The US has decided to leave paper straws because everyone hates them. The problem is the alternative: plastic

Between him merchandising Maga with whom he dressed his bankrupt 2020 attempt For returning to the White House, Donald Trump included a much less resulting piece than his famous red caps, but endowed with the same political burden: plastic straws. The cannulas carried their last name in capital letters, were sold in packages of $ 15 and were, in the words of the Republican leader, the alternative to the “Liberal straws” of paper. They did not serve to win those elections, but to raise thousands of dollars. Now, back at the White House, He has decided that the whole government also begins to use plastic cannulas instead of biodegradables. And as happened in 2020, with it he launches a message that goes beyond the straws. What happened? Donald Trump doesn’t want more straws. Rather, he doesn’t want more paper straws. That’s why He has just signed An executive order with which he reverses the efforts of the administration of his predecessor, Joe Biden, who advanced right in the opposite direction. The Democrat aspired that federal institutions be disregarding plastic cannulas throughout The next few yearsfirst taking them out of their activities in 2027 and then suppressing them until they reduce them to zero in 2035. Why’s that? Simple. Because Trump doesn’t like them. He made it clear already during his failed electoral campaign of 2020 and has stressed again these days, in a resounding way and without half inks, faithful to his style. “These things do not work, I have had them many times, and sometimes they break, they explode. If something is hot, they do not last long, a matter of minutes, sometimes second. It is something ridiculous,” He settled. The republican argument does not end there. Trump has insisted that the attached straws that have been promoting as the ecological alternative to the traditional plastic are dissolved for years “disgustingly” in the mouth and even questions that its use is positive. For both consumers and the environment. Its decree in fact that they incorporate chemicals that “can entail risks to human health”, their production is more expensive than the conventional alternative and also generate waste. “Paper strases are sometimes involved individually in plastic, which undermines the environmental argument in favor of its use,” emphasize. Goodbye to biodegradable straws? Not quite. Trump’s decision is relevant and there are those who have seen in it A declaration of intentionssomething that goes far beyond the simple cannulas. The Executive Order declares that “US’s policy is to put an end to the use of paper straws”, but at the moment its scope is limited: it focuses on the federal administration, putting an end to The Biden era policy that sought that the federal government gradually eliminate the purchase of plastics from a single use. The regulatory framework around the straws is really something more complex. There are cities and states, including California, Oregon, New Jersey or Seattle, in Washington’s own territory, endowed with regulations that limit the use of plastic cannulas or prioritize biodegradable options. Trump’s goal is clear, in any case. Before journalists, he shared transparently what his bet is: “We will return to plastic straws.” Do paper straws work? Trump ensures that its use leads to “ridiculous” situations and even that they are “disgusting” in certain cases. Those are personal, subjective appreciations. What can be affirmed objectively is that science has demonstrated that biodegradable cannulas are far from being perfect and – beyond that they may or may not be softened while using some problems related to their materials. In 2023 a group of researchers published A study in which they exposed their conclusions after analyzing 39 brands of straws of different materials, from plastic or paper to glass, steel and bamboo. And his conclusion was that the biodegradable cardboard were the ones that contained the highest volume of PFAS. That is a problem because these synthetic substances are harmful to humans and the environment. Of a total of 20 paper cannulas brands, 18 showed PFAS. Why is it a problem? It He expressed clearly Two years ago at SMC Marieta Fernández, a professor at the University of Granada, precisely following that study. “The majority of paper analyzed (90%) contained pfas. They were also detected in 80% of bamboo, 75% of plastic and 40% of glass. The steel analyzed, “summarized the academic. Fernández recalls that PFAS are commonly used for non -stick purposes and to improve the resistance of water, heat or spots, so “it is not surprising” to find them in the cannulas. The problem, abundantis that their presence in paper and bamboo straws would question that they are really “biodegradable.” And what is so or even more serious: it question that they are really “suitable for human consumption” products. Better plastic? Paper strases may not be perfect, but those of plastic are also very far from being, no matter how much Trump likes them, confessed lover of sugary and gas sodas. As Remember Fernándezthe study of 2023 also detected PFAS in the plastic units. And while its percentage was lower than in cardboard versions, the result remained elevated: chemicals were detected in 75% of the samples. His big problem is nevertheless another: the impact they have on the environment. The data does not always coincide, but they usually show a worrying scenario. There are estimates that speak that in the US they are used a day 175 million of disposable straws, Straws Turtle Island Restoraction Newtory raises the data to More than 390 million And another calculation –so cited as disputed– points out that in the country each day more than 500 million of cannulas. And what does that mean? Let any of those figures or Another estimatethe truth is that we talk about a quantity of huge straws: hundreds of thousands daily, in the best case, which take only a few minutes to become garbage. The big question is … What to do with them when they are discarded? Do they all end up in the … Read more

Do not leave everything in inheritance to your children

Bill Gates has been one of the 10 richest people in the world for decades. However, recently the Gates fortune Several positions have fallen into the list of millionaires, according to Forbes That Fall in estimation of your fortune It is not because the Microsoft founder has erred in its latest investments, but to a plan that has been executing for more than two decades. Donate 99% of his fortune through the foundation he created with his ex -wife Melinda French Gates. This foundation has already donated 100,000 million dollars. His fortune will not be his legacy. Bill Gates is only one of the best known cases of Milmillonarios who have made the decision of do not leave the fortune who have knead their children throughout their lives. He veteran investor Warren Buffett, Mark ZuckerbergMick Jagger, Lauren Powell Jobs or the Sting singer have also declared their negative to leave your empire as inheritance to their children. In one recent interview For the BBC on the occasion of the presentation of its latest book Source Code: My Beginningsthe millionaire recognized that he was not going to leave his fortune as an inheritance. Despite leaving them only a small percentage of their fortune, now estimated at about 107,000 million dollars, the millionaire ensures that Your children will not be poor. “They won’t be,” said Gates. “In absolute terms, they will do well, but in percentage terms it is not a gigantic figure.” Indeed, 1% of something does not seem much, but 1% of 107,000 million are 10.7 billion dollars. An inheritable inheritance. 100,000 million dollars. According to the millionaire to the BBC, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation faced the 25th anniversary of its foundation reaching a round figure: 100,000 million dollars donated to philanthropic projects around the world. “We have donated more than 100,000 million,” says Gates, “but I still have more to give.” The millionaire detailed that about 60,000 million of his fortune had already gone to the foundation where he works full time since he delegated the Microsoft Directorate. The remaining 40,000 million have left the third -party periodic donations, such as their friend Warren Buffett, which every year assigns several billions of dollars To the Foundation. What the Gates Foundation declares. According to the last Public facts For the Gates Foundation, until the fourth quarter of 2023, the Foundation had donated 77.6 billion dollars and had a fiduciary capital of 75.2 billion. Of those 77.6 billion dollars that the Gates Foundation claimed to have donated from its creation to 2023, 59.3 billion had left the Arcas de Gates. Buffett’s contribution since he began collaborating with the Gates Foundation in 2006 was 39.3 billion dollars. From these figures, there is already a lack of the foundation to publish its 2024 accounts, it follows that, in reality, Bill Gates would hardly have contributed 700 million more to its foundation during the last year, while its fortune has been reduced by about 16,000 million of dollars during the last year. The responsibility of wealth. The founder of Microsoft said in his interview he had been very influenced by the philanthropy that his parents had exercised throughout his childhood. His mother frequently said that “wealth entails the responsibility of giving her.” Bill Gates, inspired by his parents and Chuck Feeney Philosophyhe decided to ally with Warren Buffett to found the initiative The Giving Pledgein which several dozen Millionaires have committed to donate at least 50% of your fortune for philanthropic purposes. Names like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Mackenzie Scott or, the last to sign its commitment, Sam Altman, form part of this select club who believes that becoming rich must be accompanied with a commitment to society that has allowed them to get it. In Xataka | If the question is how much money you can donate to a child without declaring it to the Treasury, the law makes it clear: none Image | Flikr (Dfid)

50 years of research on depression psychotherapy leave a surprising fact: we have not improved anything

Since the 70s, hundreds of studies have examined the effects of psychotherapies against the depression. They have done it with many different experimental approaches and designs. They have done it insistently and, as if that were not enough, in an increasing number. That has allowed us to know two things: the first is that psychotherapies They are effective. The second is that this effectiveness has not moved an apex in 50 years. How can we know? To begin with, thanks to Pim Cuijpers, Professor Emeritus of Clinical Psychology at Amsterdam University. He and a team of researchers They gathered 562 randomized controlled trials that had been published in the last 50 years. These essays are the highest methodological quality that are currently (although, as the authors point out, average Caldiad is not as high as it should). In total, the researchers gathered information of 66,361 patients. Most American adults, but with a significant number of people from other countries. From there, they only had to weigh the interventions, the results and see what happened. What did they find? To begin with, they found that psychotherapies work. In fact, his conclusions were that, as the years go by (and studies), the “evidence that psychotherapies are effective is solid and grows over the years.” The surprise was not that, of course. The surprise was that, for many studies that have been added over the years, “they found no sign that the effects of therapies (psychological against depression) have improved.” None. The effectiveness of these treatments has remained surprisingly stable throughout all these years. And how does all this leave psychotherapy? In a strange situation. In a context in which the consumption of benzodiazepines does not stop growing (and, remember, Spain is World Ansiolithic Consumption Leader With more than 91 daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants), psychotherapies appear as an effective solution; But we are not improving. That is, we have a tool, but we cannot climb it. If the problem continues to grow (and is doing it), we will need more and more resources. Resources that, from the financial crisis and despite the concern of recent years, do not seem to be arriving. The question is no longer “What are we failing“,” Why we can’t improve more “,” where is what limits us to go further “, which also: the question is how we do it better. And it is urgent to find an answer. Image | Cuijpers et Atls | Nik Shuliahin In Xataka | Work stress as germ of depression: work pressure enhances mental disorders

Why should she borreguito coats should not leave your closet

The simplicity and elegance of his personality that Belén Corsini expresses through her looks has caused it to become a Reference image for Many women. He showed it when in October last year he posed with High seams dresses through the streets of Parisenjoying as a model and carrying elegance and sophistication to another level. Although, on other occasions such as Wedding of his cousin Beatriz Lizarriturri and Juan Ruiz de Velascoit also made it clear that Gather the glamor, With simplicity of a timeless garment is the Perfect combination To be the Ideal guest. © Studio 24 The Countess of Osorno Keep distinguishing with its looks of guest But also for day to day. ORn style referent at all occasions Thanks to the ability to Combine garments of various styles, fabrics, prints …but all characterized by a Great elegance. © LagenciaBelén Corsini and Carlos Fitz-James © © Carol García-CondeBelén Corsini at the wedding of her cousin of Beatriz Lizarriturri and Juan Ruiz de Velasco with Marta Hernández-Gil Referent in fashion also in winter As we confirmed a few weeks ago from “Hello!” Belén waits with her husband Carlos Fitz-James to her second childthat this will be born Summer 2025 and what will only take 1 year and a few months with His first child Carlos. After the announcement, the couple walked a few days ago by The streets of Madrid next to His son Carlos. The cold did not become an impediment to The family enjoyed time together by the well -known neighborhood of El Viso in the capital. © Studio 24Belén Corsini and Carlos Fitz-James Stuart walking through the streets of Madrid On this occasion, Belén opted for a look casual but chicmarking style, something that does not lose Despite the low temperatures. Dressed with a Pinza pants gray, with a picture print of very thin lines of brown and white. The pants combined perfectly with a Wool sweater gray, simple and ideal to shelter against the cold without losing the glamor. With this he chose some Rounded tip booties Brown leather to match the subtle paintings of his pants. The boots- ankle boots or high cane- Fine or rounded tipThey are the Perfect touch to stylize the legs and provide elegance to any look This season, Ideal both with pants and skirts. Stylizes and warms equally Although, the star garment of look It would undoubtedly be a Spectacular long coat of Black leather With buttons and Beige Borreguito throughout the inside layer, which contributes the Perfect contrast between the dark color of the coat and light of this material, which stands out above all In the shelter flap. A trend that triumphs since last season and could be included in the Basics of your closet replacing the famous feather coat Because of its elegance, since it has everything: stylizes and shelters in equal parts. © Studio 24 He Borreguito coat It has arrived for stay for its texture, pleasant to touch. For placing themselves inside the coat- there are also them with stress outside or on both sides- to create The perfect feeling of comfort and temperature. In addition, the sheep protrudes from the coat through the sleeves, the neck and the folds like those of the coat to give a elegant finish and be the perfect ally not to lose the glamor Under no circumstances During the cold months. Perfect not losing the glamor Bethlehem has wore it by giving the Final touch still look From his day to day as Countess and mother that Trending brand. Has combined it with a Orange bag of medium size that provides a large touch of color on the other dark colors chosen for the Total look. A form of contributing a touch of joy and warmth A Gray Winter Day in Madrid. (Tagstotranslate) Hello! +

25% of its staff wants to leave, according to La Información

The electrical marketing company Holaluz is not going through the best of times, not even in terms of your financial statusas well as his relationship with the staff, who are currently immersed in an indefinite strike due to the substantial change in their working conditions. Among those changes: eliminating teleworking. As a consequence of the loss of this type of work and other acquired social benefits, around the 25% of the workforce has decided not to accept the new conditions imposed by the energy company and terminate your contract, as published The Information. 25% of the workforce does not accept the changes The measure involves the departure of some 52 Holaluz workers until January 31, the deadline for employees to communicate their refusal to accept the substantial change in their working conditions. Union sources consulted by The Information They point out that 14 of those employees have already formalized their departure from the company. These same sources assured that the number of applicants for termination of their contract may rise to 70 workers, which would represent 30% of the energy marketer’s workforce. The Works Council itself would have been affected by this reduction in personnel, going from seven representatives to only three members, maintaining the union representation of UGT and CGT that called for the indefinite strike. Terminate the contract in the event of a substantial change Given the lack of agreement in the negotiation of working conditions and the in-person working day model that Holaluz proposed to its staff in September 2024, the company presented a Substantial Modification of Working Conditions (MSCT) for your entire workforce. This proposal implies acceptance by the company that there will be a substantial change in the working conditions under which its employees were hired and, therefore, opens the door to the application of the article 41 of the Workers’ Statute. Section 3 of this article specifies that “if the worker is harmed by the substantial modification, he will have the right to terminate his contract and receive compensation of twenty days’ salary per year of service, prorating by month the periods less than one year and with a maximum of nine months.” This means that those workers who decide not to accept the new Holaluz conditions will be able to terminate your contract and receive compensation for his departure. After suffering a serious financial setback that had the energy marketer on the verge of bankruptcy for much of 2024, it finally obtained financial support of Icosium Investment which, with a capital injection of 22 million euros, managed to keep the company afloat. According to sources of The Informationall the changes in working conditions announced, including the elimination of teleworking, respond to an effort to adjust expenses estimated at 250,300 euros in 2024. Teleworking was a red line According to what was published by The Informationthe company considered that, after an internal evaluation, teleworking was considered “a measure incompatible with the negative situation in which the company finds itself” and, therefore, it opted for a 100% in-person model. This change led to the call for an indefinite strike starting January 14. According to company sources asked by Xataka, “of 227 employees, the strike has been monitored by 37 people (16% of the workers) who have participated at some point in the strike. Of the total workers, 2% (five employees have supported 100% of the hours during the first week). Analyzing the total hours of the strike (taking into account that the call is two days per week, with four hours each, adding up to a total of eight hours per week), 130.25 strike hours have been recorded out of a total of 1,816 possible hours (227 workers x 8 hours). This represents 7.2% compliance with the hours called for the strike. For their part, union sources confirm that, in the absence of an agreement, as of January 28, the strike will be indefinite for the entire day, and not for hours as has happened until now. Holaluz assures that the company’s operational situation is completely normal and confirms that they have opened new job offers to cover the sick leave of those who have not accepted the substantial modification of their working conditions. “It has been a very hard year and returning to the office is essential to recover the cohesion of the team and recover the enthusiasm. After all the difficulties, we have to row and form a team together,” sources close to Holaluz assure. In Xataka | “It is not a hidden layoff”: Amazon’s CEO has denied that returning to the office is an excuse to reduce his workforce Image | Hellolight

Trump orders federal diversity, equity and inclusion employees to be placed on leave

One night after Donald Trump signed an executive order eliminating the federal government’s diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, The president ordered that all employees in that area be placed on paid leave starting Wednesday. Thus, the new administration sent a letter to all heads and acting heads of government agencies, informing them that All federal employees on DEI duty must be placed on paid leave by 5 p.m. Wednesday. This comes as agencies prepare to close all DEI-related offices and programs and delete all websites and social media accounts for those offices. It also calls on federal agencies to submit a written plan by Jan. 31 to lay off employees. As reported by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, “President Trump campaigned on ending the scourge of DEI from our federal government and returning America to a merit-based society where people based on their abilities, not the color of their skin.” “This is another victory for Americans of all races, religions and creeds. “Promises made, promises kept,” he said. Different media outlets highlighted that after signing the anti-DEI executive order this week, Trump fired the leader of the US Coast Guard, Admiral Linda Fagan, the first woman to lead one of the branches of the US Armed Forces. According to Fox News, the new government’s decision is due to an “erosion of trust” in Fagan due to issues related to border security or recruitment. However, critics say the dismissal came from concerns about his obsession with politics. DEI. Fagan, according to the same network, made diversity, equity and inclusion policies a priority, the same ones that the new Trump Executive has proposed to end. Keep reading: • Trump announces firing of four high-profile officials, including chef José Andrés• Jill Biden defines Donald Trump as “a dangerous bully for the LGBTQ community”• Attorneys general from 18 states sue to stop Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.