Calling Gulf of America to the Gulf of Mexico was just an occurrence of Trump. Until Apple changed its maps

The 1953 edition was the last one published in the volume Limits of Oceans and Seasthe text internationally accepted to name the seas and oceans of our planet. It is managed by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), But the curious thing is not that. The curious thing is why more than 70 years ago it has not been edited. The reason, they explain In The Conversationwe find it in the conflict between Japan and South Korea by the name of a sea. Specifically, by the Japan seaits best known and popular name. In South Korea they do not agree to call it that, and since then they try to change the name to “Mar del Este”. South Korea took the problem that created a East Sea Society 30 years ago, but the problem never solved. The IHO came to create a revised edition of its volume in 2002, but was never published. That is the clear demonstration of how difficult it is to change the name to any geographical element in our day. At least, to change it so that it is universally accepted. And that is what is happening these days with the controversy (another) created after Donald Trump’s decision, which He issued an executive order to call Gulf of MexicoGulf of America. That decision could have gone unnoticed, but it has become something especially significant. Not for the decision itself, but because to make it a standard de facto (no of iure) has forced Google Maps —which announced the change Monday— And above all Apple Maps Change the name on their maps. And if Google and Apple maps say it, the thing changes. He does it at least for the hundreds of millions of people who use these maps, who will end up seeing how that Gulf is no longer “from Mexico”, but “of America.” The popularity of these applications is exceptional, and if something changes its name in them, users They can end up accepting it as the official name. The problem is that it is not, because it is only in the US. But both Google and Apple have already introduced that change in their applications when they are used by US citizens there, and soon we will see all. That, of course, does not mean that the rest of the world accepts that new denomination and continues to use the name that that Gulf has always had. They will not probably do so in Mexico, where they responded with a sneer to the decision of the US president. His Mexican counterpart, Claudia Sherinbaum Pardo, did At a recent conference that maybe then we should Change the name to the United States to call it Mexican America. It was then that he showed a map of 1607 in which not only the Gulf of Mexico appeared as such: it is also the region now occupied by the United States was called Mexican America. The answer is absolutely valid. Sherinbaum probably does not propose that change in Google and Apple maps for Mexicans, and even if I did, Apple and Google are North American companies and would probably not accept the change. Be that as it may, the truth is that this change of names demonstrates how today changing the name to such important geographical areas is not easy, although Have Google and Apple from your side help. The question, of course, is what will happen within four years, when Trump’s mandate ends. Will the Gulf of Mexico return to be the Gulf of Mexico? Image | Daniel Torok In Xataka | When King Carlos III commissioned a map of South America and then prohibited it because it was too precise

New update on Google Maps: Gulf of Mexico will be renamed as a Gulf of Améric

In an ad that has generated controversy, Google Maps will begin to show The Gulf Name of America instead of Gulf of Mexico within the United States. This decision responds to an executive order signed by President Donald Trumpwhich instructed the use of this term on official maps and federal documents. In addition, Mount Denali, located in Alaska, It will also be renamed Monte McKinley On the map platform. Google explains its official name policy In a statement issued by the company, Google He explained that these changes obey their policy of reflecting the official names established in government sources. “We have received questions about the names on Google Maps. We apply changes when updated in official government sources, ”said the company. The decision to adopt Gulf of America in the US has been particularly controversial, since the Gulf of Mexico is an internationally recognized name and has a deep cultural, historical and geographical meaning. Google clarified that the new name will be visible only for users in the US, while in Mexico and other regions the term Gulf of Mexico will remain. In some areas, users can see both names. The controversy to rename the Gulf of Mexico as Gulf of America has generated a lot of controversy. (Photo: Shuttersock) The company also emphasized that this practice is not new. When official names vary between countries, Google Maps shows the corresponding local denominations. In the rest of the world, the platform presents the 2 versions of the name. “This is a long -standing practice,” said Google, stressing that change does not reflect a political position, but the fulfillment of the updates made by governments. Google clarified that the changes will not be immediate. The company will proceed with the modifications on its platform once the US authorities complete the update of its official databases. This process guarantees that the names reflect the official designations in each country, respecting local norms and denominations. The return of Mount McKinley Another significant update announced by Google is the change of the name of Mount Denali, the highest mountain in North America, which will recover its old name of Monte McKinley. This adjustment also responds to the executive order signed by Trump, who instructed federal agencies to use the name McKinley in honor of former president William McKinley. Mount Denali, officially recognized with this name in 2015 during the administration of Barack Obama, had been called Monte McKinley for more than a century. However, the change was celebrated by indigenous and local communities of Alaska, who considered that “Denali” (which means “the high” in the Koyukon language) better reflected the history and culture of the region. The decision to reverse the name to McKinley has generated divided opinions. Reactions to changes in Google Maps The ads have caused a wide range of reactions. While some sectors consider that modifications reflect sovereign decisions, others see them as unnecessary or even as an attempt to impose political narratives. Geography and diplomacy experts have indicated that these types of measures It could have implications in bilateral relations and in the international perception of the USA In Mexico, the change of the name of the Gulf of Mexico has been particularly poorly received by sectors that consider that it is a cultural and geographical appropriation. In social networks, the term Gulf of America has generated a wave of criticism and debates. On the other hand, in Alaska, the return of the name Monte McKinley has generated tensions with local communities that consider this measure a decline in the recognition of indigenous culture. Although Google has insisted that these adjustments do not represent a political position, the connection between government policy and corporate decisions is evident. Analysts point out that, following government provisions, technology companies also face the challenge of maintaining a neutral and objective image before a diverse global audience. Continue reading: * Panama alerts the UN by Trump’s threat on the channel* What are the riches of Greenland that explain Trump’s interest in the island* Sheinbaum responds to Trump and says that US should be called “Mexican America” (Tagstotranslate) Donald Trump (T) Gulf of Mexico (T) Google Maps

In 1956, the US published two maps that showed the contamination of atomic bombs. And they were key to spying on the enemy

On July 16, 1945, it was a historic day: in Alamogordo, in the New Mexico desert, the First nuclear detonation in history. The Trinity test was a success that led to the development of the ‘Little Boy’ and ‘Fat Man’ bombs that, a few days later, They launched on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Before the test, the scientists bet on the results, with some bets that pointed to the destruction of the State of New Mexico, the ignition of the atmosphere and even the incineration of the planet. Obviously, that did not happen, but what did happen is that Each nuclear launch He sent a large number of particles to the atmosphere. And two maps published in 1956 reflected the consequences of these releases. Nuclear tests. Although the world was horrified by what happened in the two Japanese cities when the United States decided launch the only two nuclear bombs Used in combat so far, the powers continued to test the limits of the newly discovered technology. Thus, from the United States they continued with launches in Pacific Islands. Russia also quickly began to develop its nuclear program, with tests such as the ”Tsar pump‘That had about 3,000 times the power of the launched in Hiroshima. These launches by both countries were a muscle sample in full cold war, as well as a deterrent tool. ‘IVY Mike‘. One of the US test releases was that of ‘Mike‘, a bomb launched on November 1, 1952 that vaporized an island, leaving a crater of almost two kilometers and 50 meters deep. It was the first detonation of a hydrogen pump, causing a 3.3 -kilometer radio fire at the time of the explosion, with a fungus -shaped cloud that stabilized 41 kilometers high. Lookout Mountain studies immortalized the moment, adding later sound, since they recorded it without it. The rays were not part of the postproduction, but appeared just after the detonation: Disaster. The consequences for the Eneetak atolón in which it was launched were tremendous. The expansive waves devastated the vegetation not only of the objective island, Elaugelab, but of the closest. In addition, it caused a radioactive rain and ships almost 60 kilometers away saw how pieces of radioactive corals fell on the helmet. The area had remained seriously contaminated And, as we can see in these satellite images, Elfelab simply disappeared. THE ATOLON BEFORE AND AFTER IVI MIKE Atmospheric movement. With the rise of these tests, a team of researchers from the United States Meteorological Service published in the journal Science two maps that immortalized a historical fact: the trip of the radioactive particles around the globe. Declassified in 1956, the first one shows the global and relatively rapid atmospheric diffusion of radioactive particles. The explosion has a very clear starting point, but as soon as the particles enter the atmosphere, they continue their expansion through the rest of the globe thanks to the air currents. Radioactive particle dispersion. It was a very simple map, more than anything visual, but the second was much more explicit. It was a map of isoline Particles even to American and Canadian soil. In Europe, these radioactive particles had been largely diluted. Observation networks. It was not the first time that the movement of pollution had been studied, but it was somewhat reserved for great events, such as Krakatoa volcano explosion in 1883. With these maps, researchers wanted to demonstrate that, with the right tools, it was already easy to track volatile tracers in the atmosphere. And Ivy Mike’s were a good excuse to study. Researcher Sebastian Grevsmühl published the study A few years ago and comments that, apart from satisfying scientific curiosity, maps had a more pragmatic utility. On the one hand, they helped build the idea of ​​the world’s contamination on a global scale thanks to atmospheric movements, developing that everything has consequences. On the other, they were a tool that the nuclear powers had to monitor enemy atomic activities. Nuclear espionage. With these tools, Russian and American researchers could know if the opposite had detonated a nuclear artifact … even if he had not done it public, but also if they were using nuclear reactors or producing plutonium. So much so that, in 1949, the United States sought to determine the progress of the German nuclear bomb measuring Xenon-133 in the air. To do this, they used B-29 bombers and 24 land stations distributed by the planet to collect air samples that would determine if they were developing something. This is how, thanks to the collaboration with the British army, they discovered that, in 1949, the Soviet Union had successfully carried out a first nuclear test. Over the years, the tools evolved to cross radiological, seismic and sonic data that allowed to determine both the presence of radioactive elements and enemy nuclear bombs … and estimate their power. And much of that began with works like the one led to the two previous maps. Images | Sebastian V. Grevsmühl, Mit Press In Xataka | The amazing story of the man who survived the two atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.