A satellite would have replaced 36,000 km to the US pasmo

In October 2021, China launched the Shijian-21. It was a Multipurpose satellite that destined to test technologies of Space waste mitigation In geostationary orbit. In a nutshell: a space garbage. In January of this year, another of these mysterious Shijian was launched, the SJ-25. Your purpose? Extend the useful life of other satellites. Now both have been found in the geostationary orbit and has unleashed madness. Of the United States, of course. Chinese wall-e. The SJ-21 was launched in Secret relative. China is one of the nations that More interest has lately in taking over boxes in space, and his first mission was to be coupled to the satellite -also Chinese – Beidou-2 G2 that it was already out of service and towed it successfully outside the active geostation orbit (geo). The SJ-21 dragged Beidou to the space cemetery, but from the Pentagon they saw this as a direct threat. Cold Space War. We have been immersed in a New Cold War. Not as the lived a few decades -although at times nuclear fear is also on the table -, but we are witnessing the rapid technological development of several nations with something in mind: space. American military authorities already speak openly about Dangers represented by a space China For Western interests, and the SJ-21 movement was seen as something dangerous. And lor saw like a threat due both to the precision that the satellite showed and because they claim that It has robotic arms (There are no images and China has not confirmed it) that they could put satellites from other nations in check. Apart from the “physical” attack between satellites, they went further, noting that the SJ-21 could have technologies capable of blocking transmissions and blinding the sensors of other space vehicles. In fact, the US has a Wrestling Manual between Satellites that we met a few months ago. The “space gas station”. To revive the controversy, we have the aforementioned Shijian-25. This SJ-25 is a satellite designed to verify fuel refueling technologies and extend the useful life of satellites in Geo. In a nutshell: it is a kind of space gas station. It has the ability to perform very precise approaches to other bodies, such as the SJ-21, but also coupling work with which it can fill in that fuel. The logic of this operation is simple: to provide a longer life to the satellites that work and are already in orbit instead of launching new equivalent satellites and generating more Space garbage. Money is also saved because it is cheaper “throwing gas” than putting one of these satellites into orbit. The two satellites moments before making contact Contact. And the results have not taken to arrive. As we see in Ars Technica, a few days ago it was observed not only that both satellites were operating to extremely short distances The one of the other, but reached a point, already more than 36,000 kilometers of us, joined. Can be seen in This Timelapse in which the two satellites merge into a bright ball to subsequently separate. But of course, this is not confirmed and who is raising the voice is the United States. Americans are attentive. USA, when he realized that the two satellites were approaching, two positioned GSSAP Vigías Satellites near the SJ-21 and the SJ-25 to observe more closely. Because the United States plans to carry out the first refueling of a military satellite in orbit in some moment next year they call “dynamic spatial operations”, But it is confirmed that the SH-21 and the SJ-25 have joined, China would have advanced them on the right. John Shaw is a retired general lieutenant from United States Space Force And, as we read in Ars Technica, a firm defender of these dynamic space operations. He states that “they were an operational need a few years ago, but now it is something much more important, especially given the activities of potential adversaries.” Forms that satellites have to attack each other Focus change. In the same article, Shaw comments that GSSAP satellites have operated on other occasions to approach Chinese satellites that “simply move away quickly.” When we talk about a new cold war, we do it by statements such as those of this military: “We tend to operate the GSSAP as airships, using slow and minimal energy approaches. The Chinese know it, so they find it relatively easy to maneuver to avoid such approaches.” Caution. And Shaw sees this alleged refueling in Geo by Chinese satellites as a threat: “If tomorrow they can reproduce freely and operate even more dynamically, then the cost of maneuvers will be marginal for them and the challenge for the GSSAP will be even greater.” What is clear is that there is a world of possibilities here. The SJ-21 and SJ-25 may have been successfully coupled, but it may also not. Similarly, it is possible that it was only a maneuver to distract the GSSAP. There are those who point out that the SJ-21 had run out of energy after several operations, so it will be interesting to see if, after that approach, it begins to move more freedom, indicating the alleged replacement. But well, at the end of the day, China is not the only objective. US authorities have been warning that Russia has ways to manipulate enemy satellitesand now they have another concern if the refueling between Chinese satellites is confirmed. Images | United States Space ForceS2A-Systems

Wimbledon has replaced all his line judges with a success. The only problem is that tennis players do not believe it

Wimbledon has replaced This year for the first time in its history to its line judges for a technology that is an evolution of the traditional eye of the hawk. Despite the accuracy it brings, several tennis players They have expressed their discontentespecially following the controversy with the party of Kartal and Pavlyuchenkova. What’s happening. Several tennis players have publicly expressed their doubts about the electronic system. Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu, the British numbers, have questioned the accuracy of decisions, while the Switzerland Belinda Bencic It was more direct: “I do not trust the system. Nor is it that I want to speak it too much, but it is really stressful.” The reluctance about this new system are increasingly common in tennis. Although the hawk’s eye has accompanied the games for many years already, The replacement of the judges It marks a general discontent in several professionals of this sport and fans. AND The case of Pavlyuchenkova He has put the situation more inri. Failure in three key situations. The incident that has been playing the most in networks was during the match between the British Sonay Kartal and the Russian Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on the central track. With the marker matched 4-4, a Kartal ball clearly came out, but the Hawk-Eye system remained silent. Without the usual sound signal of “out”, the referee ordered to repeat the point, causing The frustration of Pavlyuchenkova: “You have stolen the game.” The ruling lasted 6 minutes and 49 seconds, during which the system lost three decisions. The AI ​​is working. The organization has revealed that the problem of Pavlyuchenkova was actually a human error: an operator accidentally deactivated part of the cameras with a click on their computer. Sally Bolton, executive director of All England Club, He has defended that “the ball monitoring system has worked optimally and effectively” throughout the tournament. After the incident, they have modified the software so that the cameras cannot be deactivated manually when there is an ongoing game. How the system works. The Live Electronic Line Calling (Live Elc) that Wimbledon uses is An evolution of the traditional hawk eye that we have been seeing since 2007. The key difference is that it now works in real time: use a network of cameras with artificial vision that tracks the ball and automatically emits an “out” when it goes out. Before, the hawk’s eye was only used to review decisions when players requested it; Now he is the main referee of all lines. It has been working for years. Studies show that electronic systems in sport are significantly more precise than human judges. An investigation He revealed that line referees make mistakes in 27% of cases where the check -up review is required, which is equivalent to an error every 17.4 games. The system has demonstrated its reliability in multiple sports for more than a decade, and both the Australian Open and the US Open have integrated it in its entirety in recent years. AI and arbitration, whenever complaints. Resistance to technology in arbitration is not exclusive to tennis. THE VAR IN FOOTBALL It generates constant controversies. In addition, Hawk-Eye is also implemented in volleyball, Cricket, and even in football for ghost goals, situations in which there has also been controversy with technology. And it is that sport is usually very reticating to technological changes. We don’t trust technology. Machines fail less than humans, but Perception is usually different. And it is that many problems attributed to AI are actually errors in the implementation or in human decisions that accompany the system, as has happened this time in Wimbledon. Technology is not infallible, but it is statistically more reliable than any available human alternative. And why don’t we trust? According to Gina Neff, a teacher in Cambridge, “right now, in many areas in which AI affects our lives, we believe that humans understand the context much better than machines,” he says. “The machine makes decisions based on the set of rules for which it has been programmed. But people are really good when it comes to multiple external values ​​and considerations as well – what is the right decision may not seem like the fair decision,” he continues. “It is the intersection between people and systems that we have to do well.” “We have to use the best of both to make the best decisions.” Cover image | Shep Mcallister In Xataka | 150 years ago the English played the first football matches in Spain. Now there is a fierce fight for finding out where

OnePlus was the last bastion of the silence button. He has just replaced him to get into the AI ​​car

Apple was the first company to bet on A button that facilitated access to the functions of silence and sound. A simple idea, well executed … and with margin of improvement. There was OnePlus in 2015, to achieve it with the OnePlus 2 and his Alert Slider. OnePlus’s idea allowed something related to Android’s own nature and its three sound modes: silence, vibration and sound. It is a button that had been accompanying us for ten years, and that was destined to follow The same destination as Apple’s: Be replaced by something different. OnePlus was one of the companies back I was staying in the. He always opted for the balance between power and price, but artificial intelligence is already an essential in every smartphone that wants to aspire to fight the best. The death of alert slider The immediate consequence has been The death of alert sliderwhich has been replaced by what OnePlus now calls Plus Key. The first point to highlight is that this button will become customizable. Yes, it is exactly the same change you made Apple with the iPhone 15 Pro. We can start multiple actions, such as changing sound profiles, open the camera, start recordings or start translations. But, beyond the programmable functions, OnePlus wanted to go one step further and differentiate thanks to AI. This button will serve to activate AI Plus Mind, a new function centered on the Mind Space. Many new names, but the concept is easy to understand. Mind Space is a space within the phone (an app) in which We can save information related to events, photographs, audio recordings… is something very similar to what we recently saw with the Essential Space of Nothingand use artificial intelligence to make summaries out of the contents we have stored. The operation is easy: when you are sailing through any app that shows information that is of value (schedules, reservations, details of an ad), you press the new button (if you have it scheduled) or slide with the three fingers up. The content will be saved automatically in the Mind Space, it will analyze its content to extract the key data and can add them directly to your calendar. This function will be released in the OnePlus 13s, a brother of the brother of the OnePlus 13. For those state -of -the -art devices, such as 13, this function will come by OTA update. Climbing to the AI ​​car In addition to working in this new button and accompanying him from the Mind Space, OnePlus already has his “OnePlus Ai” ready. A set of artificial intelligence tools. Ai voicestrce: Record calls and meetings directly from messaging apps or video calls, then summarize them and translate them automatically. Ai Call Assistant (soon in India): Integrated in the ONPLUS 13S phone app, it will allow you to summarize calls or translate them in real time while talking. Ai translation: Unifle in a single app all translation functions – text, live voice, camera and screen – to facilitate communication in several languages. Ai Search: It allows to search naturally and conversational between files, notes, adjustments or calendars. Ai Reframe: Analyze your photos, detect the main subject and propose different automatic frames to improve the effortless composition. Ai best face 2.0 (Available in summer by OTA): Automatically correct group photos where someone has come out with closed eyes or bad face. It works with up to 20 people and even with images taken from other mobiles. With these new functions, OnePlus wants to start fighting in a competed land already mandatory for any manufacturer. Image | Xataka In Xataka | The mobile the AI ​​promises, but I only see repeated tricks. The real ace under the sleeve is called “agent” and comes on the way

The Klarna CEO dismissed 700 employees to replace them with AI. Now he has replaced himself … with an avatar

In 2022, the European technological giant Klarna (one of the main actors in the world of digital payments), He fired 700 workers To replace them with a chatbot. According to the company, in just one month implementing it, they concluded that the chatbot was able to cover two thirds of the company’s customer service chats. “He is doing the job equivalent to 700 full -time agents,” they said. Now, the company flirts again with AI to replace … to its CEO. I’m not me, it’s an avatar. Klarna has presented Your results report of the first 2025 quarter regardless of its CEO. Or, rather, using a virtual CEO. The video begins with full transparency: “It is me, or rather, my artificial intelligence avatar.” Siemiatkowski is still CEO of Klarna, but the company wanted to show its commitment to the AI ​​replacing it for the presentation of results. Avatar ia. We recommend watching the video since the avatar, Far from being one -style Facebookhe is realistic to not being able. Only the imperfect audio synchronization and the absence of natural flickering can make us suspect that we are not facing a real person. For the rest, it is an avatar that could strain perfectly. A strong bet on AI … The company was clear that customer service services could be provided through the integration of a chatbot. Klarna said at the time of dismissals that “he is on par of human agents in terms of customer satisfaction score”, and that “it is more precise in tasks.” Some service users such as Gergely Oroszcreator of the Newsletter The Pragmatic EngineerThey thought the opposite, pointing out that the chatbot did not do much beyond reciting documents. The most curious? When the chatbot was not able to find an answer, the solution it gave was to speak with a human assistant in case of problems. Klarna is marking the guideline in the practical deployment of AI, and the benefits quickly accumulate. Since 2022, Klarna has rationalized its workforce by approximately 40 %, while increasing the percentage of technological employees of 36 % in 2022 to 52 % in the first quarter of 2025. 96 % of employees use AI daily, which has contributed to a 152 % increase in revenues per employee from the first quarter of 2013 and has put Klarna on the way employee income. AI is reducing costs throughout the company, especially in customer service, where transaction costs have been reduced by 40% since the first quarter of 2013, while maintaining customer satisfaction levels. … in which humans are necessary. In February 2025 Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of the company, He admitted that AI will never be as valuable as human talent. He acknowledged that the bot was faster responding, but that it was limited to “offering fragments of documentation”, without a real understanding of the text. He announced thus through X that they would start working so that the company was the best offering real “people” to talk to. In other words: what They would begin to recover and reactivate the hiring of personnel which was once replaced by a chatbot. They are not alone. Just a few weeks ago, IBM explained that they were in the process of contracting workers, after having fired 8,000 to replace them with the. It is a somewhat more particular case, since IBM automated 94% of human resources related to human resources, With positions that will not cover again. With the savings in costs that this meant, they are reinforcing the hiring in positions related to programming and sales. There are companies guaranteeing that replacements for AI are a correct decisionothers that end up reculating and evidencing on LinkedIn that it was not a good ideaand managers fearing that be replaced in the short term. Image | Klarna In Xataka | At the moment, AI is not removing work for people. Its development is leaving a reguero of dismissals

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.