We send fewer and fewer paper letters. So Denmark Post has said goodbye to the service after 400 years

“Denmark is the canary in the mine.” The comment is by Marvin Ryder, researcher at the McMaster University (Canada), and what he talks about is not about markets, finances or geopolitics, but about something that has been part of the daily lives of a large part of the world’s population for centuries: the mail. The postal operator PostNord has decided that on Tuesday, December 30 will send his last letter in Denmark. In fact, it has been removing its characteristic red mailboxes from the streets for months and Monday the 29th will be the last day it accepts certified envelopes. From now on he wants to focus on sending packages, something that makes a lot of sense in view of his results. The question, how Ryder slidesis whether the end of postal mail will be limited to Denmark or will reach more countries. Goodbye letters, goodbye mailboxes. End of cycle in Denmark. The once powerful Danish postal service has decided to adapt to the times and say goodbye to postal mail. It’s not exactly new (the announcement did it months ago), but the effects of the measure will begin to be felt now, with the turn of the year: in 2026 the operator PostNord will stop collecting and delivering letters in Denmark. In fact the company takes time preparing the ground for change: in June it began to withdraw its 1,500 mailboxes from the streets, on the 18th it stopped accepting letters and on the 29th it will collect the last certified envelopes with acknowledgment of receipt. One day later, New Year’s Eve, PostNord will deliver its last envelopes. Chart on letter sending (in millions) from PostNord Danmark. A key figure: 90%. PostNord, a Nordic operator founded in 2009 from the merger of Denmark’s Post Danmarck and Sweden’s Posten AB, has been very clear about its motives. Stop sending letters in Denmark because its users have stopped doing so. Only in the last 25 years has its flow been reduced more than 90% without the demand showing signs of having hit rock bottom. If in 2000 they were distributed more than 1.4 billion of letters, in 2024 they did not reach 200 million. This collapse has coincided with the increase in online commercewhich is precisely where the operator has decided to focus its efforts. From now on in Denmark it will focus exclusively on the parcel service. “We are forced to adapt to the new situation and take the next step to build a strong PosNord for the future,” claims. It makes sense considering that the MitID system already allows Danes to receive all their official notifications digitally, the option chosen by the vast majority of the population. Only 5% of adults has renounced that possibility. Will there be no more letters? Yes. And no. PostNord has decided to turn the page 400 years of postal history (the service operates from the 17th centuryin times of Christian IV), but that does not mean that paper envelopes will no longer be sent. Danes will be able to continue sending letters to each other through Daoa courier firm that is already operational and is now preparing for a considerable increase in activity: if its estimates do not fail, it will go from 30 million letters in 2025 to 80 million in 2026. Of course, the service will be somewhat different for citizens: whoever wants to send a letter will have to go to one of their locations to deliver it or pay extra if they want it to be picked up at home. Question of obligations. In the statement in which it advanced its plans PostNord made it clear that its decision comes preceded by a change at a legal level that, in practice, frees its hands. “Our responsibility for the universal postal service in Denmark was extinguished with the Postal Law which came into force on January 1, 2024, except for mail for the visually impaired, small islands and international mail during a transition period,” clarify. Things will be different in Sweden, where PostNord will continue to operate a mail system “self-financed and profitable” and assuming the postal service. “Difficult decision”. Breaking a tradition that dates back to the 17th century is not easy. And this has been recognized by PostNord, which talks about “a difficult decision” and an “important step” designed to be strengthened in the future. For now, his goodbye has served to unleash collecting fever for his mailboxes: the operator put 1,000 units on sale for between 270 and 200 euros (depending on their state of conservation) and sold out of stock. in just a few hours. It is estimated that its network is made up of about 1,500 mailboxes and in January they will be auctioned another 200. Beyond Denmark. Where PostNord’s movements are probably also followed with interest is in the Post Offices. Although there are signs which suggest that Generation Z is reconnecting with the pleasure of sending written letters, the truth is that postal mail is also going through slow times in Spain. The National Markets Commission calculate that in ten years the exchange of letters has plummeted by 64%, which has forced Correos to try new (and multiple) avenues of business. Parcel shipping is increasing, moving at “record levels”, but precisely for this reason it is a sector with fierce competition in which it is not easy to gain a foothold. In Denmark, the readjustment of the postal service will be accompanied by a snip of staff, with the loss of 1,500 jobs. Images | News Ãresund – Johan Wessman (Flickr) and PostNord In Xataka | Correos wants to be a bank in 2025. It is an eye-catching plan in the face of the continuous closure of bank branches

The Washington Post had always been a progressive newspaper. Jeff Bezos has just decided that it is over

Jeff Bezos, the third greatest fortune in the world and owner of the Washington Post, has generated An intense debate In the media panorama after publishing In his X profile Your intention to apply a radical change In the editorial line of the newspaper’s opinion section, focusing exclusively on two pillars: personal freedoms and free market. This turn has caused the resignation of the opinion editor, David Shipley, as well as that of Other historical journalists of the medium, and has been interpreted as a movement towards a most aligned ideological posture with the values ​​of capitalism and conservative policies of the current government of Donald Trump. Bezos’s message. As Bezos wrote, this decision responds to the need to adapt and differentiate itself in the digital age, where the Internet already offers a diversity of opinions. “There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, could have seen it as a service to take to the reader’s door every morning a wide -based opinion section that tried to cover all the points of view. Today, the Internet does that work,” Bezos wrote in his statement. Change lamented by some, held by others. The change He has raised criticism Among the historical editors of the medium, and is perceived as a limitation to plurality that historically characterized the opinion tribune of the Washington Post. “I am from the United States and I am in favor of the United States, and I am proud of it. Our country did not become like others, and much of the success of the United States has been freedom in the economic sphere and everywhere. Freedom is ethical – it minimizes coercion – and practice – impuls Infraerentized in the current media landscape. On the other hand, outstanding personalities of the sphere of the Republican Party, such as Charlie Kirk, founder of TURNING Point USA, They praised the change. Elon Musk, main competition of Bezos in the space race, Applauded Jeff Bezos’ decision publishing a message on his social network “Bravo, Jeff Bezos!”. Touch the image to go to the original message The culmination of a turn. This announcement represents the culmination of the turn in the editorial line of the media, which began to demonstrate after the order that Jeff Bezos sent to those responsible for the newspaper withdrawing support of the Washington Post to the Democratic candidacy of Kamala Harris before the presidential elections. That decision placed the American environment In a position of equidistancewhich is now completed with a positioning towards Republican postulates. Long Democratic Tradition. As publishes EFE, the newspaper had maintained support for Democratic candidacies since 1976 (with the only exception of the 1988 candidacy). The newspaper supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections and Joe Biden in 2020, in which both faced Donald Trump, maintaining a very critical editorial line with the New York millionaire during his first term. The positioning of the Washington Post In the last elections It was the first time, since Jeff Bezos bought the newspaper in 2013, that the millionaire intervened in the newspaper of the newspaper. Another prominent fact in the change in the editorial line of the Washington Post was Waiver of the cartoonist Ann Telnaes after the rejection of the means of publishing a drawing in which Jeff Bezos and other executives of large corporations were seen leaning before a statue of Donald Trump. Millionaires and Trump’s influence. This change reflects a broader tendency among technological leaders who fight for occupying a place in the area of ​​influence of President Donald Trump and obtaining A favorable treatment for your companies. Elon Musk, he won his position as the right hand of the president and executor of the Cutting policies initiated by Doge being The main donor in the electoral campaign of Donald Trump. Other magnates like Mark Zuckerberg, have adjusted the Moderation policies in goal to align with the postulates of the Trump administration. For his part, Tim Cook recently announced A multimillionaire investment Apple in the United States, aligning the company with the wishes of the new president of industrial reinvestment in the United States. In Xataka | A government “Extremely Hardcore”: Elon Musk is applying to the US the same recipe that has applied to all its companies Image | Dvids (Anthony Nelson)

Meta is paying content creators up to $50,000 a month to post more on Instagram and Facebook

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is implementing a Aggressive strategy to attract top TikTok content creators. According to recent reports, the company is offering payments of up to $50,000 per month to those who commit to actively publishing on its platforms. This movement seeks to consolidate Instagram and Facebook as attractive destinations for creators and their followers. The initiative arises in the middle of a fierce competition in the social media marketwhere platforms fight to capture users’ attention through exclusive, high-quality content. Meta, aware of the popularity of TikTok, seeks to attract the most influential creators of this platform to strengthen its offer and gain ground in a highly competitive sector. The context of uncertainty for TikTok Meta’s offer is developed in a complicated scenario for TikTokespecially in the United States, where the platform faces political and regulatory pressures that could put its operation at risk. Joe Biden’s administration passed a law forcing ByteDance, its parent company, to sell US operations from TikTok by January 19, 2025 or face an outright ban. This panorama has generated concern among content creators, who have begun to look for alternatives to ensure the continuity of their work. The uncertainty is also motivating many users to explore options on other platforms. In addition to Meta, other apps like Lemon8, Clapper, and Fanbase have emerged as potential havens for creators who want to diversify their channels and avoid relying exclusively on TikTok. However, Meta stands out for its ability to offer a massive user base, advanced tools, and now, substantial financial incentives. Meta seeks to lead with an aggressive strategy By offering up to $50,000 per month, Meta not only aims to attract creators, but also position itself as a reliable and stable option in the social media market. This approach aims to capitalize on the possible weakness of TikTok and strengthen the presence of Instagram and Facebook as competitive platforms. For creators, these types of incentives represent a unique monetization opportunity, especially in an environment where the rules for generating income on social networks can change rapidly. However, Meta’s strategy faces challenges, such as the need to ensure that creators can maintain and expand their audiences, as well as offering them tools that make it easier to engage with and monetize their content. With this maneuver, Meta is not only trying to gain ground against TikTok, but also position itself as the undisputed leader in the digital ecosystemattracting both creators and their followers with a comprehensive offer that combines visibility, stability and financial rewards. Keep reading: – “No one should go through this”: Mark Zuckerberg apologizes to families of children who have suffered harm due to social networks– TikTok Ban in US: Do VPNs Work to Maintain Access?– TikTok loses legal battle against law that seeks to prevent its operation in the US

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.