Uber Eats abandons autonomous riders after the fight with Work

Uber Eats had been moving for some time within the perimeter of a rule that the Government promoted to redefine the labor market fit for home delivery in Spain. That standard, known as ‘Rider Law‘, put the focus on a crack that had been at the center of the debate for years, the figure of the “false self-employed“, and has been pushing the sector towards employee models or towards schemes in which the employment relationship is channeled through third parties. In this context, the fact that the platform now announces its intention to stop working with self-employed delivery drivers is not only an operational adjustment, it is a movement that contributes to reordering one of the great debates of the delivery. The announcement that finalizes the turn. Uber Eats has communicated that it will stop working with self-employed delivery drivers in Spain and links it to its adaptation to the current labor framework after several years of changes in its operations. The company explains that delivery drivers who still use the application as self-employed will be able to continue delivering as employees through collaborating fleets. “Uber Eats reaffirms its commitment to compliance with the Rider Law. After four years in which we have accumulated extensive experience working with expert logistics companies, and with the aim of promoting a long-term sustainable model, we have made the decision to stop collaborating with autonomous delivery drivers.” What happened on the way. To understand the scope of the movement you have to look back. Uber Eats does not reach this point from a fixed position, but after several changes of course from the approval of the ‘Rider Law’. In 2021, the platform stopped operating with freelancers and moved to a labor model based on subcontractors. One year later, in August 2022, opened the door to self-employment again and adopted a hybrid scheme in which salaried fleet delivery drivers and self-employed workers coexisted, in a context in which Glovo persisted in that model. On paper, the solution proposed by Uber Eats is clear. Delivery drivers who still use their application as freelancers will be able to continue delivering, but no longer as self-employed workers, but as employees of one of the collaborating fleets with which the platform operates. In practice, the transition from self-employed to salaried usually involves changes in the organization of work and conditions, although Uber Eats has not detailed how it will be applied in each case or deadlines for this transition. Not all delivery drivers could automatically fit into this traffic, nor is it clear how many real positions the fleets can absorb, which leaves open the possibility that some of these self-employed workers will be left out of the system. The threat of ‘the full weight of the law’. The background of this movement refers to a clash that came from behind. In October 2025, the Ministry of Labor raised the tone and waived the possibility of resorting to criminal proceedings if Uber Eats did not rectify its hiring model. The vice president and minister, Yolanda Díaz, was explicit in warning that “Uber (Eats) is not going to fool the Government of Spain, and I can already tell you that the weight of the law will fall on this company,” in reference to the use of false self-employed workers. A mirror in the sector. The Uber Eats movement does not occur in a vacuum. Glovo announced its change of model in Spain in December 2024 and operates fully with salaried delivery drivers from mid-2025while the criminal process continues against its top leader, accused of a crime against workers’ rights. Just Eat, for its part, stayed the course and persisted in its employee model. In this context, Uber Eats had remained the great exception, with a hybrid scheme that continued to combine fleets and freelancers. From now on, the focus shifts from the announcement to its actual landing. Uber Eats says it wants to put an end to pending litigation and facilitate a “fair process for everyone,” but it will be practical execution that will determine the extent of the turnaround. It remains to be seen how the transition from the self-employed to the fleets is articulated, how many delivery drivers manage to fit into that step and if the new scheme manages to dissipate the conflicts that have accompanied the sector in recent years. Images | Robert Anasch | appshunter.io In Xataka | The “absent recipient” trick: why delivery people mark your package as undelivered even if you were at home

Madrid riders have been using municipal bikes for some time despite it being prohibited. The City Council is tired

When it was released, more than a decadeBicimad was proposed as a public transport service with shared bikes. His idea was very simple: make it easier (and cheaper) for Madrid residents to get around the city by bike. Over time, its network of vehicles and stations has expanded, but it has also attracted a new type of user: riders interested in their benefits and low cost who rent them, skipping the regulation. Now the City Council has said enough. What has happened? That Madrid has grown tired of the riders use during your deliveries Bicimada public bicycle rental service. The message has been conveyed with crystal clear the delegate of Urban Planning, Environment and Mobility of the City Council, Borja Carabante, who recalled that the system was designed to be used by individuals (such as neighbors or tourists) not so that economic benefit could be taken from it, a possibility clearly banned in its regulations. Is the problem that serious? Yes. And no. The Municipal Transport Company (EMT) recognize that he is not aware that the riders are making “massive use” of Bicimad, although it has detected “some cases.” Much clearer has been Carabante, who assures that it is a practice that “we all see” on the street and seems to be getting worse. In fact, the City Council speaks of “an increase”. What does the regulations say? The issue is not so much that the practice is more or less widespread as that it completely fails to comply with the bases (and spirit) that regulate the service. In its chapter XI the document that sets the conditions of use slips several ideas, including one that closes the doors to riders and other delivery people. “The bicycle will be used exclusively for the transportation of users, and cannot transport other people, animals or merchandise,” collect the text. “Nor can the bicycle, nor the stations, be used for commercial purposes.” Why do they use them then? For its advantages. Bicimad offers more than 7,700 bikes and 630 stations spread across 21 districts of the capital. Those who use the service can enjoy electric bikes with a 250W central motor and 70 kilometers of autonomy for a fee of only 10 euros monthly. The service offers free, unlimited rides of up to 30 minutes. After that time, the second 30-minute fraction costs 0.5 and the subsequent three euros. In addition, its users are insured. A rider Anyone who wanted to buy a similar urban bike to deliver orders would have to pay hundreds of eurosat least. This without taking into account the wear and tear of the vehicle and another of the great advantages of Bicimad: the station network and charging points. Those responsible they calculate The service currently has 450,000 monthly users who make journeys that, on average, last just over 15 minutes. What does the City Council want to do? For now he has made it clear that he is aware that the riders They are misusing bikes and he is not willing to turn a blind eye. How he will respond and how far he is willing to go in his endeavor is another matter. The City Council has stated that it will look for a way to “disincentivize” delivery drivers from taking advantage of Bicimad and to do so, one of the options on the table is to apply extra rates to them. “We will have to see if there is some type of specific rate for this type of activity and we are analyzing possible alternatives so that it does not occur,” Carabante specifiedwho recognizes that what has sparked the interest of riders and has caused the use of Bicimad to increase among the group (according to the data managed by the City Council) it is precisely the “low rates” that the service applies, which “makes its use attractive” by the delivery people. Are you considering anything else? Yeah. Increase controls at street level. The City Council of the capital has recognized The World He plans to pay more attention to who rents the bikes to get a more precise idea of ​​the problem. “To assess whether any measure must be taken to avoid this type of use, the EMTE will soon begin a surveillance campaign to monitor these activities,” keep it up. “According to these results, actions will be applied to discourage use for commercial activities.” They won’t have it easy. The riders They use the same cards as the rest of the users and to confirm that they are using the service for commercial purposes, the police would have to stop them. Hence, for example, at the moment the improper use of bicycles is not being penalized either. The problem is not entirely new, but the City Council seems determined to put an end to a custom that, as the delegate alertsharms individuals who want to use public bicycles. Images | Bicimad In Xataka | There are no more 20 euro tickets: the trains between Madrid and Barcelona have become very expensive again for a reason

All your Riders will be used before the end of the year

“This is a transcendental day for platform workers.” Those were The words of the European Employment Commissioner, Nicolas Schmit, After approving the European Rider Law. One of the companies clearly affected by that law was Glovo, which leaves the model of false freelancers after 250 million euros and bring to trial its founder. That decision is the conclusion of a long process. The aforementioned European “Rider Law” was proposed in 2021 based on the Spirit of the Rider Law approved in Spainbut it was not until December 2022 when, under the Spanish presidency of the Council, an inter -institutional agreement with the community government and the European Parliament was reached. Was Great cuts in its content and protection, but Spain maintained its support for the text. Glovo announced last December that he would totally change his labor model and would directly hire the distributorsinstead of keeping riders as self -employed. The measure will apply to all cities in Spain where Glovo operates and in all its verticals. It is the company that has taken the most to adapt to the “Rider Law” and the one that has suffered the most In the process. Others such as Just Eat adopted it from the first moment, which has allowed to avoid numerous fines. For Glovo, however, reaching this point has been as we comment especially complex. This has been the chronology of this transformation process: May 2019: UGT files a complaint Against Glovo After the death of A deliveryman In Barcelona. According to the union, the company violated the rules of Occupational Risk Prevention. November 2019: The Superior Court of Justice of Madrid Solve that Glovo’s Riders are false freelancers. By then Glovo had 1,000 employees and presence in 26 countries. September 2020: the Supreme Court Judgment that Glovo’s distributors are false freelancers May 2021: The Government Approves The Royal Decree-Law known as the Spanish Rider Law. September 2022: Glovo receives the first great Fine of 78.9 million euros applied to a company for breaching the ‘Rider Law’. It wouldn’t be the last. According to the Ministry of Labor, Glovo had 10,614 workers as false freelancers at that time. November 2023: The entry into force of the Rider Law in August 2021 does not seem to change too much Things: two years later the companies continued “stretching the gum not to hire any rider. “ December 2023: Europe begins the project Create a European ‘Rider Lawand takes as a Spanish model to make it a reality. The objective: protect 5.5 million false freelancers. March 2024: A European pre -agreement for the approval of the European ‘Rider Law. The CEO of Glovo, Oscar Pierre, He recently promised that “we are going to complete the transformation towards a 100% labor model this year.” However, He continued to maintain that the freelancer model is “the one that best suits our orders curve”. The demand, he explained, is very volatile, so “having a flexible model Allows you to pay more and give more work. “ The government does not share that opinion, and in fact Pierre is in the midst of an investigation for crimes against the rights of the Riders. Testified Last December accused of adopting the model of false freelancers with the aim of “reducing their business costs,” the Prosecutor’s Office describes. The process follows its course, and may have been one of the triggers of that radical change in the Glovo labor model. That statement and that change in the labor model are adopted in Glovo by obligation, but its CEO He already declared In February that “we will hire 20,000 workers, but they will gain less than as self -employed.” It remains to be seen if that promise is fulfilled, but there is a striking fact: Delivery Hero, the company owner of Glovo, has provided a total of 400 million euros for face possible fines In Europe for anti -competitive practices. In Xataka | The fight to take pizza home is a multinational war

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.