We knew that lynxes were smart, but not that smart. Five females from Toledo have just rewritten what we thought we knew about wild felids

Science works like this. One day, a member of the Hunting Resources Research Institute is reviewing trapping cameras, and the next, this research team is rewriting many of the things we thought we knew about terrestrial carnivores. And also for a handful of mothers taking care of their children. What has happened? As I said, a team led by IREC has used trapping cameras to document for the first time as females iberian lynx They deliberately immerse freshly hunted rabbits in basins of water before giving them to their young. It may seem like an ethological curiosity; but we are talking about the first known case (eight different events) of deliberate manipulation of dams with water (in five different pylons) by wild felids. A complex cognitive behavior that we did not think was possible. And it’s curious because it’s not a “put in and take out,” or anything like that. It is not at all subtle, nor easily confused with something else: lynxes maintain the dive for more than 60 seconds without letting go of the prey and they do it, of course, completely on purpose. Why do they do it? Well the truth is that they don’t know. The researchers point out that the females could be using the rabbits as a vehicle for water to their young in especially hot periods. It must also be taken into account that the puppies are just weaned at that time of year. However, as I say, we don’t know for sure. Why is it important? Until now we had found many cases of animals that They washed their food in water (Japanese and Thai macaques; great apes in captivity, wild boars and cockatoos), but all in omivorous or frugivorous species that used this manipulation to remove sand and dirt. We had never seen a carnivore doing it. But the interest goes beyond that. Because not only does it challenge the idea that terrestrial carnivores capture and hide their prey without manipulating them; but rather questions the idea that solitary lynxes do not have a great capacity for social transmission. This finding suggests the opposite: that there is what we could call a “lynx culture“. Things that separate each other. We know so little… That is the main conclusion of the series of studies that this team is developing in the Montes de Toledo: that although we have been living with animals and plants for centuries, there are many things (too many) that we still do not know. Above all, when they have to do with this: with animals that are getting closer and closer to what we have called ‘humanity’ for years. Image | Wildlife Ecology and Management Research Group of the Hunting Resources Research Institute In Xataka | The question is no longer whether reintroducing the lynx in Aragon makes sense: it is what are we going to do to stop the rabbits?

It turns out that they have a loving arm that tastes the sex of females

Few animals are as fascinating as octopuses. These very intelligent invertebrates (since I saw “What the pulse taught me“I have a hard time consuming it) They have a brain in each armthree hearts, blue blood and a nervous system distributed by its tentacles. However, one of its greatest mysteries was truly intimate: how does a male manage, in the absolute darkness of a sea crevice, to locate the female’s reproductive system with surgical precision. Until now, science thought it was pure tactile instinct, but no: a recent study from Harvard University published in Science and led by Pablo Villar has discovered that the octopus does not look, it tastes love with the tips of its fingers. fingers suction cups. The love scene. Octopus mating is a sophisticated maneuver of extreme delicacy. The protagonist is the hectocotylthe third arm of the male: this tentacle is not used for eating or exploring, but for loving (in the most reproductive sense of the word). The maneuver is as follows: the male introduces this arm under the female’s mantle and there navigates between vital organs until he finds the oviduct, an opening of just a couple of millimeters. Once located, both remain motionless for approximately one hour, the time necessary for the transfer of sperm packets that the female will store throughout her life in a specific gland. Fingers that smell and taste. What the study shows is that the octopus does not “see” the path, but rather “feels” it on a chemical level. If it sounds strange, it is because humans actually lack that sensory modality, contact chemoreception. Going a little more into detail: the female emits progesterone, which will be the chemical lighthouse for the male in this internal navigation. He sensor of the hectocotyl is in its suction cups, covered by an epithelium similar to our retina or tongue, rich in receptors CRT1. According to the experiment, the male’s love arm is indifferent to other hormones: only when its CRT1 detects progesterone is the search and coupling response activated. It is literally tasting your goal with your fingertips. Why is it important. Beyond the obvious biological curiosity, this discovery has critical implications such as helping to understand how species separate and how biodiversity arises, as these receptors act as a sensory barrier: if the male’s receptor does not match the female’s chemistry, there is no copulation. On the other hand, they also put on the table the seriousness of endocrine disruptors as environmental contaminants, substances that act by imitating hormones that can confuse the male octopus and cause it to get lost. Finally, it is valuable information for aquaculture: octopus farming is a global challenge due to its complex reproduction and this finding is a step forward to optimize its sustainable breeding. From hunter to lover. One of the most fascinating aspects of this paper is how this ability originated: the octopus did not invent this loving arm out of thin air, but rather it is a recycling of an old tool for a new use. And originally the CRT1 receptors were used to detect molecules from their prey during hunting, but over time these receptors mutated with a kind of “hydrophobic pocket” that made it possible to develop that special sensitivity towards progesterone. An evolution from a survival sensor to one of genetic continuity. In Xataka | We knew that octopuses were very intelligent. But not to the point of having a “brain” in each arm In Xataka | England is experiencing an unprecedented invasion. The problem is that they are octopuses, and they are devouring everything they can find. Cover | Dear Sunflower

Genetics suggests that Neanderthal males preferred human females

We have known for years that today’s non-African populations They preserve between 1 and 4% Neanderthal DNA as a legacy of the prehistoric crossings that existed. However, when looking at our X chromosome (which determines sex), geneticists repeatedly encountered an absolute void, a phenomenon that has been dubbed ‘neanderthal desert‘since there was no ancient DNA. And the question here is quite obvious: Why did the imprint of this species disappear from our sex chromosome, but not from the rest of the chromosomes? The key data. From here science began to investigate, and a new published article in Science proposes an answer much more focused on demographics: sex between both species It had a very strong gender bias. That is to say, the fact that a member of each species had sexual relations with great frequency has survived to this day with this genetic imprint. How do you know? What was done to be able to see what happened to the genetic material and its passage between generations within the Neanderthal populations was simply to analyze genomes. Specifically, the DNA of women from current African populations, who do not have any Neanderthal genetics, and compared them with genomes of female Neanderthals, mainly the Neanderthal of Altaibut also specimens of Chagyrskaya and Vindija. The result. Here the researchers realized that the X chromosome of the Neanderthals analyzed presented a large amount of DNA that came from the Homo sapiens. Specifically, an excess of 62% was seen compared to the rest of the organism’s chromosomes. The only thing that confirms is that the genetic exchange between both species was not a one-way change, but rather that both parties were enriched, causing the Neanderthals to also have sapiens DNA, but in different proportions. A matter of preferences. How is such a brutal asymmetry in the sex chromosomes explained? Until now, the most accurate hypothesis to justify our “Neanderthal desert” was biological incompatibility between species. Here it was thought that male hybrids suffered fertility or viability problems if they received this DNA, which caused a negative selection of testicular genes that erased the Neanderthal imprint of our X chromosomes. However, science has now ruled out that this 62% excess on the Neanderthal side is due to the sapiens DNA giving them an evolutionary advantage, since they ended up disappearing in a until now inexplicable way. The conclusion. Everything indicates here that there was an extreme sexual bias in the miscegenation. That is, the crossings occurred overwhelmingly between Neanderthal males and females. Homo sapiens, and always with this pattern. This mating preference persisted across generations, where Neanderthal males preferred females sapiensand the resulting hybrid offspring were also “preferred” in group dynamics. In this way we are faced with the piece that fits into the bidirectional puzzle of our evolutionary history. There are nuances. As usual, there is always a ‘but’ in these stories. In this case, the researchers point out that, although the genetics are quite clear, the behavioral interpretation has nuances, since the pattern we see today could be the result of a mixture of factors. One of them is that societies where women sapiens They left their tribe to join the clans of their Neanderthal partners, introducing their X chromosome into the genetic pool of the other species. Images | Jan Jakubowski In Xataka | The extinction of Neanderthals has always been a mystery. Science now believes that they are still with us

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.