All viewers believe that the trailers spoil the movies too much. But there is a reason: fear of lawsuits

The paradox of trailers: they serve to encourage the public to see upcoming releases, but more and more people decide to literally cover their eyes or start talking to their neighbor, because the feeling that the trailers reveal too much is widespread: plot twists, climatic scenes that should be a surprise. There is a more or less intuitive reason: the market is increasingly competitive and it is important to show the public what each film offers that the others do not. But there are more prosaic reasons why trailers reveal more and more about movies. The trailer as a marketing tool.For decades, trailers were considered pieces with their own narrative: small works that condensed the spirit of a film, not mere advertisements. That premise was shaken in December 2022, when a court ruling questioned the legal limits of film marketing. The case pitted Universal Pictures against two viewers who claimed to have been misled by the ‘Yesterday’ trailer. The ‘Yesterday’ case.Two viewers had rented the film after seeing the trailer, in which Ana de Armas appeared in an apparently relevant role; but in the film he had disappeared: his character had been completely eliminated after test screenings. The plaintiffs alleged that they would never have paid for the film if they had known that de Armas was not in it. In Xataka The AI ​​trailers for ‘Avengers: Doomsday’ are indistinguishable from the real thing. In the end, Scorsese was right Universal Pictures requested the case be dismissed, arguing that the trailer conveyed the film’s theme in three minutes, but the judge rejected this line of defense. Although trailers involve creativity and editorial decisions, these elements do not nullify their fundamentally commercial nature: they must be treated as advertisements, and the sample they show of the film must correspond to the final product. The judge specified that his resolution was limited to the presence or absence of interpreters, excluding subjective assessments of tone, quality or generic expectations, but set a precedent. It’s not the first. The friction between what the trailers promise and what the movies deliver has generated some attempted litigation. None went so far as to establish firm jurisprudence, but all illustrate a recurring tension between public expectations and studio marketing practices. {“videoId”:”x88pexn”,”autoplay”:false,”title”:”Yesterday Trailer”, “tag”:””, “duration”:”180″} Drive (2011).a spectator sued the distributor claiming that the trailer presented the film as an action film in the style of ‘Fast & Furious’, when in reality it was an atmospheric drama with few chases and a practically mute protagonist. The case dragged on for years without success for the plaintiff: the film did contain driving scenes, but the discrepancy lay in the tone and pacing, not in objective matters. Suicide Squad (2016).The trailers had highlighted Jared Leto as Joker, but his presence in the final cut turned out to be less than fifteen minutes. a scottish fan announced his intention to sue Warner Bros. for false advertising. Leto himself fueled the controversy by confirming that the deleted material It was so extensive. what would make for an independent film. The lawsuit was unsuccessful, but it highlighted the problem of trailers edited before final editing. Dune (2021).Zendaya featured prominently in promotional material: posters, trailers, and a press tour placed her on the same level as Timothée Chalamet. However, his screen time barely exceeded seven minutes of a total footage of 155and most of his appearances were dream sequences. There were no legal repercussions: Zendaya had previously warned that her presence was reduced and that she had only filmed for four days. {“videoId”:”x88q6ut”,”autoplay”:true,”title”:”Dune Trailer”, “tag”:””, “duration”:”208″} The Castaway case.Robert Zemeckis, with his usual ability to anticipate the rest of the industry, had already traveled this path years before. The trailer for ‘Castaway’ (2000) was criticized at the time because it revealed the eventual rescue of the protagonist. Zemeckis defended himself with an argument that is still valid in the industry, beyond the current legal precautions: market studies indicate that the public wants to know exactly what they are going to see before paying for a ticket. The problem of outsourcing.Trailer production rarely falls to the films’ creative teams. Studios hire specialized agencies (Buddha Jones, Trailer Park or Mark Woolen & Associates, only in Los Angeles) that work with raw material, often months before there is a final assembly. These agencies operate fromdailieseitherrushesthe raw footage that comes directly from filming. The process of creating a trailer can take up to a year, a calendar that forces you to work without knowing the final cut. The case of ‘Yesterday’ is a direct consequence of this dynamic. In Xataka Good series are a journey that no spoiler can ruin The pressure for difference.When a franchise accumulates multiple installments, marketing teams face an additional dilemma: how to convince the public that this film offers something different from the previous ones? The answer often involves revealing the differentiating element. The trailer for ‘Terminator: Genesis’ (2015) told that John Connor, traditionally the leader of the human resistance, had been turned into a machine, a twist that constituted the dramatic core of the film. Director Alan Taylor acknowledged that the decision responded to a complex calculation: how to signal to the public that this installment was not a mere repetition of the previous ones? A dilemma that promises to continue giving us headaches for a long time. In Xataka | Disney is looking for a successor to Bob Iger as CEO and has only one condition: that he does not look like Bob Iger’s previous successor as CEO (function() { window._JS_MODULES = window._JS_MODULES || {}; var headElement = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)(0); if (_JS_MODULES.instagram) { var instagramScript = document.createElement(‘script’); instagramScript.src=”https://platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js”; instagramScript.async = true; instagramScript.defer = true; headElement.appendChild(instagramScript); – The news All viewers believe that the trailers spoil the movies too much. But there is a reason: fear of lawsuits was originally published in Xataka by John Tones .

This is spoil, the new European promise in AI

When we think of the big companies that are marking the step in artificial intelligence, it is easy for the first names to come to mind are OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta or Anthropic, that by the way it has just published a fairly useful guide to improve our prompts. They could also sneak into Deepseek or the European Mistral ai. And although each one would have its own ranking, the general trend reflects something clear: the mastery of the United States in the overall narrative of AI is difficult to ignore. Europe and China appear more blurred in that collective mental map. In the case of the Asian giant, it is not so much for lack of muscle –He has companies like Baidu or Tencent by betting strong-, but for cultural distance, access restrictions and a strategy that advances through different lanes. Even so, many analysts agree that China is gaining ground at high speed. Europe, meanwhile, is still looking for how to make a hole While adjusting its criticized regulatory framework. In that context, Mistral AI has achieved something that seemed out of European reach: play in the same league as the great US models. Its valuation already exceeds 6,000 million eurosand it is not uncommon to see her appear in technical comparisons with OpenAI or Google Deepmind. Founded by former Meta and Google engineersthis French company has put Europe again in the radar of innovation. But it is not alone. A Swedish startup, a huge assessment and an AI that already generates millions A new actor has just broken into the scene. It does not come from Paris, but from Stockholm. Is called Lovableand has not needed much time to get attention. Founded in 2023this Swedish startup has become one of the most promising names of the European panorama in AI. At the end of November he launched his star product: A platform capable of building complete web applications From a simple written instruction. In just six months, his CEO, Anton Osika, announced that They had already reached the 50 million annual recurring income. The figure not only impressed the technological community, it also lit all the alerts of risk capital. According to Financial Times and TechcrunchLovable is finalizing a financing round of more than 150 million dollars, which would place its assessment close to 2,000 million. The operation would be led by Accel, with the participation of Creandum – which had already invested in February in a round of 15 million – and signatures like 20Vc. It is not usual to see such a abrupt jump in such a short time, but in this case it seems that the market is validating it. The technical proposal is ambitious: Lovable promises to generate the backend, the border and the connection with databases such as Suppabase without writing a single line of code manually. Some users have already tested their web creation tool with striking results. From a fairly simple prompt, about 250 characters, the platform is capable of generating in a few seconds a functional, picturesque page with a coherent structure. It is just a test, and it would probably need much more work to have a real product, but the result is still surprising. This platform works with a loan system – for example, 25 dollars per month They entitle 250 credits – and is presented as an accessible alternative for those who want to develop products without an engineering structure behind. But Lovable has not comply with that. This week has announced a new beta: an AI agent who goes a step further. The idea is that this system not only generates code, but that it is able to understand existing projects, edit files, debug errors and assume maintenance tasks. It remains to be seen if Lovable will be able to consolidate its place in a field as competitive as that of the generative AI. But what he has achieved until now is not less: in just two years he has built a functional tool, he has reached figures that many startups take years to touch and aroused a growing interest between users and investors. Europe was already giving clear signs that I wanted to play a relevant role in this race, and the emergence of Lovable does nothing but reinforce that trend. Images | Lovable | Xataka screen capture In Xataka | China has been cultivating Stem talent in silence for 40 years. Today has the most coveted quarry on the planet

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.