“The cause of the sigh we make when we are sick is in the amygdala”

Sometimes words are not needed, just look carefully. Someone receives a call, listens to it carefully, remains silent for a second and lets out a long sigh. Nothing more is needed: we know that something has happened, that there is bad news. It is a language older than words, the body screaming in its universal language. That language, for the neuroscientific communicator Nazareth Castellanos, is inscribed in our brain. The thing is, it’s easy to misunderstand. How the amygdala ‘hypertrophies’ (and the stories we tell about it). Castellanos has a very interesting conference that has been circulating on the internet for weeks. As the story of how the brain is “deflated,” the amygdala “deflated,” and “reset” has circulated, it has gained popularity and lost accuracy. It is true that sighing is inscribed in our socio-emotional system, but the explanation is a little more complex. What triggers the sigh? To answer this question we have to go to a tiny circuit within the brain stem. In 2016, the team of Li, Krasnow and Feldman mapped in mice and discovered that there are about 200 neurons that make two very specific peptides that are behind sighs. The two peptides (neuromedin B and gastrin-releasing peptide) have a lot to do with the pre-Bötzinger complex, what some call the pacemaker of respiration. But, in general, we are talking about something very basic: if they appear, they sigh; If you block the receptors, the sighing stops. And the amygdala? So what does the amygdala have to do with all this? The amygdala is part of the human ’emotional processor’. That’s the thing. In 2015, Dlouhy and Richerson, from the University of Iowa, found that electrically stimulate the amygdala could cause apnea and a drop in oxygen… without the patients realizing it. They didn’t notice the choking, or anything strange. Although we don’t have the exact biological mechanism (and we don’t know if it has anything to do with sighing), it is true that the amygdala plays a role in breathing control. And that the story is plausible. In fact, Castellanos, in an interviewused the precise term: he spoke of an amygdala that ‘increases its activity’, of an ‘apnea induced by the amygdala’. It is, as I say, more than plausible. Is a “sigh” “our body telling us we’re fed up”? That’s one way of looking at it, of course. But in reality the sigh is an element of ‘high neuroscience’ that we do not understand very well. We only know that what activates it is something that has been in our brain for a long time. That’s why it’s universal, that’s why we don’t need words. Image | Bhautik Patel In Xataka | Some philosophers boast of having found the “lost law” of evolution. It is much more complex

If the question is how long do we have to use AI to become lazy, the answer is: a sigh

Ten minutes. It is the time it takes for AI to have a negative effect on our ability to reason and solve problems, or at least that is what they have concluded in a new study in which they have measured how the use of AI assistants not only improves immediate performance, but also reduces persistence and worsens performance when we do not have access to AI. The study. Researchers from Carnegie Mellon, MIT, UCLA, and Oxford have published a randomized, controlled experiment that measures the impact of using AI on the ability to solve problems independently. In total, more than 1,200 people participated in three different experiments. The researchers’ conclusion goes in the direction of what we have seen in other previous studies: using AI enhances our productivity, but It has a cognitive cost. The experiment. A first experiment was carried out with 354 participants in which they had to solve twelve simple fractions. Some of the participants had a side panel with an AI assistant (GPT 5) that they could use to solve the operations. The curious thing came when their access to the chatbot was removed and they had to answer three more questions without the help of the AI. The result was that people who had used AI made more mistakes in their answers than the control group. The gray part of the graph was when the AI ​​assistant was retired. Fountain: AI Project Confirming results. The researchers did a second experiment in which they duplicated the participants (667) and did a pretest to measure the level. In addition, they added a “placebo” side panel (without AI) to the control group participants, so that there were no interface differences. The results again showed that people who used AI failed more than the control group. There was a third experiment in which reading comprehension problems were asked with 201 participants and the same thing happened again: when AI was removed, that group performed the worst. The key nuance. There is an important detail of the study and that is that they measured how the participants used AI. 61% used it to give them answers directly, while others used it to give them clues or clarifications. The results of this second group were more similar to those of the control group. On the other hand, those who asked for AI solutions as they were failed much more when it was withdrawn. This suggests what we have said above: the negative effect of AI on our cognition. It depends largely on how we use it. Copying answers without questioning is not the same as using them as support in the cognitive process. The new silly box. The fear that technology makes us stupid is not something that has arisen with AI, it happened with the calculator, it has happened with television, with video games and it is happening with cell phones. Although there are studies that point in that direction, there is no clear evidence that technology damages our cognition. However, it is also true that until now we had not had access to technology to which we could delegate all our thinking. Cover image | Xataka In Xataka | Young programmers no longer know how to program: AI is now causing the same thing that the calculator did half a century ago

The good news is that we have an anticyclone about Spain. The bad is that stability will last a sigh

All those who thought that the rains of March were A kind of Vogone curseit seems they were right. In fact, I don’t know if it is worth continuing to call them “March rains” because, despite appearances, the rain has not left anywhere. I was taking a breath. But we have a dorsal on top! It’s true. These days, it has entered A gigantic anticyclonic dorsal of subtropical origin that is not only very warm and very stable, but will cross the Peninsula and will continue to the north until it almost arrives in Iceland. And we will notice. Because, As Aemet already pointed out In his forecast for this week is that “it will be warmer than normal throughout the country, especially in the peninsular northwest.” However, it is not a normal dorsal. As Ángel Rivero explainedthis dorsal has a characteristic “finger” form (it is very elongated, but very narrow). That exposes the Peninsula below Danas and Borrascas Frías, both for the East and West. The problem is that this type of structures (very rare before, but from 2020 more and more frequent) are characterized by An extremely winding polar jet With air bags, ripping continuously. And, as we know, those airbags have a very erratic behavior: they are very difficult to pursue. And the first example comes Wednesday. The European model draws two cold storms one between the Canary Islands and the Azores (Olivier) and the other in the Gulf of Lion. As Collect Sergio Escaama in Meteoredboth storms go to Cerner on the Peninsula and will cause rains both in the northeast and in the southwest. If the scenarios are right, both storms would merge into a About the Gulf of Cádiz creating a fairly complex situation. Although we cannot determine the intensity and the trajectory, we do know that we must monitor it closely. From the middle of the week, we can expect rains in many areas of the country. And in Holy Week? As we are experiencing in our own flesh, the country’s meteorological context is complex. We are living a spring full of thermal ups and downs and huge rains. Thus, it is difficult to know what is going to What yes We can discard it is a persistent scenario of stability. If it does not rain on the key days of next week it will be by chance and not because it must necessarily be so. As I explainedduring the next few days we will have to be aware of the Azores anticyclone. Because if as it seems, zonal circulation is restored, everything will depend on whether the anticyclone lets go storms or not. Image | WXCHARTS In Xataka | Someone has left the water key open: the rain is back and the models say it will not leave until after Holy Week

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.