Genetics suggests that Neanderthal males preferred human females

We have known for years that today’s non-African populations They preserve between 1 and 4% Neanderthal DNA as a legacy of the prehistoric crossings that existed. However, when looking at our X chromosome (which determines sex), geneticists repeatedly encountered an absolute void, a phenomenon that has been dubbed ‘neanderthal desert‘since there was no ancient DNA. And the question here is quite obvious: Why did the imprint of this species disappear from our sex chromosome, but not from the rest of the chromosomes? The key data. From here science began to investigate, and a new published article in Science proposes an answer much more focused on demographics: sex between both species It had a very strong gender bias. That is to say, the fact that a member of each species had sexual relations with great frequency has survived to this day with this genetic imprint. How do you know? What was done to be able to see what happened to the genetic material and its passage between generations within the Neanderthal populations was simply to analyze genomes. Specifically, the DNA of women from current African populations, who do not have any Neanderthal genetics, and compared them with genomes of female Neanderthals, mainly the Neanderthal of Altaibut also specimens of Chagyrskaya and Vindija. The result. Here the researchers realized that the X chromosome of the Neanderthals analyzed presented a large amount of DNA that came from the Homo sapiens. Specifically, an excess of 62% was seen compared to the rest of the organism’s chromosomes. The only thing that confirms is that the genetic exchange between both species was not a one-way change, but rather that both parties were enriched, causing the Neanderthals to also have sapiens DNA, but in different proportions. A matter of preferences. How is such a brutal asymmetry in the sex chromosomes explained? Until now, the most accurate hypothesis to justify our “Neanderthal desert” was biological incompatibility between species. Here it was thought that male hybrids suffered fertility or viability problems if they received this DNA, which caused a negative selection of testicular genes that erased the Neanderthal imprint of our X chromosomes. However, science has now ruled out that this 62% excess on the Neanderthal side is due to the sapiens DNA giving them an evolutionary advantage, since they ended up disappearing in a until now inexplicable way. The conclusion. Everything indicates here that there was an extreme sexual bias in the miscegenation. That is, the crossings occurred overwhelmingly between Neanderthal males and females. Homo sapiens, and always with this pattern. This mating preference persisted across generations, where Neanderthal males preferred females sapiensand the resulting hybrid offspring were also “preferred” in group dynamics. In this way we are faced with the piece that fits into the bidirectional puzzle of our evolutionary history. There are nuances. As usual, there is always a ‘but’ in these stories. In this case, the researchers point out that, although the genetics are quite clear, the behavioral interpretation has nuances, since the pattern we see today could be the result of a mixture of factors. One of them is that societies where women sapiens They left their tribe to join the clans of their Neanderthal partners, introducing their X chromosome into the genetic pool of the other species. Images | Jan Jakubowski In Xataka | The extinction of Neanderthals has always been a mystery. Science now believes that they are still with us

We are carrying the design of protein foods where to eat clear tuna is from males

The hallway has changed a lot in recent years. Light -low fat products are a thing of the past, now what is carried are proteins. Not only with yogurts, Proteíca fever It is in many foods and almost everyone has a design clearly oriented to attract the male audience, but perhaps we are going out of hand. All to black. They commented on this Bluesky thread Following the design of the container of the tuna cans to the natural day. Black background, a small detail in blue and high protein very large. It is not the only product with a design from style; yogurts, fresh cheese, paste and even Frozen Noodles (¿? ¿?). Most have containers in which black color predominates and, to a lesser extent, red, with aggressive designs that highlight the amount of protein that the product has. If you had not noticed, you just have to look for “proteins” in any supermarket. Day, Carrefour, Consume, Mercadona… The trend is clear. Products “high in protein” in day supermarkets. Black does not mean more protein. Or at least not many more. The case of day tuna is a good example. In their container they indicate that it is high in protein, specifically 14.3 grams per can, 25 grams per 100 grams of drained product. However, it is enough to compare it with the Normal natural tuna of the same brand To see that it only has 2 more protein. Of course, the price is much higher: 19.20 euros/kilo for the high protein version and 11.67 euros a kilo for normal. The public. Protein -rich products are aimed at those who seek to increase their muscle mass. Traditionally, the male public has been the most interested in strength training and everything around him. However, we have seen that in recent years every time More women began to do strength trainingto the point that Almost half of gym subscriptions are women. Some powdered protein containers. Gym aesthetics. Although gymnasiums are a more balanced terrain as far as gender is concerned, the aesthetics of training related products such as Protein milkshakes It is already entrenched. A lot of black, intense colors, aggressive typefaces and an aesthetic that seems to shout “if you take this, you will get strong.” The food industry has adopted this visual language, first were the energy drinks And now we see how it has spread to all kinds of products. The containers are sexist. We like it or not, It is so. Right now there is an obsession with eating more protein, but we have also lived others such as low -fat products. If protein -rich products are black, Light They are pink and have softer fishes. The reason is clear: traditionally the female audience has been the most concerned with weight loss. We can still find many products like this In the super, but the fashion of proteins seems to have moved them. Influences. We can think that the container does not matter, but the reality is that it is key in the purchase decision. In This study They found that the container influenced the perception of whether a product was healthy or not, even altering its perception of flavor and determining the purchase decision. The participants tended to associate the products that had a female packaging as healthier, while the most masculine were perceived as less healthy. Some containers of cosmetic products for men. Packaging For males. There is another predominantly feminine industry where we can see this trend more clearly even: cosmetics. The men More and more care about their personal care Beyond the shaving and many brands have launched products of products oriented to them where we find dark colored containers such as black or blue. This ‘masculinization’ is also reflected in the name of the products, such as the ‘fuel’ facial of Kiehl’s or the ‘pure carbon’ of l’Oreal to refer to a facial cream. Perhaps the most exaggerated example we have with This makeup for men To which ‘War Paint’ have baptized, because of course, a real man does not make up, he goes to war. Cover image | Day supermarkets, own edition In Xataka | We had been thinking that creatine served to train better. It turns out that the greatest benefit was in the brain

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.