A study confirms that they are more durable than previously believed

For years, the fear of an electric car battery failing prematurely has been one of the great brakes to make the leap to this type of vehicles. And although they are still systems with a good margin for improvement, the technology has advanced a lot since the Nissan Leaf It was first put into circulation in 2010. In fact, several recent studies based on real data from hundreds of thousands of cars suggest that this fear was, to some extent, unjustified. Why it is important. The cost of replacing a battery is one of the main reasons why many buyers are still wary of electric vehicles. In fact, according to a 2025 survey by the firm AutoPacific shared According to the Wall Street Journal, the fear of having to pay for a battery replacement is the number one reason why potential buyers rule out an electric vehicle. In detail. The most recent datacompiled by the analysis firm Recurrent from thousands of real vehicles in circulation, show that an average electric vehicle retains around 95% of its original range after five years of use. And the trend improves the newer the car, since according to the study, 2026 models retain an average of 97% of their autonomy after three years and 95% after five. The difference with the first electric ones is even more striking if you look at the battery replacement rate. One in twelve electric cars manufactured between 2011 and 2016 had to change their battery at some point. Among those manufactured from 2022 onwards, that figure has fallen to 0.3%, according to the same Recurrent data. Between the lines. Why have things improved so much? Experts point to better battery chemistries, more sophisticated thermal management systems and increasingly precise control software. Viet Nguyen-Tien, a researcher at the London School of Economics specializing in electric vehicles, explains told the WSJ that these advances have allowed modern batteries to last as long as a combustion car engine, even traveling more kilometers. Additionally, a less obvious reason is that traditional lab tests were much more aggressive than real driving. Simona Onori, researcher at Stanford University, counted to NPR that in everyday use the car constantly accelerates, brakes and recovers energy, a pattern much less demanding on the battery than the extreme charge and discharge cycles that were previously used to simulate its wear. According to Onori, batteries “age very gracefully” when used like this. On the other hand, Cox Automotive, which manages used car auctions in the United States, has analyzed nearly 80,000 electric cars and found an average battery health of 92%. And among electric vehicles that are more than ten years old, more than 90% continue to circulate with their original battery, according to Recurrent data cited by NPR. Be careful, not everything is perfect. Batteries do degrade faster in certain circumstances. The fast direct current charging often accelerates wear. And it is that according to the telematics company Geotaba battery usually charged at high power loses autonomy at twice the rate of one charged more gently, although even then it retains about 90% of its capacity after several years. As shared in WSJ, always charging at 100% or leaving the battery at 0% for a long time also accelerates aging, as do extreme temperatures, whether cold or hot. And now what. It is still early to know how long these batteries will really last in the very long term, because the vast majority of electric vehicles in circulation have not even remotely reached the end of their useful life. Scott Case, CEO of Recurrent, think that people’s confidence in these batteries should be considerably greater than it exists today. Cover image | Eren Goldman In Xataka | Xavier Celda, Norauto specialist: “Many do not check the air conditioning gas because they do not spend 60 euros and the breakdown is 400”

Previously, at the G7 meetings, the focus was on world leaders. Now the protagonists are Amodei, Altman and Hassabis

This week the edition was held number 52 of the G7 summit. Representatives of the seven largest world powers debated Ukraine, the Middle East, or rare earths, as expected. What was not so expected is that the true protagonists of the event were not those world leaders, but the directors of Anthropic, OpenAI, Google or Mistral who participated in the other great debate of our time: the future of AI. Power changes hands (a little). Jessica Brandt, of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—an American think tank— defined the situation with a powerful phrase: “We are seeing a change in who gets a seat at the table, and a sign of where power lies.” Exceptional guests. This expert commented on how today states need to have AI companies as allies. What has happened with Anthropic and the Pentagon first and with Claude Fable 5 They then demonstrate how AI has become a weapon for country governments. One that no one wants to do without, so the leaders of the main Western AI companies have been invited to contribute to a debate that has become crucial for the future. The courtship of Amodei, Altman and Hassabis. Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI), Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic) and Demis Hassabis (CEO of Google DeepMind) were the three great highlights of a group of technology executives that also included Arthur Mensch, CEO of the French startup Mistral or Alexandr Wang, head of AI at Meta. World leaders courted these managers: Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India, met with Mensch, for example, and Amodei did it with Macronand Hassabis, Altman and the aforementioned Amodei were part of a working lunch in which Donald Trump or Emmanuel Macron were among others. Technological dependence. The situation reflects a palpable reality: the G7 leaders meet to close all types of geopolitical agreements, but they depend completely on the private infrastructure and the hardware and software of big technology. The top leaders are clear that we must get along with these companies, but the balance of power is certainly delicate: the recent US veto of Fable 5 is a demonstration. Can countries appropriate their companies’ technology and control it? AI as a weapon. Recent announcements of AI models with advanced cybersecurity capabilities such as Claude Mythos Preview and Mythos 5 or GPT-5.5 Cyber ​​have made companies and governments noticeably concerned. Europe, for example, already complained having been set aside when Anthropic allowed some companies to use Mythos Preview. The US goes to its own. Emerson Brooking, a partner at the Atlantic Council, explained on CNBC how export controls on Anthropic models “have changed everything.” And he added that “Several G7 countries have previously alluded to the need for sovereign investments in AI, but it has always been assumed that these would take place in conjunction with access to the US technological stack. Now the US has indicated its willingness to cut off access to its AI technology both to the G7 and even to its treaties with allied powers.” Companies above governments? Advanced AI models are becoming in their own right one of the most desired and desired resources by not only companies, but also governments that are realizing what is at stake. He world geopolitical panorama already faced a similar situation with the development of nuclear weapons: only some countries can manufacture and deploy them. Digital divide on the horizon. AI is more diffuse, because models (especially open ones) are filtered, copied, and derived versions emerge from them. But one thing is certain: the data centers on which these models run are mostly under the control of companies from the US and China. Nuclear power offered deterrence, but AI can create a huge digital divide between those who control it and those who can only hope to use it. In Xataka | Claude Fable 5 has made it very clear what the big problem facing Europe is: AI is a weapon and it has none

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.