Zuckerberg in the front row of Prada seems like a mistake in The Matrix, but it’s actually Meta’s biggest statement of intent

Any regular attendee of Milan Fashion Week know what to expect in the first row: a perfectly choreographed ecosystem of K-pop idols, internet stars and Hollywood actors with million-dollar contracts. However, at the presentation of the Prada Fall/Winter 2026 women’s collection, a figure appeared which at first glance seemed like a mistake in The Matrix: Mark Zuckerberg. As the magazine points out GQthe usual fashion audience is undergoing a metamorphosis and the technological elite is reclaiming its place in the spotlight, as demonstrated the appearance by Jeff Bezos in Jonathan Anderson’s debut for Dior. However, the founder of Meta did not finish blending in with the environment. As described The Times With a certain British irony, Zuckerberg looked tense in front of the flashes, like “someone who has ever heard of the concept of sitting on a bench, but has never tried it,” awkwardly spreading his fingers over his pants and not really knowing where to look as the models paraded. But what are the Silicon Valley elite doing there? Despite its recent change of image – which some have dubbed the Zuckaissanceleaving behind his uniform of gray t-shirts for Balenciaga clothes and gold chains—his presence in Milan does not respond to the mere whim of a shopping tourist. It’s a top-notch corporate chess move. As detailed The Timesthe key was in the seating arrangement (the coveted Frow either front row). Zuckerberg was not placed next to any random celebrity, but strategically shoulder to shoulder with Lorenzo Bertelli, Prada’s marketing director and son of designer Miuccia Prada. At his side, his wife, Priscilla Chan, shared confidences with none other than Andrea Guerra, executive director of the Italian brand. Besides, they fulfilled the aesthetic duties completely changing her style for the sobriety of Prada. lhaute couture as a Trojan horse. All this social choreography points in a single commercial direction. According to the CNBCMeta and Prada are collaborating closely to launch luxury smart glasses powered by artificial intelligence. The corporate bridge that connects Silicon Valley with Milan is already built. Goal has been collaborating for years successfully with EssilorLuxottica, the Franco-Italian giant that manufactures the current Ray-Ban Meta. Glasses that, by the way, will reach the not inconsiderable figure of 7 million units sold in 2025. Given that EssilorLuxottica has just renewed its licensing agreement with Prada until the 2030s, the triangulation of the business is evident. The goal of this maneuver is to legitimize personal surveillance technology through exclusivity. As explained TechCrunch, Bringing AI to high fashion fills a niche that more sporty or casual brands like Oakley and Ray-Ban can’t reach. Consolidating these glasses as a symbol of status and luxury is the definitive step to benefit the global image of the Meta brand. The technological muscle behind the design. For a Prada product to make sense, the technology inside cannot fail, and this is where the specialized technology media provides the crucial context. As explained in an in-depth analysis by my colleague Lacort in Xatakahe hardware The current Ray-Ban Meta is brilliant—fantastic as speakers and great as a discreet camera—but its software is the weak link. Your “Meta AI” assistant currently feels like a “clueless intern” suffering from a lack of context and erratic responses. To solve this and live up to a luxury label, Meta has taken out the checkbook. Another recent report by Xataka details that the company has just signed a multi-million dollar agreement with NVIDIA to acquire its new generation of server infrastructure (the Rubin architecture and Grace processors). Mark Zuckerberg knows that to sell the glasses of the future he needs to achieve what he calls “personal superintelligence”, processing data in real time without the current glitches, whatever the cost. The elephant in the room. Despite the change of look and multi-million dollar investment, Meta faces a challenge that fashion cannot easily hide. Just a few days before sitting on the catwalk, the owner of Meta was testifying in a Los Angeles courtroom in a landmark trial over social media addiction. Most ironic of all, the judge threatened to hold her team in contempt for showing up in the courtroom wearing Meta glasses equipped with a camera, in a place where recording is prohibited. As he warns TechCrunch, Prada glasses will arrive at a time of growing citizen rejection of constant surveillance devices. Society is beginning to react against invasive technology. The rejection is so real that, as the media highlights, there is already a developer who has created a mobile application exclusively to notify you if someone around you is wearing AI glasses. This raises serious doubts about whether Meta will dare to incorporate controversial features such as facial recognition, something that The New York Times He already suggested that it was under study. Does the devil wear Prada? At the end of the parade, one detail did not go unnoticed. As observed Business InsiderZuckerberg was not wearing his signature Meta smart glasses while sitting in the front row. And he didn’t need it. The photograph of him sitting next to Prada’s leadership was the message in itself. Silicon Valley has finally understood that to convince millions of people to wear a camera, microphone and AI on their faces every day, design matters as much as microchips. The next great technological revolution will not be announced in an aseptic California auditorium with a presenter in jeans; It is being decided right now, under the spotlight on the Milan catwalk. Image | José Goulao and Mark Zuckerberg Xataka | AMD wants to be the great alternative to NVIDIA in AI chips, and Meta has a plan that involves both

We have had Stephen King releases for several weeks in a row. Don’t we know how to do anything else?

The fall of 2025 has brought with it an avalanche of Stephen King: almost in consecutive weeks we have had the premiere of ‘The long march‘ and ‘The Running Man‘, and shortly before the series started ‘It: Welcome to Derry‘ on HBO Max. Three great productions in just one month. Are we facing an unimaginative industry that constantly turns to the same author, or is it that King continues to offer something that others cannot? The answer has three keys: the so-called Kingaissance, the decisive factor of the streaming and the current value of King, which has not been devalued by bad adaptations. Debunking the myth. To deny King’s supposed dependence on the horror genre, just look at the last twelve months of releases. Independent horror is enjoying an unsuspected golden age: ‘Longlegs’, for example, grossed more than one hundred million dollars at the box office with a budget of just ten, and films like ‘The substance‘ have given terror a life-long breath of quality, including Oscar nominations. Classic franchises such as ‘Final Destination’ are recovered, ‘Frankenstein’ is sweeping Netflix and a star system from horror creators: the aforementioned Perkins, Prano Bailey-Bond, Danny and Michael Philippou, Zach Creggar and Rose Glass, among others. The Kingaissance. The Anglo-Saxon media coined a term to describe what is happening: the “Kingaissance“, a revival that has a precise birth date. In September 2017, ‘It’ by Andy Muschietti became an unexpected cultural phenomenon: With a budget of just thirty-five million, it grossed more than seven hundred globally, becoming the highest-grossing horror film in history without adjusting for inflation. What followed was an avalanche. Without exhaustiveness: ‘Doctor Sleep’, ‘Animal Graveyard’, ‘Eyes of Fire’, ‘Salem’s Lot’, ‘In the Tall Grass’, the series ‘Apocalypse’ and ‘Chapelwaite’… And now, three more adaptations, to which will be added the future television ‘Carrie’ by Mike Flanagan, ‘The Talisman’ for Netflix and perhaps a new ‘Cujo’. The difference with the eighties is abysmal. Back then, TV movies and B series predominated: now they are series on HBO and films with established directors. King himself often has creative control and serves as executive producer on many of these projects. The factor streaming. For decades, adaptations of King’s longer novels have been handicapped by having to compress their length to the margins of the feature film. He streaming changed the rules of the game: platforms now allow series of eight or ten episodes that respect the author’s narrative complexity, something that had previously only been experienced in miniseries format, in productions such as the first version of ‘It’ or ‘The Store’. It happened with ‘11.22.63’, with ‘The Stranger’, with ‘Lisey’s Story’ (which King personally wrote)… Now it is the turn of the prequel to the latest version of ‘It’, and it is clear how the logic of the platforms works: they look for recognizable IPs, and King offers dozens of stories with a bomb-proof dramatic structure. But there were bad adaptations of King. And they didn’t kill the goose that laid the golden eggs. It’s always happened: there are adaptations in miniseries format in the nineties, like ‘The Langoliers’ or ‘The Shining’ that are a pain. Since the nineties there have been as many weak King films as there have been notable ones. Very recent is the horrendous ‘The Dark Tower’ from 2017, which compressed eight novels into 95 disastrous minutes. Or ‘Cell’, absolutely forgettable. Why didn’t these catastrophes sink King’s value? First, the original novels remain, at worst, more than readable, and at best, downright excellent: the source material is indestructible. Second, readers clearly distinguish between author and adaptation, continue to appreciate the writer, and continue to try their hand at adaptations. Third, the good adaptations (‘The Shining,’ ‘Carrie,’ ‘It,’ ‘Misery,’ the original ‘Pet Sematary’) are so good that we’ll always come back for more. Why we return to King. The answer, despite appearances, is not a lack of ideas, but rather that we are faced with a name of proven effectiveness, even in its worst moments: few have that commercial hook combined with minimum standards of quality and entertainment. King has more than 65 novels and 200 short stories, an inexhaustible mine whose themes will never go out of style and are universal: generational traumas, addictions, the problems of the working class, invisible threats, the corruption of power, the weight of our past… And to top it off, we are in the era of the IP. So it is not an issue that affects only him. Marvel, DC, Disney… In 2024, the ten highest-grossing films They all came from pre-existing intellectual properties. And Hollywood seeks familiarity: from the Agatha Christie films directed by Kenneth Branagh to the explosion of video game adaptations like ‘fallout‘, ‘The Last of Us‘ and ‘Super Mario Bros.: The Movie‘. An ideal scenario for a brand that, undoubtedly, has had its ups and downs, but that right now enjoys unexpected iron health. In Xataka | There is a book by Stephen King that sells for around 100 euros and I got it for five: the strange story of ‘Rage’

Seven IAS have played 36 hours in a row to Diplomacy. What we did not expect is that each one develop a human personality

For 36 hours, seven of the most advanced AI models in the world They have faced in several diplomacy gamesa strategy table game similar to Risk. It was a mirror that revealed the true algorithmic personalities of Chatgpt, Claude, Gemini and company. Why is it important. Alex Duffy, programmer and researcher, created a Diplomacy as new Benchmark To evaluate AI models. The experiment ended up being something else, a kind of technological Rorschach test that undressed both their training biases and our own projections. What has happened. In dozens of games transmitted by Twitch, each model developed its own strategies in a way that seemed to reflect different human personalities. O3 of OpenAi It was quite Machiavellian, working false alliances for more than 40 shifts and creating “parallel realities” for different players. Claude 4 Opus It was a kind of self -destructive pacifist, refusing to betray even when that guaranteed its defeat. R1 of Deepseek He showed an extremely theatrical style, with threats not caused as “your fleet will burn in the Black Sea tonight.” Gemini 2.5 Pro It proved to be a solid strategist but more vulnerable to sophisticated manipulations. QWQ-32B From Alibaba suffered analysis by analysis, writing diplomatic messages of 300 words that cost him early eliminations. The context. Diplomacy is a European strategy game set in 1901 where seven powers compete to dominate the continent. Unlike risk, it requires constant negotiation, alliances formation and, inevitably, calculated betrayals. There are no grace given, only pure strategy and psychological manipulation. Between the lines. Each “algorithmic personality” reflects the values ​​of its creators. Claude maintains the principles of anthropic security even when it costs victory. O3 shows ruthless efficiency valued in Silicon Valley. Deepseek exhibits a drama that reflects specific cultural influences. And there is also something deeper. These are not “chose” to be cooperative or competitive. They reproduce patterns of their training data. Their “decisions” are our algorithmized prejudices, converted into code. Yes, but. We interpret betrayals where “only” there is optimization of parameters and we see loyalty where there are training restrictions. That is why the experiment also reveals more about us than about models: we anthropomorphize behaviors because we need to understand AI in human terms. In perspective. Duffy’s experiment is worth more than a Benchmark Anyone because it has created a window to how we project personality in systems that operate for statistical patterns. The course of the games was a reminder that IA has no hidden intentions, it only reflects ours. The experiment, by the way, Continue broadcasting on Twitch so that anyone can observe how our digital creations play according to the rules that we ourselves write in their algorithms. In Xataka | Outstanding image | Ai Diplomacy

More than 25 hours in a row of speech

Until today Cory Booker He was a politician with a certain predicament in the US, but away from the great headlines of the international press. Democratic Senator for New Jersey and Exalcalde de Newark, in 2019 launched A campaign to become a White House candidate that ended up withdrawing shortly after. Now Booker is known for more that has earned him the attention of the foreign press: he has pronounced The longest speech in the history of the US Senate. Standing before his lectern, with a couple of glasses of water and without any chair where to sit (he requested to be removed to avoid temptations), the Democratic Senator spoke and spoke for more than 25 hours about the dangers of the Government of Donald Trump. It may seem a simple anecdote, but its gesture says more about how the Trumpism the Democratic Party that of the Booker itself. Until the legs endure. His initiative is shared or not, Cory Anthony Booker has to recognize something: he has gone head -on from the beginning. On Monday at seven in the afternoon he took the floor in the upper house, the voice was clarified and warning To the rest of the legislators what their plans were: “I raise myself with the intention of altering the normal functioning of the US Senate as long as I can physically.” In other words, until the legs endured. And how much did you talk? Except for the Brief pauses What he did while his Democratic colleagues asked him questions, Booker kept talking until after eight in the afternoon of the next day. The Guardian Precise that his intervention lasted 25 hours and four minutes, more than a full day of oratory during which the senator read dozens of cardshe threw notes, stirred a copy of the Constitution, gestured, cried out and jumped from the emotional tone to the exhibition, with some joke included to the colleagues of the Senate. Everything while his voice was getting more and more hoarse. A speech (and a good limp). In Your chronicle, The Telegraph He explains that, although Bookers was able to take advantage of his companions’s questions to rest his throat, it was not at any time to the bathroom. Apart from the annotations and letters he carried, the only thing he had at hand to endure the guy was a couple of water vessels. Later he himself explained that had prepared for days, fasting and refraining from drinking liquids from the previous night to avoid urgencies. Neither that preparation nor the movements he made to maintain the circulation in his legs, prevented him from ending up limbing of the lectern. And all that … why? Although Bookers stretched his turn everything he could and monopolized the attention of the upper house for more than 25 hours his intention was not to obstruct the activity of the Senate, which is precisely what has been sought On other occasions With marathon speeches and tricks “Filibusteras”. On the contrary. When Booker took the floor, he had not provided law votes and if something delayed it was an initiative of his own party to repeal Trump’s tariffs. The goal of the Democrat was another: launching a long, sound (and above all media) attack on Trump’s government. During the 25 hours after the lectern, Booker denounced the republican’s plans to cut Medicaid and Medicare, charged against the “damage inflicted” by Trump to American democracy, spoke of inflation, economic chaos, the role of Musk … and read letters of people with “heartbreaking” stories related to the Trumpism. “It is not about left or right. It is the right or the incorrect,” The senator dispatched Just before putting an end to her long speech: “Mrs. President, give the word.” Beyond Booker. Booker’s gesture, which ended around 40 feet democrats and an outbreak of applause and chemist from party partners and a public chopped by the curiosity of seeing how much the senator could endure, is important for his career as a legislator; but also for the Democratic Party itself. After all, it arrives at a complicated moment for the formation, which after the defeat of Kamala Harris at the polls and Trump’s return to the White House have suffered Leadership problems and to connect with your bases. “The party is still catatonic and the election of the National Democratic Committee showed a line of continuity where the main criticism has been the way to communicate,” I commented recently to The observer Victoria Murillo, professor at Columbia University. A month ago the CNN made A poll which shows that the popularity of the Democratic Party has fallen to historical minimums and a good part of its members believe that its leaders must face Trump. With his record discourse Booker has also managed to monopolize holders and strain his criticism against Trump in the United States and abroad. Another managed to the Democrats in a Care Economy dominated by him Trumpism. Breaking Thurmond’s record. Booker’s gesture has a symbolic value for another reason: he has managed over 60 years by a South Carolina senator. On that occasion the objective was very different: its author, Strom Thurmond, recognized segregationist, intended to obstruct the civil rights law of 1957. “He tried to stop the rights I defend”, recalled yesterday Booker, which is also The first black senator of the state of New Jersey, remembering the trick Filibustera of Thurmond. “But I’m not here for his speech. I am here despite his speech. I am here because, no matter how powerful it was, the people were even more.” Images | Gage Skidmore (Flickr) 1 and 2 In Xataka | In his eagerness to attack the public sector, Elon Musk has crossed a line: distorting the story of Hitler and Stalin

Spending many hours in a row in front of the PC is more bearable with Sihoo Doro C300, the ideal chair to avoid back pain

Choosing chair to work or study at home is key if we want to avoid suffering those annoying back pain. The well-known Sihoo brand has several that can come great for this, being possibly the Doro C300 one of the best quality-price that we can choose if we seek comfort and a design designed to avoid bad positions. And be careful Because now we can take it at a brutal price: only 299.99 eurosthat we can also reduce 10% more if we use the XST10OFF code. SIHOO DORO C300 ERGONOMIC CHAIR * Some price may have changed from the last review A chair with dynamic lumbar support and designed to have good support always Although many users are launched by gaming chairs thinking that they are the most comfortable, the truth is that the office chairs They are a better option for our health. This Sihoo Doro C300 It will come great to be in front of a PC for many hours in a rowalways being comfortable and with a good position to take care of our health. One of the points that suffers the most from our body when we are sitting is lumbar, and precisely for this reason the C300 It has A body tracking system for this area. Thanks to this system, the chair will adapt at all times to our movements. This is the difference of most market chairs, since these have a rigidity that can go wrong for certain positions, something that does not happen with the C300. The support follows this same line, designed so that we have well supported our backs all the time. In fact, We can recline up to 130 degrees In those moments that we have rest or simply want to relax some of so much work stress. Here it also applies, in a great way, the body monitoring of which we talked above, so even very reclining we will have a good posture. Of course, we cannot ignore your seat, another key point to choose a chair. This is designed so that our weight is distributed correctly, causing us not to have any pressure on the thighs. In addition, it is manufactured (like support) in mesh fabric, Resistant to the passage of time and ideal in summer. His support, which is padded so that we can place both arms comfortably, They can be moved in 4 directionsmaking it very easy to configure them. A quite interesting point of them is that they are synchronized with the support of the seat when it is reclined, so we will always have them well placed. We cannot forget another key point: The headrest. This element is very important, since the neck is another of those parts of the body that suffer a lot. That of the C300 It can be adjusted with a simple mechanism, up, down, forward or backward. Moreover, you can even turn in small pleasant, everything we always have the best posture. Its pro version goes a little further, with more configuration options If we want to level up and our budget allows us, we can opt for the Pro version of the C300. This chair is identical to the previous one in several aspects, but it improves some parts to offer a more comfortable experience still. Its PVP is 799 euros, but right now we also have it on offer with a great discount: it stays in 559.99 euros. SIHOO DORO C300 PRO CHAIR * Some price may have changed from the last review In what points does this Doro C300 Pro de Sihoo stand? Without a doubt, its star point is easy to adapt to the height and weight of each person. The pro model is ideal for almost everyoneand can be adjusted comfortably for users of 1.50 to 1.90 meters. Not only that, but also your seat is bigger that you can adjust in depth as we want. Another very interesting element we have in your armrests, that move on in 6 different directionsthat is: up, down, forward, behind, in and out. This is especially useful if we are gamers, since to have comfort and precision you have to adjust them very well. Its support can be reclined a little more than the previous C300 (up to 135 degrees) and has A simple control on the side to adjust everything: From support to the seat. It doesn’t matter if we prefer this model or the previous one, any of these two Sihoo will give us what we are looking for: being comfortable and making the long hours of work or study more enjoyable. Some of the links of this article are affiliated and can report a benefit to Xataka. In case of non -availability, offers may vary. Images | Sihoo In Xataka | Purchase guide of how to make your job at home ergonomic In Xataka Selection | How to set up your home office: Guide for the purchase of supports, monitors and other peripherals, cables, headphones and more

Kansas City Chiefs seeks to join dynasties that achieved three titles in a row in NFL

Patrick Mahomes and the Kansas City Chiefs are in the prelude to a historical feat: become the first team of the modern era of the NFL in achieving a consecutive tricampeonato. After winning the Super Bowls LVII and LVIII, the Chiefs point to the unpublished achievement in a league where no one has succeeded since the days of the Green Bay Packers of Vince Lombardi in the seasons from 1965 to 1967. Three pedat in the United States Achieving a tricampeonato is not only uncommon in the NFL, but also in the other major sports leagues in the United States. The last time a team got it in any sport was more than 20 years ago, when Los Angeles Lakers, led by Shaquille O’Neal and Kobe Bryant, dominated the NBA between 2000 and 2002. In the NFL, only two teams have achieved three consecutive titles. The Packers did it first between 1929 and 1931, when the champion was decided by the best record of the regular season. Decades later, in the Era of the Super Bowl, the Packers de Lombardi won the championship in 1965 and then the first two Super Bowls, heating their legacy as a legendary team. Since then, no team has managed to replicate that feat in a league characterized by parity and constant talent replacement. Legendary teams with tricampeonates The challenge of the Chiefs is not only to overcome the history of the NFL, but to join an exclusive list of teams that have reached the glory three consecutive years in American sports: Oakland Athletics (MLB, 1972-74): Led by Reggie Jackson, dominated baseball with a team full of talent and personality. Montreal Canadiens (NHL, 1976-79): They won four consecutive Stanley glasses in an era dominated by discipline and talent under the direction of Scotty Bowman. New York Islanders (NHL, 1980-83): with a solid defensive structure and a powerful offensive, they achieved an impressive streak in the 1980s. Chicago Bulls (NBA, 1991-93 and 1996-98): Michael Jordan took the Bulls to two tricampeonates in one of the most dominant dynasties in the history of sport. New York Yankees (MLB, 1998-2000): In the modern era of free agency, the Yankees cemented their place as one of the most successful baseball franchises. Los Angeles Lakers (NBA, 2000-02): Phil Jackson, Shaquille O’Neal and Kobe Bryant marked the beginning of the 21st century with their domain in the NBA. Continue reading: – Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce celebrate the victory of the Chiefs with a passionate kiss – Chiefs return to the Super Bowl for Revancha against Eagles – Jerry Jones states that hiring Schottenheimer as Dallas coach is a risk (Tagstotranslate) Kansas City Chiefs

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.