine. We know it thanks to a mysterious site in Aragon Cover | LWL and Jebulon

It has been frozen for 30 years at 8,500 meters. Now a mission wants to finally solve who was the most famous corpse on Everest

If you like mountains and have ever gone (or fantasize about going) to Everest, surely the name of Green Boots sounds familiar: it is a reminder that climbing the highest mountain in the world is still a risky activity. The body of this mountaineer who died in the middle of the ascent was mummified at the entrance to a cave that you have to pass through when you climb the main ascent route from the Tibetan side. 30 years after his death, The Guardian echoes a leaked document where the rescue operation and repatriation of Green Boots to India is collected. In the rescue process it would also correct a mistake that has lasted three decades: the identity of the corpse would be cleared once and for all. The tragic story of Green Boots. “Green Boots” is the nickname of the mountaineer found in 1996 under a rocky outcropping at 8,500 meters above sea level, just 350 meters from the summit on the northeast route that ascends from the Tibetan side. The nickname has little originality: he was wearing boots of the same brand and model Koflach Arctis Expe phosphor green in color. His boots (and his body) were exposed and since it is in a transit area, it has become a macabre reference point to inform the base when they reach that position. Who really is Green Boots?. As for his identity, for almost 30 years it was assumed without official confirmation that It was Tsewang Paljoran Indian mountaineer who died in a severe snow storm known as the 1996 Everest disasterwhich killed 12 people. That tragedy inspired the book Into Thin Air. However, as reported by The Guardian, the document from the Indian rescue authorities identifies the body as Dorje Morupan Indian guard member of a Indo-Tibetan Border Police expedition who died in that same tragedy. The document ensures that this identification “has been confirmed through a prior verification process within the framework of a prior technical evaluation”, although without detailing what it consisted of. The recovery mission. The rescue bidding document asks companies to bid for the mission, which must have at least six Sherpas who have previous climbing experience. In addition, they must provide evidence of the mission and transport the body to Delhi before October. As explains Alan Arnettean American mountaineer and well-known blogger about Everest, lowering it is going to be “an arduous task” and estimates the operation at about $150,000. The monsoon rains also work against it. According to Sherpa Tshiring Jangbu details to The Guardianfounder of Everest Sherpa Expedition and with experience in this type of operations, with only a third of the oxygen available compared to that at sea level, activity above 8000 meters requires enormous effort and decision making can become more difficult. And that’s not to mention the load: a frozen body with mountain equipment can weigh up to 200 kilos. In addition, limbs frozen at angles impossible for descent sometimes mean they have to resort to amputation. A cemetery called Everest. Precisely because of the difficulty, danger and cost of the rescue operation, approximately 200 bodies still remain there on the slopes of Everest. As New Zealander Guy Cotter, who coordinated a similar rescue operation with his company Adventure Consultants in 1997, explains: “For families, recovering a body from the mountain gives them comfort, as long as it does not put other people at undue risk.” And according to their experience, there have been cases of recovery of bodies in which more people have died. Aware of the risk of their hobby, there are experienced climbers who wish that, if they die while climbing, their remains remain on the mountain, but are moved out of sight. Of course, families do not always think alike. In Xataka | Climbing Everest in person costs 50,000 euros. Uploading it in 4K from the sofa at home is now free In Xataka | There is something worse than Everest turning into a mountain literally full of shit: scam rescues Cover | Pavel Novak and Gemini with Koflach Arctis Expe

30 years ago we laughed at China and Japan for their obsession with sun protection. Now we’re following your path

If you travel to Qingdao or any other beach in China, you may come across bathers who, in addition to bikinis, sandals and glasses, look colorful ‘facekinis’. That’s how it was at least a few years ago (even in 2025), when this peculiar garment that covers the entire face to protect it from ultraviolet rays gained popularity in the middle of a heat wave. In Europe, the image of Chinese women with their heads in XL swim caps that only leave their eyes and mouth visible was interpreted as an eccentricityone more proof of the aversion of Asians to tan. On the beaches of Spain it may not be common see ‘facekinis’but an idea is beginning to sink in: cultural issues aside, Chinese, Japanese and Koreans may not have been wrong when they did everything possible to protect themselves from the sun. “It is very frowned upon”. The facekini It is its most obvious (and graphic) demonstration, but it connects with a much larger phenomenon: not everyone values ​​tanning in the same way. Vincent Coëffé, from the University of Angers, explained it a few years ago in an article published in The Conversation: The prospect of sporting a tan skin tone may sound great in California, but things are quite different if you talk to an Asian. “Light skin continues to be viewed favorably in Asian cultures (China, India, Japan, Korea…), to the point that exposing the body to the sun is perceived as a subversive act,” comment coffee, geographer and tourism expert. “In China, tanning is very frowned upon, especially if it alters the female body, particularly influenced by the ideal of ‘milky’ skin.” Tanning is becoming globalized and it is increasingly easier to find Asians sunbathing both abroad and on the beaches of their countries, but there is still an important cultural gap with respect to the West. Why the hell do they do it? These differences in sun exposure explain why for decades, in countries like Spain, we have seen with a mixture of fascination and incomprehension Asian tourists walking down the street in the middle of summer, fleeing the ultraviolet rays like the plague. It caught our attention that, in addition to caps and sunglasses, they wore gloveslong-sleeved t-shirts, arm warmers, sun-protective clothing and umbrellas. “Why does everyone use umbrellas on the streets of Japan? Is it very hot? Do they protect themselves from the sun or is it extremely hot?” I asked intrigued a traveler in August 2025 in the ‘Backpackers in Japan’ Facebook community. The person writing this had the opportunity to travel to Cairo a couple of years ago and one of the details that most caught his attention, in addition to the monuments of Ancient Egypt, was seeing Korean tourists with very white skin walking around with umbrellas and long dresses that covered their arms and legs. Nothing to do with us Spaniards who walked under the sun in shorts and t-shirts. Lesson in humility. In Benidorm, Malaga, Barcelona or any other beach destination in Spain it is still very difficult to meet someone with their face covered by a ‘facekini’, but it is just as undeniable that something is changing. It is less difficult to find people who opt for long sleeves and sun protection pants (even muffs) in the hottest moments and, above all, no one is surprised anymore when they come across people who cover themselves with umbrellas. We told you recently: it is increasingly common to see Spaniards walking at five or six in the afternoon in July umbrella in hand. Also parents who, before going to the beach or the river, dress their young children in sun protection shirts. Umbrellas, t-shirts and more. Umbrellas may be the clearest demonstration that we are changing our way of relating to the sun, but it is certainly not the only nor the most important one. A quick search in the newspaper library arrives to find interviews with experts determined to debunk hoaxes and who warn of the risks of sunbathing without protection, the threat of melanomas, burns… They speak because there is an underlying problem, but the fact that they do so also demonstrates a growing sensitivity. It’s not about changing our cultural perception of tanned bodies, but that the message of experts is getting through who warn that, when 20, 30 or 40 years ago we looked strangely at Asians who protected themselves from the sun at all costs, we were the eccentrics. What is ‘strange’ is not walking around with an umbrella and protective clothing on a July day at five in the afternoon. The ‘strange’ thing is deliberately punishing our body, with all the risks that entails. “The Sun is an electromagnetic radiation that, when it reaches our skin, will produce mutations in our nucleic acid, and these mutations can initially be canceled by our body,” already warned in 2016 Dr. Julián Conejo Mir, Honorary President of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. “Any person who goes to the beach every day develops skin cancer, but our defensive system, if it works, cancels it out.” Great, right? Half. We may no longer be surprised to see someone using an umbrella on a sunny August afternoon, but that does not mean that we have internalized what it means to sunbathe irresponsibly. What’s more, we even run the risk of trusting us and think that protective clothing or umbrellas are infallible tools to keep us safe from melanoma. It is clearly demonstrated by a recent study from Nivea Sun that leaves two percentages that invite reflection: 85% of Spaniards admit to being worried about the effects of the sun on their skin, but nevertheless a large majority (67%) also admit that they do not regularly use sunscreen. Another clear example is in the networks. Thanks to them, doctors can warn of the risks of lying for hours and hours in the sun without protection, but X, Instagram or TikTok also serve as a loudspeaker for people who … Read more

“We’ve been building infrastructure for humans for 20 years, maybe we have 20 months to rebuild it for agents”

Companies have embraced the agentic AI boom, to the point that some They are drowning in so many AI agents. Employees are creating uncontrolled agents, triggering token consumption and causing many of those agents to duplicate tasks. But the real underlying problem is something else: the infrastructure on which all this is running is not prepared to support it. Meta’s warning. They tell it in Venture Beat. During the VB Transform 2026 talk, Meta’s vice president of engineering Barak Yagour gave a very powerful figure: queries from agents reaching the Meta system have multiplied by 30 in the last six months. “What happens to the infrastructure we’ve built over years when agents, not humans, become its primary consumers?” Yagour asked the audience. The answer is even more worrying: “We have spent 20 years building infrastructure for humans. Maybe we have 20 months to rebuild everything for a world where humans and agents co-create at scale.” And he adds that “The opportunity is open, but it will not last long.” lthe three problems. The emergence of the agents threatens to break the infrastructure on three fronts: Ability: Until recently, to plan how much computing power, storage or bandwidth was needed to carry out a project, it was enough to count the number of employees working on it. Yagour explains it very graphically: “Now, an engineer generates 10 agents, and each one generates sub-agents. An organization of 1,000 people can generate the load of 100,000 users practically overnight.” Identity: Access control systems are not designed for an AI agent. It is not human, but it moves around the infrastructure and makes decisions on its own. Speed: The third problem is the speed at which the agents move. They can write code faster than any human, but “that code still needs to be compiled, tested, deployed and monitored.” Deep changes. Yagour mentions that reasoning models are changing the way the data layer is processed. Detecting matches from keywords is not the same as reasoning about someone’s intention; That requires a complete history of behavior, not a summary. This requires making changes to how that data is processed and stored. Meta is moving from batch processing, which can take up to 24 hours to update, to real-time processing as it is key when the model is reasoning about what a user wants at that very moment. On the other hand, they are moving from an opaque storage to one that understands its own content, so that it only reads what it needs in each query and thus lightens the load on the GPUs. Setting limits. According to Yagour “Autonomy without governance is nothing more than chaos”, which is why Meta’s solution is to create what they call “trusted data environments.” Here, agents can move freely “but every result is traced back to its source and carefully vetted. This way you can always be sure that the data shared is trusted and controlled.” It is a way of giving freedom to the agents, but in a controlled way and without exposing themselves to the risk of ending up messing up. Image | Xataka with Magnific In Xataka | AI agents can destroy jobs. Or they can also save a century-old cheese factory from bankruptcy

Junior salaries have been in free fall for years. New study suggests the impact of AI is not so obvious

We have been seeing headlines for a couple of years about the destruction that AI is doing to employment junior. And the usual reply: no, it’s an excuse, that companies cut when rates rise and AI is only a convenient justification. Both readings are partly right. That’s just the problem. The study. The Stanford Digital Economy Lab has been analyzing actual payrolls. Not surveys or estimates: payrolls. Published a study at the end of 2025 but keeps updated dashboard with much more recent data. The result. Employment of those aged 22 to 25 in professions highly exposed to AI has fallen since the end of 2022, just when ChatGPT arrived, and lately at a rate of 4% annually. In those over 30, in those same professions, it increases. Coinbase charged 14% of its workforce citing AI as the cause. Salesforce stopped hiring juniors last year. The nuance. The same study adds a very interesting nuance: the effect does not appear when the AI ​​helps someone do their job, but when it does it for them. Write code, answer ticketswrite a first draft: that’s where hiring goes down. Review, verify, support a decision: it remains there. It does not replace human work in general. It replaces the boring job you start with when you are a youngster. It’s time to stop and agree with those who disagree.. In 2001, relocation to India was blamed for a slowdown that actually came from interest rates: when rates fell, hiring returned, and the debate about India remained unresolved. The OECD points in the same direction in your report this month: Unemployment among young graduates was already rising before ChatGPT existed. Coexistence? The two things may coexist. But even if only part of the fall is done by the AI, that part attacks the step that no one else can replace. The intern who answers wrong tickets for six months or do well needing help you’re not wasting your time: you’re learning to fail cheaply in a controlled environment. Removing that step doesn’t fire anyone today. In ten years there will be a lack of people senior and no one will be able to explain why, because by then they will have forgotten that the bottom step disappeared long ago. Featured image | Xataka In Xataka | Spanish companies systematically hide their salary in job offers: there are notable exceptions

We’ve been hearing for years that adults don’t have to drink milk. The latest studies say the opposite.

For decades, milk was the undisputed pillar of any healthy breakfast. However, in recent years we have witnessed a real demonization of dairy products and we have heard practically everything, from being “unnatural” for adults, to being the culprit of increased cholesterol or even the risk of cancer. But we are faced with several myths that are important to deny. We are designed for it. One of the most repeated arguments is that we are the only mammal that consumes milk in its adult stage. The experts they explain that, although a part of the world’s population loses the ability to digest lactose after childhood, many others maintain this enzyme active throughout life thanks to a genetic adaptation. Therefore, there is no basis to recommend that all adults stop drinking milk because of this enzyme. Here science is quite clear, since a population study made in Galicia with 850 people showed that, although the alteration of lactose metabolism affects 38% of individuals, when normal physiological quantities are consumed such as a simple glass of milk or yogurt, symptomatic intolerance plummets to 2% for milk and 8% for yogurt. Mortality. Another of the most widespread myths is precisely that dairy consumption in adults increases the risk of mortality and cardiovascular diseases, but science says the opposite. Here, one monumental umbrella review of 2021 pointed out that the evidence does not support that milk is harmful and in fact, in most scenarios its impact is neutral, and in several it is clearly favorable. But if we want to sharpen our aim, a 2026 dose-response meta-analysis, based on 29 cohorts and more than 1.6 million participants, has drawn the exact curve of how dairy interacts with our life expectancy. The researchers found a “U”-shaped association, seeing that the optimal point of consumption is located between 250 and 300 grams a day. Cancer. The alleged relationship between dairy products and cancer is another of the great battlehorses on the internet. However, the most recent reviews they point in another direction, since it has been seen that dairy consumption reduces the risk of suffering from colorectal, bladder, liver, oral cavity and even ovarian and breast cancer. The calcium dilemma. With the rise of plant-based diets, it is common to hear that “spinach or oat drinks have as much or more calcium than milk.” This is where a crucial scientific concept that the nutrition label doesn’t cover comes in, which is bioavailability and the food matrix. We see this in a study published in 2024 that measured exactly how much calcium our body actually assimilates, and was seen that with the consumption of dairy products there was a bioaccessibility of between 19 and 34%, while the vegetable alternatives were 5 and 20%. And this is explained because the joint presence of lactose and casein peptides in milk acts as a “vehicle” that favors the absorption of calcium in our intestine. But in addition, many vegetables rich in calcium are loaded with phytates and oxalates, compounds that “sequester” calcium and prevent us from absorbing it. Your proteins. From a protein point of view, dairy products play in a higher league. If we use the DIAAS index, dairy proteins get scores higher than 1and this means that they provide an excellent amount of highly digestible essential amino acids, far surpassing most plant proteins. Images | Pixabay In Xataka | One in every ten liters of “milk” sold in Spain does not come from any animal: the unstoppable (and silent) growth of vegetable drinks

More than 2,000 years ago they were already used in Greece

Where Arta is today, in Ancient Greece there was a prosperous polis called Ambracia. The city, located in the northwest of the country, lived its golden age when Pyrrhus made it the capital of the Kingdom of Epirus: it had palaces, theaters and temples… but today almost nothing remains. The Romans besieged it and in that episode it appears one of the oldest and best documented cases of the use of a toxic gas as a weapon in military history. Smoke as toxic gas. Here there are no newly excavated sites that reveal this use, but it is a quote from a work of the time that has revealed the existence of chemical weapons: the Greek historian Polybius in his work ‘Histories’, book 21, chapter 28. There he narrates how during the Roman siege, the defenders of Ambracia responded to the invaders’ attempts to save their walls by digging underground tunnels with an idea that generated one of the most toxic gases. primitive for humanity: the smoke of fire. Thus, they strategically placed a clay vessel with an iron funnel filled with fine feathers, lit a fire next to the mouth of the vessel and covered it with a perforated iron cover, channeling the exhaust gas into the tunnel dug by the attackers. With a bellows, they blew hard to fan the flames and intoxicate those Romans who came through the gallery. Context. It was the year 189 BC when, during Rome’s war against the Aetolian League, the city of Ambracia was besieged following the orders of the Roman consul Marcus Fulvius Nobilior. The Ambracians and their walls resisted the siege, so the Romans resorted to a common technique to attack them: digging underground galleries to either damage the foundations or penetrate them from underneath. What happened next. Polybius himself narrates that the legionaries were trapped in a very distressing situation: the smoke was unbearable and there was no way to stop it (they had placed spears). This ingenious device accomplished its mission, forcing the Roman consul and the Aetolian commanders to sit down to negotiate and delay the outcome. Despite her ingenuity and resilience, Ambracia fell into decline: surrendered to Marco Fulvio Nobilior and suffered some looting. Later, it was thoroughly plundered by Aemilius Paulus in 167 BC and finally its population was reduced to a minimum when Augustus forcibly moved its inhabitants to the neighboring Nicopolis, founded after the Roman victory in Actium. By the 2nd century AD, the traveler and historian Pausanias he only found a grassy place. In detail. What Polybius defines in essence is an irritating smoke generator: the combustion of feathers in a closed container causes dense and harmful smoke that, concentrated in a closed area with poor ventilation, can cause suffocation and become lethal. No more is needed. Although seen in perspective the Ambracians used the toxic effects of smoke as a weapon, warns historian Adrienne Mayor that these ancient practices were not understood in their time under the category of chemical weapons, but rather as another resource of warlike ingenuity against a superior enemy. In Xataka | 80 years ago an American destroyer attacked what it believed to be an enemy submarine. We just discovered it was a sunken ship In Xataka | The Vikings already had their “Inditex”: a colossal textile factory from a thousand years ago with its own Amancio Ortega Cover | Hush Naidoo Jade Photography and Constantinos Kollias

Jensen Huang returns to Japan to acknowledge his debt to Sega 30 years later

With a market capitalization more than 5 billion dollarstoday Nvidia It is the most valuable company of the world, but it goes without saying that it was not always like this. In fact, and as happens in the best houses, the beginnings are difficult and if not tell Microsoft. Nvidia was also on the edge of the precipice just a couple of years after starting its journey, but it had a sort of “savior angel” who He gave them oxygen for six months: Sega. They say that being born well means being grateful and Jensen Huang traveled to Japan this week and there, in a meeting with fans to celebrate 30 years of collaboration between both companies,, He dedicated some kind words of thanks to Irimajiri Shōichirō, the former president of Sega and his savior. In addition, Huang thanked Yu Suzukicreator of Virtua Fighter, for his pioneering work in 3D as a fundamental basis for the later development of PC graphics. What happened in 1995. “In 1995, Nvidia was on the brink of bankruptcy. We had chosen the wrong technology and here we are today, the largest company in the world” Huang said. at this week’s event. At that time Nvidia had launched its first chip, the NV1. This processor’s rendering was based on curved surfaces instead of triangles. Good idea, bad timing: the all-powerful Microsoft made the triangle-based method the industry standard for PC graphics with DirectX. The NV1 fell into irrelevance. In fact, Nvidia had another order from Sega to develop its next chip for its Dreamcast console, but finally the order was canceled and instead it opted for NEC’s PowerVR chip, as reported by TechSpot. Sega’s decision. Nvidia had money left to survive 30 days, according to Tom’s Hardware. So Jensen Huang traveled to Japan with a kamikaze idea: he asked Sega to convert the pending payment into an equity investment. And he was honest: he admitted that if they invested that money in Nvidia, they would probably lose it, but if they didn’t, they would go bankrupt and have no chance. Irimajiri, who I had appreciation for that young foundersupported him and convinced the board of directors to contribute those 5 million dollars of the time And so Huang has recognized it 30 years later: “If it weren’t for what Sega did for NVIDIA, NVIDIA wouldn’t be here.” What happened next. With that money, Nvidia had half a year of margin to redirect its future and boy did it get it right: it built the RIVA 128, a triangular chip that was launched in 1997 and sold a million units in four months. Shortly after, another success would arrive, the GeForce 256 GPU. Nvidia went public in 1999 and Sega sold its shares shortly after for 15 million dollars, tripling his investment. At the time it seemed like a reasonable decision, but with hindsight things change. According to VGCciting Huang’s previous statements from a few months ago: “If I had kept that $5 million investment, today it would probably be worth close to a billion dollars because the moment we went public, they sold it (at that time Nvidia was worth $300 million). In Xataka | Jensen Huang enters the Samsung salary controversy: “Workers should earn as much as possible” In Xataka | NVIDIA was founded by three engineers, but only Jensen Huang remains CEO: “I wish I had kept some shares” Cover | Retro Sega and NVIDIA

the one that places Ulysses on the islet of Perejil for seven years

What if Ulysses was trapped on a Spanish islet? Yes, that Ulysses, the Homeric one, the same one who managed to stop the Greek army, who defeated Polyphemus with lies and avoided the misfortune of being drowned by siren songs. Discussion issue For decades, the thesis that it proposes is Victor Berard. In 1902 he published ‘Les Phéniciens et l’Odyssée‘ and in it he emphasizes that the Odyssey is not a story, it is a geographical document, a poetic painting but faithful to a concrete reality. And the key to everything is that triangular islet of 15,000 square meters, without drinking water, without inhabitants, 200 meters from the Moroccan coast. That is the island of Perejil today, remembered by many because in 2002 it was the protagonist of an armed incident between Spain and Morocco that was resolved on July 20, after an eviction by Spanish troops of the Moroccan gendarmes that had occupied it. Every little there is noise around the boulderso there will be some magic in there. Was Ulysses imprisoned there? One hundred years earlier, a French professor and the rector of the University of Salamanca agreed that Ulysses was kept locked up there and, in fact, that the name of Spain was born from there. This is big and I want to explain it well. Bérard baptized his method “topology”: under each Greek name he looked for the Semitic original, because the Hellenes, arriving later, translated the Phoenician toponym without completely erasing it. Applied to Calypso, for example, the method gives this: Ogygiathe island where the nymph holds Ulysses for seven years, is Parsley. The Odyssey cave fits with the royal cave—entrance 20 meters high by seven or eight meters wide, two interior rooms. And the nymph’s name comes from “kalypto”, which is to hide in Greek. Hiding Island. From there, Bérard maintains, comes “I-spania“. And from there Spain. From thesis to literature. Eduardo Gómez de Baquero, known as Adrenio after the character of Baltasar Gracián, was a furious columnist in magazines of the time, with thousands of columns. He summarized the discovery of the thesis in the Cartagena newspaper ‘The Era‘, on June 10, 1902. Seventeen days later, Miguel de Unamuno signed in the magazine ‘Around the World’ your own article“Spain-Parsley and the Island of Calypso”, published on June 27, 1902 (its reissue can be found, volume VI). The great of the Generation of ’98, philosopher and total writer, puts the tie to the thesis, celebrating Bérard’s ingenuityand sneaks in an anecdote from his Greek teacher Lázaro Bardón about the Guadix River (Semitic + Arab + Spanish. From Arabic wadia word that is usually used interchangeably for both valley and river). He only has one but: he prefers Basque. According to him, Spain comes from “ezpaña”, lip, due to the shape of the peninsula on the map of Europe. And accept the rest. On July 25, 2002, five days after the Perejil crisis was resolved, El País took the opportunity to republish the article by Unamuno. It is curious because serious philology had barely documented it. Already in 1904, reviews of Bérard’s book in the ‘Revue des Études Anciennes’ and the ‘Revue des Études Grecques’ separated the wheat from the chaff. The principle of topology seems unquestionable to them: yes, human settlements follow laws that derive from their environment. It’s just that in the application to this specific case, not so much. Georges Radet said that admiration that prohibits criticism is not worth much. Ogygia, that nonsense in question. The location of Ogygia remains one of the most disputed questions of the Odyssey. A study by the University of Malta counts at least twelve candidate islands throughout history, from Ozoni (Greece) to Corfu. It is that island that exists everywhere and at the same time nowhere, the prison for the daughter of Atlas that also served to trap Ulysses. And here, the investigation placed Bérard and, later, the author LG Pocock as the responsible for identifying Ogigia with Parsley. The dominant candidate since Antiquity is another: Gozo, in the Maltese archipelago, already proposed by Evémerus in the 4th century BC and by Callimachus in the 3rd BC Strabo and Plutarch, meanwhile, placed Ogygia directly in the Atlantic Ocean. A recent volume from the École française d’Athènes closes the historiographic debate: Bérard’s theory has no support in the literary tradition and no one took it up afterwards; Its value today is to serve as a counterweight to the “Greek miracle” and to an ahistorical reading of Homer—especially from the more nationalist German prism. Explain where Spain comes from. The good thing is that that thesis may well help us identify another name. The origin of “Spain” is documented. The thesaurus of historical toponymy of the Ministry of Culture places the consensus on a Semitic root – Ugaritic, Phoenician or Hebrew – from the second millennium BC, although it disputes the meaning. The most popular version, that of Samuel Bochart in 1646, is “land of rabbits”: it is based on Catullus, who calls the peninsula “cuniculous.” Others read “northern coast” or “metal coast.” And a nuance that Bérard ignores is that the Phoenician word “is-pan-ya” never appears in any registration. So it is pure linguistic reconstruction. From Bacchus (Bacchanal theory), from the god Pan… Iberia is the town of the Iber River and Hispania is many more things: the Phoenician theory says that Hispania was the nomenclature adopted by the Romans. Isidore of Seville focused more on native origin. The founder, Hispalo, son of Hercules, was the one who coined it by accident, when moving Hispalia to Hispania. And, thus, the beautiful Hispalis and current Seville would have given its name to our entire great nation. It is impossible to clarify completely. The islet remains. 74 meters high, rock and bushes and a cave capable of housing 200 men according to the Mediterranean route of the time. And parsley, of course, the plant that gives it its name in Spanish, which according to the Odyssey itself … Read more

The sea in Benidorm has warmed three degrees in just five years. The data is scary, but science has an explanation

The waters of the Mediterranean have been undergoing drastic changes in temperature in recent years and the coast of Alicante has become “ground zero” for this phenomenon. Here a recent report indicates that the sea temperature on the coast of Benidorm has experienced a rise of 3 °C in the last five yearsand although it may end up scary, it has an explanation. The temperature difference. The thermal jump detected in Benidorm is real and, if we look at the records of the Valencian coast, at the beginning of July 2024 the sea surface temperature was around 24 °C. But now in July 2026, the thermometers read between 26 and 28 °C. That is, an anomaly of up to 4 degrees in just a couple of years in specific areas. However, in climatology a background trend is not the same as an extreme event, and we are clear that the rise of 3 °C in five years reflects a marine heat wave, an extreme peak of the situation. As expected. If we look at the full movie, the data from the Copernicus Marine Service confirm that the long-term warming rate of the Mediterranean is 0.4 °C per decade. This means that the “base” temperature should have risen by about 0.12 °C in the last five years, and not 3 °C, so what is happening off the coast of Benidorm is a radical anomalous event fueled by the lack of winds, the anticyclone and high sunshine. We continue to increase. The fact that it is a peak that can end up being recovered and not the base trend does not mean that we should breathe easy, since marine heat waves are like fever: a symptom that the patient is going through a difficult time, and the Mediterranean is the reality that is not going through its best moment. The data of SOCIB in its 2025 report They pointed out that the year was the second warmest year since 1982, with an average sea surface temperature of 21.1 ºC, only surpassed by 2024. But the most revealing data comes from the CLIVAR-Spain program of the AEMET and the IEO-CSIC when they point out that The waters surrounding Spain are warming at a rapid rate between 60% and 200% higher than the global average. The Mediterranean bears the brunt, warming up to three times faster than the average world ocean. The transition. This summer of 2026 is being especially hard, since at the end of June, the AEMET recorded that the Mediterranean reached 26.63 °C on average, being 2.6 °C above normal. And if we go outside the average, in the western basin, the Copernicus satellites have managed to capture astonishing peaks of up to +8 °C above the historical averages (1991-2020) in very localized areas. The importance for Benidorm. A sea at 28°C alters ecosystems, endangers Posidonia meadows, attracts invasive species and, from a meteorological point of view, acts like a can of gasoline. Such a hot sea does not cool the night atmosphere on the coast, aggravating the torrid nights, and accumulates an immense amount of energy that, when colliding with the first gusts of cold air in September, can trigger more violent damage and torrential rains. Images | Emilio Sanchez Hernandez In Xataka | Sea temperature continues to rise and experts are clear: “It is partly favored by the start of a new El Niño phenomenon”

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.